Urinary (Renal or Ureteral) StonesNCT01222325
Comparison Between Two Shock Wave Regimens for Treating Urinary Stones
A study testing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in people with Urinary (Renal or Ureteral) Stones, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
In order to check if a reduction in the frequency and total number of shocks delivered during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) results in a great number of stone-free patients,the investigators compared two different ways of treating urinary stones using SWL. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary (Renal or Ureteral) Stones
- What is being tested?
- extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 302 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Aug 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with renal or ureteral stones from 5 to 20 mm
Who cannot join
- pregnancy
- coagulation disturbs and antiplatelet treatment
- urinary tract infection
- aortic aneurism bigger than 2 cm
- clinical contraindication to general anesthesia
- refusal in participating of the protocol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Two Shock Wave Regimens Using Frequencies of 60 and 90 Impulses Per Minute for Urinary Stones
In order to check if a reduction in the frequency and total number of shocks delivered during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) results in a great number of stone-free patients,the investigators compared two different ways of treating urinary stones using SWL.
Read the detailed description
Purpose: Two different regimens of SWL delivery for treating urinary stones were compared.
Methods: After informed consent, patients with previously untreated renal and ureteric stones were admitted for an initial treatment by SWL between June 2008 and May 2009. Patients were randomly divided into two groups; one group received 3000 impulses at a rate of 60 impulses per minute, and the other received 4000 impulses at a rate of 90 impulses per minute. Patients submitted to re-treatment of the same stone were excluded. All treatments were done using the Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter. Stones were located by x-ray or ultrasound. Prior to treatment, patients were submitted to laboratory tests and a cardiologic evaluation when indicated. Urinary infections were treated prior to the SWL session. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Briefly, Tramadol 1-2 mg/kg associated to Propofol 2.5-3.0 mg/kg and scopolamine were employed in the majority of the procedures. Patients received 50-100 mg of diluted Tramadol and 20 mg of scopolamine just before the beginning of the SWL session and Propofol was maintained on continuous bomb infusion during the treatment and interrupted three minutes before the end of the session. All patients were maintained under spontaneous breathing, and a facial or a laryngeal oxygen mask was used according to the anesthesiologist's judgment. The potency of the lithotripter was increased progressively by 300 shocks until reaching the final stage, which occurred at a mean of 1500 shocks. The maximum potency employed was level 4 (equivalent to 14 kV) for renal stones and level 6 (16 kV) for ureteric stones.
All patients were treated on an outpatient basis and were discharged from the hospital six hours after treatment. All patients received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Dipyrone in combination with to Hyoscine for three days postoperatively unless contraindicated and were instructed to come to the emergency department in case of severe pain, fever or hematuria.
The final results for each patient were assessed with a kidney and urinary bladder scan (KUB) plus an abdominal ultrasound three months after the procedure. Success was defined as stone-free status or the detection of residual fragments ≤ 3 mm on final evaluation. Partial fragmentation was considered to have occurred if a significant reduction in the stone burden was observed but residual fragments bigger than 3 mm remained.
We evaluated overall stone-free rates, the incidence of unchanged stones and the occurrence of partial fragmentation as well as the occurrence of significant complications in both groups.
The sample size required was based on the assumption that the estimated success rate would be 70% in the 3000 impulses at 60 impulses per minute group and 50% in the 4000 impulses at 90 impulses per minute group, with a type I error of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.05 (power of 80%). This yielded a projected sample size of 93 stones in each group.
Data were analyzed using the Fischer's exact, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests; a level of significance of 5% was adopted.
- Conditions
- Urinary (Renal or Ureteral) Stones
- Being tested
- extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL)
- Keywords
- kidney calculi, urolithiasis, urologic surgical procedures, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
- Medical subject headings
- Calculi, Kidney Calculi, Urolithiasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL)Procedure or surgery
Also called lithotripsy, shock waves
patients were submitted to one session SWL at a Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter under general anesthesia under supervision of an anesthesiologist and an urologist.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| swl 3000 impulses- 60 imp/min | Active comparator | patients in this group were submitted to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) 3000 impulses at 60 impulses per minute under general anesthesia. Unique session Receives: Procedure: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) |
| swl- 4000 impulses - 90 impulses /min | Active comparator | patients in this group were submitted extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (swl) to 4000 impulses at 90 impulses per minute under general anesthesia- unique session Receives: Procedure: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
abdominal ultrasound and abdominal x rays (KUB)
patients submitted to SWL in two different regimens were submited to renal ultrasound and abdominal x rays (KUB) three months after procedure to check the occourrence of stone-free status, residual fragments or unmodified stone.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
adverse effects of the two different regimens
patients submitted to two different SWL regimens were followed clinically and submited to renal ultrasound and abdominal x ray to check the occurrence of adverse effects like hematoma or peri renal collections.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionNov 2008
- Study completionAug 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Urinary (Renal or Ureteral) StonesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- eduardo mazzucchi, md, Principal investigator, univesrity of sao paulo general hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01222325
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1183/06
- Status last verified
- Aug 2009
- First submitted
- 5 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Two Shock Wave Regimens Using Frequencies of 60 and 90 Impulses Per Minute for Urinary Stones
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01222325
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1183/06
- Conditions
- Urinary (Renal or Ureteral) Stones
- Keywords
- kidney calculi, urolithiasis, urologic surgical procedures, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Nov 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In order to check if a reduction in the frequency and total number of shocks delivered during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) results in a great number of stone-free patients,the investigators compared two different ways of treating urinary stones using SWL.
