PharmacodynamicsPhase 3NCT01242241
Propofol in Obese Children
A Phase 3 study testing Propofol in people with Pharmacodynamics and Obesity, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Obesity in children,as in adults,has rapidly become a public health concern. Studies in adults have shown that obesity, now considered to be a disease state, is a modifier of the effect of drugs on the body as well as how the body handles the drug.The anesthetic management of obese children poses a variety of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pharmacodynamics, Obesity
- What is being tested?
- Propofol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2008to Dec 2011
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children between the ages of 3 and 17 years who fall into the categories of non-obese(BMI percentile between 25-84th percentile) or obese(>95th percentile)
- American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA) classification 1 or 2-
Who cannot join
- Patients classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) Class 3 or greater.
- Patients with documented kidney or liver disease or those presenting for open surgery on the liver or kidney.
- Patients who will NOT be receiving propofol for induction as part of their anesthetic regimen.
- Patients who are currently on anti-convulsant medication or receiving drugs with sedative effects.
- Patients currently being treated for attention deficit disorder.
- Patients who are diagnosed with failure to thrive or those with a BMI less than 25th percentile.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable.
- Patients with egg allergy.
- Patients with low levels of albumin -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
About this study
Obesity in children,as in adults,has rapidly become a public health concern. Studies in adults have shown that obesity, now considered to be a disease state, is a modifier of the effect of drugs on the body as well as how the body handles the drug.The anesthetic management of obese children poses a variety of significant challenges which include determination of the appropriate dose of anesthetic intravenous agents. Dosing of most drugs is calculated based on the effective dose in 50% of patients but the more practical and required information is the effective dose in 95%(ED95%)of patients. The aim of this study is to determine the effective dose in 95% of patients(children). The hypothesis is the ED95 of propofol in obese children will be higher than that of non-obese children.
Read the detailed description
All subjects were fasted in keeping with our institutional NPO guidelines and had IV access established in the upper extremity in the pre-anesthesia area. No pre-induction sedative drugs were administered. Routine ASA monitors were applied and in cooperative children, a bispectral index (BIS) monitor pad (Aspect Medical Systems, Inc., Shattuck, MA) was applied over the forehead. Each child was given a water-filled syringe to hold tightly in the hand contralateral to the IV site. Lidocaine 1 mg/kg IV (maximum of 60 mg) was administered to decrease pain with propofol injection. A predetermined sequential dose of propofol (Diprivan, APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Schaumburg, IL) was administered IV rapidly over 10 seconds, followed by a normal saline flush.
Biased Coin Design An independent observer blinded to the propofol dose tested for lash reflex at 20 seconds, and also recorded the vital signs; level of sedation, using the University of Michigan sedation scale (UMSS)10; and the BIS values at 20, 60, and 120 seconds after propofol administration, along with the time the patient dropped the handheld syringe. The study was terminated after 120 seconds and additional propofol administered if needed.
Both nonobese and obese patients were studied in parallel using the biased coin design (BCD), in which a certain number of dose levels (k levels) are chosen with a fixed constant interval. In the absence of dose-ranging data in obese children, we chose a low starting dose of 1.0 mg/kg for the first patient in both groups to avoid missing a desired response in this patient population. If the desired effect (loss of lash reflex at 20 seconds) was not observed, the next patient in the assigned group received the next higher dose of propofol in predetermined increments (0.25 mg/kg) from the previous dose. If the desired effect was observed, the next patient in the same assigned group was randomized with a 0.95 probability to receive the same dose or a 0.05 probability to receive the next lower dose (also in 0.25 mg/kg decrements).
