PainNCT01211340
The ACTIVE Intervention to Improve Hospice Care
A study testing ACTIVE in people with Pain, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The ACTIVE Intervention to Improve Hospice Caregiver Pain Management The major goal of this project is to implement and test this promising intervention in three hospice programs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- ACTIVE
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 446 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2010to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informal caregiver of an enrolled hospice patient
- Age 18 or over and legally able to provide informed consent
- Involved in decisions related to pain medications
- Access to at least one of the below:
- A standard land line telephone
- A high-speed Internet connection with operational computer
Show all 10Show fewer
- Without functional hearing loss or with a hearing aid that allows the participant to conduct phone or Internet conversations as assessed by the research staff (by questioning and observation
- -
- Exclusion Criteria:Informal caregivers of hospice patients with a life expectancy less than 14 days as assessed by the hospice nurse with the palliative performance scale (PPS) (99)
- -
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Hospice Compassus
Columbia, Missouri, 65203
Hands of Hope Hospice
Saint Joseph, Missouri, 65203
About this study
The ACTIVE Intervention to Improve Hospice Caregiver Pain Management The major goal of this project is to implement and test this promising intervention in three hospice programs. The mixed methods evaluation of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) will provide evidence-based data for a tested intervention manual that hospice staff members can use to integrate the intervention into their practices.
Read the detailed description
The ACTIVE Intervention to Improve Hospice Caregiver Pain Management The major goal of this project is to implement and test this promising intervention in three hospice programs. The mixed methods evaluation of this RCT will provide evidence-based data for a tested intervention manual that hospice staff members can use to integrate the intervention into their practices. We will rigorously test the effectiveness of the ACTIVE intervention. We will investigate whether the assessment of the informal caregivers perception of pain management will identify those who will benefit most and whether changes in the perceptions of informal caregivers will result in improvement of patient pain. We will explore barriers and challenges in the implementation of this into every day practice within hospice
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- ACTIVE
- Keywords
- Hospice, Caregivers, Interdisciplinary Team, Pain management
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ACTIVEBehavioural
Assessing Caregivers for Team Intervention via Video Encounters: this intervention uses video technology to bridge geographic distance to empower hospice caregivers to participate in plan of care meetings for their patient
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | No intervention | Usual hospice care- there is no intervention in this arm |
| ACTIVE | Experimental | Behavioral intervention using web conferencing Receives: Behavioral: ACTIVE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Caregiver Perceptions of Pain Medicine Questionaire
This 16 question instrument measures the perceptions hospice caregivers have toward the administration of pain medications. Scores on items vary from 1-5 with the lower scores indicating more problematic perceptions of pain management. A Total score is computed between 16-80 Only the last available measure will be used to reflect the measure closest to time of death.
Measured: Every 14 days until the death of the patient for an average of 45 days-Only measure used in analysis is the last completed measure
Secondary outcomes (2)
Caregiver Quality of Life-Revised Subscale Emotional
This is one domain of a four domain instrument. It involves one question with a range of 0-10.Only the last available measure will be used to reflect the measure closest to time of death.
Measured: Every 14 days until the death of the patient for an average of 45 days-Only measure used in analysis is the last completed measure
Anxiety
This measure determines the level of anxiety experienced by a hospice caregiver. Total scores range from 0-21 with higher scores representing more anxiety. Only the last available measure will be used to reflect the measure closest to time of death.
Measured: Every 14 days until the death of the patient for an average of 45 days-Only measure used in analysis is the last completed measure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2010
- Primary completionApr 2014
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 446 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Debra Parker Oliver, Washington University School of Medicine
- Investigators
- Debra Parker Oliver, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Missouri-Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01211340
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1160518
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 23 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kruse RL, Parker Oliver D, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Demiris G. Conducting the ACTIVE randomized trial in hospice care: keys to success. Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):160-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774512461858. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
PubMed 23104974Parker Oliver D, Demiris G, Washington K, Kruse RL, Petroski G. Hospice Family Caregiver Involvement in Care Plan Meetings: A Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Nov;34(9):849-859. doi: 10.1177/1049909116661816. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
PubMed 27465403Washington KT, Demiris G, Pike KC, Kruse RL, Oliver DP. Anxiety among informal hospice caregivers: an exploratory study. Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):567-73. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513001193. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
PubMed 24524662Parker Oliver D, Albright DL, Washington K, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Gage A, Mooney M, Demiris G. Hospice caregiver depression: the evidence surrounding the greatest pain of all. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2013;9(4):256-71. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2013.846891.
PubMed 24295096Albright DL, Kruse RL, Oliver DP, Washington K, Cagle J, Demiris G. Testing the factorial validity of scores from the caregiver pain medicine questionnaire. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jul;48(1):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PubMed 24246789Wittenberg-Lyles E, Goldsmith J, Oliver DP, Demiris G, Kruse RL, Van Stee S. Using medical words with family caregivers. J Palliat Med. 2013 Sep;16(9):1135-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0041. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
PubMed 23937064Demiris G, Parker Oliver D, Capurro D, Wittenberg-Lyles E. Implementation science: implications for intervention research in hospice and palliative care. Gerontologist. 2014 Apr;54(2):163-71. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt022. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
PubMed 23558847Wittenberg-Lyles E, Goldsmith J, Oliver DP, Demiris G, Kruse RL, Van Stee S. Exploring oral literacy in communication with hospice caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Nov;46(5):731-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.11.006. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
PubMed 23522518Baldwin PK, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Kruse RL, Demiris G, Parker Oliver D. Pain management and the African American hospice caregiver: a case report. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2013 Dec;30(8):795-8. doi: 10.1177/1049909112469274. Epub 2012 Dec 10. No abstract available.
