Cardiovascular DiseaseNCT01245686
Heart to Health: A Combined Lifestyle and Medication Intervention to Reduce Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk
A study testing Lifestyle and medication intervention in people with Cardiovascular Disease and Coronary Heart Disease, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including heart disease and stroke, is the leading cause of death in the US. Every year, more than one million Americans have a heart attack, and nearly 800,000 have a stroke. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 to 79 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Disease, Coronary Heart Disease
- What is being tested?
- Lifestyle and medication intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 489 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to Nov 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 to 79 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Established patients
- Men ages 35-79
- Women ages 45-79
- History of CVD (100 participants)
- CHD risk equal or greater than 10%
- elevated CHD risk factor
Who cannot join
- non-English speaking
- no phone
- treatment of psychosis
- history of alcohol/substance abuse within last 2 years
- pregnancy, breast feeding, or anticipated pregnancy in next 18 months
- history of malignancy, other than non-melanoma skin cancer, that has not been in remission or cured surgically for >5 years
- recent history (in past year) of hypoglycemic event requiring medical attention
- estimated creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Durham Family Practice
Durham, North Carolina, 27704
Dayspring Family Medicine
Eden, North Carolina, 27288
Cabarrus Family Medicine Residency
Kannapolis, North Carolina, 28081
Moncure Community Health Center
Moncure, North Carolina, 27559
Caswell Family Medical Clinic
Yanceyville, North Carolina, 27379
About this study
Official title: A Combined Lifestyle and Medication Intervention to Reduce CVD Risk
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including heart disease and stroke, is the leading cause of death in the US. Every year, more than one million Americans have a heart attack, and nearly 800,000 have a stroke. In 2010, heart disease alone is expected to cost the country more than $316 billion in health care and lost productivity.
Both lifestyle changes and medication can reduce the risk of CVD, and this project combines these approaches in the hopes of identifying a practical intervention for use in primary care medical offices. The project combines two previously tested interventions and updates them to meet current guidelines for diet and use of aspirin and cholesterol-controlling drugs (statins).
Read more
The research team is delivering the combined intervention in two formats: web-based and counselor-based. Each format has the same content, but the web-based advice is accessed through the Internet by clients at home, a community site, or a primary care office. The other format involves sessions delivered to clients by a counselor either in person at a primary care office or over the telephone. The researchers will compare how effective each format is in reducing participants' risk of coronary heart disease. They will also determine the interventions' effect on participants' diet, physical activity, smoking status, medication adherence, and other health indicators. In addition, the team will compare the two formats' cost-effectiveness and how well the patients, office staff, and clinicians accept the interventions.
Recruited from five family practices, 600 patients representing the geographic and ethnic diversity of North Carolina are taking part in this study. Half the participants are randomly assigned to the web-based intervention; the other half to the counselor-based version. Both groups will also get information on local resources, such as gyms and farmers markets, that can help participants maintain a healthy lifestyle.
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Disease, Coronary Heart Disease
- Being tested
- Lifestyle and medication intervention
- Keywords
- Diet interventions, Physical activity interventions, Medication adherence, Tailored interventions
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Medication Adherence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lifestyle and medication interventionBehavioural
The Heart to Health Intervention combines and enhances two previously tested interventions to reduce CVD risk (a counselor-based intervention to improve lifestyle and a web-based intervention to improve medication adherence). The new lifestyle and medication adherence intervention (delivered alternately in a one-on-one counseling or web-format) includes a decision aid on heart disease risk and risk-reducing options, general education on lifestyle and medication adherence, tips for overcoming barriers to CHD risk reduction, and goal setting and specification of first steps.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| One-on-one counseling | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will receive 4 intensive one-on-one counseling sessions (either in person or on the phone) and 3 brief maintenance sessions. Receives: Behavioral: Lifestyle and medication intervention |
| Web counseling | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will receive 4 intensive counseling sessions over the web. They will also receive 3 maintenance sessions over the web. Receives: Behavioral: Lifestyle and medication intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Predicted 10-year CHD risk
Framingham risk scores are well-validated and provide an absolute estimate of the likelihood of CHD events (MI, angina, and CHD death) over a 10-year time period.
We will examine absolute changes in this outcome in both intervention arms. We will also examine whether this outcome varies by subgroups of the following variables: baseline level of predicted CHD risk, age, race, SES, insurance status, overall health status, numeracy, literacy, # medications, # of perceived barriers to adherence, use of the intervention, time with the intervention, study practice site, and health counselor
Measured: 4-month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (10)
Predicted 10-year CHD risk
Framingham risk scores are well-validated and provide an absolute estimate of the likelihood of CHD events (MI, angina, and CHD death) over a 10-year time period.
