Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4COMPARE-IINCT01233453
Comparison of the Everolimus Eluting With the Biolimus A9 Eluting Stent
A Phase 4 study testing the everolimus eluting ® stent and the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Maasstad Hospital at 11 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, randomized, multi center study. Approximately 2700 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 2:1 basis. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized to the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® stent versus the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI®… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- the everolimus eluting ® stent and the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,700 participants
- Where
- 11 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient is at least 18 years old and has a life expectancy of 5 years.
- Patient undergoes a PCI procedure for indications according to the Dutch and European guidelines
- Patient is willing to comply with the extended follow-up period of 2 to 5 years(for secondary endpoint only)
- Reference lumen diameter of the treated vessels between 2.0 - 4.0 mm.
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Expected non-adherence to dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year (e.g: known allergy to ASA or thienopyridines like clopidogrel)
- Expected major surgery within 30 days (these patients will receive bare metal stents)
- Cardiogenic shock (Kilip class 4)
- Previous PCI procedures with implantation of drug eluting stents within 1 year.
- Expected loss for follow up
- Enrollment in an investigative stent study with different stents
- Inability to implant Nobori or Xience-V / Promus stent(s)
Trial locations and contacts
11 sites in 4 countries.
11 sites in 4 countries
Netherlands4 sites
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
Amsterdam
Amphia Ziekenhuis
Breda
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
Leeuwarden
Maasstad Hospital
Rotterdam
Spain4 sites
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Juan Canalejo
A Coruña
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario Virgen Arrixaca
Murcia
Hospital Clinico universitario de Santiago de Compostella
Santiago de Compostela
Switzerland2 sites
Kantonsspital Aarau
Aarau
Hopital Cantonal de Fribourg
Fribourg
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Everolimus Eluting (XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® Stent) With the Biolimus A9 Eluting NOBORI® Stent in All-comers: a Randomized Open Label Study
This is a prospective, randomized, multi center study. Approximately 2700 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 2:1 basis. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized to the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® stent versus the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent. Patients will be followed for 5 years.
Read the detailed description
The main objective of the study is a head to head comparison of the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V ®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS ® stent with the biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent in order to observe whether there is a difference in clinical outcome between both stents in a real world / all-comer situation.
Clinical outcome of both stents will be assessed by the composite end point of: cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization.
Endpoints
The primary end point of the study is the composite of safety (cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction) and efficacy (target vessel revascularization) at 12 months.
The secondary end points of the study are:
- The combined endpoint of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction, ischemic driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 12 months follow-up.
- Incidence of Cardiac Death and Post-Procedural (>48h) MI rate at 12 months, 3 and 5 years C) Target lesion revascularization at 12 months, 3 and 5 years D) The combined endpoint of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate at 3 and 5 years follow-up.
- The combined endpoint of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization at 12 months, 3 and 5 years in STEMI patients, small vessels (< 2.75 mm RVD), long lesions (> 20 mm), female patients, DM patients and octogenarians. F) Procedural performance at the index procedures, measured by the ability to cross the lesions with the designated DES stent.
- Incidence of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 12 months, 3 and 5 years time.
- Incidence of definite, probable and possible stent thrombosis at 12 months, 3 and5 years time.
Overview of the study
This is a prospective, randomized, multi center study. Approximately 2700 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 2:1 basis. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized to the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® stent versus the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent. Patients will be followed for 5 years.
The study population will consist of approximately 2700 patients (1 year enrollment of consecutive all-comers referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery or by-pass grafts lesions). Patients must meet all eligibility criteria for inclusion into the study.
Randomization will be performed by using a closed envelope with code N for the NOBORI stent and code E for the Everolimus eluting stent. Duration of the study The enrollment phase will start January 2009 and will stop December 2010. The followup phase will last till December 2015.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- the everolimus eluting ® stent, the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
the everolimus eluting ® stentDevice
stenting in coronary artery disease using the XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® stent
the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stentDevice
stenting in coronary artery disease using the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| the everolimus eluting ® stent | Active comparator | the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® stent Receives: Device: the everolimus eluting ® stent |
| Biolimus A9 stent | Active comparator | the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent Receives: Device: the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Major adverse coronary events
composite of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Major adverse coronary events
The combined endpoint of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction, ischemic driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Safety of stenting with drug eluting stents
Incidence of Cardiac Death and Post-Procedural (>48h) MI rate at 12 months, 3 and 5 years
Measured: 5 years
Target lesion revascularization
Target lesion revascularization at 12 months, 3 and 5 years
Measured: 5 years
Late major adverse coronary events
The combined endpoint of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate at 3 and 5 years follow-up.
Measured: 5 years
Major adverse coronary events in subgroups
The combined endpoint of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization at 12 months, 3 and 5 years in STEMI patients, small vessels (< 2.75 mm RVD), long lesions (> 20 mm), female patients, DM patients and octogenarians
Measured: 5 years
Procedural performance
Procedural performance at the index procedures, measured by the ability to cross the lesions with the designated DES stent.
Measured: 1 year
Stent Thrombosis
Incidence of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 12 months, 3 and 5 years time.
Incidence of definite, probable or possible stent thrombosis at 12 months, 3 and 5 years time
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,700 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maasstad Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pieter C Smits, MD, PHD, Principal investigator, Maasstad ZiekenhuisA Serra, MD, Study chair, Hospital del MarA J van Boven, MD, PHD, Study chair, Medisch Centrum LeeuwardenJ J Goy, MD, Study chair, Hopital Cantonal de FribourgV Voudris, MD, Study chair, Onassis Heart Centre, Athens
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01233453
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL25754.101.08
- Acronym
- COMPARE-II
- Status last verified
- Jan 2014
- First submitted
- 28 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Vlachojannis GJ, Smits PC, Hofma SH, Togni M, Vazquez N, Valdes M, Voudris V, Puricel S, Slagboom T, Goy JJ, den Heijer P, van der Ent M. Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: three-year follow-up of the COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) trial. EuroIntervention. 2015 Jul;11(3):272-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I3A53.