PubMed 23233538Washington KT, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Parker Oliver D, Demiris G, Shaunfield S, Crumb E. Application of the VALUE communication principles in ACTIVE hospice team meetings. J Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;16(1):60-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0229. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
PubMed 23036014
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The ACTIVE Intervention to Improve Hospice Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01211340
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1160518
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- Hospice, Caregivers, Interdisciplinary Team, Pain management
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 446 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2010
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Jun 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The ACTIVE Intervention to Improve Hospice Caregiver Pain Management The major goal of this project is to implement and test this promising intervention in three hospice programs. The mixed methods evaluation of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) will provide evidence-based data for a tested intervention manual that hospice staff members can use to integrate the intervention into their practices.
Detailed description
The ACTIVE Intervention to Improve Hospice Caregiver Pain Management The major goal of this project is to implement and test this promising intervention in three hospice programs. The mixed methods evaluation of this RCT will provide evidence-based data for a tested intervention manual that hospice staff members can use to integrate the intervention into their practices. We will rigorously test the effectiveness of the ACTIVE intervention. We will investigate whether the assessment of the informal caregivers perception of pain management will identify those who will benefit most and whether changes in the perceptions of informal caregivers will result in improvement of patient pain. We will explore barriers and challenges in the implementation of this into every day practice within hospice
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | No intervention | –Usual hospice care- there is no intervention in this arm |
| ACTIVE | Experimental | Behavioral: ACTIVEBehavioral intervention using web conferencing |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Informal caregiver of an enrolled hospice patient
- Age 18 or over and legally able to provide informed consent
- Involved in decisions related to pain medications
- Access to at least one of the below:
- Without functional hearing loss or with a hearing aid that allows the participant to conduct phone or Internet conversations as assessed by the research staff (by questioning and observation
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ACTIVEAssessing Caregivers for Team Intervention via Video Encounters: this intervention uses video technology to bridge geographic distance to empower hospice caregivers to participate in plan of care meetings for their patient | Behavioural | ACTIVE |
Primary outcome
Caregiver Perceptions of Pain Medicine Questionaire
Time frame: Every 14 days until the death of the patient for an average of 45 days-Only measure used in analysis is the last completed measure
This 16 question instrument measures the perceptions hospice caregivers have toward the administration of pain medications. Scores on items vary from 1-5 with the lower scores indicating more problematic perceptions of pain management. A Total score is computed between 16-80 Only the last available measure will be used to reflect the measure closest to time of death.
2 secondary outcomes
Caregiver Quality of Life-Revised Subscale Emotional
Time frame: Every 14 days until the death of the patient for an average of 45 days-Only measure used in analysis is the last completed measure
Anxiety
Time frame: Every 14 days until the death of the patient for an average of 45 days-Only measure used in analysis is the last completed measure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 23104974Kruse RL, Parker Oliver D, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Demiris G. Conducting the ACTIVE randomized trial in hospice care: keys to success. Clin Trials. 2013 Feb;10(1):160-9. doi: 10.1177/1740774512461858. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 27465403Parker Oliver D, Demiris G, Washington K, Kruse RL, Petroski G. Hospice Family Caregiver Involvement in Care Plan Meetings: A Mixed-Methods Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Nov;34(9):849-859. doi: 10.1177/1049909116661816. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24524662Washington KT, Demiris G, Pike KC, Kruse RL, Oliver DP. Anxiety among informal hospice caregivers: an exploratory study. Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):567-73. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513001193. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24295096Parker Oliver D, Albright DL, Washington K, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Gage A, Mooney M, Demiris G. Hospice caregiver depression: the evidence surrounding the greatest pain of all. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2013;9(4):256-71. doi: 10.1080/15524256.2013.846891.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24246789Albright DL, Kruse RL, Oliver DP, Washington K, Cagle J, Demiris G. Testing the factorial validity of scores from the caregiver pain medicine questionnaire. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jul;48(1):99-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23937064Wittenberg-Lyles E, Goldsmith J, Oliver DP, Demiris G, Kruse RL, Van Stee S. Using medical words with family caregivers. J Palliat Med. 2013 Sep;16(9):1135-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0041. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23558847Demiris G, Parker Oliver D, Capurro D, Wittenberg-Lyles E. Implementation science: implications for intervention research in hospice and palliative care. Gerontologist. 2014 Apr;54(2):163-71. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt022. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23522518Wittenberg-Lyles E, Goldsmith J, Oliver DP, Demiris G, Kruse RL, Van Stee S. Exploring oral literacy in communication with hospice caregivers. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Nov;46(5):731-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.11.006. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23233538Baldwin PK, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Kruse RL, Demiris G, Parker Oliver D. Pain management and the African American hospice caregiver: a case report. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2013 Dec;30(8):795-8. doi: 10.1177/1049909112469274. Epub 2012 Dec 10. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23036014Washington KT, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Parker Oliver D, Demiris G, Shaunfield S, Crumb E. Application of the VALUE communication principles in ACTIVE hospice team meetings. J Palliat Med. 2013 Jan;16(1):60-6. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0229. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Digital Use, 24-Hour Movement Behaviors, and Myofascial Release in University Students With Neck Pain
Forward Head Posture, Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Dietary Intervention for Migraine Relief
Migraine
RecruitingPhase 4
Anrikefon-based Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopic Surgery, Visceral Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Focal Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis, Adenomyoma of Uterus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Debra Parker Oliver, PhD principal investigator
University of Missouri-Columbia
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ACTIVE in people with Pain, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Jun 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Caregiver Perceptions of Pain Medicine Questionaire (time frame: Every 14 days until the death of the patient for an average of 45 days-Only measure used in analysis is the last completed measure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01211340, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2021.