Spondylitis, AnkylosingPhase 3NCT01209702
A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Have Failed Treatment With NSAIDs
A Phase 3 study testing tocilizumab in people with Spondylitis, Ankylosing, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 139 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have failed treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and are naïve to tumor necrsos factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
- What is being tested?
- tocilizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 306 participants
- Where
- 139 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2010to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age
- Ankylosing Spondylitis as defined by the modified New York criteria for ≥ 3 months prior to baseline
- Active disease at screening and baseline (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] ≥4.0, spinal pain visual analog scale [VAS] ≥40)
- Inadequate response or intolerant to 1 or more previous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) must be withdrawn for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline (methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine may be allowed if at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline)
- Oral corticosteroids (≥ 10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs/COX-2 inhibitors must be at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline
Who cannot join
- Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months after randomization
- Total ankylosis of spine (as determined by investigator)
- Inflammatory rheumatic disease other than ankylosing spondylitis
- Active, acute uveitis at baseline
- Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy at any time prior to baseline
- Intra-articular or tendon injections or parenteral corticosteroids within 4 weeks prior to screening
Show all 10Show fewer
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
- Active current or history of recurrent bacterial, viral, fungal, mycobacterial or other infection
- History of or currently active primary or secondary immunodeficiency
- Body weight > 150 kg
Trial locations and contacts
139 sites in 18 countries.
139 sites in 18 countries
United States15 sites
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Study site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Study site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Study site
Cumberland, Maryland, 21502
Study site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Study site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Study site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408
Study site
Hickory Grove, South Carolina, 28602
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77004
Study site
Huntington Beach, California, 92646
Study site
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404
Study site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Study site
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Study site
Saint Claire Shores, Michigan, 48081
Study site
Wichita, Kansas, 67207
Canada11 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
Study site
Kitchener, Ontario, N2M 5N6
Study site
Mississauga, Ontario, L5M 2V8
Study site
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Study site
Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7
Study site
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1W 4R4
Study site
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2N 7E4
Study site
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1C 5B8
Study site
Toronto, Ontario, M9W 6V1
Study site
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 1Y2
Study site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1M3
Poland11 sites
Study site
Bydgoszcz, 85-168
Study site
Krakow, 30-119
Study site
Krakow, 31-121
Study site
Lublin, 20-607
Study site
Lublin, 20-954
Study site
Poznan, 60-218
Study site
Torun, 87-100
Study site
Warsaw, 00-235
Study site
Warsaw, 00-909
Study site
Warsaw, 02-256
Study site
Wroclaw, 51-124
Czechia10 sites
Study site
Bruntál, 792 01
Study site
Hlučín, 748 01
Study site
Olomouc, 775 20
Study site
Prague, 12850
Study site
Prague, 140 00
Study site
Prague, 148 00
Study site
Praha 4 Nusle, 140 00
Study site
Sokolov, 356 01
Study site
Uherské Hradiště, 686 01
Study site
Zlín, 760 01
India10 sites
Study site
Ahmedabad, 380009
Study site
Bangalore, 560003
Study site
Bangalore, 560034
Study site
Bangalore, 560054
Study site
Bangalore, 560076
Study site
Hyderabad, 500 033
Study site
Jaipur, 302 015
Study site
New Delhi, 110029
Study site
New Delhi, 110076
Study site
Secunderabad, 500003
Spain10 sites
Study site
A Coruña, 15006
Study site
Barcelona, 08036
Study site
Córdoba, 14004
Study site
Lugo, 27004
Study site
Madrid, 28009
Study site
Madrid, 28046
Study site
Madrid, 28222
Study site
Oviedo, 33006
Study site
Oviedo, 33012
Study site
Sabadell, 08208
United Kingdom9 sites
Study site
Basingstoke, RG24 9NA
Study site
Bath, BA1 1RL
Study site
Cannock, WS11 5XY
Study site
Greenock, PA16 0XN
Study site
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Study site
London, EC1M 6BQ
Study site
Salford, M6 8HD
Study site
Stoke-on-Trent, ST6 7AG
Study site
Wigan, WN6 9EW
Bulgaria8 sites
Study site
Plovdiv, 4002
Study site
Plovdiv, 4003
Study site
Rousse, 7002
Study site
Sevlievo, 5400
Study site
Sofia, 1233
Study site
Sofia, 1606
Study site
Sofia, 1612
Study site
