BlepharoptosisPhase 4NCT01239498
Saline Injection - Assisted Anesthesia in Eyelid Surgery
A Phase 4 study testing Injection of Saline + Lidocaine/Adrenaline and Lidocaine/Adrenaline only in people with Blepharoptosis, run by Sheba Medical Center at 2 sites in Israel.
Trial summary
The investigators hypothesize that injection of saline to the upper eyelids prior to lidocaine/adrenaline injection will reduce pain of the local anesthetic in comparison to injection of lidocaine alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Blepharoptosis
- What is being tested?
- Injection of Saline + Lidocaine/Adrenaline and Lidocaine/Adrenaline only
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesIsrael
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid surgery under local anaesthetic who have given fully informed consent to be in the trial
Who cannot join
- Previous upper eyelid surgery
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Israel2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Goldschlager eye institute
Ramat Gan
Ido Ido Fabian, MD, didifabian@gmail.com
- Not yet recruiting
Goldschleger institute of ophthalmology, Sheba medical center
Ramat Gan
Ido Didi Fabian, MD, +972547830444, didifabian@gmail.com
About this study
The investigators hypothesize that injection of saline to the upper eyelids prior to lidocaine/adrenaline injection will reduce pain of the local anesthetic in comparison to injection of lidocaine alone.
Read the detailed description
Purpose:
To carry out a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy of saline injection prior to the injection of Lidocaine/Adrenaline in reducing the pain of local anaesthetic injections into the upper eyelid.
Hypothesis:
Injection of saline to the upper eyelids prior to lidocaine/adrenaline injection reduces the pain of anaesthetic injections in upper eyelid surgery.
Justification:
In many surgical procedures performed under local anaesthetic, the most frightening and painful aspect of the procedure for patients is the anaesthetic injection, and various techniques have been advocated to address this.
Simple measures that reduce the pain of anaesthetic injection and are widely practised include administering the injection slowly and using a fine-bore needle (30 Gauge). Other techniques that have been shown to be effective include warming or buffering the local anaesthetic. The use of 0.9% bacteriostatic saline solution in conjunction with lidocaine has been demonstrated to significantly reduce patients' perceived pain during the injection and operative procedure in eyelid surgery. Cooling the skin immediately prior to treatment has been shown to reduce the pain of dermatological laser procedures although this might be difficult to perform around the eyes because of the risk of injuring the cornea. Similarly, topical anaesthetic agents, such as EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics) cream, which are applied to the skin one hour prior to injection are commonly employed for use on the limbs of infants and children but are not safe for use around the eyes since inadvertent ocular application causes corneal de-epithelisation.
Sedative agents, such as midazolam may be useful in anxious patients, but this requires the input of an anaesthetist and it is often difficult to finely control the level of sedation; it is usually preferable not to have patients sedated during eyelid surgery when patient cooperation is required intra-operatively to assess the height of the eyelids, for example in ptosis surgery.
The investigators have noticed in clinical practice that whenever the investigators injected saline into the upper eyelids prior to the injection of the mixture of lidocaine/adrenaline the patients reported of no pain. The investigators assume that by using the isotonic saline cells in the tissue are not harmed and a minor effect of anesthesia is achieved. The anesthetic solution injected later on is diluted, however the eyelid is properly anesthesized.
Research Methods:
The study will be a prospective, interventional, randomised, controlled clinical trial.
All patients who fit the inclusion criteria will be offered participation in the trial on the day their surgery is booked. They will be given an information leaflet about the trial, explaining the aim of the study without describing the effect of the saline injection prior to the anesthetic solution injection in order to reduce the risk of biasing their perception. They will be advised that non-participation will not affect their care in anyway.
The intervention is of no risk to the patient and will not affect the surgical procedure in any way. Any questions that the patient has will be addressed beforehand and they will be required to sign a consent form prior to inclusion in the trial.
They will be advised beforehand that they will be required to verbally rate their pain score on a scale of 0 to 10 immediately after both sides have been anaesthetised, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst imaginable pain.
All participants included in the study will undergo bilateral surgery and will therefore act as their own controls: Saline will only be injected prior to the injection of the anaesthetic into one side. The test and placebo will be randomly assigned to either the first or second eyelid; the right eyelid will be injected first in all patients, as is routine practice. Computer-generated sequential binary randomisation will be used. Allocation will be concealed from the surgeon until immediately prior to the anaesthetic injection.
All anaesthetic injections will consist of xylocaine 1% with 1:100,000 adrenaline and will be administered through a short 30 Gauge needle at a constant slow speed at multiple (6-7) sites along the upper lid by a single oculoplastic consultant.
Patients' verbal pain scores will be elicited and documented immediately by the oculoplastic fellow.
Planned sample size On a scale of 0 to 10 a difference in pain score of 1.5 may be considered to be clinically significant. The power calculation for a paired t-test with 90% power and p=0.05 demonstrated that a sample size of 80 patients to be more than sufficient to detect a significant difference.
The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed ophthalmological journal and presentation at international ophthalmological meetings.
