Drug AbuseSMART-EDNCT01207791
Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments
A study testing screening, assessment and referral in people with Drug Abuse, run by University of New Mexico at 7 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Misuse of drugs and alcohol has a tremendous impact on individual health and on society, in terms of both human suffering and economic cost. Most substance abusers never seek specialty addiction treatment, but a large percentage of them receives some form of medical care, frequently in emergency room settings. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Drug Abuse
- What is being tested?
- screening, assessment and referral
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,285 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Mar 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Registration as patient in the ED during study screening hours
- Positive screen (≥3) for problematic use of a non-alcohol, non-nicotine drug based on the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST)
- At least one day of problematic drug use (excluding alcohol and nicotine) in the past 30 days
- Age 18 years or older
- Adequate English proficiency
- Ability to provide informed consent
- Access to phone (for booster sessions)
Who cannot join
- Inability to participate due to emergency treatment
- Significant impairment of cognition or judgment rendering the person incapable of informed consent. (e.g., traumatic brain injury, delirium, intoxication)
- Status as a prisoner or in police custody at the time of treatment.
- Current engagement in addiction treatment
- Residence more than 50 miles from the location of follow-up visits
- Inability to provide sufficient contact information (must provide at least 2 reliable locators).
- Prior participation in the current study.
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
United States7 sites
University of New Mexico Hospital
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts
University of Cincinnati Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio
Jackson Memorial Hospital
Miami, Florida
West Virginia University Hospital
Morgantown, West Virginia
Belleview Hospital
New York, New York
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington
About this study
Misuse of drugs and alcohol has a tremendous impact on individual health and on society, in terms of both human suffering and economic cost. Most substance abusers never seek specialty addiction treatment, but a large percentage of them receives some form of medical care, frequently in emergency room settings. There is considerable evidence showing that Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral, and Treatment (SBIRT) interventions in medical settings result in decreased drinking and alcohol-related problems among those with alcohol abuse or dependence. However, there are few studies using these models focusing on drug users. Although drug users are seen in large numbers in emergency departments, there have been no randomized controlled trials of SBIRT models for drug users presenting in Emergency Departments (EDs).
This study is designed to assess the effects of Assessment, Referral, and a Brief Intervention on substance use of individuals screening positive for drug use during a medical ED visit. The Southwest Node of the NIDA Clinical Trials Network, located at UNM CASAA, is taking the lead on this study. Six sites across the country will participate in this study, including the ED of UNM Hospital. A total of 1285 ED patients who screen positive for current drug use problems will be randomly assigned to receive 1) minimal screening only, 2) assessment of substance use and referral to treatment, or 3) assessment and referral combined with a 30-minute counseling session (Brief Intervention) and two follow-up telephone counseling sessions. Outcomes will be assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after the ED visit. We hypothesize that those who receive the Brief Intervention will have the least drug use at follow-up, that those who receive minimal screening only (the usual current practice) will have the most drug use, and that those receiving assessment and referral without the Brief intervention will have intermediate outcomes.
Read the detailed description
- STUDY SYNPOSIS AND SCHEMA
STUDY OBJECTIVES:
The study will contrast substance use and substance-related outcomes among patients endorsing problematic drug use during an emergency department (ED) visit who are randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: 1) minimal screening only (MSO); 2) screening, assessment, and referral to treatment (if indicated) (SAR); and 3) screening, assessment, and referral plus a brief intervention (BI) with two telephone follow-up booster sessions (BI-B).
STUDY DESIGN:
The proposed project is a 3-group randomized, prospective trial with blinded assessments. Individuals presenting in the ED endorsing problematic drug use on screening will be randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to MSO vs. SAR vs. BI-B. Randomization will occur after screening, and those randomized to MSO will not receive further assessment until follow-up. The other two groups will receive baseline assessment, and assignment to SAR vs. BI-B will not be revealed until after the baseline assessment is complete. Those in the SAR group will then receive referral if indicated or requested, and those assigned to the BI-B group will be receive a brief intervention consisting of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) adapted for use in the ED, followed by referral if indicated or requested. The BI-B group will also receive two booster telephone calls, ideally within one week of the ED visit. Follow-up assessments of all three groups will be conducted face-to-face at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-enrollment.
