PsoriasisPhase 3NCT01241591
A Phase 3, Multi Site, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Comparing CP- 690,550 And Etanercept In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
A Phase 3 study testing CP 690,550 5 mg, CP 690,550 10 mg and Etanercept 50 mg in people with Psoriasis, run by Pfizer at 122 sites in 26 countries.
Trial summary
To evaluate the efficacy of CP-690,550 as compared to etanercept and the safety of CP-690,550 for treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- CP 690,550 5 mg, CP 690,550 10 mg and Etanercept 50 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,101 participants
- Where
- 122 sitesin 26 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Jan 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have had a diagnosis of plaque type psoriasis (psoriasis vulgaris);
- Have plaque-type psoriasis covering at least 10% of total body surface area
- Considered by dermatologist investigator to be a candidate for systemic therapy or phototherapy of psoriasis
Who cannot join
- Non-plaque or drug induced forms of psoriasis
- Cannot discontinue current systemic and/or topical therapies for the treatment of psoriasis
- Cannot discontinue phototherapy
- Any uncontrolled significant medical condition
Trial locations and contacts
122 sites in 26 countries.
122 sites in 26 countries
France16 sites
CHU de Besancon - Hopital Saint Jacques
Besançon, 25030
Hopital Ambroise Pare, Service de Dermatologie
Boulogne, 92104
Chu Morvan
Brest Cédex, 29609
CHG Le Mans
Le Mans, Cedex 09, 72037
Hopital Dupuytren
Limoges, 87042
Hopital Fournier
Nancy Cédex, 54035
CHU de Nantes - Hotel Dieu
Nantes, 44035
CHU de NICE - Hôpital de l'Archet II
Nice, 06200
Hopital Saint-Louis
Paris, 75010
Hôpital Bichat
Paris, 75018
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69310
C.H.U. de Poitiers
Poitiers, 86000
Hopital Robert Debre
Reims, 51100
Hopital Nord
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270
Hôpital Larrey
Toulouse, 31059
Hôpital de Brabois / Bâtiment Philippe Canton
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Germany16 sites
Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Hautarztpraxis
Berlin, 13507
Dres.Kirsten Prepeneit und Volker Streit
Buchholz, 21244
Universitaets- Hautklinik Koeln
Cologne, 50924
Universitaetsklinik Carl Gustav Carus
Dresden, 01307
Hautzentrum Duelmen
Dülmen, 48249
Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen Hautklinik im Internistischen Zentrum
Erlangen, 91054
Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitaet
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Hautklinik der Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69115
Hautarztpraxis Dres. Scholz, Sebastian, Schilling
Mahlow, 15831
Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz KoeR
Mainz, 55131
Technische Universitaet Muenchen
München, 80802
Dres. med. Bredlich/PD Rosenbach/Thiele
Osnabrück, 49078
Eberhard-Karls-Universitaet Tuebingen
Tübingen, 72076
Hautarztpraxis
Witten, 58453
Russia12 sites
Korolev Dermatovenerologic Dispensary
Korolyov, Moscow Oblast, 141070
State Research Center of Dermatovenerology, Department of clinical dermatology
Moscow, 107076
State Research Center of Dermatovenerology, Department of dermatology
Moscow, 107076
Dermatovenerologic dispensary #7
Moscow, 121614
Rostov-on-Don regional dermatovenerologic dispensary
Rostov-on-Don, 344007
Ryazan regional clinical dermatovenerologic dispensary
Ryazan, 390046
Dermatovenerologic dispensary #10 of Vyborg region
Saint Petersburg, 194021
Military medical academy S.M. Kirov
Saint Petersburg, 194044
North-Western State Medical University I.I. Mechnikov, Dermatovenerology Department
Saint Petersburg, 195067
Clinic of dermatovenerologic diseases
Saratov, 410028
Smolensk State Medical Academy
Smolensk, 214019
Clinical hospital of emergency care N.V. Soloviev
Yaroslavl, 150003
Czechia6 sites
Nemocnice Ceske Budejovice, a.s.
České Budějovice, 37001
FN Kradec Kralove
Hradec Králové, 50005
Fakultni nemocnice Plzen
Plzen - Bory, 30599
Kozni ordinace
Prague, 11000
Kralska zdravotni a.s., Masarykovy nemocnice o.z.
