Sickle Cell DiseaseMACSNCT01242878
MACS Study - Microparticles and Coagulation in Sickle Cell Disease
An observational study of Sickle Cell Disease, run by University College, London at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited disorder of the red blood cell. It is now the commonest genetic disorder in the UK and of childhood stroke, with up to 40% of children having a stroke (clinical or picked up on a scan) by school age. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sickle Cell Disease
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Dec 2010to not given
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: This is an observational case-control study in adults and children with sickle cell disease. The cases are any child or adult attending the study centres with a confirmed diagnosis of sickle cell disease that meet the eligibility criteria. The controls are ethnically matched volunteers who meet the appropriate eligibility criteria for controls and who do not have sickle cell disease and will be recruited from the same study sites.
Who may be able to join
- Subject Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient (or parent if child) able to give informed consent Compound heterozygote or homozygote for a sickling disorder (i.e. has sickle cell disease) Having a blood test in any case
- Healthy volunteer Inclusion Criteria:
- Person (or parent if child) able to give informed consent If a child, having a blood test or cannula inserted in any case Ethnically matched - of African origin Must know their sickle cell status or have it tested as part of the study and agree to have this result given to them and their G.P.
Who cannot join
- Subject Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to meet all inclusion criteria
- Healthy Volunteer Exclusion Criteria:
- Compound heterozygote or homozygote for a sickling disorder (i.e. has sickle cell disease) Inability to meet all inclusion criteria Ongoing cancerous/inflammatory/haematological/infective illness (the levels of microparticles and coagulation parameters have been shown to be elevated in these disorders and so would not be appropriate to be included in a control group)
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Sara Trompeter, MB ChB BSC MRCPCH FRCPath contact
United Kingdom3 sites
Whittington Hospital NHS Trust
London, N19 5NF
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, NW1 2PJ
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE1 7EH
About this study
Official title: MACS Study - Microparticles and Coagulation in Sickle Cell Disease: An Observational Study to Measure the Levels of Circulating Microvesicles and Coagulation Activation Parameters in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease in the in- and Out-patient Setting.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited disorder of the red blood cell. It is now the commonest genetic disorder in the UK and of childhood stroke, with up to 40% of children having a stroke (clinical or picked up on a scan) by school age. Patients are prone to develop acute crises necessitating hospital admission and resulting in long-term complications. Such events result in considerable morbidity, disability and mortality with its consequent burden on patients, families, the health service and society as a whole. Doctors have very little ability to predict who will get ill and when and so it is very difficult to known when and how to administer treatments. Furthermore there is very little in the way of treatments available and the mainstay of prevention is a chronic blood transfusion programme which is expensive, requires time off work and school and can be fraught with complications. This, in a population who is frequently educationally and socially disadvantaged at the outset. Recent evidence in sickle cell disease and other diseases that have similar underlying processes, points towards the importance of microparticles (circulating broken pieces of cells) and the coagulation system as being important. By comparing levels of these particles and molecules in patients with those found in healthy volunteers and with other measures known to be important, this study hopes to identify their role so as to improve the management of these patients and potentially to lead the way for new therapies. Participants will be required to donate a small amount of blood (1 teaspoon in the very young, two in older children and adults). The investigators aim to take this sample where possible when people are having a blood test in any case.
Read the detailed description
Purpose and design
- Why is it needed? The purpose of this study is to try and identify a measurable parameter to act as a disease indicator in sickle cell disease. The reason such a parameter is needed is that although patients seem to have the same genetic defect, they can have enormously different outcomes ranging from mild illness to stroke, catastrophic chest disease, kidney failure and death. Currently we have no real tools to properly prognosticate. This means it is difficult to know when to intervene in an illness and when to scale down and stop treatment. The repercussions of not intervening in a timely manner can be catastrophic and it is known that children who develop stroke have future ongoing and progressive intellectual deficits. The identification of a disease indicator could have potential for therapeutic innovation in the future. This is important as much of the current treatments are blunt, expensive and not always effective. In addition there is a paucity of treatment options for the clinician and those that are available e.g. blood transfusion are expensive socially and financially, have medical complications and are realistically not available for the majority of people who have sickle cell disease.