STUDY POPULATION:
A total of 1285 patients with probable drug abuse or dependence (approximately 429 per group) seeking medical treatment in the ED, recruited from 6 EDs, will be randomized to MSO, SAR, or BI-B. Each ED will enroll approximately 215 participants.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:
Participants will be men and women 18 years of age or older who are seeking medical treatment at the ED, have adequate English proficiency, are able to provide informed consent, endorse current (past 30 days) problematic use of one or more drugs, are willing to participate in the protocol (e.g., be randomized to treatment, participate in follow-up assessment), and have access to a telephone. Individuals will be excluded if they are incapable of informed consent, are prisoners or in police custody, are currently engaged in addiction treatment, reside more than 50 miles from the site where follow-ups are conducted, are unable to provide sufficient contact information, or have already participated in the study.
TREATMENTS:
The MSO group will not receive further assessment or treatment following randomization, but will be given an informational pamphlet about drug use and its potential consequences.
The SAR group will be provided with the same information pamphlet as the MSO group. In addition, following assessment, SAR participants with "probable dependence" on one or more substances (based on ASSIST score ≥ 27) will also be provided a referral to treatment, consisting of a positive recommendation to seek treatment and a standardized list of available treatment options. Participants who request a referral will also receive one, regardless of ASSIST score. Referrals will be made to CTN-affiliated CTPs as well as other community programs in the normal clinical referral networks of the participating EDs.
Individuals randomized to the BI+Booster (BI-B) condition will receive the same information and referral as those in SAR. In addition, while in the ED the BI-B group will receive a manual-guided brief intervention based on motivational interviewing principles, including feedback based on screening information, the FRAMES heuristic, and development of a change plan if indicated. The brief intervention will focus primarily on the most problematic drug of abuse identified by the participant. The BI will be provided in person in the ED while the participant is still there. In addition, participants in the BI-B group will receive up to 2 phone "booster" sessions that will check to see whether they have engaged in treatment, review change plans, and seek a commitment from them (Mello, Longabaugh et al. 2008). The content of these boosters is patterned after sessions in Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET). The initial phone booster call will occur within 3 days of discharge from the ED if possible, and the second within 7 days. Booster calls will be made using a centralized, study-wide intervention booster call center.
SAFETY ASSESSMENT:
Adverse Events (AEs) including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) will be monitored and reported throughout the study. These events will be subject to ongoing monitoring by the study executive committee (including representatives of the lead nodes, NIDA, and the Clinical Coordinating Center), and will be presented for DSMB review.
OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS:
The primary outcome is days of use of the patient-defined primary problem drug, assessed by the Time-Line Follow-Back for the 30-day period preceding the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include change from baseline in days of use of the primary substance, the number days abstinent from all drugs, days of heavy drinking, total quantity of drug use, objective change in drug use based on analysis of hair samples, self-reported consequences of drug and alcohol use, percent entering treatment among those classified as having probable dependence, and ED and other health care utilization.
PRIMARY OUTCOME ANALYSIS:
The primary analysis will contrast MSO, SAR and BI-B groups with respect to the primary outcome variable (days of use of the primary drug of abuse in the 30 days preceding 3-month follow-up) using a linear mixed model with a random site effect and fixed treatment effect and intercept. Three pairwise contrasts will be made with an overall type 1 error rate of α = 0.05.
REGULATORY ISSUES:
The trial will be conducted in compliance with protocol, ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines, and applicable regulatory requirements.
