AzTrials
AzTrials

PsoriasisPhase 3NCT01241591

A Phase 3, Multi Site, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Comparing CP- 690,550 And Etanercept In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3 study testing CP 690,550 5 mg, CP 690,550 10 mg and Etanercept 50 mg in people with Psoriasis, run by Pfizer at 122 sites in 26 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the efficacy of CP-690,550 as compared to etanercept and the safety of CP-690,550 for treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Psoriasis
What is being tested?
CP 690,550 5 mg, CP 690,550 10 mg and Etanercept 50 mg
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,101 participants
Where
122 sitesin 26 countries
Study dates
Nov 2010to Jan 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have had a diagnosis of plaque type psoriasis (psoriasis vulgaris);
  • Have plaque-type psoriasis covering at least 10% of total body surface area
  • Considered by dermatologist investigator to be a candidate for systemic therapy or phototherapy of psoriasis

Who cannot join

  • Non-plaque or drug induced forms of psoriasis
  • Cannot discontinue current systemic and/or topical therapies for the treatment of psoriasis
  • Cannot discontinue phototherapy
  • Any uncontrolled significant medical condition

Trial locations and contacts

122 sites in 26 countries.

122 sites in 26 countries

France16 sites
  • CHU de Besancon - Hopital Saint Jacques

    Besançon, 25030

  • Hopital Ambroise Pare, Service de Dermatologie

    Boulogne, 92104

  • Chu Morvan

    Brest Cédex, 29609

  • CHG Le Mans

    Le Mans, Cedex 09, 72037

  • Hopital Dupuytren

    Limoges, 87042

  • Hopital Fournier

    Nancy Cédex, 54035

  • CHU de Nantes - Hotel Dieu

    Nantes, 44035

  • CHU de NICE - Hôpital de l'Archet II

    Nice, 06200

  • Hopital Saint-Louis

    Paris, 75010

  • Hôpital Bichat

    Paris, 75018

  • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

    Pierre-Bénite, 69310

  • C.H.U. de Poitiers

    Poitiers, 86000

  • Hopital Robert Debre

    Reims, 51100

  • Hopital Nord

    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270

  • Hôpital Larrey

    Toulouse, 31059

  • Hôpital de Brabois / Bâtiment Philippe Canton

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511

Other trials in France

Germany16 sites
  • Charite - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Hautarztpraxis

    Berlin, 13507

  • Dres.Kirsten Prepeneit und Volker Streit

    Buchholz, 21244

  • Universitaets- Hautklinik Koeln

    Cologne, 50924

  • Universitaetsklinik Carl Gustav Carus

    Dresden, 01307

  • Hautzentrum Duelmen

    Dülmen, 48249

  • Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen Hautklinik im Internistischen Zentrum

    Erlangen, 91054

  • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universitaet

    Frankfurt am Main, 60590

  • Universitaetsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

    Hamburg, 20246

  • Hautklinik der Ruprecht-Karls-Universitaet Heidelberg

    Heidelberg, 69115

  • Hautarztpraxis Dres. Scholz, Sebastian, Schilling

    Mahlow, 15831

  • Universitaetsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz KoeR

    Mainz, 55131

  • Technische Universitaet Muenchen

    München, 80802

  • Dres. med. Bredlich/PD Rosenbach/Thiele

    Osnabrück, 49078

  • Eberhard-Karls-Universitaet Tuebingen

    Tübingen, 72076

  • Hautarztpraxis

    Witten, 58453

Other trials in Germany

Russia12 sites
  • Korolev Dermatovenerologic Dispensary

    Korolyov, Moscow Oblast, 141070

  • State Research Center of Dermatovenerology, Department of clinical dermatology

    Moscow, 107076

  • State Research Center of Dermatovenerology, Department of dermatology

    Moscow, 107076

  • Dermatovenerologic dispensary #7

    Moscow, 121614

  • Rostov-on-Don regional dermatovenerologic dispensary

    Rostov-on-Don, 344007

  • Ryazan regional clinical dermatovenerologic dispensary

    Ryazan, 390046

  • Dermatovenerologic dispensary #10 of Vyborg region

    Saint Petersburg, 194021

  • Military medical academy S.M. Kirov

    Saint Petersburg, 194044

  • North-Western State Medical University I.I. Mechnikov, Dermatovenerology Department

    Saint Petersburg, 195067

  • Clinic of dermatovenerologic diseases

    Saratov, 410028

  • Smolensk State Medical Academy

    Smolensk, 214019

  • Clinical hospital of emergency care N.V. Soloviev

    Yaroslavl, 150003

Other trials in Russia

Czechia6 sites
  • Nemocnice Ceske Budejovice, a.s.