- Why microparticles and coagulation markers? An excellent candidate for the role of disease prognosticator is coagulation markers and microparticles. Microparticles and coagulation markers have been shown by members of this investigative group to be elevated in sickle cell disease and in other paediatric vascular diseases. There has been a lot of interest in the haematology world of late in these particles with papers and presentations and all the international conferences - EHA (European Haematology Association), BSH (British Society of Haematology) and ASH (American Society of Hematology), though these have been performed on small selected groups, frequently on adults only and only rarely with any sort of controls. What has not been done so far is to compare these levels to ethnically matched people or to measure these in children with sickle cell disease. This is remiss as it is known that the vascular changes occur right from the beginning of life with children have symptoms and signs of vasculopathy often by 6 months of age and with up to 40% having had some sort of stroke by school entry. What also has been omitted is performing these tests in a larger cohort and comparing with the variety of current measures of disease severity and measure of vasculopathy. It is only with this kind of information can we make proper inferences about the importance of these measures and go on to develop studies where these are used as disease prognosticators and one day even as a target for therapeutic intervention.
- Why here and now? Here and now presents a perfect opportunity for this study. Dr Trompeter is the author of the study and will be coordinating the study. She is currently a locum Consultant Haematologist at UCLH and a Specialist Registrar in Haemoglobinopathies at Guy's and St Thomas' and has been looking after the in- and out-patients with sickle cell disease at these sites. She has also been involved in ongoing studies in sickle cell disease at these sites as an investigator. Furthermore she has worked in a similar clinical capacity at both UCLH and The Whittington Hospital and has built up a good rapport and working relationship with staff, patients and their families at these sites. She is registered for a PhD at UCL and has already performed these assays as part of the original ongoing study in adults with sickle cell disease, which has papers published and soon to be submitted. These sites in combination represent one of the largest cohort of sickle cell patients in the country. The centres have been externally audited as part of the sickle peer review and have had their considerable qualities assessed and lauded. They have the capacity, ability and habit of measuring all the other parameters of interest in this study as a matter of routine clinical care. The clinicians have enormous experience and rapport with their patients but also have a considerable research repertoire. The Professors and scientists in this study have all demonstrated their immense knowledge and expertise in the fields of sickle cell disease and vasculopathy and are internationally renown, leading many important related studies. They have provided much of the support and scientific rationale to the designing of this study. The investigators are well known to the sickle community and its representatives and the author has spoken with patients groups who persistently express a desire for medical advancement and showed a real interest and support for this study. This conglomeration of sites, clinicians, experts and patients represents the most exciting opportunity for advancing the understanding of sickle cell disease.
Recruitment
- Participants will be identified by the Investigator (who is part of their normal care team) from the in- or out-patient setting as having met the inclusion criteria. Patients with sickle cell disease attend dedicated clinics and are well known to the investigators. The consent procedures are described below. There will be no payment.
- In the case of the patients, they will then progress to have their scheduled blood test as part of their normal clinic care, onto which a further blood sample (1 teaspoon in the case of small children, 2 teaspoons in the case of older children and adults) will be obtained for the purpose of this study.
- There are two groups of healthy volunteers - adults and children. They should be ethnically matched. The majority of the adults can be identified from the sickle clinic setting as family members attending with their patient relative. These people have the additional advantage of knowing their sickle status. There are also many ethnically matched members of staff or other people attending the hospital that may want to be involved in the study. Some adult volunteers will have a blood sample for the purpose of the study only, others will be having blood tests in any case and the study sample being taken in addition, if they do not know their sickle status they will be tested. They will consent separately for this and the information given back to them regarding this second test. Separate consent will also be taken for reporting to them and their G.P. also. Ethnically matched children healthy volunteers will be identified from the in and outpatient setting. They are extremely likely to know their sickle status in any case because of the national screening programme. Children will only participate in the study if they are having a blood tests in any case.