Ústí nad Labem, 40113
Kralska zdravotni
Ústí nad Labem, 40113
Spain6 sites
Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon
Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
Alicante, 03010
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Madrid, 28006
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222
Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46014
Bulgaria5 sites
Universitetska Mnogoprofilna Bolnitsa Za Aktivno Lechenie- Dr Georgi Stranski- Pleven
Pleven, 5800
Tsentar za kozhno-venericheski zaboliavania" EOOD
Sofia, 1404
Mnogoprofilna Bolnitsa Za Aktivno Lechenie- Tokuda Bolnitsa Sofia- Sofia
Sofia, 1407
Universitetska mnogoprofilna bolnitsa za aktivno lechenie- Alexandrovska- Sofia
Sofia, 1431
MBAL na Voennomeditsinska akademia- Sofia
Sofia, 1606
Colombia5 sites
Centro Integral de Reumatología del Caribe Circaribe S.A
Barranquilla, Atlántico, 0000
Centro de Investigacion Clinica de la Universidad del Rosario
Bogota, Cundinamarca, 0000
Riesgo de Fractura S.A.
Bogota, Cundinamarca, 0000
Medicity S.A.S
Bucaramanga, Santander Department, 0000
Reumalab S.A.S.
Medellín, Antioquia, 0
Hungary5 sites
Synexus Magyarorszag Kft.
Budapest, 1036
Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum/Bor- es Nemikortani Klinika
Debrecen, 4032
Miskolci Semmelweis Ignac Korhaz-Rendelointezet/Borgyogyaszat
Miskolc, 3529
SZTE Szentgyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont/Borgyogyaszati es Allergologiai Klinika
Szeged, 6720
ALLERGO-DERM BAKOS Kft.
Szolnok, 5000
Poland5 sites
NZOZ Osteo-Medic s.c. Artur Racewicz, Jerzy Supronik
Bialystok, 05-354
Klinika Dermatologii, Wenerologii i Alergologii, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gdansk, 80-952
Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne NZOZ
Krakow, 31-501
Novum Instytut Dermatologii Leczniczej i Estetycznej
Opole, 45-080
Solumed S.C.
Poznan, 60-539
Sweden5 sites
Falu lasarett, Hudkliniken
Falun, 791 82
Hermelinen Forskning AB
Luleå, 972 33
Skanes Universitetssjukhus i Malmo, Hudkliniken
Malmö, 205 02
Sodersjukhuset, Hudkliniken
Stockholm, 118 83
Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Solna
Stockholm, 171 76
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Mersin University Medical Faculty
Akdeniz, Mersin, 33070
Gazi University Medical Faculty
Beşevler, Ankara, 06500
Istanbul university Istanbul Medical Faculty
Çapa, Istanbul, 34390
Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dermatoloji Anabilim Dali
Izmir, 35340
T.C. Saglik Bakanligi Marmara Universitesi Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi Dermatoloji Anabilim Dali
Pendik, Istanbul, 34890
Austria4 sites
LKH Feldkirch Abteilung fuer Dermatologie und Venerologie
Feldkirch, A-6807
LKH Innsbruck Universitaetsklinik fuer Dermatologie und Venerologie
Innsbruck, A-6020
LKH Salzburg, Landesklinik fuer Dermatologie
Salzburg, 5020
Krankenhaus Hietzing mit Neurologischem Zentrum Rosenhuegel
Vienna, 1130
Chile4 sites
Clinica Dermovein S.A.
Santiago, 7640881
Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile, Departamento Dermatologia
Santiago, 8380456
Clinica Davila
Santiago, Rm 8431657, RM, 8420383
Centro de Especialidades Dermatologicas
Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 00000
Netherlands4 sites
Academic Medical Centre (AMC)
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ
PT & R
Beek, 6191 JW
Amphia Hospital Location Molengracht / Department Dermatology
Breda, 4800 RK
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, 3015 CA
Argentina3 sites
Centro de Investigaciones Dermatologicas
Buenos Aires, C1114aap
Centro de Investigaciones Dermatologicas
Buenos Aires, C1114AAP
IMAI (Instituto Medico de Asistencia e Investigaciones)
Buenos Aires, C1425AWC
Croatia3 sites
Department of Dermatovenerology, University Hospital Center Osijek
Osijek, 31000
Dermatovenerological Clinic, University hospital center "Sestre milosrdnice"
Zagreb, 10 000
Department of dermatovenerology, University Hospital Center Zagreb
Zagreb, 10000
Denmark3 sites
Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus C, 8000
Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen NV, 2400
Hudklinikken Herning
Herning, 7400
Slovakia3 sites
Dermatologicka klinika SZU, Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou F.D. Roosevelta
Banská Bystrica, 975 17
Narodny ustav reumatickych chorob
Piešťany, 921 12
DOST-Dermatovenerologicke oddelenie sanatorneho typu, SANARE, spol. s r.o.
