AphasiaNCT01234090
Living With Aphasia: An International Study
An observational study of Aphasia, run by NYU Langone Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This prospective cohort study hypothesizes that an analysis of parallel qualitative and quantitative data is necessary to examine the full experience of living with aphasia. It is also hypothesized that there are specific factors that act as barriers or facilitators to successfully living with aphasia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aphasia
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to May 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Inpatient/outpatient hospital population
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age and older, willingness to be videotaped, first incidence of aphasia secondary to stroke with stroke onset ≤2.5
- months pre-stroke or 3.5 months post-stroke with no significant complicating concomitant conditions (e.g. dementia, schizophrenia),
- premorbid fluency/literacy in English, and no history of psychiatric disorder, and sufficient communication ability (including adequate hearing and vision) in English to participate in an interview as determined by a qualified speech pathologist based on administration of the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical observation.
- participants will be enrolled in the study at 3 months post onset (+/- 2 weeks) wherever they are living, and presence of aphasia will be confirmed at the beginning of the first interview using the Aphasia Quotient cut offs of the Western Aphasia Battery.
- participants with severe global aphasia will only be excluded after the interview if meaningful responses cannot be obtained using all available communication support tools. Hence, participants with a range of aphasia severity will be included.
Who cannot join
- unwillingness to be videotaped
- onset of stroke <2.5 months post and >3.5 months post
- moderate or severe dementia
- symptoms of another preexisting neurological condition other than or in addition to aphasia due to stroke, or drug abuse
- neurological surgical treatment not including a surgical treatment specifically for treatment of stroke, absence of aphasia.
- no subjects will have a hearing loss unexpected for his/her chronological age.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
New York University School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10016
About this study
This prospective cohort study hypothesizes that an analysis of parallel qualitative and quantitative data is necessary to examine the full experience of living with aphasia. It is also hypothesized that there are specific factors that act as barriers or facilitators to successfully living with aphasia. A unique aspect of the project is the use of the Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA), a new aphasia friendly measure based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO ICF). Each session will assess written and spoken language, functional communication, mobility, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) function, burden of stroke, quality of life, and depression.
Read the detailed description
Synopsis: This three year longitudinal study, based on a gerontological model, was the product of an Aphasia Think-Tank established in Toronto in 2007. The original concept and design, developed at Queensland Hospital in Australia, has been recently funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Rationale: Aphasia, which occurs in 30% of ischemic first strokes, is known to have a negative impact on quality of life, increase the incidence of post-stroke depression, be associated with a loss of self identity, and have a widespread effect on partners, children, siblings, and friends. Research conducted in Australia and the United Kingdom (UK) provides evidence that many persons living successfully with aphasia do not attribute their successes to speech-language pathology and rehabilitation services. Inappropriate, irrelevant, inaccessible, or non-existent required services have been cited. It has also been reported that current speech-language pathology service providers lack an overall understanding of the long term goals of aphasia rehabilitation and how these objectives may be achieved.
Hypothesis: It is hypothesized that an analysis of parallel qualitative and quantitative data is necessary to examine the full experience of living with aphasia; it is also hypothesized that there are specific factors that act as barriers or facilitators to successfully living with aphasia.
Methodology: The primary study site of this international research is the Community Disability Centre of the School of Health and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Queensland. The Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine will collaborate by following, to the extent possible, the same protocols as the Australian team with respect to subject selection criteria, measures used, and test time-points. This is a prospective cohort study which uses parallel qualitative and quantitative (mixed) methods in a unique way to quantify the extent of and statistically model the relationship of the determinants to self-rated "successfully living with aphasia". Furthermore, it will permit an understanding of the underlying reasons (the why and how) behind the relationships. A unique aspect of the project is the use of the Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA), a new, aphasia friendly measure based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO ICF). It is a specialized tool using a self-rating scale and is focused on specific themes that have emerged from previous research. 204 subjects will be recruited who consent to being examined at 3, 6, and 12 months post-stroke. Considering an attrition rate of 25%, it is estimated that 153 subjects will provide the study data. Each session will be videotaped and consist of the administration of a demographic questionnaire, the Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA), the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (a standardized measure which investigates language understanding and expression), a social-convoy model, the Barthel Index, the Wepman Self-Correction Scale, and the Aphasic Depression Rating Scale.