- Conditions
- Pharmacodynamics, Obesity
- Being tested
- Propofol
- Keywords
- Propofol, Childhood obesity, Pharmacodynamics
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity, Pediatric Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PropofolDrug
Also called Diprivan
Each Obese child/subject in this group will receive a predetermined dose of propofol ranging from 1.0mg/kg to 4.25mg/kg to induce loss of consciousness depending on the response (presence or absence of lash reflex) of the preceding patient to his/her assigned dose (biased coin design)
PropofolDrug
Also called Diprivan
This arm of patients(non-obese)will act as the control group for the obese children. Each non-obese child/subject will receive a predetermined dose of propofol from a range of 1.0mg/kg to 4.25mg/kg depending on the response of the previous patient to their assigned dose( biased coin design)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-obese | Other | Non-obese children categorized as those with a body mass index(BMI)between 25-84th percentile Receives: Drug: Propofol |
| Obese children | Active comparator | Obese children are categorized as those with a body mass index >95th percentile Receives: Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Dose of Propofol That Caused Loss of Consciousness in 95% (ED95) of Obese and Non-obese Children
Propofol is administered over 10 seconds. 20 seconds after adminstration, loss of consciousness is assessed by the presence or absence of a lash reflex. The dose responsible for loss of lash reflex/consciousness in 95% of patients was determined in mg/kg.
Measured: 20 seconds
Secondary outcomes (1)
Depth of Sedation
After propofol administration, the patient was assessed for depth of sedation at 30 seconds, 1 minute, and 2 minutes using the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) and Ramsay Sedation Scale. UMSS assesses the level of alertness on a five-point scale ranging from 1 (wide awake) to 5 (unarousable with deep stimulation). Ramsay Sedation Scale assesses the level of sedation on a six-point scale ranging from 1 (Patient is anxious and agitated or restless, or both) to 6 (Patient exhibits no response).
Measured: 30 seconds, 1 minute, and 2 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study start1 Apr 2008
- Primary completionDec 2011
- Study completionDec 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PharmacodynamicsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Baylor College of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Olutoyin A. Olutoye, Baylor College of Medicine
- Investigators
- Olutoyin A Olutoye, MD, Principal investigator, Baylor College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01242241
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-22091
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 15 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 21 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jul;107(1):144-52. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a.
PubMed 17585226Mulla H, Johnson TN. Dosing dilemmas in obese children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2010 Aug;95(4):112-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.163055. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
PubMed 20585055
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Propofol in Obese Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01242241
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-22091
- Conditions
- Pharmacodynamics, Obesity
- Keywords
- Propofol, Childhood obesity, Pharmacodynamics
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Dec 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Obesity in children,as in adults,has rapidly become a public health concern. Studies in adults have shown that obesity, now considered to be a disease state, is a modifier of the effect of drugs on the body as well as how the body handles the drug.The anesthetic management of obese children poses a variety of significant challenges which include determination of the appropriate dose of anesthetic intravenous agents. Dosing of most drugs is calculated based on the effective dose in 50% of patients but the more practical and required information is the effective dose in 95%(ED95%)of patients. The aim of this study is to determine the effective dose in 95% of patients(children). The hypothesis is the ED95 of propofol in obese children will be higher than that of non-obese children.
Detailed description
All subjects were fasted in keeping with our institutional NPO guidelines and had IV access established in the upper extremity in the pre-anesthesia area. No pre-induction sedative drugs were administered. Routine ASA monitors were applied and in cooperative children, a bispectral index (BIS) monitor pad (Aspect Medical Systems, Inc., Shattuck, MA) was applied over the forehead. Each child was given a water-filled syringe to hold tightly in the hand contralateral to the IV site. Lidocaine 1 mg/kg IV (maximum of 60 mg) was administered to decrease pain with propofol injection. A predetermined sequential dose of propofol (Diprivan, APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Schaumburg, IL) was administered IV rapidly over 10 seconds, followed by a normal saline flush.
Biased Coin Design An independent observer blinded to the propofol dose tested for lash reflex at 20 seconds, and also recorded the vital signs; level of sedation, using the University of Michigan sedation scale (UMSS)10; and the BIS values at 20, 60, and 120 seconds after propofol administration, along with the time the patient dropped the handheld syringe. The study was terminated after 120 seconds and additional propofol administered if needed.
