Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4PROTECT-SBNCT01238510
Comparison Between Provisional Versus Routine Kissing Balloon Technique After Main Vessel Crossover Stenting for Bifurcated Lesions.
A Phase 4 study testing stent technique: Provisional fKBT and stent technique: Routine fKBT in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital at 2 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
In the setting of single stent strategy for treatment of bifurcation, we investigate to compare simple strategy as "provisional final kissing balloon technique(fKBT)" to complex one as "routine FKBT", focusing on actual myocardial ischemia assessed by scintigraphy in 7-month and to examine optimal endpoint of side… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- stent technique: Provisional fKBT and stent technique: Routine fKBT
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- Mar 2010to Apr 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- (Patient) Patient who has angina or documented ischemia, Patients who are eligible for drug eluting stent, Age >=18, Patient who received informed consent, Patient who can receive dipyridamole-stress-technetium scintigraphy.
- (Lesion) Non-left main bifurcation except for Medina class (0,0,1), De-Novo lesion, Vessel diameter in visual (main vessel>2.5mm, side branch >2.0mm), SB lesion length <5mm in visual estimate, MB lesion length < 46mm in visual, TIMI 3 in main vessel as well as side branch,
Who cannot join
- (Patient) Patients who is pregnant, Patient contraindicated for antiplatelet therapy, Patients whose ejection fraction is less than 30%, Patients who has renal dysfunction, creatinine >=2.3, Patients who has live dysfunction, Patients who cannot agree with informed consent, Patient whose life expectancy is less than 1 year, Patients contraindicated for dipyridamole-stress-technetium scintigraphy.
- (Lesion) Target site of acute myocardial infarction, Left main disease, In-Stent restenosis lesion, Bypass graft, Chronic total occlusion, Main vessel reference diameter >4.5mm, Bifurcation lesion that needs intended 2 stent strategy, Highly tortus and calcified lesion,
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Japan2 sites
Edogawa Hospital
Tokyo
Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital
Yokohama, 230-8765
About this study
In the setting of single stent strategy for treatment of bifurcation, we investigate to compare simple strategy as "provisional final kissing balloon technique(fKBT)" to complex one as "routine FKBT", focusing on actual myocardial ischemia assessed by scintigraphy in 7-month and to examine optimal endpoint of side branch ostium.
Read the detailed description
Final kissing balloon technique (FKBT) is effective and accepted technique for the treatment of bifurcation. However, in complex lesion or anatomy, much procedure-time and contrast media are needed to accomplish this technique. Recent FFR study for jailed side branch (SB) demonstrated that angiographic severe stenosis at SB ostium includes "pseudo-stenosis" and stent-deployment jailing SB without FKBT has comparable impact on clinical outcome with FKBT strategy. Considering simple technique for bifurcation, we sought to investigate to compare "provisional FKBT" with "routine FKBT", focusing on actual myocardial ischemia assessed by scintigraphy in 7 month and to examine optimal endpoint of SB ostium.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- stent technique: Provisional fKBT, stent technique: Routine fKBT
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
stent technique: Provisional fKBTProcedure or surgery
Provisional use of fKBT only when SB flow is aggravated to TIMI0-2 after stenting for non-left main bifurcation.
Additional stenting for SB is recommended if residual stenosis (>50% in visual) or TIMI flow grade (<TIMI 3) was seen at SB after fKBT.
Stent type: Everolimus-eluting stent only
stent technique: Routine fKBTProcedure or surgery
Mandatory use of fKBT irrespective of SB flow after stenting for non-left main bifurcation. Additional stenting for SB is recommended if residual stenosis (>50% in visual) or TIMI flow grade (<TIMI 3) was seen at SB after fKBT.
Stent type: Everolimus-eluting stent only
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Provisional fKBT | Active comparator | Stent technique that final kissing balloon technique(fKBT) is performed if side branch flow was aggravated to TIMI0-2 after stent deployment Receives: Procedure: stent technique: Provisional fKBT |
| Routine fKBT | Active comparator | Stent technique that fKBT was mandatory irrespective of side branch flow after stenting. Receives: Procedure: stent technique: Routine fKBT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of positive dipyridamole stress technetium scintigraphy
Measured: 7 month
Secondary outcomes (7)
Composite of major cardiac adverse events(MACE)
Including cardiac death,myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and target vessel revascularization
Measured: 8 month
Angiographic restenosis rate in main vessel
Measured: 8 month
Fluoroscopic time
Measured: after procedure
Amount of contrast media
Measured: after procedure
Number of stent and wire use
Measured: after procedure
Diameter stenosis and late loss in side branch
Measured: 8 month
Regional summed difference score
Measured: 7 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2010
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionApr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Masahiro Yamawaki, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital
- Investigators
- Masahiro Yamawaki, MD,PhD, Principal investigator, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01238510
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2009009
- Acronym
- PROTECT-SB
- Status last verified
- Apr 2013
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 23 Apr 2013
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Apr 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison Between Provisional Versus Routine Kissing Balloon Technique After Main Vessel Crossover Stenting for Bifurcated Lesions.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01238510
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROTECT-SB / 2009009
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2010
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In the setting of single stent strategy for treatment of bifurcation, we investigate to compare simple strategy as "provisional final kissing balloon technique(fKBT)" to complex one as "routine FKBT", focusing on actual myocardial ischemia assessed by scintigraphy in 7-month and to examine optimal endpoint of side branch ostium.