Measured: 12 months
Use of and adherence to cardiovascular medicines
Use of cardiovascular medicines will be by self-report. Adherence to cardiovascular medicines will be measured by the 8-Item Morisky scale and a single-item specifying overall percentage adherence to cardiovascular medicines(categorical).
Participants will additionally report use of and adherence to individual medicines, including aspirin, blood pressure medicine, and cholesterol medicine. Aspirin adherence will be validated by serum thromboxane b2 in a subsample of participants. Blood pressure and cholesterol medicine use will be confirmed by changes in blood pressure and cholesterol.
Measured: 4 and 12 months
Dietary Intake
Dietary intake will be measured through a combination of self-report and objective measures. Participants will self-report diet on two validated questionnaires: the block questionnaire (fruit and vegetable intake) and the fat quality screener. Fruit and vegetable intake will be objectively measured by serum carotenoids. Fat quality will be objectively measured using RBC membrane fatty acids.
Measured: 4 and 12 months
Physical activity
Physical activity will be measured through a combination of self-report and objective measures. Participants will report physical activity on the validated modified RESIDE questionnaire. They will additionally wear a pedometer to monitor their daily total and aerobic steps.
Measured: 4 and 12 months
Blood pressure
Blood pressure will be measure via standardized protocol using an oscillometric automatic monitor
Measured: 4 and 12 months
Total, HDL, and direct LDL cholesterol
Total, HDL, and direct LDL cholesterol will be measured via enzymatic calorametric testing.
Measured: 4 and 12 months
Smoking status
Smoking will be measured through a combination of self-report and urinary cotinine (Nicalert test strips).
Measured: 4 and 12 months
Adverse events
We will monitor the following adverse events: ED visits (self-report), hospitalizations (self-report), deaths (family report confirmed by death registry), GI bleeds (self-report), hemorrhagic stroke (self-report), musculoskeletal injury (self-report), renal dysfunction (serum creatinine), and liver dysfunction (AST).
Measured: 4 and 12 months
Acceptability of the Intervention
We will measure the acceptability of the intervention using process measures querying participants, office staff, and clinicians about the perceptions of the acceptability of the intervention and the time to deliver it.
Measured: 4 and 12 months
Cost-effectiveness
We will measure the cost-unit CHD risk reduction for the two interventions using a societal perspective.
Measured: 4 and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionNov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 489 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Thomas Keyserling, MD, MPH, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Investigators
- Thomas C Keyserling, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, UNC-Chapel HillStacey L Sheridan, MD, MPH, Study director, UNC-Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01245686
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10-2028
- Other IDs
- 1U48DP002658
- Status last verified
- Feb 2013
- First submitted
- 19 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 6 Feb 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Keyserling TC, Sheridan SL, Draeger LB, Finkelstein EA, Gizlice Z, Kruger E, Johnston LF, Sloane PD, Samuel-Hodge C, Evenson KR, Gross MD, Donahue KE, Pignone MP, Vu MB, Steinbacher EA, Weiner BJ, Bangdiwala SI, Ammerman AS. A comparison of live counseling with a web-based lifestyle and medication intervention to reduce coronary heart disease risk: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1144-57. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1984.
PubMed 24861959Sheridan SL, Draeger LB, Pignone MP, Sloane PD, Samuel-Hodge C, Finkelstein EA, Gizlice Z, Vu MB, Gitterman DP, Bangdiwala SI, Donahue KE, Evenson K, Ammerman AS, Keyserling TC. Designing and implementing a comparative effectiveness study of two strategies for delivering high quality CHD prevention: methods and participant characteristics for the Heart to Health study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Nov;36(2):394-405. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
PubMed 23916919
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Feb 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Combined Lifestyle and Medication Intervention to Reduce CVD Risk
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01245686
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10-2028
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Disease, Coronary Heart Disease
- Keywords
- Diet interventions, Physical activity interventions, Medication adherence, Tailored interventions
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 489 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including heart disease and stroke, is the leading cause of death in the US. Every year, more than one million Americans have a heart attack, and nearly 800,000 have a stroke. In 2010, heart disease alone is expected to cost the country more than $316 billion in health care and lost productivity.
Both lifestyle changes and medication can reduce the risk of CVD, and this project combines these approaches in the hopes of identifying a practical intervention for use in primary care medical offices. The project combines two previously tested interventions and updates them to meet current guidelines for diet and use of aspirin and cholesterol-controlling drugs (statins).
