AzTrials
AzTrials

Cystic FibrosisNCT01238081

The Role of Respiratory Viruses in Exacerbations of Cystic Fibrosis in Adults

An observational study of Cystic Fibrosis, run by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Respiratory viruses, such as those that cause colds and influenza, are very common in the general population. The average adult will experience between 2 and 4 viral respiratory illnesses each year. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cystic Fibrosis
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Dec 2010to Apr 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults with cystic fibrosis attending the Manchester Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre, Manchester, UK

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with cystic fibrosis attending Manchester Adult CF Centre
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Capable of providing written informed consent
  • Able and willing to provide required samples and meet visit schedule

Who cannot join

  • Previous lung transplantation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust

    Manchester, Lancashire, M23 9LT

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: The Role of Respiratory Viruses in Exacerbations of Cystic Fibrosis in Adults.

Respiratory viruses, such as those that cause colds and influenza, are very common in the general population. The average adult will experience between 2 and 4 viral respiratory illnesses each year. It is known that respiratory viruses can cause flare-ups of chronic lung diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In children with CF, respiratory viral infections have been identified in nearly half of all exacerbations and are associated with a decline in lung function and increased frequency of hospital admission and acquisition of new bacterial pathogens.

Currently, little is known about the impact of viral infections on the course of CF lung disease in adults and no large-scale prospective studies in this area have been performed to date. It is unknown how often respiratory viruses can be found in patients with CF when they are well and what consequences they have on the course of exacerbations of CF lung disease. This study will identify the frequency of common viral infections in adults with CF and determine the effects they have on lung function, the rate and diversity of bacterial infection and patients' treatment burden. The information gained from this study will lead to improved prevention and treatment of respiratory infections in CF.

Read the detailed description

Background Lung disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by chronic airway infection with periodic exacerbations which are associated with impaired lung function, reduced quality of life and increased healthcare costs.1 2 Respiratory viruses are common and are known to be associated with exacerbations of other chronic respiratory diseases such as asthma.3 Studies in children with CF have shown that respiratory viruses are common during exacerbations. Wat and colleages identified respiratory viruses in 46% of patients at the time of pulmonary exacerbation of CF.4 Several older studies in children with CF have found an association between viral infections and decline in lung function, frequency and duration of hospital admission and CF disease progression.5-7 An association between respiratory viruses and acquisition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been proposed but this remains unproven.8 Retrospective data in adults has shown an incidence of viral infection in pulmonary exacerbations of between 8.7 and 45.8%.9 10 To date, no prospective studies have been conducted to investigate the impact of these infections on clinical outcomes in adults with CF, or the effects of these infections on respiratory bacterial flora. It is entirely unknown how frequently viruses can be identified in adults with CF when they are asymptomatic. This study will fill these gaps in current knowledge and improve our management of respiratory infections in CF.

Primary Research Question What is the prevalence of respiratory virus infection in adults with CF during a pulmonary exacerbation and when clinically stable?

Secondary Research Questions

  1. What is the effect of respiratory virus infection on lung function and disease progression?
  2. What is the effect of respiratory virus infection on bacterial and fungal colonization in CF?
  3. What is the effect of respiratory virus infection on the CF microbiome, specifically the rate and diversity of bacterial infection?
  4. Are any specific rhinovirus sub-types (including rhinovirus C) associated with worse outcome following viral respiratory infections in adults with CF?

Methodology This is a prospective observational study looking at the incidence and consequences of respiratory virus infection in CF both during exacerbations and during periods of clinical stability. Subjects eligible for the study will be all patients with CF over the age of 18 years attending the Manchester Adult Cystic Fibrosis Centre (MACFC). We aim to recruit 100 patients into the study. Participants will be screened for respiratory viruses at baseline and every two months throughout a twelve month follow-up period. Screening will also occur at the time of diagnosis of a pulmonary exacerbation or onset of new respiratory symptoms. At each visit an oral mouth wash, sputum sample and a nose-swab will be taken; the mouth wash and an aliquot of sputum will be stored frozen for later microbial diversity analysis. On each occasion, sputum will also be sent for conventional bacteriology/mycology to identify any new bacterial or fungal colonization.