Anticipated Results: The outcomes of this project will lead to better services for people with aphasia via a fully articulated model of the predictive factors of success following aphasia. Not only will a statistical model be generated but the meaning of the factors and the relationships between them will be explained through the qualitative studies. For example, if decreasing social network size and satisfaction is a significant predictor variable of successfully living with aphasia, then rehabilitation services must target the loss of social networks in the first year through a variety of available but infrequently used interventions (e.g. communication partner training. The qualitative data will describe how social networks have changed (e.g. less contact with friends or formal groups) and why (e.g. communication or mobility issues) so that appropriate interventions are targeted to the correct group. This research will lead to substantial changes across the continuum of all aphasia rehabilitation services throughout the United States. Specifically, it will improve meaningful outcomes for persons with aphasia in terms of how to live successfully with aphasia. Results will also streamline aphasia services so that they meet the needs of this seriously disabled population who often cannot speak for themselves and rely on costly services for many years after their stroke. This international project will lead the way in changing speech pathology practices to meet the needs of people with aphasia around the world.
- Conditions
- Aphasia
- Keywords
- Aphasia, Quality of Life
- Medical subject headings
- Aphasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Persons with Aphasia | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Assessment for Living with Aphasia
A new, aphasia friendly measure based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. It is a specialized tool using a self-rating scale and is focused on specific themes that have emerged from previous research.
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Western Aphasia Battery - Revised
This measure is designed to assess clinical aspects of language functions in aphasic patients and to provide the data needed to establish a prognosis for therapy.
Measured: 9 months
Successfully Living with Aphasia Rating Scale
This scale is a quantitative self-rating of how successfully a person is living with aphasia.
Measured: 9 months
Burden of Stroke Scale
The Burden of Stroke Scale is a health-status assessment instrument designed to measure patient-reported difficulty in multiple domains of functioning, psychological distress associated with specific functional limitations, and general well-being in stroke survivors.
Measured: 9 months
Aphasia Depression Rating Scale
The Aphasic Depression Rating Scale (ADRS) was developed to detect and measure depression in aphasic patients during the subacute stage of stroke.
Measured: 9 months
The Wepman Self-Correction Scale
This scale, based on a continuum, measures disturbances in the ability of the person with aphasia to self-correct speech and language errors.
Measured: 9 months
The Barthel Index
This measure is a simple index of independence to score the ability of a patient with a neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorder to care for himself.
Measured: 9 months
The Functional Communication Profile
This rating scale is for persons with aphasia which considers 45 everyday communication behaviors. Ratings of each behavior are made on a 9-point scale, based on observations of the patient during an informal conversation.
Measured: 9 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Why it stopped: Funding stopped
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AphasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by NYU Langone HealthThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Solomon Foundation, The University of Queensland
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Martha T Sarno, MA,Dhonorary, Principal investigator, NYU Langone Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01234090
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10-01628
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Living With Aphasia: An International Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01234090
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10-01628
- Conditions
- Aphasia
- Keywords
- Aphasia, Quality of Life
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Funding stopped
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- The Solomon Foundation, The University of Queensland
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective cohort study hypothesizes that an analysis of parallel qualitative and quantitative data is necessary to examine the full experience of living with aphasia. It is also hypothesized that there are specific factors that act as barriers or facilitators to successfully living with aphasia. A unique aspect of the project is the use of the Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA), a new aphasia friendly measure based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO ICF). Each session will assess written and spoken language, functional communication, mobility, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) function, burden of stroke, quality of life, and depression.
Detailed description
Synopsis: This three year longitudinal study, based on a gerontological model, was the product of an Aphasia Think-Tank established in Toronto in 2007. The original concept and design, developed at Queensland Hospital in Australia, has been recently funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.
Rationale: Aphasia, which occurs in 30% of ischemic first strokes, is known to have a negative impact on quality of life, increase the incidence of post-stroke depression, be associated with a loss of self identity, and have a widespread effect on partners, children, siblings, and friends. Research conducted in Australia and the United Kingdom (UK) provides evidence that many persons living successfully with aphasia do not attribute their successes to speech-language pathology and rehabilitation services. Inappropriate, irrelevant, inaccessible, or non-existent required services have been cited. It has also been reported that current speech-language pathology service providers lack an overall understanding of the long term goals of aphasia rehabilitation and how these objectives may be achieved.
Hypothesis: It is hypothesized that an analysis of parallel qualitative and quantitative data is necessary to examine the full experience of living with aphasia; it is also hypothesized that there are specific factors that act as barriers or facilitators to successfully living with aphasia.
