BronchiolitisHypertonicNCT01238848
Efficacy of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline in the Treatment of Acute Bronchiolitis
A study testing Hypertonic saline and Normal saline in people with Bronchiolitis, run by Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde at 1 site in Argentina.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of hypertonic saline vs. normal saline in the treatment of infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis, regarding length of hospital stay, oxygen requirements and clinical outcome. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 2 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bronchiolitis
- What is being tested?
- Hypertonic saline and Normal saline
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 82 participants
- Where
- 1 siteArgentina
- Study dates
- Dec 2010to May 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 2 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Infants aged 1 to 24 months, hospitalized for first episode of bronchiolitis, with severity score ≥ 5 points and oxygen saturation ≥ 97%.
Who cannot join
- Chronic respiratory or cardiovascular disease, respiratory failure.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Argentina1 site
Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., C1270AAN
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline vs. Normal Saline in the Treatment of Hospitalized Children With Bronchiolitis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of hypertonic saline vs. normal saline in the treatment of infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis, regarding length of hospital stay, oxygen requirements and clinical outcome.
Read the detailed description
Despite bronchiolitis is a very frequent disease among infants, there are still controversies regarding its treatment. Hypertonic saline has been proposed as useful treatment in these children, bur information is still controversial.
The aim is to asses that using Nebulized Hypertonic Saline with bronchodilators (albuterol) may reduce the days of hospitalization and improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute bronchiolitis, compared with using Normal Saline with albuterol.
- Conditions
- Bronchiolitis
- Being tested
- Hypertonic saline, Normal saline
- Keywords
- Hypertonic, Saline, Bronchiolitis, Efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Bronchiolitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hypertonic salineDrug
Also called ClNa 3% (sodium chloride 3%)
3 cc nebulized hypertonic saline + albuterol 0.25 mg/kg/day, four times a day (QID), 5 days
Normal salineDrug
Also called ClNa 0.9% (sodium chloride 0.9%)
3 cc nebulized normal saline + albuterol 0.25 mg/kg/day, four times a day (QID), 5 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hypertonic | Experimental | Nebulized hypertonic saline (sodium chloride 3%) + albuterol Receives: Drug: Hypertonic saline |
| Normal | Active comparator | Normal saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) + albuterol Receives: Drug: Normal saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hospitalization Days
hospitalization days
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospitalization, an expected average of 4 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Length of Oxygen Use
Length of oxygen use (days)
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospitalization, an expected average of 4 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2010
- Primary completionOct 2011
- Study completionMay 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BronchiolitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Maria I Espelt, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01238848
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HGNPE-14-2010
- Acronym
- Hypertonic
- Status last verified
- Jul 2012
- First submitted
- 9 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright C, Klassen TP. Nebulized hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD006458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub2.
PubMed 18843717Ralston S, Hill V, Martinez M. Nebulized hypertonic saline without adjunctive bronchodilators for children with bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):e520-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3105. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
PubMed 20713480Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright CE, Aregbesola A, Klassen TP. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 4;4(4):CD006458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub5.
PubMed 37014057
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline vs. Normal Saline in the Treatment of Hospitalized Children With Bronchiolitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01238848
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hypertonic / HGNPE-14-2010
- Conditions
- Bronchiolitis
- Keywords
- Hypertonic, Saline, Bronchiolitis, Efficacy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 82 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital General de Niños Pedro de ElizaldeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Aug 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of hypertonic saline vs. normal saline in the treatment of infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis, regarding length of hospital stay, oxygen requirements and clinical outcome.
Detailed description
Despite bronchiolitis is a very frequent disease among infants, there are still controversies regarding its treatment. Hypertonic saline has been proposed as useful treatment in these children, bur information is still controversial.
The aim is to asses that using Nebulized Hypertonic Saline with bronchodilators (albuterol) may reduce the days of hospitalization and improve clinical outcomes in patients with acute bronchiolitis, compared with using Normal Saline with albuterol.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hypertonic | Experimental | Drug: Hypertonic salineNebulized hypertonic saline (sodium chloride 3%) + albuterol |
| Normal | Active comparator | Drug: Normal salineNormal saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) + albuterol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 2 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Infants aged 1 to 24 months, hospitalized for first episode of bronchiolitis, with severity score ≥ 5 points and oxygen saturation ≥ 97%.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Chronic respiratory or cardiovascular disease, respiratory failure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hypertonic salineAlso: ClNa 3% (sodium chloride 3%)3 cc nebulized hypertonic saline + albuterol 0.25 mg/kg/day, four times a day (QID), 5 days | Drug | Hypertonic |
| Normal salineAlso: ClNa 0.9% (sodium chloride 0.9%)3 cc nebulized normal saline + albuterol 0.25 mg/kg/day, four times a day (QID), 5 days | Drug | Normal |
Primary outcome
Hospitalization Days
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospitalization, an expected average of 4 days
hospitalization days
1 secondary outcome
Length of Oxygen Use
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospitalization, an expected average of 4 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 18843717Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright C, Klassen TP. Nebulized hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):CD006458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 20713480Ralston S, Hill V, Martinez M. Nebulized hypertonic saline without adjunctive bronchodilators for children with bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):e520-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3105. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37014057Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright CE, Aregbesola A, Klassen TP. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 4;4(4):CD006458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub5.
Related trials for Bronchiolitis
Active, not recruiting
Respiratory Support and Treatment for Efficient and Cost-Effective Care
Bronchiolitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Not yet recruiting
Influence of Patient Positioning During Nasal Lavage
Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections, Nasal Obstruction
Recruiting
Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
A New ECP Protocol for the Treatment of cGVHD
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maria I Espelt, MD principal investigator
Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hypertonic saline and Normal saline in people with Bronchiolitis, run by Hospital General de Niños Pedro de Elizalde at 1 site in Argentina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Argentina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Aug 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hospitalization Days (time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospitalization, an expected average of 4 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01238848, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2017.