AzTrials
AzTrials

PregnancyPhase 4NCT01213147

Mild Stimulation Protocol Versus Microdose Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist Flare up Protocol in Poor Responders

A Phase 4 study testing clomiphene citrate and buserelin in people with Pregnancy, run by Yazd Medical University at 1 site in Iran.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Despite the progression in assisted reproductive technology (ART), the preferred protocol for poor responders is still controversial. The management of poor responders consists of 10% of ART cycles . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 38 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pregnancy
What is being tested?
clomiphene citrate and buserelin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
159 participants
Where
1 siteIran
Study dates
Apr 2009to May 2010
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 38 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women with ≥38 years old
  • women who had one or more previous failed IVF cycles in which three or fewer oocyte were been retrieved and/or serum E2 level on the day of hCG administration was ≤500 pg/ml were enrolled in this study

Who cannot join

  • BMI > 30
  • endocrine disorders
  • metabolic disorders
  • history of ovarian surgery
  • sever endometriosis
  • sever male factor ( azospermia )

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Iran1 site
  • Yazd Research and Clinical Center for Infertility

    Yazd, Yazd Province, 8916877391

Other trials in Iran

About this study

Official title: The Use of Mild Stimulation Protocol in Poor Responders : a Randomized Trial

Despite the progression in assisted reproductive technology (ART), the preferred protocol for poor responders is still controversial. The management of poor responders consists of 10% of ART cycles .

The response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is lower regarding estradiol level , number of obtained oocytes , and fertilization , implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with low ovarian reserve . Furthermore , bad quality embryos are observed in these women more than normoresponders and the increase of cancellation rate and doses of gonadotropin administration are remarkable results in poor responders . Several criteria have introduced for poor responders , the main defect in the management of them is lack of specific definition .Several strategies are available to improve ART cycles outcome in poor responders. These modalities include using : high FSH dose , stop GnRH-agonist protocol , addition of growth hormone , transdermal testosterone , aromatase inhibitor , GnRH-antagonist and recombinant FSH ( r-FSH) ; while the improvement of pregnancy rate has been quite low.

Read more

The most common used protocol for ovarian stimulation is microdose GnRH-agonist flare in poor responders .Some investigators concluded that the use of GnRH-agonist " even in lower doses , led to prolonged stimulation and increased the cost without improving IVF outcome. Furthermore this method increased LH , progesterone and androgen of serum in follicular phase , which caused deleterious effect on follicular growth and oocyte quality .

Clomiphene citrate co-treatment with gonadotropin and antagonist are one of the recommended protocol in poor responders . Clomiphene citrate increases endogenous FSH versus agonist in microdose protocol. Decreasing the doses of used gonadotropin and duration of stimulation are its beneficial effects in COH cycle .

The aim of this study was comparing CC/gonadotropin/antagonist and GnRH agonist flare protocols on IVF outcome in poor responders .

Read the detailed description

Despite the progression in assisted reproductive technology (ART) , the preferred protocol for poor responders is still controversial. The management of poor responders consists of 10% of ART cycles .

The response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) is lower regarding estradiol (E₂) level , number of obtained oocytes , and fertilization , implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with low ovarian reserve . Furthermore , bad quality embryos are observed in these women more than normoresponders and the increase of cancellation rate and doses of gonadotropin administration are remarkable results in poor responders Several criteria have introduced for poor responders , the main defect in the management of them is lack of specific definition .Several strategies are available to improve ART cycles outcome in poor responders. These modalities include using : high FSH dose , stop GnRH-agonist protocol , addition of growth hormone , transdermal testosterone , aromatase inhibitor , GnRH-antagonist and recombinant FSH ( r-FSH) ; while the improvement of pregnancy rate has been quite low.

The most common used protocol for ovarian stimulation is microdose GnRH-agonist flare in poor responders .Some investigators concluded that the use of GnRH-agonist " even in lower doses " led to prolonged stimulation and increased the cost without improving IVF outcome. Furthermore this method increased LH , progesterone and androgen of serum in follicular phase , which caused deleterious effect on follicular growth and oocyte quality .

Clomiphene citrate co-treatment with gonadotropin and antagonist are one of the recommended protocol in poor responders . Clomiphene citrate increases endogenous FSH versus agonist in microdose protocol. Decreasing the doses of used gonadotropin and duration of stimulation are its beneficial effects in COH cycle .