- Conditions
- Drug Abuse
- Being tested
- screening, assessment, referral, Brief intervention, booster sessions
- Keywords
- drug abuse, emergency department, brief intervention, motivational interviewing, SBIRT
- Medical subject headings
- Substance-Related Disorders, Emergencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
screeningBehavioural
Brief screening to assess eligibility and collect minimal baseline data
assessmentBehavioural
comprehensive substance use assessment
referralBehavioural
referral to treatment if indicated or requested
Brief interventionBehavioural
30-minute brief intervention session in ED
booster sessionsBehavioural
two 15-minute booster counseling sessions conducted by telephone
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Minimal screening only (MSO) | Other | Minimal screening Receives: Behavioral: screening |
| Screening, assessment, and referral (SAR) | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: screening; Behavioral: assessment; Behavioral: referral |
| Brief intervention plus telephone boosters (BI-B) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: screening; Behavioral: assessment; Behavioral: referral; Behavioral: Brief intervention; Behavioral: booster sessions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
days of use of the primary drug of abuse
Assessed by Time-line Follow-back method
Measured: 30 days preceding 3-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (8)
Days of use of the primary drug of abuse
Measured: 6 months, 12 months
number days abstinent from all drugs
Measured: 3, 6, 12 months
days of heavy drinking
Measured: 3, 6, 12 months
total quantity of drug use
Measured: 3, 6, 12 months
objective change in drug use based on analysis of hair samples
Measured: 3, 6, 12 months
self-reported consequences of drug and alcohol use
Measured: 3, 6, 12 months
percent entering treatment among those classified as having probable dependence
Measured: 3, 6, 12 months
ED and other health care utilization
Measured: 3, 6, 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionJun 2012
- Study completionMar 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Drug AbuseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,285 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of New Mexico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michael Bogenschutz, University of New Mexico
- Investigators
- Michael P. Bogenschutz, M.D., Principal investigator, University of New Mexico
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01207791
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NIDA CTN Protocol 0047
- Other IDs
- U10DA015833, U10DA013732
- Acronym
- SMART-ED
- Status last verified
- May 2013
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 24 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Bogenschutz MP, Donovan DM, Mandler RN, Perl HI, Forcehimes AA, Crandall C, Lindblad R, Oden NL, Sharma G, Metsch L, Lyons MS, McCormack R, Macias-Konstantopoulos W, Douaihy A. Brief intervention for patients with problematic drug use presenting in emergency departments: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1736-45. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4052.
PubMed 25179753Donovan DM, Bogenschutz MP, Perl H, Forcehimes A, Adinoff B, Mandler R, Oden N, Walker R. Study design to examine the potential role of assessment reactivity in the Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED) protocol. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2012 Aug 28;7(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-7-16.
PubMed 23186329
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01207791
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SMART-ED / NIDA CTN Protocol 0047
- Conditions
- Drug Abuse
- Keywords
- drug abuse, emergency department, brief intervention, motivational interviewing, SBIRT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,285 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of New MexicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Misuse of drugs and alcohol has a tremendous impact on individual health and on society, in terms of both human suffering and economic cost. Most substance abusers never seek specialty addiction treatment, but a large percentage of them receives some form of medical care, frequently in emergency room settings. There is considerable evidence showing that Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral, and Treatment (SBIRT) interventions in medical settings result in decreased drinking and alcohol-related problems among those with alcohol abuse or dependence. However, there are few studies using these models focusing on drug users. Although drug users are seen in large numbers in emergency departments, there have been no randomized controlled trials of SBIRT models for drug users presenting in Emergency Departments (EDs).
This study is designed to assess the effects of Assessment, Referral, and a Brief Intervention on substance use of individuals screening positive for drug use during a medical ED visit. The Southwest Node of the NIDA Clinical Trials Network, located at UNM CASAA, is taking the lead on this study. Six sites across the country will participate in this study, including the ED of UNM Hospital. A total of 1285 ED patients who screen positive for current drug use problems will be randomly assigned to receive 1) minimal screening only, 2) assessment of substance use and referral to treatment, or 3) assessment and referral combined with a 30-minute counseling session (Brief Intervention) and two follow-up telephone counseling sessions. Outcomes will be assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months after the ED visit. We hypothesize that those who receive the Brief Intervention will have the least drug use at follow-up, that those who receive minimal screening only (the usual current practice) will have the most drug use, and that those receiving assessment and referral without the Brief intervention will have intermediate outcomes.
Detailed description
- STUDY SYNPOSIS AND SCHEMA
STUDY OBJECTIVES:
The study will contrast substance use and substance-related outcomes among patients endorsing problematic drug use during an emergency department (ED) visit who are randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: 1) minimal screening only (MSO); 2) screening, assessment, and referral to treatment (if indicated) (SAR); and 3) screening, assessment, and referral plus a brief intervention (BI) with two telephone follow-up booster sessions (BI-B).