The research team is delivering the combined intervention in two formats: web-based and counselor-based. Each format has the same content, but the web-based advice is accessed through the Internet by clients at home, a community site, or a primary care office. The other format involves sessions delivered to clients by a counselor either in person at a primary care office or over the telephone. The researchers will compare how effective each format is in reducing participants' risk of coronary heart disease. They will also determine the interventions' effect on participants' diet, physical activity, smoking status, medication adherence, and other health indicators. In addition, the team will compare the two formats' cost-effectiveness and how well the patients, office staff, and clinicians accept the interventions.
Recruited from five family practices, 600 patients representing the geographic and ethnic diversity of North Carolina are taking part in this study. Half the participants are randomly assigned to the web-based intervention; the other half to the counselor-based version. Both groups will also get information on local resources, such as gyms and farmers markets, that can help participants maintain a healthy lifestyle.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| One-on-one counseling | Active comparator | Behavioral: Lifestyle and medication interventionParticipants in this arm will receive 4 intensive one-on-one counseling sessions (either in person or on the phone) and 3 brief maintenance sessions. |
| Web counseling | Active comparator | Behavioral: Lifestyle and medication interventionParticipants in this arm will receive 4 intensive counseling sessions over the web. They will also receive 3 maintenance sessions over the web. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 to 79 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Established patients
- Men ages 35-79
- Women ages 45-79
- History of CVD (100 participants)
- CHD risk equal or greater than 10%
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- non-English speaking
- no phone
- treatment of psychosis
- history of alcohol/substance abuse within last 2 years
- pregnancy, breast feeding, or anticipated pregnancy in next 18 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lifestyle and medication interventionThe Heart to Health Intervention combines and enhances two previously tested interventions to reduce CVD risk (a counselor-based intervention to improve lifestyle and a web-based intervention to improve medication adherence). The new lifestyle and medication adherence intervention (delivered alternately in a one-on-one counseling or web-format) includes a decision aid on heart disease risk and risk-reducing options, general education on lifestyle and medication adherence, tips for overcoming barriers to CHD risk reduction, and goal setting and specification of first steps. | Behavioural | One-on-one counseling, Web counseling |
Primary outcome
Predicted 10-year CHD risk
Time frame: 4-month follow-up
Framingham risk scores are well-validated and provide an absolute estimate of the likelihood of CHD events (MI, angina, and CHD death) over a 10-year time period. We will examine absolute changes in this outcome in both intervention arms. We will also examine whether this outcome varies by subgroups of the following variables: baseline level of predicted CHD risk, age, race, SES, insurance status, overall health status, numeracy, literacy, # medications, # of perceived barriers to adherence, use of the intervention, time with the intervention, study practice site, and health counselor
10 secondary outcomes
Predicted 10-year CHD risk
Time frame: 12 months
Use of and adherence to cardiovascular medicines
Time frame: 4 and 12 months
Dietary Intake
Time frame: 4 and 12 months
Physical activity
Time frame: 4 and 12 months
Blood pressure
Time frame: 4 and 12 months
Total, HDL, and direct LDL cholesterol
Time frame: 4 and 12 months
Smoking status
Time frame: 4 and 12 months
Adverse events
Time frame: 4 and 12 months
Acceptability of the Intervention
Time frame: 4 and 12 months
Cost-effectiveness
Time frame: 4 and 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Feb 2013.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24861959Keyserling TC, Sheridan SL, Draeger LB, Finkelstein EA, Gizlice Z, Kruger E, Johnston LF, Sloane PD, Samuel-Hodge C, Evenson KR, Gross MD, Donahue KE, Pignone MP, Vu MB, Steinbacher EA, Weiner BJ, Bangdiwala SI, Ammerman AS. A comparison of live counseling with a web-based lifestyle and medication intervention to reduce coronary heart disease risk: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1144-57. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1984.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23916919Sheridan SL, Draeger LB, Pignone MP, Sloane PD, Samuel-Hodge C, Finkelstein EA, Gizlice Z, Vu MB, Gitterman DP, Bangdiwala SI, Donahue KE, Evenson K, Ammerman AS, Keyserling TC. Designing and implementing a comparative effectiveness study of two strategies for delivering high quality CHD prevention: methods and participant characteristics for the Heart to Health study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Nov;36(2):394-405. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.07.013. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas C Keyserling, MD, MPH principal investigator
UNC-Chapel Hill
Stacey L Sheridan, MD, MPH study director
UNC-Chapel Hill
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Lifestyle and medication intervention in people with Cardiovascular Disease and Coronary Heart Disease, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Predicted 10-year CHD risk (time frame: 4-month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01245686, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2013.