The aim of this study was comparing CC/gonadotropin/antagonist and GnRH agonist flare protocols on IVF outcome in poor responders .

Materials and Methods Study design This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial including 159 poor responder patients who were candidate for IVF . Women with ≥38 years old who had one or more previous failed IVF cycles in which three or fewer oocyte were been retrieved and/or serum E2 level on the day of hCG administration was ≤500 pg/ml were enrolled in this study . Patients with BMI > 30 , endocrine or metabolic disorders , history of ovarian surgery , sever endometriosis and sever male factor ( azospermia ) were excluded from the study . Patients were divided into two groups , 79 women in group I received CC/gonadotropin/antagonist (mild protocol) and 80 women in group II received microdose GnRH-agonist flare (microdose protocol) . A method of computer-generated randomization was used .

Treatment Protocols All women received oral contraceptive for 21 days which started on the first day of previous cycle . In group I , stimulation were performed by administration of clomiphene citrate (Iran hormone, Tehran, Iran) 100 mg from day 3 of withdrawal bleeding until day 7 of cycle and gonadotropin stimulation with 225-300 IU daily , recombinant FSH (r-FSH) SC or hMG IM , were started from day 5 of cycle . In group II ovarian stimulation was initiated with GnRH-agonist , buserelin (Suprefact, Aventis Pharma, Frankfurt, Germany) 50 µg SC twice a day from cycle day 2 of withdrawal bleeding . After two days , 225-300 IU/day recombinant FSH (r-FSH) SC or hMG IM were administered.

Ovarian response was monitored by serial ultrasound examinations and evaluation of serum E₂ levels , then doses of gonadotropin were adjusted as required in both groups.

In group I , when at least one follicle ≥ 14 mm in mean diameter was observed , 0.25 mg GnRH antagonist (ganirelix , Organon, netherlands) SC daily was started and continued until hCG injection . Urinary Human chorionic gonadotropin 10000 IU was administered intramuscular when at least two follicles reached a mean diameter of 18 mm in both groups . Also , endometrial thickness and serum E₂ level were measured on the day of hCG injection .Oocyte retrieval was performed 34-36 hours after hCG injection and conventional IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was done as appropriately . All embryos were scored by the number , size , shape , symmetry and cytoplasmic appearance of blastomers , and the presence of anucleate cytoplasmic fragmentation .

Based on the number and quality of available embryos and patient's age , one to five embryos were transferred on the day 2 or 3 after oocyte retrieval under ultrasound guidance with a CCD embryo transfer catheter (Laboratory C.C.D., Paris, France). Luteal support with progesterone 100 mg daily IM was started on the day of oocyte retrieval and was continued until the documentation of fetal heart activity on ultrasound.

Cycle cancellation was defined as three groups : [1] poor ovarian response : fewer than two growing follicles on transvaginal ultrasound, and an E₂ level < 200 pg/ml on the day 7 of stimulation ; [2] failed oocyte retrieval : no obtained oocyte on the day of ovarian puncture ; [3] failed fertilization : no fertilized oocyte after IVF/ICSI.

Conditions
Pregnancy
Being tested
clomiphene citrate, buserelin
Keywords
Pregnancy, Clomiphene Citrate, Fertilization, Buserelin

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • clomiphene citrateDrug

    100 mg per day oral for 7 days

  • buserelinDrug

    50 µg Subcutaneous twice a day from cycle day 2 of menstrual cycle

Study groups in NCT01213147
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
clomiphene citrate,pregnancy,poor respondersExperimentalWoman in clomiphene citrate arm are administered 100mg/day oral from day 3 of menstrual cycle until day 7 of cycle
Receives: Drug: clomiphene citrate
buserelin,pregnancy,poor responderActive comparatorwomen in control arm are administered Buserelin buserelin 50 µg SC twice a day from cycle day 2 of menstrual cycle
Receives: Drug: buserelin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. clinical pregnancy rate

    Measured: until 12th gestational week

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. and implantation rate

    Measured: until 12th gestational week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Oct 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completionAug 2009
  4. Study completionMay 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
159 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01213147
Sponsor's protocol ID
2063
Status last verified
Sep 2010
First submitted
30 Sep 2010
Last updated
1 Oct 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing clomiphene citrate and buserelin in people with Pregnancy, run by Yazd Medical University at 1 site in Iran.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Iran. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

clinical pregnancy rate (time frame: until 12th gestational week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in