PubMed 26196753Smits PC, Hofma S, Togni M, Vazquez N, Valdes M, Voudris V, Slagboom T, Goy JJ, Vuillomenet A, Serra A, Nouche RT, den Heijer P, van der Ent M. Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):651-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61852-2. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
PubMed 23374650
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Everolimus Eluting (XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® Stent) With the Biolimus A9 Eluting NOBORI® Stent in All-comers: a Randomized Open Label Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01233453
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COMPARE-II / NL25754.101.08
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 2,700 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Maasstad HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, randomized, multi center study. Approximately 2700 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 2:1 basis. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized to the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® stent versus the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent. Patients will be followed for 5 years.
Detailed description
The main objective of the study is a head to head comparison of the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V ®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS ® stent with the biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent in order to observe whether there is a difference in clinical outcome between both stents in a real world / all-comer situation.
Clinical outcome of both stents will be assessed by the composite end point of: cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization.
Endpoints
The primary end point of the study is the composite of safety (cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction) and efficacy (target vessel revascularization) at 12 months.
The secondary end points of the study are:
- The combined endpoint of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction, ischemic driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 12 months follow-up.
- Incidence of Cardiac Death and Post-Procedural (>48h) MI rate at 12 months, 3 and 5 years C) Target lesion revascularization at 12 months, 3 and 5 years D) The combined endpoint of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate at 3 and 5 years follow-up.
- The combined endpoint of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization at 12 months, 3 and 5 years in STEMI patients, small vessels (< 2.75 mm RVD), long lesions (> 20 mm), female patients, DM patients and octogenarians. F) Procedural performance at the index procedures, measured by the ability to cross the lesions with the designated DES stent.
- Incidence of definite and probable stent thrombosis at 12 months, 3 and 5 years time.
- Incidence of definite, probable and possible stent thrombosis at 12 months, 3 and5 years time.
Overview of the study
This is a prospective, randomized, multi center study. Approximately 2700 patients will be entered in the study and will be randomized on a 2:1 basis. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized to the everolimus eluting XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® stent versus the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent. Patients will be followed for 5 years.
The study population will consist of approximately 2700 patients (1 year enrollment of consecutive all-comers referred for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with coronary artery or by-pass grafts lesions). Patients must meet all eligibility criteria for inclusion into the study.
Randomization will be performed by using a closed envelope with code N for the NOBORI stent and code E for the Everolimus eluting stent. Duration of the study The enrollment phase will start January 2009 and will stop December 2010. The followup phase will last till December 2015.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| the everolimus eluting ® stent | Active comparator | Device: the everolimus eluting ® stentthe everolimus eluting XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® stent |
| Biolimus A9 stent | Active comparator | Device: the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stentthe Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The patient is at least 18 years old and has a life expectancy of 5 years.
- Patient undergoes a PCI procedure for indications according to the Dutch and European guidelines
- Patient is willing to comply with the extended follow-up period of 2 to 5 years(for secondary endpoint only)
- Reference lumen diameter of the treated vessels between 2.0 - 4.0 mm.
- Informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Expected non-adherence to dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year (e.g: known allergy to ASA or thienopyridines like clopidogrel)
- Expected major surgery within 30 days (these patients will receive bare metal stents)
- Cardiogenic shock (Kilip class 4)
- Previous PCI procedures with implantation of drug eluting stents within 1 year.
- Expected loss for follow up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| the everolimus eluting ® stentstenting in coronary artery disease using the XIENCE-V®, XIENCE-Prime® or PROMUS® stent | Device | the everolimus eluting ® stent |
| the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stentstenting in coronary artery disease using the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent | Device | Biolimus A9 stent |
Primary outcome
Major adverse coronary events
Time frame: 12 months
composite of cardiac death, non fatal myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularization
7 secondary outcomes
Major adverse coronary events
Time frame: 12 months
Safety of stenting with drug eluting stents
Time frame: 5 years
Target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 5 years
Late major adverse coronary events
Time frame: 5 years
Major adverse coronary events in subgroups
Time frame: 5 years
Procedural performance
Time frame: 1 year
Stent Thrombosis
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26196753Vlachojannis GJ, Smits PC, Hofma SH, Togni M, Vazquez N, Valdes M, Voudris V, Puricel S, Slagboom T, Goy JJ, den Heijer P, van der Ent M. Long-term clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: three-year follow-up of the COMPARE II (Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent) trial. EuroIntervention. 2015 Jul;11(3):272-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I3A53.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23374650Smits PC, Hofma S, Togni M, Vazquez N, Valdes M, Voudris V, Slagboom T, Goy JJ, Vuillomenet A, Serra A, Nouche RT, den Heijer P, van der Ent M. Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (COMPARE II): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013 Feb 23;381(9867):651-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61852-2. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pieter C Smits, MD, PHD principal investigator
Maasstad Ziekenhuis
A Serra, MD study chair
Hospital del Mar
A J van Boven, MD, PHD study chair
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden
11 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing the everolimus eluting ® stent and the Biolimus A9 eluting NOBORI® stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Maasstad Hospital at 11 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 11 sites in Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Major adverse coronary events (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01233453, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2014.