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Keywords
- HbSS, Sickle cell anemia, HbSC, HbSbetathalassemia, Hemoglobinopathy, Hemoglobinopathies
- Medical subject headings
- Anemia, Sickle Cell, Hemoglobinopathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| healthy volunteers | ethnically matched people who do not have sickle cell disease | |
| patients | sickle cell disease patients |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sickle Cell DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University College, LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust
- Investigators
- John B Porter, MB BChir FRCPath MD, Principal investigator, University College London and University College London NHS Foundation TrustBaba Inusa, MB BS FRCPCH, Principal investigator, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustBernard A Davis, MD FRCPath, Principal investigator, Whittington Hospital NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01242878
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10/0270
- Acronym
- MACS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2010
- First submitted
- 16 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 18 Nov 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Nov 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- MACS Study - Microparticles and Coagulation in Sickle Cell Disease: An Observational Study to Measure the Levels of Circulating Microvesicles and Coagulation Activation Parameters in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease in the in- and Out-patient Setting.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01242878
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MACS / 10/0270
- Conditions
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Keywords
- HbSS, Sickle cell anemia, HbSC, HbSbetathalassemia, Hemoglobinopathy, Hemoglobinopathies
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University College, LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust
- Study start
- Dec 2010
- First posted
- 17 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited disorder of the red blood cell. It is now the commonest genetic disorder in the UK and of childhood stroke, with up to 40% of children having a stroke (clinical or picked up on a scan) by school age. Patients are prone to develop acute crises necessitating hospital admission and resulting in long-term complications. Such events result in considerable morbidity, disability and mortality with its consequent burden on patients, families, the health service and society as a whole. Doctors have very little ability to predict who will get ill and when and so it is very difficult to known when and how to administer treatments. Furthermore there is very little in the way of treatments available and the mainstay of prevention is a chronic blood transfusion programme which is expensive, requires time off work and school and can be fraught with complications. This, in a population who is frequently educationally and socially disadvantaged at the outset. Recent evidence in sickle cell disease and other diseases that have similar underlying processes, points towards the importance of microparticles (circulating broken pieces of cells) and the coagulation system as being important. By comparing levels of these particles and molecules in patients with those found in healthy volunteers and with other measures known to be important, this study hopes to identify their role so as to improve the management of these patients and potentially to lead the way for new therapies. Participants will be required to donate a small amount of blood (1 teaspoon in the very young, two in older children and adults). The investigators aim to take this sample where possible when people are having a blood test in any case.
Detailed description
Purpose and design
- Why is it needed? The purpose of this study is to try and identify a measurable parameter to act as a disease indicator in sickle cell disease. The reason such a parameter is needed is that although patients seem to have the same genetic defect, they can have enormously different outcomes ranging from mild illness to stroke, catastrophic chest disease, kidney failure and death. Currently we have no real tools to properly prognosticate. This means it is difficult to know when to intervene in an illness and when to scale down and stop treatment. The repercussions of not intervening in a timely manner can be catastrophic and it is known that children who develop stroke have future ongoing and progressive intellectual deficits. The identification of a disease indicator could have potential for therapeutic innovation in the future. This is important as much of the current treatments are blunt, expensive and not always effective. In addition there is a paucity of treatment options for the clinician and those that are available e.g. blood transfusion are expensive socially and financially, have medical complications and are realistically not available for the majority of people who have sickle cell disease.
- Why microparticles and coagulation markers? An excellent candidate for the role of disease prognosticator is coagulation markers and microparticles. Microparticles and coagulation markers have been shown by members of this investigative group to be elevated in sickle cell disease and in other paediatric vascular diseases. There has been a lot of interest in the haematology world of late in these particles with papers and presentations and all the international conferences - EHA (European Haematology Association), BSH (British Society of Haematology) and ASH (American Society of Hematology), though these have been performed on small selected groups, frequently on adults only and only rarely with any sort of controls. What has not been done so far is to compare these levels to ethnically matched people or to measure these in children with sickle cell disease. This is remiss as it is known that the vascular changes occur right from the beginning of life with children have symptoms and signs of vasculopathy often by 6 months of age and with up to 40% having had some sort of stroke by school entry. What also has been omitted is performing these tests in a larger cohort and comparing with the variety of current measures of disease severity and measure of vasculopathy. It is only with this kind of information can we make proper inferences about the importance of these measures and go on to develop studies where these are used as disease prognosticators and one day even as a target for therapeutic intervention.