Detailed description
Purpose: Two different regimens of SWL delivery for treating urinary stones were compared.
Methods: After informed consent, patients with previously untreated renal and ureteric stones were admitted for an initial treatment by SWL between June 2008 and May 2009. Patients were randomly divided into two groups; one group received 3000 impulses at a rate of 60 impulses per minute, and the other received 4000 impulses at a rate of 90 impulses per minute. Patients submitted to re-treatment of the same stone were excluded. All treatments were done using the Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter. Stones were located by x-ray or ultrasound. Prior to treatment, patients were submitted to laboratory tests and a cardiologic evaluation when indicated. Urinary infections were treated prior to the SWL session. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Briefly, Tramadol 1-2 mg/kg associated to Propofol 2.5-3.0 mg/kg and scopolamine were employed in the majority of the procedures. Patients received 50-100 mg of diluted Tramadol and 20 mg of scopolamine just before the beginning of the SWL session and Propofol was maintained on continuous bomb infusion during the treatment and interrupted three minutes before the end of the session. All patients were maintained under spontaneous breathing, and a facial or a laryngeal oxygen mask was used according to the anesthesiologist's judgment. The potency of the lithotripter was increased progressively by 300 shocks until reaching the final stage, which occurred at a mean of 1500 shocks. The maximum potency employed was level 4 (equivalent to 14 kV) for renal stones and level 6 (16 kV) for ureteric stones.
All patients were treated on an outpatient basis and were discharged from the hospital six hours after treatment. All patients received non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Dipyrone in combination with to Hyoscine for three days postoperatively unless contraindicated and were instructed to come to the emergency department in case of severe pain, fever or hematuria.
The final results for each patient were assessed with a kidney and urinary bladder scan (KUB) plus an abdominal ultrasound three months after the procedure. Success was defined as stone-free status or the detection of residual fragments ≤ 3 mm on final evaluation. Partial fragmentation was considered to have occurred if a significant reduction in the stone burden was observed but residual fragments bigger than 3 mm remained.
We evaluated overall stone-free rates, the incidence of unchanged stones and the occurrence of partial fragmentation as well as the occurrence of significant complications in both groups.
The sample size required was based on the assumption that the estimated success rate would be 70% in the 3000 impulses at 60 impulses per minute group and 50% in the 4000 impulses at 90 impulses per minute group, with a type I error of 0.05 and a type II error of 0.05 (power of 80%). This yielded a projected sample size of 93 stones in each group.
Data were analyzed using the Fischer's exact, Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests; a level of significance of 5% was adopted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| swl 3000 impulses- 60 imp/min | Active comparator | Procedure: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL)patients in this group were submitted to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) 3000 impulses at 60 impulses per minute under general anesthesia. Unique session |
| swl- 4000 impulses - 90 impulses /min | Active comparator | Procedure: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL)patients in this group were submitted extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (swl) to 4000 impulses at 90 impulses per minute under general anesthesia- unique session |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients with renal or ureteral stones from 5 to 20 mm
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- pregnancy
- coagulation disturbs and antiplatelet treatment
- urinary tract infection
- aortic aneurism bigger than 2 cm
- clinical contraindication to general anesthesia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL)Also: lithotripsy, shock wavespatients were submitted to one session SWL at a Dornier Compact Delta lithotripter under general anesthesia under supervision of an anesthesiologist and an urologist. | Procedure or surgery | swl 3000 impulses- 60 imp/min, swl- 4000 impulses - 90 impulses /min |
Primary outcome
abdominal ultrasound and abdominal x rays (KUB)
Time frame: 3 months
patients submitted to SWL in two different regimens were submited to renal ultrasound and abdominal x rays (KUB) three months after procedure to check the occourrence of stone-free status, residual fragments or unmodified stone.
1 secondary outcome
adverse effects of the two different regimens
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2010.
Related trials for Urinary (Renal or Ureteral) Stones
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Stone and Laser Therapies Post-Market Study (SALT)
Benign Prostate Hypertrophy(BPH), Renal Calculi
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Radiomics and Image Segmentation of Urinary Stones by Artificial Intelligence
Urinary Stone, Renal Colic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
eduardo mazzucchi, md principal investigator
univesrity of sao paulo general hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in people with Urinary (Renal or Ureteral) Stones, run by University of Sao Paulo General Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
abdominal ultrasound and abdominal x rays (KUB) (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2010; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.