PeritonitisPhase 3ABDO-MIXNCT01222663
Effects of Hemoperfusion With a Polymyxin B Membrane in Peritonitis With Septic Shock
A Phase 3 study testing standard therapy and hemoperfusion in people with Peritonitis and Septic Shock, run by Meditor SAS at 18 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this randomized, comparative, open and multi-centre study is to show that two sessions of hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin performed within maximum 36 hours after the surgery of a peritonitis by hollow organ perforation reduce the mortality in patients suffering from septic shock. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peritonitis, Septic Shock
- What is being tested?
- standard therapy and hemoperfusion
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 243 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Oct 2010to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Confirmed community or nosocomial acquired peritonitis due to organ perforation
- Septic shock requiring catecholamine infusion started or maintained 2 hours after surgery
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- No severity criteria within the 8 hours following surgery
- Neutropenia due to chemotherapy or malignancy
- Abdominal sepsis without peritonitis
- Mesenteric ischemia without perforation
- Peritonitis due to appendicitis
Show all 12Show fewer
- Perforation linked to trauma
- Cirrhosis child C
- Impossibility to use heparin
- Prolonged cardiac arrest within 72h before surgery
- Terminal disease diagnosed during surgery
- Moribund subjects
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country.
18 sites in 1 country
France18 sites
Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital
Clermont-Ferrand, 63058
Dieppe Hospital
Dieppe, 76202
Vendée Hospital
La Roche-sur-Yon, 85925
Dr Schaffner Hospital
Lens, 62307
Lille University Hospital
Lille, 59037
Limoges University Hospital
Limoges, 87042
La Source Hospital
Orléans, 45067
Lariboisière University Hospital
Paris, 75010
Saint Louis Hospital
Paris, 75475
Saint Jean Hospital
Perpignan, 66046
Bordeaux University Hospital
Pessac, 33600
Poitiers University Hospital
Poitiers, 86021
Pontchaillou University Hospital
Rennes, 35033
Roanne Hospital
Roanne, 42300
Rouen University Hospital
Rouen, 76031
Saint-Malo Hospital
St-Malo, 35403
Strasbourg University Hospital
Strasbourg, 67091
Tours University Hospital
Tours, 37044
About this study
The purpose of this randomized, comparative, open and multi-centre study is to show that two sessions of hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin performed within maximum 36 hours after the surgery of a peritonitis by hollow organ perforation reduce the mortality in patients suffering from septic shock.
Read the detailed description
The mortality rate due to peritonitis associated to a severe sepsis or a septic shock remains high (between 40 and 60% as per the studies). The recent complementary therapies for severe sepsis have been reassessed (strict glycaemic control, substitutive corticotherapy, activated protein C). Early neutralisation of the endotoxaemia related to gram-negative bacilli sepsis in contact with hemoperfusion membrane covered with polymyxin B (Toraymyxin™) may enable reduction of the inflammatory reaction caused by sepsis and improve its prognosis. 30 studies, including 10 randomized studies, have compared hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin™ to the standard treatment, showing an improvement in the patients' haemodynamic state, oxygenation conditions and reduction in mortality. This treatment is commonly used in Japan. However, the studies conducted either include only a limited number of patients or are not randomized prospective studies. The post-hoc analysis of a recent randomized study conducted on a limited number of patients with abdominal septic shock shows a significant reduction in mortality after factor adjustment. Though the side effects of such a treatment are limited, its cost is high. Hence, extensive prospective studies are necessary to confirm its effectiveness.
- Conditions
- Peritonitis, Septic Shock
- Being tested
- standard therapy, hemoperfusion
- Keywords
- peritonitis, septic shock, hemoperfusion, Polymyxin B, endotoxin
- Medical subject headings
- Peritonitis, Shock, Septic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
standard therapyDevice
Standard therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate
hemoperfusionDevice
Also called toraymyxin, PMX-20R
Extracorporeal hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin PMX-20R and conventional medical therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard therapy | Other | Standard therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate Receives: Device: standard therapy |
| Hemoperfusion | Experimental | standard therapy + 2 sessions of hemoperfusion within the first 24 hours Receives: Device: standard therapy; Device: hemoperfusion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality
Measured: 28 days
Secondary outcomes (4)
organ failure assessed by SOFA score
Measured: day 3
delay to withdraw catecholamine after initial shock
Measured: day 1-day 28
mortality between the two groups at 7 dayx, 14 days, 21 days and 90 days
Measured: 90 days
number of participants with adverse events related to hemoperfusion technique including anticoagulation therapy such as bleeding (type and number of blood transfusion)
Measured: day1-day4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2010
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PeritonitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 243 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Meditor SAS
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Didier Payen, MD, Principal investigator, Lariboisière University HospitalRené Robert, MD, Principal investigator, Poitiers University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01222663
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2010-67-PMX
- Acronym
- ABDO-MIX
- Status last verified
- Dec 2013
- First submitted
- 8 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Payen DM, Guilhot J, Launey Y, Lukaszewicz AC, Kaaki M, Veber B, Pottecher J, Joannes-Boyau O, Martin-Lefevre L, Jabaudon M, Mimoz O, Coudroy R, Ferrandiere M, Kipnis E, Vela C, Chevallier S, Mallat J, Robert R; ABDOMIX Group. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jun;41(6):975-84. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3751-z. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
PubMed 25862039
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Hemoperfusion With a Polymyxin B Membrane in Peritonitis With Septic Shock
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01222663
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ABDO-MIX / 2010-67-PMX
- Conditions
- Peritonitis, Septic Shock
- Keywords
- peritonitis, septic shock, hemoperfusion, Polymyxin B, endotoxin
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 243 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Meditor SASIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2010
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this randomized, comparative, open and multi-centre study is to show that two sessions of hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin performed within maximum 36 hours after the surgery of a peritonitis by hollow organ perforation reduce the mortality in patients suffering from septic shock.
