AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerPhase 4NCT01216254

Clinical Trial Comparing Outcomes of Breast Conserving Operations With Classic v High-frequency Electrocoagulation

A Phase 4 study testing classic v high-frequency electrocoagulation in people with Breast Cancer, run by Medical University of Gdansk at 1 site in Poland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of breast conserving therapy operation depending on the type of surgical tool used: classic electrocoagulation with higher operative temperatures and high frequency electrocoagulation with lower operative temperatures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer
What is being tested?
classic v high-frequency electrocoagulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
Oct 2010to Oct 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • female
  • age 18-100
  • breast cancer
  • stage IIA and II B (cT1a-3; cN0-1; cM0)
  • no previous breast surgery
  • no previous cancer
  • obtained informed consent

Who cannot join

  • stages I, III, IV
  • localised breast infection
  • previous breast surgery for any cause
  • previous cancer
  • no voluntary consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Jacek Zielinski, M.D., Ph.D. contact

+48583492440

jaziel@gumed.edu.pl

Maciej Bobowicz, M.D. contact

+48608738614

mbobowicz@gumed.edu.pl

Poland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Surgical Oncology

    Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-211

    Jacek Zielinski, M.D., Ph.D.

    Maciej Bobowicz, M.D.

    Recruiting

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Pain Sensation, Seroma Formation and Quality od Life Following BCT With SLND in Breast Cancer Patients Operated With Classic Versus High-frequency Electrocoagulation.

The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of breast conserving therapy operation depending on the type of surgical tool used: classic electrocoagulation with higher operative temperatures and high frequency electrocoagulation with lower operative temperatures. The investigators would assess the pain levels, length and amount of the lymphatic secretion as well as quality of life following breast conserving surgery.

Conditions
Breast Cancer
Being tested
classic v high-frequency electrocoagulation
Keywords
breast cancer, stage 2, breast conserving therapy, sentinel lymph node dissection, high frequency electrocoagulation
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • classic v high-frequency electrocoagulationDevice

    Also called Ellmann

    During the BCT with SLND the investigators would use two types of electrocoagulation. The steps of the operation would remain the same in both arms, nevertheless the tool used would vary.

Study groups in NCT01216254
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Classic electrocoagulationActive comparatorArm of the study where the classic low-frequency electrocoagulation is used during the operation
Receives: Device: classic v high-frequency electrocoagulation
High Frequency electrocoagulationExperimentalArm of the study where the tested high-frequency electrocoagulation is used during the operation
Receives: Device: classic v high-frequency electrocoagulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain Control

    Pain assessment would be performed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at the days 1-5, 10 (+/- 2), 20 (+/- 2), 30 (+/- 2), and 12 weeks (+/- 2 days). SF - MPQ questionnaire would be filled in on admission, 10th (+/- 2) post-operative day and 12 weeks (+/- 2 days)after surgery.

    Measured: From the day before surgery up to 12 weeks (+/-2days) after surgery

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Quality of life (QoL)

    Pre-operative assessment of QoL would be performed by psychologist using questionnaires: CISS, HADS - M, Eysencka. Postoperative assessment of QoL would be performed using QLQ C30 and QLQ BR 23 questionnaires 12 weeks (+/- 2 days)after surgery

    Measured: From the day before surgery up to 12 weeks (+/-2days) after surgery

  2. Length of lymphatic secretion

    Number of days of lymphatic secretion would be assessed.

    Measured: From the day before surgery up to 12 weeks (+/-2days) after surgery

  3. Amount of lymphatic secretion

    Amount of lymphatic secretion would be measured until it stops on daily basis.

    Measured: From the day before surgery up to 12 weeks (+/-2days) after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2010
  3. Primary completionOct 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01216254
Sponsor's protocol ID
NKEBN/219/2010
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
4 Oct 2010
Last updated
31 Jan 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing classic v high-frequency electrocoagulation in people with Breast Cancer, run by Medical University of Gdansk at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jacek Zielinski, M.D., Ph.D. (+48583492440, jaziel@gumed.edu.pl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain Control (time frame: From the day before surgery up to 12 weeks (+/-2days) after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in