Methodology: The primary study site of this international research is the Community Disability Centre of the School of Health and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Queensland. The Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University (NYU) School of Medicine will collaborate by following, to the extent possible, the same protocols as the Australian team with respect to subject selection criteria, measures used, and test time-points. This is a prospective cohort study which uses parallel qualitative and quantitative (mixed) methods in a unique way to quantify the extent of and statistically model the relationship of the determinants to self-rated "successfully living with aphasia". Furthermore, it will permit an understanding of the underlying reasons (the why and how) behind the relationships. A unique aspect of the project is the use of the Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA), a new, aphasia friendly measure based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (WHO ICF). It is a specialized tool using a self-rating scale and is focused on specific themes that have emerged from previous research. 204 subjects will be recruited who consent to being examined at 3, 6, and 12 months post-stroke. Considering an attrition rate of 25%, it is estimated that 153 subjects will provide the study data. Each session will be videotaped and consist of the administration of a demographic questionnaire, the Assessment for Living with Aphasia (ALA), the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (a standardized measure which investigates language understanding and expression), a social-convoy model, the Barthel Index, the Wepman Self-Correction Scale, and the Aphasic Depression Rating Scale.
Anticipated Results: The outcomes of this project will lead to better services for people with aphasia via a fully articulated model of the predictive factors of success following aphasia. Not only will a statistical model be generated but the meaning of the factors and the relationships between them will be explained through the qualitative studies. For example, if decreasing social network size and satisfaction is a significant predictor variable of successfully living with aphasia, then rehabilitation services must target the loss of social networks in the first year through a variety of available but infrequently used interventions (e.g. communication partner training. The qualitative data will describe how social networks have changed (e.g. less contact with friends or formal groups) and why (e.g. communication or mobility issues) so that appropriate interventions are targeted to the correct group. This research will lead to substantial changes across the continuum of all aphasia rehabilitation services throughout the United States. Specifically, it will improve meaningful outcomes for persons with aphasia in terms of how to live successfully with aphasia. Results will also streamline aphasia services so that they meet the needs of this seriously disabled population who often cannot speak for themselves and rely on costly services for many years after their stroke. This international project will lead the way in changing speech pathology practices to meet the needs of people with aphasia around the world.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Persons with Aphasia | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Inpatient/outpatient hospital population
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 18 years of age and older, willingness to be videotaped, first incidence of aphasia secondary to stroke with stroke onset ≤2.5
- months pre-stroke or 3.5 months post-stroke with no significant complicating concomitant conditions (e.g. dementia, schizophrenia),
- premorbid fluency/literacy in English, and no history of psychiatric disorder, and sufficient communication ability (including adequate hearing and vision) in English to participate in an interview as determined by a qualified speech pathologist based on administration of the Western Aphasia Battery - Revised and clinical observation.
- participants will be enrolled in the study at 3 months post onset (+/- 2 weeks) wherever they are living, and presence of aphasia will be confirmed at the beginning of the first interview using the Aphasia Quotient cut offs of the Western Aphasia Battery.
- participants with severe global aphasia will only be excluded after the interview if meaningful responses cannot be obtained using all available communication support tools. Hence, participants with a range of aphasia severity will be included.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- unwillingness to be videotaped
- onset of stroke <2.5 months post and >3.5 months post
- moderate or severe dementia
- symptoms of another preexisting neurological condition other than or in addition to aphasia due to stroke, or drug abuse
- neurological surgical treatment not including a surgical treatment specifically for treatment of stroke, absence of aphasia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The Assessment for Living with Aphasia
Time frame: 9 months
A new, aphasia friendly measure based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. It is a specialized tool using a self-rating scale and is focused on specific themes that have emerged from previous research.
7 secondary outcomes
Western Aphasia Battery - Revised
Time frame: 9 months
Successfully Living with Aphasia Rating Scale
Time frame: 9 months
Burden of Stroke Scale
Time frame: 9 months
Aphasia Depression Rating Scale
Time frame: 9 months
The Wepman Self-Correction Scale
Time frame: 9 months
The Barthel Index
Time frame: 9 months
The Functional Communication Profile
Time frame: 9 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Funding stopped). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2016.
Related trials for Aphasia
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Recruiting
Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Restoring Speech With an Intracortical Neuroprosthesis for Post-Stroke Agrammatic Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-02)
Aphasia, ALS
Not yet recruiting
Cerebellar Brain Stimulation Plus Language Therapy for People at Risk of Poor Aphasia Recovery After Stroke
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Detecting and Predicting Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Martha T Sarno, MA,Dhonorary principal investigator
NYU Langone Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Aphasia, run by NYU Langone Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Funding stopped). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Assessment for Living with Aphasia (time frame: 9 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2016.