Detailed description
The mortality rate due to peritonitis associated to a severe sepsis or a septic shock remains high (between 40 and 60% as per the studies). The recent complementary therapies for severe sepsis have been reassessed (strict glycaemic control, substitutive corticotherapy, activated protein C). Early neutralisation of the endotoxaemia related to gram-negative bacilli sepsis in contact with hemoperfusion membrane covered with polymyxin B (Toraymyxin™) may enable reduction of the inflammatory reaction caused by sepsis and improve its prognosis. 30 studies, including 10 randomized studies, have compared hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin™ to the standard treatment, showing an improvement in the patients' haemodynamic state, oxygenation conditions and reduction in mortality. This treatment is commonly used in Japan. However, the studies conducted either include only a limited number of patients or are not randomized prospective studies. The post-hoc analysis of a recent randomized study conducted on a limited number of patients with abdominal septic shock shows a significant reduction in mortality after factor adjustment. Though the side effects of such a treatment are limited, its cost is high. Hence, extensive prospective studies are necessary to confirm its effectiveness.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard therapy | Other | Device: standard therapyStandard therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate |
| Hemoperfusion | Experimental | Device: standard therapy, Device: hemoperfusionstandard therapy + 2 sessions of hemoperfusion within the first 24 hours |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Confirmed community or nosocomial acquired peritonitis due to organ perforation
- Septic shock requiring catecholamine infusion started or maintained 2 hours after surgery
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Pregnancy
- No severity criteria within the 8 hours following surgery
- Neutropenia due to chemotherapy or malignancy
- Abdominal sepsis without peritonitis
- Mesenteric ischemia without perforation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| standard therapyStandard therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate | Device | Hemoperfusion, Standard therapy |
| hemoperfusionAlso: toraymyxin, PMX-20RExtracorporeal hemoperfusion with Toraymyxin PMX-20R and conventional medical therapy in the ICU including but not limited to: antibiotic therapy, nutrition, fluid challenge, vasopressors, hemodynamic monitoring, organ support in the ICU including mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy when appropriate. | Device | Hemoperfusion |
Primary outcome
Mortality
Time frame: 28 days
4 secondary outcomes
organ failure assessed by SOFA score
Time frame: day 3
delay to withdraw catecholamine after initial shock
Time frame: day 1-day 28
mortality between the two groups at 7 dayx, 14 days, 21 days and 90 days
Time frame: 90 days
number of participants with adverse events related to hemoperfusion technique including anticoagulation therapy such as bleeding (type and number of blood transfusion)
Time frame: day1-day4
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25862039Payen DM, Guilhot J, Launey Y, Lukaszewicz AC, Kaaki M, Veber B, Pottecher J, Joannes-Boyau O, Martin-Lefevre L, Jabaudon M, Mimoz O, Coudroy R, Ferrandiere M, Kipnis E, Vela C, Chevallier S, Mallat J, Robert R; ABDOMIX Group. Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Jun;41(6):975-84. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3751-z. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
Related trials for Peritonitis
Recruiting
Optimal Treatment Strategy for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis, Paracentesis
RecruitingObservational study
AIDE: Decision Support for Anastomosis or Colostomy in Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Diverticulitis
Complicated Diverticulitis, Acute Diverticulitis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Nitazoxanide in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
SBP - Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
N-Acetylcysteine in the Management of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
SBP - Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Recruiting
Vacuum Assisted Closure Versus On-demand Relaparotomy in Patients With Fecal or Diffuse Peritonitis
Fecal Peritonitis, Secondary Peritonitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Didier Payen, MD principal investigator
Lariboisière University Hospital
René Robert, MD principal investigator
Poitiers University Hospital
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing standard therapy and hemoperfusion in people with Peritonitis and Septic Shock, run by Meditor SAS at 18 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01222663, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2013.