AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 3NCT01208181

A Two-Part, 12-Week Study of Etoricoxib as a Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (MK-0663-107)

A Phase 3 study testing Etoricoxib 60 mg and Etoricoxib 90 mg in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Organon and Co.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a 2-part (6 weeks duration for each part), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. The hypothesis is that etoricoxib (60 mg and 90 mg) administration will demonstrate superior efficacy compared to placebo after 6 weeks of treatment, as measured by the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
Etoricoxib 60 mg and Etoricoxib 90 mg
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,404 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
27 Sep 2010to 29 Jul 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Is male or female ≥ 18 years of age in general good health (other than RA)
  • Has an American College of Rheumatology Rheumatoid Clinical Response Criteria (ACR) Functional Class I, II, or III
  • Has a diagnosis of RA at least 6 months ago and was at least 16 years of age when diagnosed
  • Has a history of positive therapeutic benefit with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and is taking an NSAID on a regular basis and at a therapeutic dose level and is not anticipated to undergo a change during the study

Who cannot join

  • Has a concurrent medical/arthritic disease that could confound or interfere with evaluation of efficacy
  • Has a history of gastric or biliary surgery (including gastric bypass surgery) or small intestine surgery that causes clinical malabsorption
  • Has an active peptic (gastric or duodenal) ulcer or history of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Has a confirmed medical diagnosis of ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral artery occlusive disease
  • Class II-IV congestive heart failure
  • Has uncontrolled hypertension (systolic >160 mm Hg or diastolic > 90 mm Hg) at Visit 1 or Visit 2
Show all 16Show fewer
  • Has a clinical diagnosis of hepatic insufficiency defined as Child-Pugh score ≥5
  • Has estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL/min
  • Has a history of neoplastic disease within 5 years (exceptions: basal cell carcinoma or carcinoma in situ of the cervix)
  • Is allergic to etoricoxib; history of a significant clinical or laboratory adverse experience associated with etoricoxib; hypersensitivity to aspirin or NSAIDs; or allergy to acetaminophen/paracetamol
  • Has a personal or family history of an inherited or acquired bleeding disorder
  • Requires oral corticosteroid therapy in excess of the equivalent of 10 mg daily of prednisone and/or have not been on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and/or whose dose is not expected to remain stable during the study
  • Treated with B-cell depleting therapies within the past 6 months or anticipate this treatment during this trial
  • Is a recreational or illicit drug use, or history within 5 years of drug or alcohol abuse/dependence;
  • Is morbidly obese (defined as body mass index ≥40 kg/m^2)
  • Is pregnant or breast feeding

About this study

Official title: A Phase III, Two-Part, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial to Assess the Relative Efficacy and Tolerability of Two Doses of MK-0663/Etoricoxib in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

This is a 2-part (6 weeks duration for each part), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants with rheumatoid arthritis. The hypothesis is that etoricoxib (60 mg and 90 mg) administration will demonstrate superior efficacy compared to placebo after 6 weeks of treatment, as measured by the greater mean improvement from baseline in the Disease Activity Score C-Reactive Protein (DAS-28 CRP), and by the greater mean improvement in Patient Global Assessment of Pain (PGAP) from baseline over 6 weeks of treatment. Additionally, the added benefit of increasing the dose of etoricoxib from 60 mg to 90 mg will be assessed in the second part of the study.

Being tested
Etoricoxib 60 mg, Etoricoxib 90 mg, Placebo to Etoricoxib 60 mg, Placebo to Etoricoxib 90 mg
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Etoricoxib 60 mgDrug

    Also called MK-0663

    One tablet orally once daily for 6 weeks.

  • Etoricoxib 90 mgDrug

    Also called MK-0663

    One tablet orally once daily for 6 weeks.

  • Placebo to Etoricoxib 60 mgDrug

    One tablet orally once daily for 6 weeks.

  • Placebo to Etoricoxib 90 mgDrug

    One tablet orally once daily for 6 weeks

Study groups in NCT01208181
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Etoricoxib 60 mg/Etoricoxib 60 mgExperimentalThe etoricoxib 60 mg/etoricoxib 60 mg treatment sequence will receive etoricoxib 60 mg tablets administered orally once daily for 6 weeks in Part 1 and Part 2 of the study.
Receives: Drug: Etoricoxib 60 mg; Drug: Placebo to Etoricoxib 60 mg
Etoricoxib 60 mg/Etoricoxib 90 mgExperimentalThe etoricoxib 60 mg/etoricoxib 90 mg treatment sequence will receive etoricoxib 60 mg tablets administered orally once daily for 6 weeks in Part 1 and etoricoxib 90 mg tablets administered orally once daily for 6 weeks in Part 2 of the study.
Receives: Drug: Etoricoxib 60 mg; Drug: Placebo to Etoricoxib 60 mg
Etoricoxib 90 mgExperimentalThe etoricoxib 90 mg treatment sequence will receive etoricoxib 90 mg tablets administered orally once daily for 6 weeks in Part 1 and will not participate in Part 2 of the study.
Receives: Drug: Etoricoxib 90 mg; Drug: Placebo to Etoricoxib 90 mg
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorThe placebo treatment sequence will receive matching placebo to etoricoxib tablets administered orally once daily for 6 weeks in Part 1 and will not participate in Part 2 of the study.
Receives: Drug: Placebo to Etoricoxib 60 mg; Drug: Placebo to Etoricoxib 90 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time-Weighted Average Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP in Part 1 (Etoricoxib vs. Placebo)