Svidník, 089 01
Belgium2 sites
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels, 1200
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000
Singapore2 sites
National Skin Centre
Singapore, 308205
Changi General Hospital
Singapore, 529889
South Korea2 sites
Samsung Medical Center / Department of Dermatology
Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 135-710
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Department of Dermatology
Seoul, 120-752
United Kingdom2 sites
Leicester Royal Infirmary, Balmoral building, Clinic 3, Dermatology
Leicester, LE1 5WW
Whipps Cross University Hospital
London, Leytonstone, E11 1NR
Bosnia and Herzegovina1 site
Department for skin and venerial diseases, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo
Sarajevo, 71000
Hong Kong1 site
The University of Hong Kong (HKU)-Queen Mary Hospital (QMH)
Hong Kong, 0
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multi Site, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Oral Doses Of CP- 690,550 And 1 Subcutaneous Dose Of Etanercept In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
To evaluate the efficacy of CP-690,550 as compared to etanercept and the safety of CP-690,550 for treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Being tested
- CP 690,550 5 mg, CP 690,550 10 mg, Etanercept 50 mg, Placebo
- Keywords
- CP-690,550, Etanercept, Moderate, Severe, Chronic, Plaque, Psoriasis, Efficacy, Safety, Tofacitinib, Xeljanz, OPT Compare, OPT, head-to-head, non-inferiority, Psoriasis vulgaris, short-term, Itch, Pruritus, Plaque psoriasis
- Medical subject headings
- Psoriasis, Lymphoma, Follicular, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome, Plaque, Amyloid, Pruritus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CP 690,550 5 mgDrug
CP-690,550 5 mg orally dosed twice daily and placebo subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks
CP 690,550 10 mgDrug
CP-690,550 10 mg orally dosed twice daily and placebo subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks
Etanercept 50 mgBiological
Placebo orally dosed twice daily and etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks
PlaceboOther
Placebo orally dosed twice daily and placebo subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CP 690,550 5 mg BID+Placebo BIW | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: CP 690,550 5 mg |
| CP 690,550 10 mg BID+Placebo BIW | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: CP 690,550 10 mg |
| Placebo BID+Etanercept 50 mg BIW | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Etanercept 50 mg |
| Placebo BID+Placebo BIW | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" at Week 12
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 to 4). The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Week 12
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin], and lower limbs [including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response was defined as at least a 75 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline/Day 1.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (44)
Percentage of Participants With a PGA Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 to 4). The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response is defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 to 4). The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin], and lower limbs [including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline/Day 1.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Mean PASI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section*area score*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section*area score*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean PASI Component Scores by Body Region During the 12-Week Double Blind Treatment
Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section*area score*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores by Body Region During the 12-Week Double Blind Treatment
Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section*area score*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Percentage of Total Psoriatic BSA During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The % surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Psoriatic BSA During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The %surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant(fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline (PASI50) During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
PASI quantifies severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin], and lower limbs [including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Median Time to PASI50 Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Measured: Baseline up to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline (PASI90) During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
PASI quantifies severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin], and lower limbs [including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Median Time to Achieve PASI75 Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Measured: Baseline up to Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score Greater Than or Equal to (≥)125% of the Baseline PASI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in ISI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ISI Score of 0 During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in DLQI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 12
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in DLQI Subscale Scores During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3). The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Response ≥5 During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Response ≤1 During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 12
Median Time to DLQI Response
The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. DLQI Response was defined as a 5-point reduction in the total DLQI score.
Measured: Weeks 4 and 12
Mean Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores at Baseline and Week 12
The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). A PCS score and MCS score are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores; PCS/MCS summary concept score = (raw score*10) plus 50. Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 12
The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 MCS and PCS Scores
The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). A PCS score and MCS score are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores; PCS/MCS summary concept score = (raw score*10) plus 50. Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.
Measured: Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores
The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PtGA) Category During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5-point scale (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; 4=severe).