- Conditions
- Blepharoptosis
- Being tested
- Injection of Saline + Lidocaine/Adrenaline, Lidocaine/Adrenaline only
- Medical subject headings
- Blepharoptosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Injection of Saline + Lidocaine/AdrenalineProcedure or surgery
Also called Local eyelid anesthesia
All anaesthetic injections will consist of xylocaine 1% with 1:100,000 adrenaline and will be administered through a short 30 Gauge needle at a constant slow speed at multiple (6-7) sites along the upper lid by a single oculoplastic consultant.
The experimental eyelid will receive a saline-consisted injection 0.5cc prior to the administration of the anesthetic injection.
Injection of Saline + Lidocaine 1%
Lidocaine/Adrenaline onlyProcedure or surgery
Also called Local eyelid anesthesia
Injection of Lidocaine/Adrenaline only
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Saline + Lidocaine/Adrenaline | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Injection of Saline + Lidocaine/Adrenaline |
| Lidocaine/Adrenaline only | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Lidocaine/Adrenaline only |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patients' verbal pain scores will be elicited and documented immediately by the oculoplastic fellow
Measured: 1-2 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionOct 2011 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BlepharoptosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Investigators
- Ido Didi Fabian, MD, Study chair, Sheba medical center, Goldschleger institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01239498
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHEBA-10-8246-DF-CTIL
- Status last verified
- Aug 2011
- First submitted
- 2 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Chen BK, Eichenfield LF. Pediatric anesthesia in dermatologic surgery: when hand-holding is not enough. Dermatol Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1010-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.01854.x.
PubMed 11849262Brogan GX Jr, Giarrusso E, Hollander JE, Cassara G, Maranga MC, Thode HC. Comparison of plain, warmed, and buffered lidocaine for anesthesia of traumatic wounds. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Aug;26(2):121-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70139-7.
PubMed 7618771Bainbridge LC. Comparison of room temperature and body temperature local anaesthetic solutions. Br J Plast Surg. 1991 Feb-Mar;44(2):147-8. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(91)90050-t.
PubMed 2018901Stewart JH, Cole GW, Klein JA. Neutralized lidocaine with epinephrine for local anesthesia. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989 Oct;15(10):1081-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1989.tb03127.x.
PubMed 2794204Bartfield JM, Gennis P, Barbera J, Breuer B, Gallagher EJ. Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Dec;19(12):1387-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82603-4.
PubMed 2240750Fayers T, Morris DS, Dolman PJ. Vibration-assisted anesthesia in eyelid surgery. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jul;117(7):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.025. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
PubMed 20303597
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Saline Injection - Assisted Anesthesia in Eyelid Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01239498
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHEBA-10-8246-DF-CTIL
- Conditions
- Blepharoptosis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators hypothesize that injection of saline to the upper eyelids prior to lidocaine/adrenaline injection will reduce pain of the local anesthetic in comparison to injection of lidocaine alone.
Detailed description
Purpose:
To carry out a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy of saline injection prior to the injection of Lidocaine/Adrenaline in reducing the pain of local anaesthetic injections into the upper eyelid.
Hypothesis:
Injection of saline to the upper eyelids prior to lidocaine/adrenaline injection reduces the pain of anaesthetic injections in upper eyelid surgery.
Justification:
In many surgical procedures performed under local anaesthetic, the most frightening and painful aspect of the procedure for patients is the anaesthetic injection, and various techniques have been advocated to address this.
Simple measures that reduce the pain of anaesthetic injection and are widely practised include administering the injection slowly and using a fine-bore needle (30 Gauge). Other techniques that have been shown to be effective include warming or buffering the local anaesthetic. The use of 0.9% bacteriostatic saline solution in conjunction with lidocaine has been demonstrated to significantly reduce patients' perceived pain during the injection and operative procedure in eyelid surgery. Cooling the skin immediately prior to treatment has been shown to reduce the pain of dermatological laser procedures although this might be difficult to perform around the eyes because of the risk of injuring the cornea. Similarly, topical anaesthetic agents, such as EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics) cream, which are applied to the skin one hour prior to injection are commonly employed for use on the limbs of infants and children but are not safe for use around the eyes since inadvertent ocular application causes corneal de-epithelisation.
Sedative agents, such as midazolam may be useful in anxious patients, but this requires the input of an anaesthetist and it is often difficult to finely control the level of sedation; it is usually preferable not to have patients sedated during eyelid surgery when patient cooperation is required intra-operatively to assess the height of the eyelids, for example in ptosis surgery.
The investigators have noticed in clinical practice that whenever the investigators injected saline into the upper eyelids prior to the injection of the mixture of lidocaine/adrenaline the patients reported of no pain. The investigators assume that by using the isotonic saline cells in the tissue are not harmed and a minor effect of anesthesia is achieved. The anesthetic solution injected later on is diluted, however the eyelid is properly anesthesized.
Research Methods:
The study will be a prospective, interventional, randomised, controlled clinical trial.
All patients who fit the inclusion criteria will be offered participation in the trial on the day their surgery is booked. They will be given an information leaflet about the trial, explaining the aim of the study without describing the effect of the saline injection prior to the anesthetic solution injection in order to reduce the risk of biasing their perception. They will be advised that non-participation will not affect their care in anyway.