Detailed description
Final kissing balloon technique (FKBT) is effective and accepted technique for the treatment of bifurcation. However, in complex lesion or anatomy, much procedure-time and contrast media are needed to accomplish this technique. Recent FFR study for jailed side branch (SB) demonstrated that angiographic severe stenosis at SB ostium includes "pseudo-stenosis" and stent-deployment jailing SB without FKBT has comparable impact on clinical outcome with FKBT strategy. Considering simple technique for bifurcation, we sought to investigate to compare "provisional FKBT" with "routine FKBT", focusing on actual myocardial ischemia assessed by scintigraphy in 7 month and to examine optimal endpoint of SB ostium.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Provisional fKBT | Active comparator | Procedure: stent technique: Provisional fKBTStent technique that final kissing balloon technique(fKBT) is performed if side branch flow was aggravated to TIMI0-2 after stent deployment |
| Routine fKBT | Active comparator | Procedure: stent technique: Routine fKBTStent technique that fKBT was mandatory irrespective of side branch flow after stenting. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- (Patient) Patient who has angina or documented ischemia, Patients who are eligible for drug eluting stent, Age >=18, Patient who received informed consent, Patient who can receive dipyridamole-stress-technetium scintigraphy.
- (Lesion) Non-left main bifurcation except for Medina class (0,0,1), De-Novo lesion, Vessel diameter in visual (main vessel>2.5mm, side branch >2.0mm), SB lesion length <5mm in visual estimate, MB lesion length < 46mm in visual, TIMI 3 in main vessel as well as side branch,
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- (Patient) Patients who is pregnant, Patient contraindicated for antiplatelet therapy, Patients whose ejection fraction is less than 30%, Patients who has renal dysfunction, creatinine >=2.3, Patients who has live dysfunction, Patients who cannot agree with informed consent, Patient whose life expectancy is less than 1 year, Patients contraindicated for dipyridamole-stress-technetium scintigraphy.
- (Lesion) Target site of acute myocardial infarction, Left main disease, In-Stent restenosis lesion, Bypass graft, Chronic total occlusion, Main vessel reference diameter >4.5mm, Bifurcation lesion that needs intended 2 stent strategy, Highly tortus and calcified lesion,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| stent technique: Provisional fKBTProvisional use of fKBT only when SB flow is aggravated to TIMI0-2 after stenting for non-left main bifurcation. Additional stenting for SB is recommended if residual stenosis (>50% in visual) or TIMI flow grade (<TIMI 3) was seen at SB after fKBT. Stent type: Everolimus-eluting stent only | Procedure or surgery | Provisional fKBT |
| stent technique: Routine fKBTMandatory use of fKBT irrespective of SB flow after stenting for non-left main bifurcation. Additional stenting for SB is recommended if residual stenosis (>50% in visual) or TIMI flow grade (<TIMI 3) was seen at SB after fKBT. Stent type: Everolimus-eluting stent only | Procedure or surgery | Routine fKBT |
Primary outcome
Rate of positive dipyridamole stress technetium scintigraphy
Time frame: 7 month
7 secondary outcomes
Composite of major cardiac adverse events(MACE)
Time frame: 8 month
Angiographic restenosis rate in main vessel
Time frame: 8 month
Fluoroscopic time
Time frame: after procedure
Amount of contrast media
Time frame: after procedure
Number of stent and wire use
Time frame: after procedure
Diameter stenosis and late loss in side branch
Time frame: 8 month
Regional summed difference score
Time frame: 7 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Apr 2013.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of a Half-dose Bolus of r-SAK Prior to Primary PCI in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD
Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingPhase 4
CCTA Evaluation of SGLT2i-related Pericoronary Fat Changes Patients With Stage 4 CKM Syndrome
ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome), SGLT2 Inhibitors
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Propionic Acid Supplementation on Endothelial Function
Cardiovascular Diseases, Endothelial Dysfunction
Recruiting
Intracoronary Cryotherapy Effect on Stabilization of Vulnerable Plaque in Patients With Stable Angina or ACS - A Traditional Feasibility Study
Coronary Arterial Disease (CAD), Plaque
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Masahiro Yamawaki, MD,PhD principal investigator
Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing stent technique: Provisional fKBT and stent technique: Routine fKBT in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital at 2 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of positive dipyridamole stress technetium scintigraphy (time frame: 7 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2013.