Sofia, 1709
France8 sites
Study site
Besançon, 25030
Study site
Boulogne-Billancourt, 92104
Study site
Créteil, 94010
Study site
Grenoble, 38042
Study site
Montpellier, 34295
Study site
Paris, 75679
Study site
Strasbourg, 67098
Study site
Toulouse, 31059
South Africa8 sites
Study site
Cape Town, 7405
Study site
Cape Town, 7500
Study site
Cape Town, 8001
Study site
Durban, 4001
Study site
Pretoria, 0002
Study site
Pretoria, 0084
Study site
Pretoria, 0184
Study site
Stellenbosch, 7600
Australia7 sites
Study site
Adelaide, 5041
Study site
Heidelberg, 3084
Study site
Hobart, 7000
Study site
Malvern East, 3145
Study site
Maroochydore, 4558
Study site
Sydney, 2050
Study site
Woodville, 5011
Italy7 sites
Study site
Ferrara, 44100
Study site
Florence, 50141
Study site
Monserrato, 09042
Study site
Prato, 59100
Study site
Reggio Emilia, 42100
Study site
Roma, 00161
Study site
Siena, 53100
Germany6 sites
Study site
Berlin, 10117
Study site
Berlin, 14059
Study site
Cologne, 50924
Study site
Gommern, 39245
Study site
Hanover, 30625
Study site
Würzburg, 97080
Brazil5 sites
Study site
Cuiabá, 78025-000
Study site
Goiânia, 74110-120
Study site
São Paulo, 04026-000
Study site
São Paulo, 04039-000
Study site
São Paulo, 04266-010
Russia5 sites
Study site
Kazan', 4420029
Study site
Moscow, 115522
Study site
Moscow, 123060
Study site
Voronezh, 394066
Study site
Yaroslavl, 150062
Belgium4 sites
Study site
Brussels, 1200
Study site
Kortrijk, 8500
Study site
Liège, 4000
Study site
Yvoir, 5530
Lithuania3 sites
Study site
Kaunas, 50009
Study site
Klaipėda, 92288
Study site
Vilnius, LT-08661
About this study
Official title: A Ph II/III Seamless, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Reduction in Signs and Symptoms and Inhibition of Structural Damage During Treatment With Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Have Failed Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Are naïve to TNF Antagonist Therapy NSAIDs
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have failed treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and are naïve to tumor necrsos factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. In Part 1 of the study, patients will be randomized to receive either RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. In Part 2, patients will be randomized to receive RoActemra at either 8 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg IV or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. The double-blind treatment period will be followed by open-label treatment with RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks until Week 208 for all patients. Anticipated time on study treatment is 208 weeks.
Read the detailed description
This study was planned as a Phase II/III seamless, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with AS who were naïve to TNF antagonist therapy. The study consisted of 2 parts, each preceded by a screening visit and followed by a common open-label extension phase. Recruitment into Part 2 commenced after completion of enrollment for Part 1.
Part 1 was designed as a Phase II study exploring the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab therapy versus placebo. Part 1 was intended to determine whether Part 2 of the study would continue, based on a Week 12 analysis.
Part 2 was designed to provide pivotal Phase III efficacy and safety data for tocilizumab in patients with AS. Approximately 400 patients were to be enrolled. Once randomization into Part 1 was complete, randomization into Part 2 of the study was to be initiated.
Based on the results of the Week 12 Part 1 analyses of the primary endpoint (ASAS20) and secondary endpoints, and in consideration of all available safety data, a benefit/risk assessment was made and it was decided to halt the study because of lack of overall efficacy. Most patients did not complete the 24-week double-blind treatment period in Part 2.
- Conditions
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
- Being tested
- tocilizumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tocilizumabBiological
Also called RoActemra/Actemra
Administered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks
PlaceboDrug
Placebo to tocilizumab administered intravenously every 4 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Part 1: Tocilizumab | Experimental | Participants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208. Receives: Biological: tocilizumab |
| Part 2: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis-20 (ASAS20) response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Part 2: Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg | Experimental | Participants received intravenous infusions of 4 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage. Receives: Biological: tocilizumab |
| Part 2: Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Experimental | Participants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage. Receives: Biological: tocilizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 12
ASAS is composed of four domains. To achieve an ASAS20 response required improvement of ≥20% and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in at least 3 domains and no worsening of ≥ 20 % and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in the remaining domain.
- The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100).
- The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions.