    Disease Activity Score Using C-Reactive Protein [DAS28-CRP] (0 - 10 Range). The DAS28-CRP index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP). For each observation (Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 10, 12), components were combined into a single DAS28-CRP score using the following algorithm: 0.56*square root (sqrt) (tender joint count [28])+0.28*sqrt(swollen joint count [28] )+0.36* ln(crp+1) + 0.014* Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + 0.96. The primary objectives of the study compared the efficacy of etoricoxib (90 mg, 60 mg) to placebo in Part 1 of this study so data for only these 3 arms are displayed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  2. Time-Weighted Average Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Pain in Part 1 (Etoricoxib vs. Placebo)

    A participant overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) was assessed with a question concerning the amount of pain due to arthritis during the past 48 hours. Pain was assessed on an 100 mm VAS scale with a left-hand marker "no pain" (0 mm) or right-hand marker "extreme pain" (100 mm). The primary objectives of the study compared the efficacy of etoricoxib (90 mg, 60 mg) to placebo in Part 1 of this study so data for only these 3 arms are displayed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure.

    Measured: Up to 112 days

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE

    An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure.

    Measured: Up to Week 12

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Time-Weighted Average Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP in Part 1 (Etoricoxib 90 mg vs. Etoricoxib 60 mg)

    Disease Activity Score Using C-Reactive Protein [DAS28-CRP] (0 - 10 Range). The DAS28-CRP index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP). For each observation (Baseline, Week 2, 4, 6, 10, 12), components were combined into a single DAS28-CRP score using the following algorithm: 0.56*square root (sqrt) (tender joint count [28])+0.28*sqrt(swollen joint count [28] )+0.36* ln(crp+1) + 0.014* Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity + 0.96. The key secondary objectives compared the relative efficacy between etoricoxib 90 mg and 60 mg in Part 1 of this study so data for only these 2 arms are displayed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  2. Time-Weighted Average Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Pain in Part 1 (Etoricoxib 90 mg vs. Etoricoxib 60 mg)

    A participant overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) was assessed with a question concerning the amount of pain due to arthritis during the past 48 hours. Pain was assessed on an 100 mm VAS scale with a left-hand marker "no pain" (0 mm) or right-hand marker "extreme pain" (100 mm). The key secondary objectives compared the relative efficacy between etoricoxib 90 mg and 60 mg in Part 1 of this study so data for only these 2 arms are displayed.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  3. Average Change From Week 6 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain Over Weeks 10 and 12 in Part 2 Among Pain Inadequate Responders From Part 1

    A participant overall assessment of pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) was assessed with a question concerning the amount of pain due to arthritis during the past 48 hours. Pain was assessed on an 100 mm VAS scale with a left-hand marker "no pain" (0 mm) or right-hand marker "extreme pain" (100 mm). In those participants who were considered inadequate responders to etoricoxib 60 mg in Part 1 (defined as a participant with <50% improvement from baseline in PGAP [VAS] at Week 6), the incremental benefit of increasing the etoricoxib dose from 60 mg (in Part 1) to 90 mg (in Part 2) compared to remaining on 60 mg in Part 2 was evaluated via average change from Week 6 over Weeks 10 and 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain score. Therefore, data for only these 2 arms are displayed.

    Measured: Week 6 and Week 10 to Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start27 Sep 2010
  3. Primary completion9 Jun 2014
  4. Study completion29 Jul 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,404 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01208181
Sponsor's protocol ID
0663-107
Other IDs
2010-019871-31
Status last verified
Feb 2022
First submitted
22 Sep 2010
Last updated
18 Jun 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bickham K, Kivitz AJ, Mehta A, Frontera N, Shah S, Stryszak P, Popmihajlov Z, Peloso PM. Evaluation of two doses of etoricoxib, a COX-2 selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), in the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 8;17:331. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1170-0.

    PubMed 27502582

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Etoricoxib 60 mg and Etoricoxib 90 mg in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Organon and Co.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 May 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time-Weighted Average Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP in Part 1 (Etoricoxib vs. Placebo) (time frame: Baseline and Week 6). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01208181, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in