    České Budějovice, 37001

  • FN Kradec Kralove

    Hradec Králové, 50005

  • Fakultni nemocnice Plzen

    Plzen - Bory, 30599

  • Kozni ordinace

    Prague, 11000

  • Kralska zdravotni a.s., Masarykovy nemocnice o.z.

    Ústí nad Labem, 40113

  • Kralska zdravotni

    Ústí nad Labem, 40113

Other trials in Czechia

Spain6 sites
  • Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon

    Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922

  • Hospital General Universitario de Alicante

    Alicante, 03010

  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

    Madrid, 28006

  • Hospital 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda

    Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222

  • Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

    Valencia, 46014

Other trials in Spain

Bulgaria5 sites
  • Universitetska Mnogoprofilna Bolnitsa Za Aktivno Lechenie- Dr Georgi Stranski- Pleven

    Pleven, 5800

  • Tsentar za kozhno-venericheski zaboliavania" EOOD

    Sofia, 1404

  • Mnogoprofilna Bolnitsa Za Aktivno Lechenie- Tokuda Bolnitsa Sofia- Sofia

    Sofia, 1407

  • Universitetska mnogoprofilna bolnitsa za aktivno lechenie- Alexandrovska- Sofia

    Sofia, 1431

  • MBAL na Voennomeditsinska akademia- Sofia

    Sofia, 1606

Other trials in Bulgaria

Colombia5 sites
  • Centro Integral de Reumatología del Caribe Circaribe S.A

    Barranquilla, Atlántico, 0000

  • Centro de Investigacion Clinica de la Universidad del Rosario

    Bogota, Cundinamarca, 0000

  • Riesgo de Fractura S.A.

    Bogota, Cundinamarca, 0000

  • Medicity S.A.S

    Bucaramanga, Santander Department, 0000

  • Reumalab S.A.S.

    Medellín, Antioquia, 0

Other trials in Colombia

Hungary5 sites
  • Synexus Magyarorszag Kft.

    Budapest, 1036

  • Debreceni Egyetem Orvos- es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum/Bor- es Nemikortani Klinika

    Debrecen, 4032

  • Miskolci Semmelweis Ignac Korhaz-Rendelointezet/Borgyogyaszat

    Miskolc, 3529

  • SZTE Szentgyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont/Borgyogyaszati es Allergologiai Klinika

    Szeged, 6720

  • ALLERGO-DERM BAKOS Kft.

    Szolnok, 5000

Other trials in Hungary

Poland5 sites
  • NZOZ Osteo-Medic s.c. Artur Racewicz, Jerzy Supronik

    Bialystok, 05-354

  • Klinika Dermatologii, Wenerologii i Alergologii, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne

    Gdansk, 80-952

  • Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne NZOZ

    Krakow, 31-501

  • Novum Instytut Dermatologii Leczniczej i Estetycznej

    Opole, 45-080

  • Solumed S.C.

    Poznan, 60-539

Other trials in Poland

Sweden5 sites
  • Falu lasarett, Hudkliniken

    Falun, 791 82

  • Hermelinen Forskning AB

    Luleå, 972 33

  • Skanes Universitetssjukhus i Malmo, Hudkliniken

    Malmö, 205 02

  • Sodersjukhuset, Hudkliniken

    Stockholm, 118 83

  • Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset Solna

    Stockholm, 171 76

Other trials in Sweden

Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
  • Mersin University Medical Faculty

    Akdeniz, Mersin, 33070

  • Gazi University Medical Faculty

    Beşevler, Ankara, 06500

  • Istanbul university Istanbul Medical Faculty

    Çapa, Istanbul, 34390

  • Dokuz Eylul Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dermatoloji Anabilim Dali