- The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The patient provides self-assessment of 10 questions on a 100 mm VAS. The BASFI score is the mean of these values.
- The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 12
ASAS is composed of four domains. To achieve an ASAS20 response required improvement of ≥20% and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in at least 3 domains and no worsening of ≥ 20 % and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in the remaining domain.
- The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100).
- The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions.
- The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The patient provides self-assessment of 10 questions on a 100 mm VAS. The BASFI score is the mean of these values.
- The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Secondary outcomes (19)
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 24
ASAS is composed of four domains. To achieve an ASAS20 response required improvement of ≥20% and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in at least 3 domains and no worsening of ≥ 20 % and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in the remaining domain.
- The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100).
- The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions.
- The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The patient provides self-assessment of 10 questions on a 100 mm VAS. The BASFI score is the mean of these values.
- The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Value <2 in Each of the 4 ASAS Parameters at Week 12
Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS) is composed of four domains.
- The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100).
- The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions.
- The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the mean of 10 self-assessment questions on a 100 mm VAS.
- The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Each of the above 4 domains are measured on a scale from 0-100 mm, but reported on a 0-10 cm scale. A score of less than 2 units (20 mm) in each domain is defined as partial remission.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 40% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS40) at Week 12
ASAS is composed of four domains. To achieve an ASAS40 response required improvement of ≥40% and ≥ 2 units (20 mm) in at least 3 domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain.
- The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100).
- The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions.
- The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The patient provides self-assessment of 10 questions on a 100 mm VAS. The BASFI score is the mean of these values.
- The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 40% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS40) at Week 24
ASAS is composed of four domains. To achieve an ASAS40 response required improvement of ≥40% and ≥ 2 units (20 mm) in at least 3 domains and no worsening at all in the remaining domain.
- The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100).
- The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions.
- The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The patient provides self-assessment of 10 questions on a 100 mm VAS. The BASFI score is the mean of these values.
- The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
The BASDAI is a patient-administered assessment of 6 parameters specific to AS. The following parameters were assessed on a 100-mm horizontal visual analogue: fatigue, spinal pain, peripheral arthritis, enthesitis, intensity of morning stiffness, and duration of morning stiffness. For questions 1 to 5, the left-hand extreme of the line (0) represents "none" (symptom-free) and the right-hand extreme (100) represents "very severe" (maximum severity). For question 6, a time axis was used, with the left-hand extreme of the line representing "0 hours" and the right-hand extreme representing "2 or more hours". The BASDAI score was calculated as follows:
BASDAI = [Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4 + (Q5 + Q6)/2]/5. The total score is tabulated on a scale from 0 (best) to 10 cm (worst).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) is an assessment of function in AS patients. The participant provides their assessment of their ability to perform 10 activities on a 100 mm horizontal visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (easy) to 100 (impossible). The BASFI score is the mean of these values and is tabulated on a 0 (best) to 10 (worst) cm scale.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)
The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index linear function is a combined index of 5 clinical measurements (performed by the Joint Assessor) which reflect axial mobility in the AS patient. The measurements to assess mobility are:
- Tragus-to-wall;
- Modified Schober (lumbar flexion);
- Cervical rotation;
- Lateral spinal flexion;
- Intermalleolar distance.
The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the patient's limitation of movement due to their AS.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein
Levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured from blood samples taken at Baseline and at Week 12.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve of Tocilizumab
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) of tocilizumab at steady state after 12 weeks of treatment.
Measured: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Part 2: Peak Plasma Concentration of Tocilizumab
The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of tocilizumab at steady state after 12 weeks of treatment.
Measured: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Part 2: Elimination Half-life of Tocilizumab
Elimination half-life of tocilizumab at steady state after 12 weeks of treatment.
Measured: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Part 2: Clearance of Tocilizumab
Clearance of tocilizumab at steady state after 12 weeks of treatment.
Measured: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Part 2: Volume of Distribution of Tocilizumab
Volume of distribution of tocilizumab at steady state after 12 weeks of treatment.
Measured: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Change From Baseline in the Level of Interleukin-6
Interleukin-6 levels were measured from blood samples taken pre-dose at Baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.
The analysis was not performed for participants in Part 2 due to premature study termination.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Level of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor
Soluble Interleukin-6 receptor levels were measured from blood samples taken pre-dose at Baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment.
