AzTrials
AzTrials

CoagulopathyRapidTEGNCT01228058

A Prospective Evaluation of Thromboelastography for Identifying Coagulopathy in Severely Injured Patients

An observational study of Coagulopathy, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of thrombelastography (TEG) to predict and identify trauma patients at increased risk of receiving blood transfusion, develop multiple organ failure and mortality. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coagulopathy
What is being tested?
RapidTEG test
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
1,450 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2010to Jan 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The target population for this study is all major-trauma patients admitted to one of the three participating ACS-verified academic Level 1 trauma centers.

Who may be able to join

  • Major trauma patients who require the highest level of trauma team activation at each site.
  • Estimated age of 18 or higher
  • Transfers less than 6 hours post-injury Exclusion Criteria: -Children less than 18 years of age.
  • Burns > 20% of body surface area
  • CPR pre-hospital
  • Prisoners - defined as anyone directly admitted from a correctional facility

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • University of California - San Francisco

    San Francisco, California, 94110

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of thrombelastography (TEG) to predict and identify trauma patients at increased risk of receiving blood transfusion, develop multiple organ failure and mortality.

TEG has been proposed as a superior tool to rapidly diagnose and help guide resuscitation with blood products and preclinical data suggest that TEG is both more sensitive and specific than PT or PTT for coagulation abnormalities. Based on the preclinical work led by Dr. Holcomb, our hypothesis is that the Rapid TEG will help to identify these coagulopathic patients earlier, allow for rapid MT protocol activation, and assist in developing data driven blood product transfusion guidelines.

Read the detailed description

This protocol is based on the fact that approximately 30% of severely injured military and civilian patients have disturbances of coagulation immediately upon arrival to the trauma center by traditional coagulation testing. It is hypothesized that:

  1. the coagulopathy of these patients may be detected more rapidly with RapidTEG than with traditional coagulation testing (prothrombin time, PT; international normalized ratio, INR; activated partial thromboplastin time, aPTT).
  2. the disturbances in the different RapidTEG parameters will correlate with early blood product utilization.
  3. the RapidTEG parameters will correlate closely with patient outcomes.
  4. the Rapid TEG will be able to describe the changes that occur with coagulation over time and do so for patients with different injury mechanisms and severities

This group has recently completed enrollment on the PRospective, Observational, Multi-center Massive Transfusion sTudy (PROMMTT) to evaluate the process, the decision-making, and outcomes associated with MT. This trial is supported by a ten million dollar grant from the U.S. Department of Defense for the Center for Translational Injury Research (CeTIR) and it investigators to conduct a multi-site observational study of severely injured trauma patients who require blood transfusions. Through our efforts, we hope to determine the best method of identifying patients who will benefit from receiving different ratios of red blood cells to plasma to platelets. This study was also designed to evaluate existing MT protocols at ten leading trauma centers and to identify which protocols are associated with better survival. Results of this study will be used to develop a future randomized clinical trial that will test these protocols.

Building on the authors proven experience with (1) predictive scoring methods to predict massive transfusion, (2) creation and maturation of a massive transfusion protocol, and (3) design of large, multi-institutional studies, the PROMMTT investigators will conduct a prospective cohort study of severely injured patients (major trauma activations) arriving to three ACS-verified academic Level 1 Trauma Centers, in which the following 3 aims will be addressed:

  1. To determine the prevalence and severity of immediate disturbances in coagulation by both RapidTEG and conventional coagulation parameters among major trauma activations.
  2. To determine if there are specific abnormalities of RapidTEG that correlate with specific early blood product utilization.
  3. To determine if RapidTEG abnormalities, when compared to kaolin-activated TEG, PT, INR and aPTT, correlate with patient outcomes in severely injured patients.
  4. To determine the temporal relationship between RapidTEG parameters and anatomic injury, mechanism of injury, and severity of injury.

TEG has been proposed as a superior tool to rapidly diagnose and help guide resuscitation with blood products and preclinical data suggest that TEG is both more sensitive and specific than PT or PTT for coagulation abnormalities. Based on the preclinical work led by Dr Holcomb, we feel that the Rapid TEG will help to identify these coagulopathic patients earlier, allow for rapid MT protocol activation, and assist in developing data driven blood product transfusion guidelines. While the TEG machine is not new, widespread and thoughtful implementation in the trauma arena has not occurred. There are no transfusion algorithms constructed on large numbers of patients, admission TEG and PT/PTT values, transfusion amounts and patient outcomes. We feel that a logical step-by-step program that first constructs a data driven algorithm, and then validates the algorithm is the safest pathway to follow.