    Izmir, 35340

  • T.C. Saglik Bakanligi Marmara Universitesi Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi Dermatoloji Anabilim Dali

    Pendik, Istanbul, 34890

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Austria4 sites
  • LKH Feldkirch Abteilung fuer Dermatologie und Venerologie

    Feldkirch, A-6807

  • LKH Innsbruck Universitaetsklinik fuer Dermatologie und Venerologie

    Innsbruck, A-6020

  • LKH Salzburg, Landesklinik fuer Dermatologie

    Salzburg, 5020

  • Krankenhaus Hietzing mit Neurologischem Zentrum Rosenhuegel

    Vienna, 1130

Other trials in Austria

Chile4 sites
  • Clinica Dermovein S.A.

    Santiago, 7640881

  • Hospital Clinico Universidad de Chile, Departamento Dermatologia

    Santiago, 8380456

  • Clinica Davila

    Santiago, Rm 8431657, RM, 8420383

  • Centro de Especialidades Dermatologicas

    Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 00000

Other trials in Chile

Netherlands4 sites
  • Academic Medical Centre (AMC)

    Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ

  • PT & R

    Beek, 6191 JW

  • Amphia Hospital Location Molengracht / Department Dermatology

    Breda, 4800 RK

  • Erasmus MC

    Rotterdam, 3015 CA

Other trials in Netherlands

Argentina3 sites
  • Centro de Investigaciones Dermatologicas

    Buenos Aires, C1114aap

  • Centro de Investigaciones Dermatologicas

    Buenos Aires, C1114AAP

  • IMAI (Instituto Medico de Asistencia e Investigaciones)

    Buenos Aires, C1425AWC

Other trials in Argentina

Croatia3 sites
  • Department of Dermatovenerology, University Hospital Center Osijek

    Osijek, 31000

  • Dermatovenerological Clinic, University hospital center "Sestre milosrdnice"

    Zagreb, 10 000

  • Department of dermatovenerology, University Hospital Center Zagreb

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Denmark3 sites
  • Department of Dermatology, Aarhus University Hospital

    Aarhus C, 8000

  • Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen

    Copenhagen NV, 2400

  • Hudklinikken Herning

    Herning, 7400

Other trials in Denmark

Slovakia3 sites
  • Dermatologicka klinika SZU, Fakultna nemocnica s poliklinikou F.D. Roosevelta

    Banská Bystrica, 975 17

  • Narodny ustav reumatickych chorob

    Piešťany, 921 12

  • DOST-Dermatovenerologicke oddelenie sanatorneho typu, SANARE, spol. s r.o.

    Svidník, 089 01

Other trials in Slovakia

Belgium2 sites
  • Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc

    Brussels, 1200

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

    Ghent, 9000

Other trials in Belgium

Singapore2 sites
  • National Skin Centre

    Singapore, 308205

  • Changi General Hospital

    Singapore, 529889

Other trials in Singapore

South Korea2 sites
  • Samsung Medical Center / Department of Dermatology

    Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 135-710

  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine/Department of Dermatology

    Seoul, 120-752

Other trials in South Korea

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary, Balmoral building, Clinic 3, Dermatology

    Leicester, LE1 5WW

  • Whipps Cross University Hospital

    London, Leytonstone, E11 1NR

Other trials in United Kingdom

Bosnia and Herzegovina1 site
  • Department for skin and venerial diseases, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo

    Sarajevo, 71000

Other trials in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Hong Kong1 site
  • The University of Hong Kong (HKU)-Queen Mary Hospital (QMH)

    Hong Kong, 0

Other trials in Hong Kong

Israel1 site
  • Dermatology Department

    Afula, 18101

Other trials in Israel

Switzerland1 site
  • Kantonsspital St. Gallen

    Sankt Gallen, 9007

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Multi Site, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Oral Doses Of CP- 690,550 And 1 Subcutaneous Dose Of Etanercept In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

To evaluate the efficacy of CP-690,550 as compared to etanercept and the safety of CP-690,550 for treatment of moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

