AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNCT01237704

Dysphagia Rehabilitation for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Post Radiotherapy

A study testing Traditional rehabilitation (TR) and Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ES) in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Radiotherapy, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 2 sites in Hong Kong.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In Hong Kong, every 30 and 12.9 in 100,000 males and females respectively has nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). With early detection and advances in medical care, the number of NPC survivors post radiotherapy is rapidly growing in Hong Kong. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Radiotherapy
What is being tested?
Traditional rehabilitation (TR) and Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ES)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
160 participants
Where
2 sitesHong Kong
Study dates
Jan 2011to Dec 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • able 18 years of age
  • undergone primary radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy as the treatment
  • are expected to complete the 12 month follow-up

Who cannot join

  • prior history of head and neck surgery except biopsies of the NP or the neck nodes
  • previous history or having a concurrent neoplasm other than NPC
  • other severe medical problems that might contribute to dysphagia, e.g. cerebral vascular accident, neuromuscular diseases, respiratory diseases that may cause dysphagia
  • present contraindications for the use of electrical stimulation which include pregnancy, pacemaker, other implanted electrodes or significant reflux
  • non-oral feeding is contemplated in prior to treatment
  • inability to complete the assessment including cognitive impairment
  • of a low life expectancy related to NPC or other illnesses
  • history of dysphagia prior to radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Michael Tong, MD contact

+852 2632 2633

mtong@ent.cuhk.edu.hk

Janice Lin, MBChB contact

janicelin@ent.cuhk.edu.hk

Hong Kong2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    Kowloon

    Rita Wong, ritawong@ent.cuhk.edu.hk

    Janice Lin, janicelin@ent.cuhk.edu.hk

    Recruiting
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Shatin, New Territories

    Janice Lin, MBChB, janicelin@ent.cuhk.edu.hk

    Rita Wong, ritawong@ent.cuhk.edu.hk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Dysphagia Rehabilitation for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Post Radiotherapy: a Randomised-controlled Trial

In Hong Kong, every 30 and 12.9 in 100,000 males and females respectively has nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). With early detection and advances in medical care, the number of NPC survivors post radiotherapy is rapidly growing in Hong Kong. One of the most distressing consequences post radiotherapy for NPC patients is swallowing disorder, or dysphagia. Dysphagia in NPC patients almost certainly cause frequent chest infection, dehydration, malnutrition and limitations to concurrent treatment such as oral medication. Given the existing large costs NPC patients incur to the healthcare system, dysphagia only serves to further inflate the soaring costs.

In an attempt to reduce dysphagia related costs to the healthcare system, swallowing rehabilitation is offered to NPC patients. Currently, two major swallowing rehabilitation approaches are commonly adopted. The first is traditional rehabilitation, which involves patients performing various oropharyngeal exercises aimed at improving swallowing physiology. The other swallowing rehabilitation approach is transcutaneous electrical stimulation, which entails using small amount of electric current to increase muscle strength while patients are engaged in swallowing activities. These two methods are proven as effective in patients with stroke and head and neck carcinoma patients. Neither of these methods, nevertheless, yields any efficacy studies in treating NPC patients. Yet, clinicians continue to use either one or both rehabilitation methods as swallowing rehabilitation.

This study aims to address the gap in efficacy studies on swallowing rehabilitation for NPC patients post radiotherapy. The research results should provide justification for rehabilitation time, clinicians' efforts, costs involved and resources used in rehabilitating the swallowing difficulties of the NPC patients.

Being tested
Traditional rehabilitation (TR), Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ES)
Medical subject headings
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Traditional rehabilitation (TR)Behavioural

    TR rehabilitation will be scheduled three 45-minute sessions per week for 4 weeks with a total of 12 sessions that include Mendelsohn manoeuvre, Shaker's exercise, Effortful swallow and Masako manoeuvre.

  • Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ES)Behavioural

    Subjects will receive three 45-minute sessions per week for 4 weeks with a total of 12 sessions.

Study groups in NCT01237704
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Traditional rehabilitation (TR)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Traditional rehabilitation (TR)
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ES)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ES)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Penetration-Aspiration Scale

    Each subject will undergo Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) to identify penetration and aspiration risks of each consistency. Subjects will be assessed on five different consistencies: thin fluids, honey-thick fluids, pureed diet, soft diet and biscuits. Therefore, five penetration-aspiration scores will be generated for each assessment.

    Scores will be obtained at baseline, post rehabilitation, six months after baseline and one year after baseline for comparison.

    Measured: Up to 1 year after rehabilitation program

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Nasopharyngeal (FACT-NP)

    The validated FACT-NP is a Chinese QOL questionnaire that evaluates the rehabilitation outcomes specifically for NPC patients. Among the sixteen NPC sub-scale items, seven are specific to dysphagia. The total score and dysphagia specific scores will be analysed.

    Scores will be obtained at baseline, post rehabilitation, six months after baseline and one year after baseline for comparison.

    Measured: Up to 1 year after rehabilitation program

  2. Self-rated Swallowing Score

    A questionnaire based on patient's perception of existing feeding difficulties. Scores will be obtained at baseline, post rehabilitation, six months after baseline and one year after baseline for comparison.

    Measured: up to 1 year after rehabilitation program

  3. Voice Handicap Index - 30

    This self-assessment scale consists of 30 items that measures the voice-related quality-of-life over three domains: functional, physical, and emotional. Scores will be obtained at baseline, post rehabilitation, six months after baseline and one year after baseline for comparison.

    Measured: Up to 1 year after rehabilitation program

  4. Oral Assessment Guide

    This 24 point tool comprise of eight categories: swallow, voice, lips, saliva, tongue, gingival, teeth and mucous membrane. Each category is rated by a scale of 1 (normal), 2 (some abnormality) and 3 (severely abnormal). Scores can be obtained at baseline, post rehabilitation, six months after baseline and one year after baseline for comparison.

    Measured: Up to 1 year after rehabilitation program

  5. Perceptual Evaluation of Voice

    Four vocal parameters, overall severity, roughness, breathiness and strain, will be rated on a 10-point equal-appearing interval scale by the attending speech therapists. Scores will be obtained at all 4 assessment time point for comparison.

    Measured: Up to 1 year after rehabilitation program

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Nov 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2014 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
160 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01237704
Sponsor's protocol ID
GRF 475210
Status last verified
Feb 2013
First submitted
28 Oct 2010
Last updated
26 Feb 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Traditional rehabilitation (TR) and Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (ES) in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Radiotherapy, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 2 sites in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Michael Tong, MD (+852 2632 2633, mtong@ent.cuhk.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Penetration-Aspiration Scale (time frame: Up to 1 year after rehabilitation program). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in