AzTrials
AzTrials

Shock, SepticSEPSICOAGNCT01231672

Prospective Validation of Clini-biological Parameters Including Initial Hemostasis, Which Improve the Prediction of Death at 1 Month Among Patients With Septic Shock

An observational study of Shock, Septic, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 7 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prognostic score was proposed by the investigative team to predict death at 1 month. This score is based on certain biological markers, scored under emergency conditions in the first 24 hours of routine clinical practice management for septic shock. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Shock, Septic
What is being tested?
Routine biological analyses
How many people
780 participants
Where
7 sitesFrance
Study dates
Apr 2009to 30 Oct 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Severe septic shock patients entering intensive care units in the participating centers.

Who may be able to join

  • patient (or representative) received the information notice
  • patient has hemodynamic insufficiency of non-traumatic or cardiogenic origin associated with severe sepsis (treated with Noradrenalin) and organ dysfunction, hypoperfusion or hypotension
  • body temperature > 38.3°C or < 36°C
  • heart rate > 90 bpm
  • Tachypnea > 20 C/min or PaCO2 < 32 mmHg or mechanical ventilation
  • leukocytes > 12000 µL-1 ou < 4000 µL-1 ou > 10% immature forms
Show all 13Show fewer
  • oliguria < 0.5 ml/kg/h for at least 2 hours
  • abrupt alteration (24 h) of conscienceness
  • thrombocytopenia < 100 000 G/L or disseminated intravascular coagulation
  • mottled skin and / or capillary refill time> 3 sec
  • PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg ou < 40KPas
  • Lactatemia > 2mMol/l
  • septic shock: Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) > 90 mmHg or need for vasopressors to maintain SBP> 90 mmHg despite a prior filling (20-30 ml / kg of macromolecules or 40 to 60 ml / kg of normal saline (or decrease in SBP> 40% in the hypertensive)

Who cannot join

  • patient is dying or limitation or cessation of active treatment
  • patient is already included in another trial
  • patient or family refusal
  • patient not affiliated with a social security system

Trial locations and contacts

7 sites in 1 country.

7 sites in 1 country

France7 sites
  • CHU de Clermont Ferrand - Hôpital Estaing

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

  • APHM - Hôpital de la Conception

    Marseille, 13385

  • AP-HM Hôpital Nord

    Marseille, 13915

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier

    Montpellier

  • CHU de Nice

    Nice

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

    Nîmes, 30029

  • CHU de Saint Etienne

    Saint-Etienne, 42055

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation and Prospective Validation of Clini-biological Parameters Including Initial Hemostasis, Which Improve the Prediction of Death at 1 Month Among Patients Entering Intensive Care Units for Septic Shock

A prognostic score was proposed by the investigative team to predict death at 1 month. This score is based on certain biological markers, scored under emergency conditions in the first 24 hours of routine clinical practice management for septic shock.

The main objective of this multicenter study is to validate the performance of the score in terms of area under the ROC curve and negative predictive value.

Read the detailed description

There are two secondary objectives:

  • Validate a prognostic score for death at the end of the first week from initial data.
  • Validate a predictive score of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in patients with septic shock by comparing with the Gold Standard of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (overt-DIC in the first 5 days after inclusion).

As for the main objective, these scores are based on biological markers scored under emergency situations within the first 24 hours of routine clinical practice management for septic shock.

The objectives and endpoints stated correspond to the protocol directly submitted to ethics authorities prior to the first inclusion and can be verified by contacting the Committee for the Protection of Persons Sud Mediterranée III (mail: CPP SUD-MEDITERRANEE III, UFR MEDECINE 186, chemin du Carreau de Lanes CS 83021, 30908 NIMES Cedex 2 FRANCE. Study reference: 2008.11.04 bis) For more information: carey.suehs@chu-nimes.fr

Conditions
Shock, Septic
Being tested
Routine biological analyses
Medical subject headings
Shock, Septic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Routine biological analysesBiological

    Bilirubinemia (total and conjugated), hematology, hemogram, SOFA score

Study groups in NCT01231672
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Septic shock patientsNot described
Receives: Biological: Routine biological analyses

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. AUC of the studied prognostic score

    The biological parameters measured at the time of admission to the intensive care unit and that make up the prognostic score for death at 1 month will be collected. The event "death within 1 month" will be analyzed. For patients discharged from service before the end of the first month, the clinician will still be informed concerning possible death.

    The studied biological parameters correspond to routine coagulation and hematological parameters for patients in septic shock, according to SFAR (Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation) recommendations and the SRLF (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française) Consensus (2002).

    Measured: 24 hours (studied score parameters); 1 month (mortality)

  2. Negative predictive value of the studied prognostic score

    The biological parameters measured at the time of admission to the intensive care unit and that make up the prognostic score for death at 1 month will be collected. The event "death within 1 month" will be analyzed. For patients discharged from service before the end of the first month, the clinician will still be informed concerning possible death.

    The studied biological parameters correspond to routine coagulation and hematological parameters for patients in septic shock, according to SFAR (Société Française d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation) recommendations and the SRLF (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française) Consensus (2002).

    Measured: 24 hours (studied score parameters); 1 month (mortality)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. AUC of the studied prognostic score

    Biological parameters at the time of intensive care unit admission and making up the prognostic score for death at 1 week will be collected. The event "death within 1 week" will be analyzed. For patients discharged from the department before the end of the first week, the clinician will still be informed of possible death. For the prognostic score at 1 week, a single biological parameter is used: fibrinogen. Age and SAPSII are also included in the score.

    Measured: 24 hours (studied score parameters); 1 week (mortality)

  2. Negative predictive value of the studied prognostic score

    Biological parameters at the time of intensive care unit admission and making up the prognostic score for death at 1 week will be collected. The event "death within 1 week" will be analyzed. For patients discharged from the department before the end of the first week, the clinician will still be informed of possible death. For the prognostic score at 1 week, a single biological parameter is used: fibrinogen. Age and SAPSII are also included in the score.

    Measured: 24 hours (studied score parameters); 1 week (mortality)

  3. AUC of the studied prognostic score

    Our secondary objective is to validate a clinicobiological score, including hemostasis parameters (clotting factors and coagulation activation) and a clinical score (SOFA) for predicting the occurrence of DIC in the first 5 days after inclusion.

    The DIC score will be calculated according to ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis) recommandations (Taylor et al, 2001).

    Measured: 24 hours (studied score parameters); 5 days (DIC)

  4. Negative predictive value for the studied prognostic score

    Our secondary objective is to validate a clinicobiological score, including hemostasis parameters (clotting factors and coagulation activation) and a clinical score (SOFA) for predicting the occurrence of DIC in the first 5 days after inclusion.

    The DIC score will be calculated according to ISTH (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis) recommandations (Taylor et al, 2001).

    Measured: 24 hours (studied score parameters); 5 days (DIC)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Nov 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2009
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2013
  4. Study completion30 Oct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
780 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01231672
Sponsor's protocol ID
PHRC-I/2008/GL-03
Other IDs
2008-A01214-51
Acronym
SEPSICOAG
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
29 Oct 2010
Last updated
17 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Gris JC, Faillie JL, Cochery-Nouvellon E, Lissalde-Lavigne G, Lefrant JY. ISTH overt disseminated intravascular coagulation score in patients with septic shock: automated immunoturbidimetric soluble fibrin assay vs. D-dimer assay. J Thromb Haemost. 2011 Jun;9(6):1252-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04270.x. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21645228

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Shock, Septic, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 7 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 7 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

AUC of the studied prognostic score (time frame: 24 hours (studied score parameters); 1 month (mortality)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01231672, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in