Conditions
Psoriasis
Being tested
CP 690,550 5 mg, CP 690,550 10 mg, Etanercept 50 mg, Placebo
Keywords
CP-690,550, Etanercept, Moderate, Severe, Chronic, Plaque, Psoriasis, Efficacy, Safety, Tofacitinib, Xeljanz, OPT Compare, OPT, head-to-head, non-inferiority, Psoriasis vulgaris, short-term, Itch, Pruritus, Plaque psoriasis
Medical subject headings
Psoriasis, Lymphoma, Follicular, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome, Plaque, Amyloid, Pruritus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CP 690,550 5 mgDrug

    CP-690,550 5 mg orally dosed twice daily and placebo subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks

  • CP 690,550 10 mgDrug

    CP-690,550 10 mg orally dosed twice daily and placebo subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks

  • Etanercept 50 mgBiological

    Placebo orally dosed twice daily and etanercept 50 mg subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks

  • PlaceboOther

    Placebo orally dosed twice daily and placebo subcutaneously dosed twice weekly for 12 weeks.

Study groups in NCT01241591
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CP 690,550 5 mg BID+Placebo BIWExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: CP 690,550 5 mg
CP 690,550 10 mg BID+Placebo BIWExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: CP 690,550 10 mg
Placebo BID+Etanercept 50 mg BIWActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Biological: Etanercept 50 mg
Placebo BID+Placebo BIWPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" at Week 12

    The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 to 4). The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Percentage of Participants With a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response at Week 12

    The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin], and lower limbs [including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response was defined as at least a 75 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline/Day 1.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (44)
  1. Percentage of Participants With a PGA Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 to 4). The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response is defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  2. Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 to 4). The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe).

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  3. Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin], and lower limbs [including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline/Day 1.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  4. Mean PASI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section*area score*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section*area score*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  6. Mean PASI Component Scores by Body Region During the 12-Week Double Blind Treatment

    Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section*area score*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores by Body Region During the 12-Week Double Blind Treatment

    Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section*area score*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  8. Mean Percentage of Total Psoriatic BSA During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The % surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  9. Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Total Psoriatic BSA During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The %surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant(fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline (PASI50) During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    PASI quantifies severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin], and lower limbs [including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  11. Median Time to PASI50 Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 12

  12. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline (PASI90) During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    PASI quantifies severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk [including axillae and groin], and lower limbs [including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  13. Median Time to Achieve PASI75 Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 12

  14. Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score Greater Than or Equal to (≥)125% of the Baseline PASI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  15. Mean Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  16. Mean Change From Baseline in ISI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  17. Percentage of Participants Achieving an ISI Score of 0 During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  18. Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12

  19. Mean Change From Baseline in DLQI Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

    Measured: Weeks 4 and 12

  20. Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3).

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 12

  21. Mean Change From Baseline in DLQI Subscale Scores During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3). The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

    Measured: Weeks 4 and 12

  22. Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Response ≥5 During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

    Measured: Weeks 4 and 12

  23. Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI Response ≤1 During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

    Measured: Weeks 4 and 12

  24. Median Time to DLQI Response

    The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. DLQI Response was defined as a 5-point reduction in the total DLQI score.

    Measured: Weeks 4 and 12

  25. Mean Short Form 36 (SF-36) Mental Component Summary (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) Scores at Baseline and Week 12

    The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). A PCS score and MCS score are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores; PCS/MCS summary concept score = (raw score*10) plus 50. Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  26. Mean SF-36 Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 12

    The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  27. Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 MCS and PCS Scores

    The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). A PCS score and MCS score are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores; PCS/MCS summary concept score = (raw score*10) plus 50. Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

    Measured: Week 12

  28. Mean Change From Baseline in SF-36 Domain Scores

    The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

    Measured: Week 12

  29. Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PtGA) Category During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5-point scale (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; 4=severe).

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  30. Percentage of Participants With a PtGA Response During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5-point scale (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; 4=severe). Response defined as score of 0 or 1.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  31. Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Category During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The PSSM is a single, 7 point item that evaluates overall participant satisfaction with the study treatment. Response options range from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied" with the study medication.

    Measured: Week 12

  32. Percentage of Participants Achieving PSSM Response of 'Very Satisfied' or 'Somewhat Satisfied' at Week 12

    The PSSM is a single, 7 point item that evaluates overall participant satisfaction with the study treatment. Response options range from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied" with the study medication.

