AzTrials
AzTrials

PsoriasisPhase 3NCT01235442

Evaluate Efficacy, and Safety of Topical Therapy and Etanercept in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3 study testing 1=Etanercept and 2=Clobetasol propionate foam in people with Psoriasis, run by Amgen.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary hypothesis of this trial is that the addition of short courses of clobetasol propionate foam to etanercept monotherapy in subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis will yield greater efficacy compared with etanercept monotherapy, as measured by PASI 75 at Week 12. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriasis
What is being tested?
1=Etanercept and 2=Clobetasol propionate foam
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
592 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2010to Dec 2011
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject has had stable moderate to severe plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months
  • Subject has involved BSA ≥ 10% and PASI ≥ 10 at screening and at baseline.
  • Subject is a candidate for systemic therapy or phototherapy in the opinion of the investigator

Who cannot join

  • Subject has active guttate, erythrodermic, or pustular psoriasis at the time of the screening visit.
  • Subject has evidence of skin conditions at the time of the screening visit (eg, eczema) that would interfere with evaluations of the effect of etanercept and/orclobetasol propionate foam on psoriasis.
  • Subject diagnosed with medication-induced or medication exacerbated psoriasis
  • Subject has any active Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 2 or higher infection
  • Subject has a significant concurrent medical condition or laboratory abnormalities as defined in the study protocol.
  • Subject has used any of the following therapies within 14 days of the first dose: UVB therapy or topical psoriasis therapies other than Class I or II topical steroids.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Subject has used any of the following therapies within 28 days of the first dose: Class I or II topical steriods, UVA therapy (with or without psoralen), or systemic psoriasis therapies
  • Subject has used one or more biologic therapies (other than interleukin (IL)12/IL23 inhibitors) within 3 months of the first dose
  • Subject has used an IL-12/IL-23 inhibitor within 6 months of the first dose of etanercept
  • Subject has ever used efalizumab (Raptiva®).

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Adding Topical Therapy to Etanercept in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

The primary hypothesis of this trial is that the addition of short courses of clobetasol propionate foam to etanercept monotherapy in subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis will yield greater efficacy compared with etanercept monotherapy, as measured by PASI 75 at Week 12.

Conditions
Psoriasis
Being tested
1=Etanercept, 2=Clobetasol propionate foam
Keywords
Psoriasis, Topical, etanercept, clobetasol propionate
Medical subject headings
Psoriasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 1=EtanerceptDrug

    50 mg SC bi-weekly for 12 weeks followed by 50 mg SC weekly for 12 weeks.

  • 2=Clobetasol propionate foamDrug

    0.05% clobetasol propionate foam applied topically twice daily during two up-to-2 week courses

Study groups in NCT01235442
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
etanercept and clobetasolExperimentalEtanercept 50 mg twice weekly x 12 weeks + clobetasol propionate foam (weeks 11 and 12) then Etanercept 50 mg once weekly x 12 weeks + clobetasol propionate foam (weeks 23 and 24)
Receives: Drug: 2=Clobetasol propionate foam
etanerceptExperimentalEtanercept 50 mg twice weekly x 12 weeks then Etanercept 50 mg once weekly x 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: 1=Etanercept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. PASI 75 at Week 12

    The percentage of participants with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Indexs (PASI) 75 responses at week 12. PASI is an assessment of psoriasis based on severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation as well as area of involvement. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72. The higher score represents the worse symptom severity. A response was considered a 75% reduction in the PASI score from Baseline.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. sPGA (0,1) at Week 12

    The percentage of participants achieving sPGA 0 or 1 at week 12. Static physician global assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) is a physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA of psoriasis comprises a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 with increasing severity.

    Measured: Week 12

  2. PASI 90 at Week 12

    The percentage of participants with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Indexs (PASI) 90 responses at week 12. PASI is an assessment of psoriasis based on severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation as well as area of involvement. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72. The higher score represents the worse symptom severity. A response was considered a 90% reduction in the PASI score from Baseline.

    Measured: Week 12

  3. Patient Satisfaction at Week 12

    Patient assessment of treatment satisfaction status at week 12. It is a measure of a participant's level of satisfaction with the medication's control of psoriasis, ranging from "very satisfied" to "very dissatisfied."

    Measured: Week 12

  4. Percent PASI Improvement From Baseline at Week 12

    The percentage of the improvement in PASI score at week 12 from baseline. PASI is an assessment of psoriasis based on severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation as well as area of involvement. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72. The higher score represents the worse symptom severity.

    Measured: Week 12

  5. PASI 75 at Week 24

    The percentage of participants with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Indexs (PASI) 75 responses at week 24. PASI is an assessment of psoriasis based on severity of erythema, infiltration, and desquamation as well as area of involvement. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72. The higher score represents the worse symptom severity. A response was considered a 75% reduction in the PASI score from Baseline.

    Measured: Week 24

  6. sPGA (0,1) at Week 24

    The percentage of participants achieving sPGA 0 or 1 at week 24. Static physician global assessment of psoriasis (sPGA) is a physician's global assessment of the participant's psoriasis based on severity of induration, scaling, and erythema. The sPGA of psoriasis comprises a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 5 with increasing severity.

    Measured: Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionOct 2011
  4. Study completionDec 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
592 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01235442
Sponsor's protocol ID
20080470
Status last verified
Aug 2015
First submitted
28 Oct 2010
Last updated
7 Aug 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Lebwohl MG, Kircik L, Callis Duffin K, Pariser D, Hooper M, Wenkert D, Thompson EH, Yang J, Kricorian G, Koo J. A randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding topical therapy to etanercept in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Sep;69(3):385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.03.031. Epub 2013 May 1.

    PubMed 23643256

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing 1=Etanercept and 2=Clobetasol propionate foam in people with Psoriasis, run by Amgen.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Oct 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

PASI 75 at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01235442, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in