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Percentage of Participants With a PtGA Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5-point scale (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; 4=severe). Response defined as score of 0 or 1.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Category During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The PSSM is a single, 7 point item that evaluates overall participant satisfaction with the study treatment. Response options range from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied" with the study medication.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSM Response of 'Very Satisfied' or 'Somewhat Satisfied' at Week 12
The PSSM is a single, 7 point item that evaluates overall participant satisfaction with the study treatment. Response options range from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied" with the study medication.
Measured: Week 12
Mean European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Utility Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Least Squares (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Health State Utility Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.
Measured: Week 12
Mean EQ-5D Visual Analog Score (VAS) During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS at Week 12
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Measured: Week 12
Dimension Health State EQ-5D Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed").
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Dimension Health State Score at Week 12
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed").
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Interacting With Healthcare Professionals During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization (Ps-HCRU) questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work. The first section assesses direct costs associated with healthcare resource use (interactions with healthcare providers such as general practitioners [GPs], primary care physicians [PCPs], or family medicine physicians [FMP], emergency room visits, and hospitalizations), and the second section assesses indirect costs associated with absenteeism due to psoriasis and the impact of psoriasis on productivity at work.
Measured: Baseline (BL) and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Reporting Healthcare Resource Use Events During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Employed or Not Employed and the Impact of Psoriasis on Work
Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization Questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work. The questionnaire assesses employment status of participant (employed: yes or no) and if currently employed it asks the participant if they were absent or on sick leave from work due to psoriasis; if unemployed it asks the participant if the unemployment is due to psoriasis.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Reporting Work-Impacted Events During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization Questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work.
Measured: Week 12
Mean Psoriasis Quality of Life 12 (PQOL-12) Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The PQOL-12 is a 12-item questionnaire; 8 of the items on the Koo-Menter Psoriasis Index 12-item Quality of Life Questionnaire (PQOL-12) focus on emotional issues associated with psoriasis (self conscious, helpless, embarrassed, ability to enjoy life). The last 4 items deal with physical symptoms (pain or soreness, itch, physical irritation) and choice of clothing. The recall period is over the past month. The questions are answered on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being best and 10 being worst. Scores from each question are summed to give a total score (range 0 -120); higher scores indicate greater impairment to quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in PQOL-12 Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
The PQOL-12 is a 12-item questionnaire; 8 of the items on the PQOL-12) focus on emotional issues associated with psoriasis (self conscious, helpless, embarrassed, ability to enjoy life). The last 4 items deal with physical symptoms (pain or soreness, itch, physical irritation) and choice of clothing. The recall period is over the past month. The questions are answered on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being best and 10 being worst. Scores from each question are summed to give a total score (range 0 -120); higher scores indicate greater impairment to quality of life.
Measured: Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionJan 2013
- Study completionJan 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01241591
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3921080
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 12 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 26 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Panaccione R, Isaacs JD, Chen LA, Wang W, Marren A, Kwok K, Wang L, Chan G, Su C. Characterization of Creatine Kinase Levels in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Clinical Trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2732-2743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06560-4. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
PubMed 32816215Valenzuela F, Paul C, Mallbris L, Tan H, Papacharalambous J, Valdez H, Mamolo C. Tofacitinib versus etanercept or placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: patient-reported outcomes from a Phase 3 study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1753-1759. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13702. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
PubMed 27271195Bachelez H, van de Kerkhof PC, Strohal R, Kubanov A, Valenzuela F, Lee JH, Yakusevich V, Chimenti S, Papacharalambous J, Proulx J, Gupta P, Tan H, Tawadrous M, Valdez H, Wolk R; OPT Compare Investigators. Tofacitinib versus etanercept or placebo in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis: a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):552-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62113-9. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
PubMed 26051365
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multi Site, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Oral Doses Of CP- 690,550 And 1 Subcutaneous Dose Of Etanercept In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01241591
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A3921080
- Conditions
- Psoriasis
- Keywords
- CP-690,550, Etanercept, Moderate, Severe, Chronic, Plaque, Psoriasis, Efficacy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 May 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the efficacy of CP-690,550 as compared to etanercept and the safety of CP-690,550 for treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CP 690,550 5 mg BID+Placebo BIW | Experimental | Drug: CP 690,550 5 mg |
| CP 690,550 10 mg BID+Placebo BIW | Experimental | Drug: CP 690,550 10 mg |
| Placebo BID+Etanercept 50 mg BIW | Active comparator | Biological: Etanercept 50 mg |
| Placebo BID+Placebo BIW | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Have had a diagnosis of plaque type psoriasis (psoriasis vulgaris);
- Have plaque-type psoriasis covering at least 10% of total body surface area
- Considered by dermatologist investigator to be a candidate for systemic therapy or phototherapy of psoriasis
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Non-plaque or drug induced forms of psoriasis
- Cannot discontinue current systemic and/or topical therapies for the treatment of psoriasis
- Cannot discontinue phototherapy
- Any uncontrolled significant medical condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CP 690,550 5 mgCP-690,550 5 mg orally dosed twice daily and placebo subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks | Drug | CP 690,550 5 mg BID+Placebo BIW |
| CP 690,550 10 mgCP-690,550 10 mg orally dosed twice daily and placebo subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks | Drug | CP 690,550 10 mg BID+Placebo BIW |
| Etanercept 50 mgPlacebo orally dosed twice daily and etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks | Biological | Placebo BID+Etanercept 50 mg BIW |
| PlaceboPlacebo orally dosed twice daily and placebo subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks. | Other | Placebo BID+Placebo BIW |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 to 4). The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).
Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin], and lower limbs [including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response was defined as at least a 75 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline/Day 1.
44 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With a PGA Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Mean PASI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean PASI Component Scores by Body Region During the 12-Week Double Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores by Body Region During the 12-Week Double Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Percentage of Total Psoriatic BSA During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Psoriatic BSA During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline (PASI50) During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Median Time to PASI50 Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline (PASI90) During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Median Time to Achieve PASI75 Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 12
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score Greater Than or Equal to (≥)125% of the Baseline PASI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in ISI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ISI Score of 0 During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in DLQI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 12
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12
Mean Change From Baseline in DLQI Subscale Scores During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Response ≥5 During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Response ≤1 During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 12
Median Time to DLQI Response
Time frame: Weeks 4 and 12
Mean Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores at Baseline and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 12
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 MCS and PCS Scores
Time frame: Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PtGA) Category During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, and 8
Percentage of Participants With a PtGA Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Category During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSM Response of 'Very Satisfied' or 'Somewhat Satisfied' at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Mean European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Utility Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Least Squares (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Health State Utility Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Week 12
Mean EQ-5D Visual Analog Score (VAS) During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Dimension Health State EQ-5D Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Dimension Health State Score at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Participants Interacting With Healthcare Professionals During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Baseline (BL) and Week 12
Percentage of Participants Reporting Healthcare Resource Use Events During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment
Time frame: Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Dec 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32816215Panaccione R, Isaacs JD, Chen LA, Wang W, Marren A, Kwok K, Wang L, Chan G, Su C. Characterization of Creatine Kinase Levels in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Clinical Trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2732-2743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06560-4. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27271195Valenzuela F, Paul C, Mallbris L, Tan H, Papacharalambous J, Valdez H, Mamolo C. Tofacitinib versus etanercept or placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: patient-reported outcomes from a Phase 3 study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1753-1759. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13702. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26051365Bachelez H, van de Kerkhof PC, Strohal R, Kubanov A, Valenzuela F, Lee JH, Yakusevich V, Chimenti S, Papacharalambous J, Proulx J, Gupta P, Tan H, Tawadrous M, Valdez H, Wolk R; OPT Compare Investigators. Tofacitinib versus etanercept or placebo in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis: a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):552-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62113-9. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Psoriasis
RecruitingObservational study
Treatment Effectiveness in People With axSpA or PsA Starting Treatment With Bimekizumab, Risankizumab, Guselkumab, Upadacitinib, or a TNF Inhibitor
Axial Spondylarthritis (axSpA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Crisaborole 2% Ointment Versus Tacrolimus 0.1% Ointment in the Treatment of Intertriginous and/or Anogenital Psoriasis.
Psoriasis, Psoriasis Genital
RecruitingObservational study
PsoBest - The German Psoriasis Registry
Psoriasis, Psoriatic-arthritis
RecruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Trial of MK-8644 in Healthy Participants and Participants With Psoriasis (MK-8644-001)
Psoriasis, Healthy
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis (LATITUDE PsA NeXt)
Psoriatic Arthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
122 sites in 26 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing CP 690,550 5 mg, CP 690,550 10 mg and Etanercept 50 mg in people with Psoriasis, run by Pfizer at 122 sites in 26 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 122 sites in France, Germany, Russia, Czechia, Spain and 21 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01241591, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Dec 2018.