The analysis was not performed for participants in Part 2 due to premature study termination.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With Anti-tocilizumab Antibodies
A positive anti-tocilizumab antibody result was defined as a negative assay result at Baseline and a positive post-baseline screening assay with positive confirmation or neutralizing assay at the same visit.
Measured: From Baseline until end of study (a maximum treatment duration of 40 weeks).
Part 2: Radiographic Change According to the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS)
Radiographs were to be assessed using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS). The mSASSS is a four-point scoring system for lateral radiographs of the lumbar and cervical spine and has been shown to reliably track disease progression over time, where:
- 0 = No abnormality;
- 1 = Erosion, sclerosis, or squaring;
- 2 = Syndesmophyte;
- 3 = Total bony bridging at each site.
Measured: Baseline and Week 104
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Proven Spinal Inflammation
Magentic resonance imaging of the axial skeleton was to be performed at Baseline and Week 24. MRI scans will be evaluated using the ankylosing spondylitis spinal MRI activity (ASspiMRI-a) score, grading activity (0-6) per vertebral unit in 23 units.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Part 1: The Number of Participants With Adverse Events
A serious adverse event (AE) is any event that is fatal, life-threatening, requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above. The intensity of each AE was graded according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.02. A severe AE was any event of Grade 4 (life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated) or 5 (death related to AE).
Measured: Up to 40 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2010
- Primary completionMay 2011
- Study completionDec 2011
Why it stopped: Recruitment halted: Failed to achieve efficacy
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Spondylitis, AnkylosingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 306 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01209702
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NA22823
- Other IDs
- 2009-017443-34, 2009
- Status last verified
- Jan 2013
- First submitted
- 24 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Sieper J, Porter-Brown B, Thompson L, Harari O, Dougados M. Assessment of short-term symptomatic efficacy of tocilizumab in ankylosing spondylitis: results of randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):95-100. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203559. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
PubMed 23765873
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Ph II/III Seamless, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of the Reduction in Signs and Symptoms and Inhibition of Structural Damage During Treatment With Tocilizumab Versus Placebo in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis Who Have Failed Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Are naïve to TNF Antagonist Therapy NSAIDs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01209702
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NA22823
- Conditions
- Spondylitis, Ankylosing
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Recruitment halted: Failed to achieve efficacy
- Enrolment
- 306 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Feb 2013
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who have failed treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and are naïve to tumor necrsos factor (TNF) antagonist therapy. In Part 1 of the study, patients will be randomized to receive either RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) or placebo every 4 weeks for 12 weeks. In Part 2, patients will be randomized to receive RoActemra at either 8 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg IV or placebo every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. The double-blind treatment period will be followed by open-label treatment with RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg iv every 4 weeks until Week 208 for all patients. Anticipated time on study treatment is 208 weeks.
Detailed description
This study was planned as a Phase II/III seamless, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with AS who were naïve to TNF antagonist therapy. The study consisted of 2 parts, each preceded by a screening visit and followed by a common open-label extension phase. Recruitment into Part 2 commenced after completion of enrollment for Part 1.
Part 1 was designed as a Phase II study exploring the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab therapy versus placebo. Part 1 was intended to determine whether Part 2 of the study would continue, based on a Week 12 analysis.
Part 2 was designed to provide pivotal Phase III efficacy and safety data for tocilizumab in patients with AS. Approximately 400 patients were to be enrolled. Once randomization into Part 1 was complete, randomization into Part 2 of the study was to be initiated.
