the Efficacy of Aromatase Inhibitor vs. Gonadotrpins Releasing Hormone Agonists in Treating Premenopausal Women With Uterine AdenomyosisPhase 2/3NCT01218581
Aromatase Inhibitors or GnRH-a for Uterine Adenomyosis
A Phase 2/3 study testing received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month) in people with the Efficacy of Aromatase Inhibitor vs. Gonadotrpins Releasing Hormone Agonists in Treating Premenopausal Women With Uterine Adenomyosis, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
To date, there is no uniform agreement on the most appropriate therapeutic methods for managing women with uterine adenomyosis and/or adenomyoma who want to preserve their fertility. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- the Efficacy of Aromatase Inhibitor vs. Gonadotrpins Releasing Hormone Agonists in Treating Premenopausal Women With Uterine Adenomyosis
- What is being tested?
- received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- Dec 2005to Jan 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients included in the study were premenopausal women aged 18-42 years with adenomyosis with abnormal uterine bleeding, unexplained infertility, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, or pressure effect
Who cannot join
- Excluded subjects included women who had myoma(s) measuring >2 cm, women with uterine adenomyoma who were under treatment with any type of hormonal therapy more recently than 1 month, and women with a history of major medical problem and/or previous medical or surgical treatment for the problem
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Mansoura University Hospitals
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, 35111
About this study
Official title: Aromatase Inhibitors or Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonists for the Management of Uterine Adenomyosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
To date, there is no uniform agreement on the most appropriate therapeutic methods for managing women with uterine adenomyosis and/or adenomyoma who want to preserve their fertility. Management with hormonal treatment that aims to reduce the proliferation of endometrial cells is promising, but there is a paucity of well-designed studies to guide treatment. There is a strong need to develop pharmacological agents that provide an efficient outcome. Gonadotripn releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) have been used in several studies, to produce a constant hypoestrogenic state in a woman with adenomyosis which cause amenorrhoea, control of pain and uterine shrinkage . Pure antiestrogens, however, may offer some advantage in the treatment of adenomyosis and trials are required to assess its usefulness. Leiomyoma and uterine volumes were successfully reduced by use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Assuming aromatase production activity in the adenomyosis lesion, Kimura et al, used GnRHa and an AI concomitantly for treatment of uterine adenomyosis. This lack of information stimulated us to run this trial to compare the efficacy of aromatase inhibitor vs. GnRHa in treating premenopausal women with uterine adenomyosis.
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, non-blind trial performed in the period from December 2005 and January 2010 in the teaching hospitals affiliated with Mansoura University (Egypt) and a private practice setting (Delta Fertility Center, Egypt). Thirty eight patients were assessed for eligibility, 6 patients were excluded and 32 with uterine adenomyosis were included in the study. Patients included in the study were premenopausal women aged 18-42 years with adenomyosis with abnormal uterine bleeding, unexplained infertility, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, or pressure effect. Excluded subjects included women who had myoma(s) measuring >2 cm, women with uterine adenomyoma who were under treatment with any type of hormonal therapy more recently than 1 month, and women with a history of major medical problem and/or previous medical or surgical treatment for the problem.
Patients were randomly allocated into two treatments groups (A and B) using a computer-generated random table. Group A received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day, Femara, Novartis PharmaServices, Basel, Switzerland) and group B received goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month, Zoladex@, Zeneka Pharma International, UK) for 12 weeks. Because, for technical reasons, GnRHa was supplied in vials and aromatase inhibitor in tablets, a double-blind study design was not feasible. Instead an assessor-blind design was chosen, whereby preparation and administration were performed by a person who did not take part in any decision concerning medication administration during the study. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the university and institutional Review Board (IRB), and each subject provided written informed consent before participating in the study. All subjects underwent baseline measurement, performed in the early follicular phase.
An expert gynecologist performed all transvaginal ultrasound scans and analysis using D 4000 (Honda, Japan) ultrasound machine with a 5.5-MHz vaginal probe. Ultrasound criteria used for diagnosis of adenomyosis included uterine enlargement in the absence of leiomyomas, asymmetric enlargement of the anterior or posterior myometrial wall, lack of contour abnormality or mass effect, heterogeneous, poorly circumcised areas within the myometrium, hyperechoic islands or nodules, finger-like projections or linear striations. After identification of the adenomyosis, its volume was calculated with a stepwise planimetry method using an integrated software program. Measurements for the whole uterine and the adenomyoma volumes were performed at baseline and during treatment at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Symptoms at the start and after 12 weeks of therapy were evaluated.