Respiratory viruses in the sputum will then be identified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. The following viruses will be tested for: adenovirus, human metapneumovirus, influenza A, B \& C (including influenza A H1N1), parainfluenza 1-3, respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus. Rhinovirus identifications will be sequenced to determine the frequency of infection with individual subtypes.

After 6 months of the study, 10 CF individuals who provided a stable and viral-linked exacerbation samples will be selected and the total bacterial diversity in their sputum examined by state-of-the-art, cultivation independent 16S rRNA pyrosequencing analysis.11 To account for the potential of oral flora contamination in the sputum samples, the mouth wash taken prior to each sputum sample will also be examined. Total DNA will be extracted from the selected samples and the V1-3 region of the 16S rRNA gene amplified using tagged primers specifically developed for pyrosequencing sequence analysis. The derived bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences (8000-10,000 reads per sample) will be trimmed to 450 bases and compared to the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP; http://rdp.cme.msu.edu) to determine the identity of the bacteria from which the DNA derived. Correlation between viral-linked exacerbation and the load of known pathogens (eg. Pseudomonas aeruginosa), new players (CF anaerobes), and the total/unique bacterial flora in the sputum will be made.

Data Analysis \& Statistical Methods The primary outcome measure will be identification of a respiratory virus in nose/throat swab or sputum. Statistical analysis will use longitudinal regression modeling of the cohort which takes account of the repeated sampling of each patient. The study will have over 80% power to detect differences of 20% (e.g. 50% vs. 30%) in incidence of viral infection between exacerbation and routine sample periods in patients showing at least one-third of the samples with infection (using a McNemar's paired test with p=0.05).

Ethical Approval The study has been reviewed by the North West 9 Research Ethics Committee - Greater Manchester West and has received a favourable opinion.

References

  1. Goss C et al. Exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. 1: Epidemiology and pathogenesis. Thorax 2007;62:360-7.
  2. Britto M et al. Impact of recent pulmonary exacerbations on quality of life in patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest 2002;121:64-72.
  3. Johnston S et al. The relationship between upper respiratory infections and hospital admissions for asthma: a time-trend analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;154:654-60.
  4. Wat D et al. The role of respiratory viruses in cystic fibrosis. J Cystic Fibros 2008;7:320-8.
  5. Smyth A et al. Effect of respiratory virus infections including rhinovirus on clinical status in cystic fibrosis. Arch Dis Child 1995;73:117-20.
  6. Wang E et al. Association of respiratory viral infections with pulmonary deterioration in patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 1984;311:1653-8.
  7. Collinson J et al. Effects of upper respiratory tract infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax 1996;51:1115-22.
  8. Petersen NT et al. Respiratory infections in cystic fibrosis patients caused by virus, chlamydia and mycoplasma--possible synergism with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Acta Paed Scand 1981;70:623-8.
  9. De Schutter I et al. Detection of viruses in pulmonary exacerbations in CF. J Cystic Fibros, 2010:s37.
  10. Naseer R et al. Pulmonary exacerbations in adult patients with cystic fibrosis associated with positive viral PCR. J Cystic Fibros 2010;9:S37.

11 White J et al. Culture-independent analysis of bacterial fuel contamination provides insights into the level of concordance with conventional cultivation. Appl Environ Microbiol (in review) 2010.

Conditions
Cystic Fibrosis
Keywords
Cystic fibrosis
Medical subject headings
Cystic Fibrosis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Identification of respiratory viruses in sputum, nose- or throat-swabs

    A panel of 6 viruses will be tested for using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)technology: adenovirus, rhinovirus, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza virus 1-3, influenza A,B\&C and respiratory syncytial virus

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Nov 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2010
  3. Primary completionApr 2012
  4. Study completionApr 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01238081
Sponsor's protocol ID
2010CF004
Status last verified
May 2012
First submitted
9 Nov 2010
Last updated
1 Jun 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cystic Fibrosis, run by Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Identification of respiratory viruses in sputum, nose- or throat-swabs (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in