Both nonobese and obese patients were studied in parallel using the biased coin design (BCD), in which a certain number of dose levels (k levels) are chosen with a fixed constant interval. In the absence of dose-ranging data in obese children, we chose a low starting dose of 1.0 mg/kg for the first patient in both groups to avoid missing a desired response in this patient population. If the desired effect (loss of lash reflex at 20 seconds) was not observed, the next patient in the assigned group received the next higher dose of propofol in predetermined increments (0.25 mg/kg) from the previous dose. If the desired effect was observed, the next patient in the same assigned group was randomized with a 0.95 probability to receive the same dose or a 0.05 probability to receive the next lower dose (also in 0.25 mg/kg decrements).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-obese | Other | Drug: PropofolNon-obese children categorized as those with a body mass index(BMI)between 25-84th percentile |
| Obese children | Active comparator | Drug: PropofolObese children are categorized as those with a body mass index >95th percentile |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Children between the ages of 3 and 17 years who fall into the categories of non-obese(BMI percentile between 25-84th percentile) or obese(>95th percentile)
- American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA) classification 1 or 2-
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients classified as ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) Class 3 or greater.
- Patients with documented kidney or liver disease or those presenting for open surgery on the liver or kidney.
- Patients who will NOT be receiving propofol for induction as part of their anesthetic regimen.
- Patients who are currently on anti-convulsant medication or receiving drugs with sedative effects.
- Patients currently being treated for attention deficit disorder.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PropofolAlso: DiprivanEach Obese child/subject in this group will receive a predetermined dose of propofol ranging from 1.0mg/kg to 4.25mg/kg to induce loss of consciousness depending on the response (presence or absence of lash reflex) of the preceding patient to his/her assigned dose (biased coin design) | Drug | Obese children |
| PropofolAlso: DiprivanThis arm of patients(non-obese)will act as the control group for the obese children. Each non-obese child/subject will receive a predetermined dose of propofol from a range of 1.0mg/kg to 4.25mg/kg depending on the response of the previous patient to their assigned dose( biased coin design) | Drug | Non-obese |
Primary outcome
Dose of Propofol That Caused Loss of Consciousness in 95% (ED95) of Obese and Non-obese Children
Time frame: 20 seconds
Propofol is administered over 10 seconds. 20 seconds after adminstration, loss of consciousness is assessed by the presence or absence of a lash reflex. The dose responsible for loss of lash reflex/consciousness in 95% of patients was determined in mg/kg.
1 secondary outcome
Depth of Sedation
Time frame: 30 seconds, 1 minute, and 2 minutes
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Dec 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17585226Pace NL, Stylianou MP. Advances in and limitations of up-and-down methodology: a precis of clinical use, study design, and dose estimation in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jul;107(1):144-52. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267514.42592.2a.
- Background: PubMed 20585055Mulla H, Johnson TN. Dosing dilemmas in obese children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2010 Aug;95(4):112-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.163055. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pharmacodynamics
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of the Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Biosimilarity of Insulin Aspart 30 Injections After Single-Dose Subcutaneous Administration to Healthy Volunteers
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of Eleveld PK/PD Model-based Dosing During General Anesthesia
Remimazolam, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase I Drug-Drug Interaction Study of UBT251 Injection in Participants With Overweight or Obesity
Drug Drug Interaction (DDI), Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of NANOKINE Compared With Eprex 4000 U in Healthy Volunteers
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Healthy Volunteers
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Study to Determine the Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Enoxaparin Sodium Biosimilar With That From Clexane
Healthy Participants Study, The Focus of the Study is to Determine the Comparative Pharmacodynamic of Enoxaparin Sodium With That of Clexane in Healthy Human Participants
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Olutoyin A Olutoye, MD principal investigator
Baylor College of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Propofol in people with Pharmacodynamics and Obesity, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Dec 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Dose of Propofol That Caused Loss of Consciousness in 95% (ED95) of Obese and Non-obese Children (time frame: 20 seconds). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01242241, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Dec 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.