    Measured: Week 12

  33. Mean European Quality of Life 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Health State Utility Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  34. Least Squares (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Health State Utility Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Week 12

  35. Mean EQ-5D Visual Analog Score (VAS) During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  36. Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS at Week 12

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Week 12

  37. Dimension Health State EQ-5D Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed").

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  38. Mean Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Dimension Health State Score at Week 12

    EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed").

    Measured: Week 12

  39. Percentage of Participants Interacting With Healthcare Professionals During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization (Ps-HCRU) questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work. The first section assesses direct costs associated with healthcare resource use (interactions with healthcare providers such as general practitioners [GPs], primary care physicians [PCPs], or family medicine physicians [FMP], emergency room visits, and hospitalizations), and the second section assesses indirect costs associated with absenteeism due to psoriasis and the impact of psoriasis on productivity at work.

    Measured: Baseline (BL) and Week 12

  40. Percentage of Participants Reporting Healthcare Resource Use Events During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    Measured: Week 12

  41. Percentage of Participants Employed or Not Employed and the Impact of Psoriasis on Work

    Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization Questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work. The questionnaire assesses employment status of participant (employed: yes or no) and if currently employed it asks the participant if they were absent or on sick leave from work due to psoriasis; if unemployed it asks the participant if the unemployment is due to psoriasis.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  42. Percentage of Participants Reporting Work-Impacted Events During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    Psoriasis Health Care Resource Utilization Questionnaire is a short questionnaire designed to assess healthcare resource use and the impact of psoriasis on work.

    Measured: Week 12

  43. Mean Psoriasis Quality of Life 12 (PQOL-12) Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The PQOL-12 is a 12-item questionnaire; 8 of the items on the Koo-Menter Psoriasis Index 12-item Quality of Life Questionnaire (PQOL-12) focus on emotional issues associated with psoriasis (self conscious, helpless, embarrassed, ability to enjoy life). The last 4 items deal with physical symptoms (pain or soreness, itch, physical irritation) and choice of clothing. The recall period is over the past month. The questions are answered on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being best and 10 being worst. Scores from each question are summed to give a total score (range 0 -120); higher scores indicate greater impairment to quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  44. Mean Change From Baseline in PQOL-12 Score During the 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment

    The PQOL-12 is a 12-item questionnaire; 8 of the items on the PQOL-12) focus on emotional issues associated with psoriasis (self conscious, helpless, embarrassed, ability to enjoy life). The last 4 items deal with physical symptoms (pain or soreness, itch, physical irritation) and choice of clothing. The recall period is over the past month. The questions are answered on a scale from 0 to 10 with 0 being best and 10 being worst. Scores from each question are summed to give a total score (range 0 -120); higher scores indicate greater impairment to quality of life.

    Measured: Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Nov 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2013
  4. Study completionJan 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
1,101 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01241591
Sponsor's protocol ID
A3921080
Status last verified
Dec 2018
First submitted
12 Nov 2010
Last updated
26 Dec 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Panaccione R, Isaacs JD, Chen LA, Wang W, Marren A, Kwok K, Wang L, Chan G, Su C. Characterization of Creatine Kinase Levels in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Clinical Trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2732-2743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06560-4. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

    PubMed 32816215
  • Valenzuela F, Paul C, Mallbris L, Tan H, Papacharalambous J, Valdez H, Mamolo C. Tofacitinib versus etanercept or placebo in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis: patient-reported outcomes from a Phase 3 study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Oct;30(10):1753-1759. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13702. Epub 2016 Jun 7.

    PubMed 27271195
  • Bachelez H, van de Kerkhof PC, Strohal R, Kubanov A, Valenzuela F, Lee JH, Yakusevich V, Chimenti S, Papacharalambous J, Proulx J, Gupta P, Tan H, Tawadrous M, Valdez H, Wolk R; OPT Compare Investigators. Tofacitinib versus etanercept or placebo in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis: a phase 3 randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):552-61. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62113-9. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

    PubMed 26051365

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing CP 690,550 5 mg, CP 690,550 10 mg and Etanercept 50 mg in people with Psoriasis, run by Pfizer at 122 sites in 26 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 122 sites in France, Germany, Russia, Czechia, Spain and 21 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01241591, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Dec 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in