- Being tested
- received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month)
- Keywords
- Adenomyosis, letrozole, GnRH-a
- Medical subject headings
- Adenomyosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month)Drug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| group A | Active comparator | Group A received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day, Femara, Novartis PharmaServices, Basel, Switzerland) Receives: Drug: received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month) |
| group B | Active comparator | group B received goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month, Zoladex@, Zeneka Pharma International, UK) Receives: Drug: received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month) |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2005
- Primary completionJan 2010
- Study completionJan 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for the Efficacy of Aromatase Inhibitor vs. Gonadotrpins Releasing Hormone Agonists in Treating Premenopausal Women With Uterine AdenomyosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mansoura UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01218581
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- adenomyosis
- Other IDs
- aromatase inhibitors
- Status last verified
- Dec 2005
- First submitted
- 8 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Aromatase Inhibitors or Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonists for the Management of Uterine Adenomyosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01218581
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- adenomyosis
- Keywords
- Adenomyosis, letrozole, GnRH-a
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mansoura UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2005
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To date, there is no uniform agreement on the most appropriate therapeutic methods for managing women with uterine adenomyosis and/or adenomyoma who want to preserve their fertility. Management with hormonal treatment that aims to reduce the proliferation of endometrial cells is promising, but there is a paucity of well-designed studies to guide treatment. There is a strong need to develop pharmacological agents that provide an efficient outcome. Gonadotripn releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) have been used in several studies, to produce a constant hypoestrogenic state in a woman with adenomyosis which cause amenorrhoea, control of pain and uterine shrinkage . Pure antiestrogens, however, may offer some advantage in the treatment of adenomyosis and trials are required to assess its usefulness. Leiomyoma and uterine volumes were successfully reduced by use of aromatase inhibitors (AIs). Assuming aromatase production activity in the adenomyosis lesion, Kimura et al, used GnRHa and an AI concomitantly for treatment of uterine adenomyosis. This lack of information stimulated us to run this trial to compare the efficacy of aromatase inhibitor vs. GnRHa in treating premenopausal women with uterine adenomyosis.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, randomized, non-blind trial performed in the period from December 2005 and January 2010 in the teaching hospitals affiliated with Mansoura University (Egypt) and a private practice setting (Delta Fertility Center, Egypt). Thirty eight patients were assessed for eligibility, 6 patients were excluded and 32 with uterine adenomyosis were included in the study. Patients included in the study were premenopausal women aged 18-42 years with adenomyosis with abnormal uterine bleeding, unexplained infertility, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, or pressure effect. Excluded subjects included women who had myoma(s) measuring >2 cm, women with uterine adenomyoma who were under treatment with any type of hormonal therapy more recently than 1 month, and women with a history of major medical problem and/or previous medical or surgical treatment for the problem.
Patients were randomly allocated into two treatments groups (A and B) using a computer-generated random table. Group A received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day, Femara, Novartis PharmaServices, Basel, Switzerland) and group B received goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month, Zoladex@, Zeneka Pharma International, UK) for 12 weeks. Because, for technical reasons, GnRHa was supplied in vials and aromatase inhibitor in tablets, a double-blind study design was not feasible. Instead an assessor-blind design was chosen, whereby preparation and administration were performed by a person who did not take part in any decision concerning medication administration during the study. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the university and institutional Review Board (IRB), and each subject provided written informed consent before participating in the study. All subjects underwent baseline measurement, performed in the early follicular phase.
An expert gynecologist performed all transvaginal ultrasound scans and analysis using D 4000 (Honda, Japan) ultrasound machine with a 5.5-MHz vaginal probe. Ultrasound criteria used for diagnosis of adenomyosis included uterine enlargement in the absence of leiomyomas, asymmetric enlargement of the anterior or posterior myometrial wall, lack of contour abnormality or mass effect, heterogeneous, poorly circumcised areas within the myometrium, hyperechoic islands or nodules, finger-like projections or linear striations. After identification of the adenomyosis, its volume was calculated with a stepwise planimetry method using an integrated software program. Measurements for the whole uterine and the adenomyoma volumes were performed at baseline and during treatment at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Symptoms at the start and after 12 weeks of therapy were evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| group A | Active comparator | Drug: received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month)Group A received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day, Femara, Novartis PharmaServices, Basel, Switzerland) |
| group B | Active comparator | Drug: received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month)group B received goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month, Zoladex@, Zeneka Pharma International, UK) |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients included in the study were premenopausal women aged 18-42 years with adenomyosis with abnormal uterine bleeding, unexplained infertility, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, or pressure effect
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Excluded subjects included women who had myoma(s) measuring >2 cm, women with uterine adenomyoma who were under treatment with any type of hormonal therapy more recently than 1 month, and women with a history of major medical problem and/or previous medical or surgical treatment for the problem
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month) | Drug | group A, group B |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2010.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing received oral letrozole (2.5 mg/day)and goserelin subcutaneosly (3.6 mg/month) in people with the Efficacy of Aromatase Inhibitor vs. Gonadotrpins Releasing Hormone Agonists in Treating Premenopausal Women With Uterine Adenomyosis, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2010.