- Why here and now? Here and now presents a perfect opportunity for this study. Dr Trompeter is the author of the study and will be coordinating the study. She is currently a locum Consultant Haematologist at UCLH and a Specialist Registrar in Haemoglobinopathies at Guy's and St Thomas' and has been looking after the in- and out-patients with sickle cell disease at these sites. She has also been involved in ongoing studies in sickle cell disease at these sites as an investigator. Furthermore she has worked in a similar clinical capacity at both UCLH and The Whittington Hospital and has built up a good rapport and working relationship with staff, patients and their families at these sites. She is registered for a PhD at UCL and has already performed these assays as part of the original ongoing study in adults with sickle cell disease, which has papers published and soon to be submitted. These sites in combination represent one of the largest cohort of sickle cell patients in the country. The centres have been externally audited as part of the sickle peer review and have had their considerable qualities assessed and lauded. They have the capacity, ability and habit of measuring all the other parameters of interest in this study as a matter of routine clinical care. The clinicians have enormous experience and rapport with their patients but also have a considerable research repertoire. The Professors and scientists in this study have all demonstrated their immense knowledge and expertise in the fields of sickle cell disease and vasculopathy and are internationally renown, leading many important related studies. They have provided much of the support and scientific rationale to the designing of this study. The investigators are well known to the sickle community and its representatives and the author has spoken with patients groups who persistently express a desire for medical advancement and showed a real interest and support for this study. This conglomeration of sites, clinicians, experts and patients represents the most exciting opportunity for advancing the understanding of sickle cell disease.
Recruitment
- Participants will be identified by the Investigator (who is part of their normal care team) from the in- or out-patient setting as having met the inclusion criteria. Patients with sickle cell disease attend dedicated clinics and are well known to the investigators. The consent procedures are described below. There will be no payment.
- In the case of the patients, they will then progress to have their scheduled blood test as part of their normal clinic care, onto which a further blood sample (1 teaspoon in the case of small children, 2 teaspoons in the case of older children and adults) will be obtained for the purpose of this study.
- There are two groups of healthy volunteers - adults and children. They should be ethnically matched. The majority of the adults can be identified from the sickle clinic setting as family members attending with their patient relative. These people have the additional advantage of knowing their sickle status. There are also many ethnically matched members of staff or other people attending the hospital that may want to be involved in the study. Some adult volunteers will have a blood sample for the purpose of the study only, others will be having blood tests in any case and the study sample being taken in addition, if they do not know their sickle status they will be tested. They will consent separately for this and the information given back to them regarding this second test. Separate consent will also be taken for reporting to them and their G.P. also. Ethnically matched children healthy volunteers will be identified from the in and outpatient setting. They are extremely likely to know their sickle status in any case because of the national screening programme. Children will only participate in the study if they are having a blood tests in any case.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| healthy volunteers | – | –ethnically matched people who do not have sickle cell disease |
| patients | – | –sickle cell disease patients |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- This is an observational case-control study in adults and children with sickle cell disease. The cases are any child or adult attending the study centres with a confirmed diagnosis of sickle cell disease that meet the eligibility criteria. The controls are ethnically matched volunteers who meet the appropriate eligibility criteria for controls and who do not have sickle cell disease and will be recruited from the same study sites.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient (or parent if child) able to give informed consent Compound heterozygote or homozygote for a sickling disorder (i.e. has sickle cell disease) Having a blood test in any case
- Healthy volunteer Inclusion Criteria:
- Person (or parent if child) able to give informed consent If a child, having a blood test or cannula inserted in any case Ethnically matched - of African origin Must know their sickle cell status or have it tested as part of the study and agree to have this result given to them and their G.P.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to meet all inclusion criteria
- Healthy Volunteer Exclusion Criteria:
- Compound heterozygote or homozygote for a sickling disorder (i.e. has sickle cell disease) Inability to meet all inclusion criteria Ongoing cancerous/inflammatory/haematological/infective illness (the levels of microparticles and coagulation parameters have been shown to be elevated in these disorders and so would not be appropriate to be included in a control group)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Nov 2010.
Related trials for Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Escalating Doses of Fostamatinib in Subjects With Stable Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disorders, Sickle Cell Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Investigating the Mechanistic Effects of Mitapivat in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Anemia, Sickle Cell Thalassemia
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
A Study to Provide Access to Mitapivat for Participants Who Previously Participated in an Agios-Sponsored Mitapivat Study
Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency, Anemia, Hemolytic
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Dose-Finding Study of Tebapivat to Assess Efficacy, and Safety in Participants With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)
Sickle Cell Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Effect of Mitapivat on Transfusion Burden in Subjects With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)
Sickle Cell Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sara Trompeter, MB ChB BSC MRCPCH FRCPath contact
John B Porter, MB BChir FRCPath MD principal investigator
University College London and University College London NHS Foundation Trust
Baba Inusa, MB BS FRCPCH principal investigator
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Bernard A Davis, MD FRCPath principal investigator
Whittington Hospital NHS Trust
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Sickle Cell Disease, run by University College, London at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sara Trompeter, MB ChB BSC MRCPCH FRCPath (sara.trompeter@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2010.