STUDY DESIGN:
The proposed project is a 3-group randomized, prospective trial with blinded assessments. Individuals presenting in the ED endorsing problematic drug use on screening will be randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to MSO vs. SAR vs. BI-B. Randomization will occur after screening, and those randomized to MSO will not receive further assessment until follow-up. The other two groups will receive baseline assessment, and assignment to SAR vs. BI-B will not be revealed until after the baseline assessment is complete. Those in the SAR group will then receive referral if indicated or requested, and those assigned to the BI-B group will be receive a brief intervention consisting of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) adapted for use in the ED, followed by referral if indicated or requested. The BI-B group will also receive two booster telephone calls, ideally within one week of the ED visit. Follow-up assessments of all three groups will be conducted face-to-face at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-enrollment.
STUDY POPULATION:
A total of 1285 patients with probable drug abuse or dependence (approximately 429 per group) seeking medical treatment in the ED, recruited from 6 EDs, will be randomized to MSO, SAR, or BI-B. Each ED will enroll approximately 215 participants.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:
Participants will be men and women 18 years of age or older who are seeking medical treatment at the ED, have adequate English proficiency, are able to provide informed consent, endorse current (past 30 days) problematic use of one or more drugs, are willing to participate in the protocol (e.g., be randomized to treatment, participate in follow-up assessment), and have access to a telephone. Individuals will be excluded if they are incapable of informed consent, are prisoners or in police custody, are currently engaged in addiction treatment, reside more than 50 miles from the site where follow-ups are conducted, are unable to provide sufficient contact information, or have already participated in the study.
TREATMENTS:
The MSO group will not receive further assessment or treatment following randomization, but will be given an informational pamphlet about drug use and its potential consequences.
The SAR group will be provided with the same information pamphlet as the MSO group. In addition, following assessment, SAR participants with "probable dependence" on one or more substances (based on ASSIST score ≥ 27) will also be provided a referral to treatment, consisting of a positive recommendation to seek treatment and a standardized list of available treatment options. Participants who request a referral will also receive one, regardless of ASSIST score. Referrals will be made to CTN-affiliated CTPs as well as other community programs in the normal clinical referral networks of the participating EDs.
Individuals randomized to the BI+Booster (BI-B) condition will receive the same information and referral as those in SAR. In addition, while in the ED the BI-B group will receive a manual-guided brief intervention based on motivational interviewing principles, including feedback based on screening information, the FRAMES heuristic, and development of a change plan if indicated. The brief intervention will focus primarily on the most problematic drug of abuse identified by the participant. The BI will be provided in person in the ED while the participant is still there. In addition, participants in the BI-B group will receive up to 2 phone "booster" sessions that will check to see whether they have engaged in treatment, review change plans, and seek a commitment from them (Mello, Longabaugh et al. 2008). The content of these boosters is patterned after sessions in Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET). The initial phone booster call will occur within 3 days of discharge from the ED if possible, and the second within 7 days. Booster calls will be made using a centralized, study-wide intervention booster call center.
SAFETY ASSESSMENT:
Adverse Events (AEs) including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) will be monitored and reported throughout the study. These events will be subject to ongoing monitoring by the study executive committee (including representatives of the lead nodes, NIDA, and the Clinical Coordinating Center), and will be presented for DSMB review.
OUTCOME ASSESSMENTS:
The primary outcome is days of use of the patient-defined primary problem drug, assessed by the Time-Line Follow-Back for the 30-day period preceding the 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include change from baseline in days of use of the primary substance, the number days abstinent from all drugs, days of heavy drinking, total quantity of drug use, objective change in drug use based on analysis of hair samples, self-reported consequences of drug and alcohol use, percent entering treatment among those classified as having probable dependence, and ED and other health care utilization.
PRIMARY OUTCOME ANALYSIS:
The primary analysis will contrast MSO, SAR and BI-B groups with respect to the primary outcome variable (days of use of the primary drug of abuse in the 30 days preceding 3-month follow-up) using a linear mixed model with a random site effect and fixed treatment effect and intercept. Three pairwise contrasts will be made with an overall type 1 error rate of α = 0.05.