The intervention is of no risk to the patient and will not affect the surgical procedure in any way. Any questions that the patient has will be addressed beforehand and they will be required to sign a consent form prior to inclusion in the trial.
They will be advised beforehand that they will be required to verbally rate their pain score on a scale of 0 to 10 immediately after both sides have been anaesthetised, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst imaginable pain.
All participants included in the study will undergo bilateral surgery and will therefore act as their own controls: Saline will only be injected prior to the injection of the anaesthetic into one side. The test and placebo will be randomly assigned to either the first or second eyelid; the right eyelid will be injected first in all patients, as is routine practice. Computer-generated sequential binary randomisation will be used. Allocation will be concealed from the surgeon until immediately prior to the anaesthetic injection.
All anaesthetic injections will consist of xylocaine 1% with 1:100,000 adrenaline and will be administered through a short 30 Gauge needle at a constant slow speed at multiple (6-7) sites along the upper lid by a single oculoplastic consultant.
Patients' verbal pain scores will be elicited and documented immediately by the oculoplastic fellow.
Planned sample size On a scale of 0 to 10 a difference in pain score of 1.5 may be considered to be clinically significant. The power calculation for a paired t-test with 90% power and p=0.05 demonstrated that a sample size of 80 patients to be more than sufficient to detect a significant difference.
The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed ophthalmological journal and presentation at international ophthalmological meetings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Saline + Lidocaine/Adrenaline | Experimental | Procedure: Injection of Saline + Lidocaine/Adrenaline |
| Lidocaine/Adrenaline only | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Lidocaine/Adrenaline only |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid surgery under local anaesthetic who have given fully informed consent to be in the trial
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Previous upper eyelid surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Injection of Saline + Lidocaine/AdrenalineAlso: Local eyelid anesthesiaAll anaesthetic injections will consist of xylocaine 1% with 1:100,000 adrenaline and will be administered through a short 30 Gauge needle at a constant slow speed at multiple (6-7) sites along the upper lid by a single oculoplastic consultant. The experimental eyelid will receive a saline-consisted injection 0.5cc prior to the administration of the anesthetic injection. Injection of Saline + Lidocaine 1% | Procedure or surgery | Saline + Lidocaine/Adrenaline |
| Lidocaine/Adrenaline onlyAlso: Local eyelid anesthesiaInjection of Lidocaine/Adrenaline only | Procedure or surgery | Lidocaine/Adrenaline only |
Primary outcome
Patients' verbal pain scores will be elicited and documented immediately by the oculoplastic fellow
Time frame: 1-2 minutes
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2011.
- Background: PubMed 11849262Chen BK, Eichenfield LF. Pediatric anesthesia in dermatologic surgery: when hand-holding is not enough. Dermatol Surg. 2001 Dec;27(12):1010-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.01854.x.
- Background: PubMed 7618771Brogan GX Jr, Giarrusso E, Hollander JE, Cassara G, Maranga MC, Thode HC. Comparison of plain, warmed, and buffered lidocaine for anesthesia of traumatic wounds. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Aug;26(2):121-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70139-7.
- Background: PubMed 2018901Bainbridge LC. Comparison of room temperature and body temperature local anaesthetic solutions. Br J Plast Surg. 1991 Feb-Mar;44(2):147-8. doi: 10.1016/0007-1226(91)90050-t.
- Background: PubMed 2794204Stewart JH, Cole GW, Klein JA. Neutralized lidocaine with epinephrine for local anesthesia. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989 Oct;15(10):1081-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1989.tb03127.x.
- Background: PubMed 2240750Bartfield JM, Gennis P, Barbera J, Breuer B, Gallagher EJ. Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Dec;19(12):1387-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82603-4.
- Background: PubMed 20303597Fayers T, Morris DS, Dolman PJ. Vibration-assisted anesthesia in eyelid surgery. Ophthalmology. 2010 Jul;117(7):1453-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.025. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
Related trials for Blepharoptosis
RecruitingObservational study
Blepharoptosis After Repeated Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections: A Prospective Study
Blepharoptosis, Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
The Effect of Lumify™ on Ocular Redness, Intraocular Pressure, and Eyelid Position in Glaucoma Patients
Glaucoma, Glaucoma, Open-Angle
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Suture Material on Eyelid Height Stability After Anterior White-Line Advancement for Aponeurotic Ptosis.
Blepharoptosis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Performance and Safety Assessment of SPRING THREAD® Elastic Tensor Thread in Patients With Mild to Moderate Facial Ptosis.
Ptosis, Ptosis, Mild
Recruiting
A Feedback-enabled Magnetic Device for Temporary Management of Blepharoptosis
Blepharoptosis, Device Usability
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ido Didi Fabian, MD study chair
Sheba medical center, Goldschleger institute
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Injection of Saline + Lidocaine/Adrenaline and Lidocaine/Adrenaline only in people with Blepharoptosis, run by Sheba Medical Center at 2 sites in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ido Didi Fabian, MD (+972547830444, didifabian@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patients' verbal pain scores will be elicited and documented immediately by the oculoplastic fellow (time frame: 1-2 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01239498, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2011.