Based on the results of the Week 12 Part 1 analyses of the primary endpoint (ASAS20) and secondary endpoints, and in consideration of all available safety data, a benefit/risk assessment was made and it was decided to halt the study because of lack of overall efficacy. Most patients did not complete the 24-week double-blind treatment period in Part 2.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208. |
| Part 1: Tocilizumab | Experimental | Biological: tocilizumabParticipants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 12. Following the Week 12 visit, participants who completed Part 1 of the study received open-label 8 mg/kg tocilizumab through Week 208. |
| Part 2: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants received intravenous infusions of placebo once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis-20 (ASAS20) response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage. |
| Part 2: Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg | Experimental | Biological: tocilizumabParticipants received intravenous infusions of 4 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage. |
| Part 2: Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Experimental | Biological: tocilizumabParticipants received intravenous infusions of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab once every 4 weeks until Week 24. Participants who did not attain an ASAS20 response at Week 16 were, at the investigator's discretion, eligible to receive open-label escape therapy consisting of 8 mg/kg tocilizumab. After Week 24, participants were to receive open-label treatment with 8 mg/kg tocilizumab every 4 weeks until Week 104. At the completion of Week 104, all Part 2 participants were to receive tocilizumab 8 mg/kg in the common open-label extension phase, however the study was terminated prior to any participants reaching this stage. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult patients, ≥ 18 years of age
- Ankylosing Spondylitis as defined by the modified New York criteria for ≥ 3 months prior to baseline
- Active disease at screening and baseline (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI] ≥4.0, spinal pain visual analog scale [VAS] ≥40)
- Inadequate response or intolerant to 1 or more previous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) must be withdrawn for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline (methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine may be allowed if at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned major surgery within 6 months after randomization
- Total ankylosis of spine (as determined by investigator)
- Inflammatory rheumatic disease other than ankylosing spondylitis
- Active, acute uveitis at baseline
- Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist therapy at any time prior to baseline
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tocilizumabAlso: RoActemra/ActemraAdministered intravenously (iv) every 4 weeks | Biological | Part 1: Tocilizumab, Part 2: Tocilizumab 4 mg/kg, Part 2: Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg |
| PlaceboPlacebo to tocilizumab administered intravenously every 4 weeks | Drug | Part 1: Placebo, Part 2: Placebo |
Primary outcome
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
ASAS is composed of four domains. To achieve an ASAS20 response required improvement of ≥20% and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in at least 3 domains and no worsening of ≥ 20 % and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in the remaining domain. * The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100). * The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions. * The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The patient provides self-assessment of 10 questions on a 100 mm VAS. The BASFI score is the mean of these values. * The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
ASAS is composed of four domains. To achieve an ASAS20 response required improvement of ≥20% and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in at least 3 domains and no worsening of ≥ 20 % and ≥ 1 unit (10 mm) in the remaining domain. * The patient's global assessment of current disease status, measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS), from symptom-free / no AS symptoms (0) to maximum AS disease severity (100). * The patient's overall assessment of the severity of spinal pain based on responses to 2 questions assessed on a 100 mm VAS, from no pain (0) to most severe pain (100). The spinal pain score is the mean of these 2 questions. * The function component was measured by the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). The patient provides self-assessment of 10 questions on a 100 mm VAS. The BASFI score is the mean of these values. * The inflammation component of the ASAS was determined by the mean of questions 5 and 6 of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).
19 secondary outcomes
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Value <2 in Each of the 4 ASAS Parameters at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 40% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS40) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 40% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS40) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Part 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve of Tocilizumab
Time frame: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Part 2: Peak Plasma Concentration of Tocilizumab
Time frame: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Part 2: Elimination Half-life of Tocilizumab
Time frame: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Part 2: Clearance of Tocilizumab
Time frame: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Part 2: Volume of Distribution of Tocilizumab
Time frame: Week 12, pre-dose and at the end of infusion, on the 2nd and 7th day of Week 12, 14 days post-dose (Week 14) and 28 days post-dose (pre-dose of Week 16 infusion).
Change From Baseline in the Level of Interleukin-6
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Level of Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Number of Participants With Anti-tocilizumab Antibodies
Time frame: From Baseline until end of study (a maximum treatment duration of 40 weeks).
Part 2: Radiographic Change According to the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 104
Part 2: Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Proven Spinal Inflammation
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Part 1: The Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to 40 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2013.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23765873Sieper J, Porter-Brown B, Thompson L, Harari O, Dougados M. Assessment of short-term symptomatic efficacy of tocilizumab in ankylosing spondylitis: results of randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):95-100. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203559. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
Related trials for Spondylitis, Ankylosing
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of HB0017 Injection in Healthy Volunteers to Evaluate Safety and Tolerability of a Single Subcutaneous Injection in Low-Body-Weight Subjects; and Pharmacokinetics at Different Subcutaneous Injection Sites at the Same Dose
Psoriasis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Identification of Serum Level of Glutathione Peroxidase 4
Spondyloarthropathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of GKL-006Allo Injection in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Neuropathic Spinal Pain in Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing Spondylitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
139 sites in 18 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing tocilizumab in people with Spondylitis, Ankylosing, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 139 sites in 18 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 139 sites in United States, Canada, Poland, Czechia, India and 13 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Feb 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Part 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 20% Improvement in Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis (ASAS20) at Week 12 (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01209702, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2013.