AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Birth WeightVACVINANCT01235767

Animal Source Food Supplement and Pregnancy in Vietnam

A study testing Food in people with Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth, run by UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland at 1 site in Vietnam.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if a nutrient-rich supplement of animal-source foods ingested 5d/wk from pre-conception to term improves maternal nutrient status, decreases infections, and improves birth weight and rates of prematurity compared with supplemental ingestion during pregnancy ( from… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 30 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Low Birth Weight, Preterm Birth
What is being tested?
Food
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
291 participants
Where
1 siteVietnam
Study dates
Jan 2011to May 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 30 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Non-pregnant women registering to marry in the Cam Khe District of Phu Tho Province
  • Nulliparous
  • Planning to reside in the study site for the next 3 years.

Who cannot join

  • Married
  • Have had a previous pregnancy
  • Have a history of severe infections (HIV, TB) or metabolic disease (diabetes)
  • BMI <17 kg/m2
  • Do not reside in study communes
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Vietnam1 site
  • National Institute of Nutrition

    Hanoi

Other trials in Vietnam

About this study

Official title: Effect of Animal Source Food Supplement Prior to and During Pregnancy on Birth Weight and Prematurity in Rural Vietnam

The purpose of this study is to determine if a nutrient-rich supplement of animal-source foods ingested 5d/wk from pre-conception to term improves maternal nutrient status, decreases infections, and improves birth weight and rates of prematurity compared with supplemental ingestion during pregnancy ( from mid-gestation to term) or routine prenatal care.

Read the detailed description

It has been known for over 80 years that maternal starvation reduces fetal growth and increases neonatal infections. Many different nutrition programs have been targeted to pregnant women to improve pregnancy outcomes. The impact of these programs has been disappointing, and the prevalence of low birth weight (LBW) and infant mortality remains high, especially in developing countries. More recently, as a result of improved access to cereals following the 'green revolution,' nutritional concerns shifted from protein and energy to micronutrient deficiencies, especially those micronutrients in animal-source foods (ASFs)-iron, zinc, vitamins A and B12. Diets of pregnant women are usually limited to rice and a few vegetables, and they lack key nutrients known to reduce preterm delivery, to support fetal growth, and to prevent infections that leads to early neonatal deaths. Vietnam has a well-established farm system that supports the local production of fish, pork, poultry, and eggs. This provides an opportunity to evaluate the impact of a food-based, micronutrient-rich supplement on pregnancy outcome in high-risk, rural Vietnamese women. Since maternal nutritional status at conception is strongly linked to pregnancy outcomes, we will compare the effect of consuming a micronutrient-rich, animal-source food (ASF) supplement from pre-conception to term with a supplement from mid-gestation to term or routine prenatal care on infant birth weight, prematurity rate, and infant growth during the first 6 months of life. This study will be the first to compare a food-based, micronutrient-rich supplement consumed prior to conception to term with one given only during pregnancy. Although it is recognized by many that pregnancy may be too narrow a window to improve maternal nutritional health, it is typical for micronutrient supplements to only be given from the time of enrolling for prenatal care to term. The results of our study, therefore, will have world-wide implications regarding when maternal supplementation should be given to have the greatest impact on pregnancy outcome.

Being tested
Food
Keywords
birth weight, prematurity, gestational age, low birth weight, pregnancy, nutrition, Vietnam
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth, Birth Weight

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FoodOther

    Animal-source food (ASF) supplement rich in iron, zinc, vitamin A, and vitamin B12 taken week-days at mid-morning separate from other food. Length of intervention is either from pre-pregnancy (time of registration to marry) to term or from 16 weeks gestation to term.

Study groups in NCT01235767
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ASF supplement pre-pregnancy to termExperimentalSupplement of animal-source foods rich in iron, zinc, vitamin A, and vitamin B12
Receives: Other: Food
ASF Supplement mid-gestation to termExperimentalSupplement of animal-source foods rich in iron, zinc, vitamin A, and vitamin B12
Receives: Other: Food
Routine prenatal careNo interventionNutrition education and iron-folate supplements during pregnancy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Birth Weight

    Weight of baby at birth on a scale weighing to 0.1 g made within one hour of delivery

    Measured: At birth

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Preterm birth

    Birth of baby prior to 37 weeks gestation based on mother's last menstrual period, confirmed by ultrasound

    Measured: At birth

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2016
  4. Study completionMay 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
291 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01235767
Sponsor's protocol ID
2010-068
Other IDs
TRF-01
Acronym
VACVINA
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
4 Nov 2010
Last updated
24 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Quyen PN, Nga HT, Chaffee B, Ngu T, King JC. Effect of maternal prenatal food supplementation, gestational weight gain, and breast-feeding on infant growth during the first 24 months of life in rural Vietnam. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0233671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233671. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32584881
  • Nga HT, Quyen PN, Chaffee BW, Diep Anh NT, Ngu T, King JC. Effect of a nutrient-rich, food-based supplement given to rural Vietnamese mothers prior to and/or during pregnancy on birth outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0232197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232197. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32469870

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Food in people with Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth, run by UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland at 1 site in Vietnam.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Birth Weight (time frame: At birth). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01235767, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in