We plan to perform RapidTEG upon admission, at 3-hours post-admission, 6-hours post-admission, 12-hours post-admission, 24-hours post-admission, and then daily for 4 additional days. Blood samples (2 mL non-citrated fresh whole blood) will be obtained in addition to standard blood samples for major trauma patients. RapidTEG will be performed using the Thrombelastograph 5000 (Hemoscope Corporation, Niles, IL). Coagulation will be activated by tissue factor. Standard parameters will be obtained using Hemoscope software: TEG-ACT, r-time, K-time, alpha angle, maximum amplitude (mA), and LY30. In addition to RapidTEG, we plan to perform conventional kaolin-activated TEG, prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), activated thromboplastin time (aPTT), and platelet count using standard methods. The time from obtaining the blood sample until the time that the results are made available will also be recorded for all parameters tested. For the RapidTEG, this will include the final results for the test as well as the times that the TEG-ACT, alpha angle, and MA become available by graphical display.

Conditions
Coagulopathy
Being tested
RapidTEG test
Keywords
Trauma, Coagulopathy, Coagulopathy in adult trauma patients
Medical subject headings
Hemostatic Disorders, Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RapidTEG testProcedure or surgery

    The RapidTEG test will be done at the study time points (3, 6, 12, 24 hours and 4 addiitonal days).

Study groups in NCT01228058
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adult trauma patientsPatients admitted to the emergency department (ED) as the highest level of acuity following a traumatic injury at three Level 1 trauma centers in the United States (UT Houston, UC San Francisco, Oregon Health Center).
Receives: Procedure: RapidTEG test

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To determine the prevalence and severity of immediate disturbances in coagulation by both RapidTEG and conventional coagulation parameters among major trauma activations.

    Measured: First 5 days of hospitalization

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. To determine if there are specific abnormalities of RapidTEG that correlate with specific early blood product utilization.

    Measured: First 5 days of hospitalization

  2. To determine if RapidTEG abnormalities, when compared to kaolin-activated TEG, PT, INR and aPTT, correlate with patient outcomes in severely injured patients.

    Measured: First 5 days of hospitalization

  3. To determine the temporal relationship between rapid TEG parameters and anatomic injury, mechanism of injury, and severity of injury.

    Measured: First 5 days of hospitalization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Oct 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2012
  4. Study completionJan 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,450 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01228058
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSC-MS-10-0160
Acronym
RapidTEG
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
20 Oct 2010
Last updated
18 Dec 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Acosta JA, Yang JC, Winchell RJ, Simons RK, Fortlage DA, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, Hoyt DB. Lethal injuries and time to death in a level I trauma center. J Am Coll Surg. 1998 May;186(5):528-33. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00082-9.

    PubMed 9583692
  • Brohi K, Singh J, Heron M, Coats T. Acute traumatic coagulopathy. J Trauma. 2003 Jun;54(6):1127-30. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000069184.82147.06.

    PubMed 12813333
  • Cotton BA, Gunter OL, Isbell J, Au BK, Robertson AM, Morris JA Jr, St Jacques P, Young PP. Damage control hematology: the impact of a trauma exsanguination protocol on survival and blood product utilization. J Trauma. 2008 May;64(5):1177-82; discussion 1182-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816c5c80.

    PubMed 18469638
  • Niles SE, McLaughlin DF, Perkins JG, Wade CE, Li Y, Spinella PC, Holcomb JB. Increased mortality associated with the early coagulopathy of trauma in combat casualties. J Trauma. 2008 Jun;64(6):1459-63; discussion 1463-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318174e8bc.

    PubMed 18545109
  • MacLeod JB, Lynn M, McKenney MG, Cohn SM, Murtha M. Early coagulopathy predicts mortality in trauma. J Trauma. 2003 Jul;55(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000075338.21177.EF.

    PubMed 12855879
  • Cotton BA, Au BK, Nunez TC, Gunter OL, Robertson AM, Young PP. Predefined massive transfusion protocols are associated with a reduction in organ failure and postinjury complications. J Trauma. 2009 Jan;66(1):41-8; discussion 48-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819313bb.

    PubMed 19131804

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coagulopathy, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To determine the prevalence and severity of immediate disturbances in coagulation by both RapidTEG and conventional coagulation parameters among major trauma activations. (time frame: First 5 days of hospitalization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01228058, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in