REGULATORY ISSUES:
The trial will be conducted in compliance with protocol, ICH Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines, and applicable regulatory requirements.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Minimal screening only (MSO) | Other | Behavioral: screeningMinimal screening |
| Screening, assessment, and referral (SAR) | Active comparator | Behavioral: screening, Behavioral: assessment, Behavioral: referral |
| Brief intervention plus telephone boosters (BI-B) | Experimental | Behavioral: screening, Behavioral: assessment, Behavioral: referral, Behavioral: Brief intervention, Behavioral: booster sessions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Registration as patient in the ED during study screening hours
- Positive screen (≥3) for problematic use of a non-alcohol, non-nicotine drug based on the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST)
- At least one day of problematic drug use (excluding alcohol and nicotine) in the past 30 days
- Age 18 years or older
- Adequate English proficiency
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Inability to participate due to emergency treatment
- Significant impairment of cognition or judgment rendering the person incapable of informed consent. (e.g., traumatic brain injury, delirium, intoxication)
- Status as a prisoner or in police custody at the time of treatment.
- Current engagement in addiction treatment
- Residence more than 50 miles from the location of follow-up visits
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| screeningBrief screening to assess eligibility and collect minimal baseline data | Behavioural | Brief intervention plus telephone boosters (BI-B), Minimal screening only (MSO), Screening, assessment, and referral (SAR) |
| assessmentcomprehensive substance use assessment | Behavioural | Brief intervention plus telephone boosters (BI-B), Screening, assessment, and referral (SAR) |
| referralreferral to treatment if indicated or requested | Behavioural | Brief intervention plus telephone boosters (BI-B), Screening, assessment, and referral (SAR) |
| Brief intervention30-minute brief intervention session in ED | Behavioural | Brief intervention plus telephone boosters (BI-B) |
| booster sessionstwo 15-minute booster counseling sessions conducted by telephone | Behavioural | Brief intervention plus telephone boosters (BI-B) |
Primary outcome
days of use of the primary drug of abuse
Time frame: 30 days preceding 3-month follow-up
Assessed by Time-line Follow-back method
8 secondary outcomes
Days of use of the primary drug of abuse
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months
number days abstinent from all drugs
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
days of heavy drinking
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
total quantity of drug use
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
objective change in drug use based on analysis of hair samples
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
self-reported consequences of drug and alcohol use
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
percent entering treatment among those classified as having probable dependence
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
ED and other health care utilization
Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 May 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25179753Bogenschutz MP, Donovan DM, Mandler RN, Perl HI, Forcehimes AA, Crandall C, Lindblad R, Oden NL, Sharma G, Metsch L, Lyons MS, McCormack R, Macias-Konstantopoulos W, Douaihy A. Brief intervention for patients with problematic drug use presenting in emergency departments: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1736-45. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4052.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23186329Donovan DM, Bogenschutz MP, Perl H, Forcehimes A, Adinoff B, Mandler R, Oden N, Walker R. Study design to examine the potential role of assessment reactivity in the Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED) protocol. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2012 Aug 28;7(1):16. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-7-16.
Related trials for Drug Abuse
Recruiting
The Trans-Led Care Study
Substance Abuse, Substance Addiction
Recruiting
Young Adult Tobacco/Nicotine and Cannabis Co-use
Tobacco Use Disorder, Nicotine Dependence
Recruiting
Advanced Functional and Structural MRI Techniques for Neuropharmacological Imaging
Drug Abuse, Nicotine Dependence
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Active, not recruiting
The MOUD Plus Pilot: Counseling and Peer Support to Support Retention for Medically Complex Patients With Opioid Use Disorder Seen In Primary Care
Opioid Dependence, Substance Abuse Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael P. Bogenschutz, M.D. principal investigator
University of New Mexico
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing screening, assessment and referral in people with Drug Abuse, run by University of New Mexico at 7 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
days of use of the primary drug of abuse (time frame: 30 days preceding 3-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01207791, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2013.