AzTrials
AzTrials

PsoriasisPhase 2NCT01246583

CP-690-550 Ointment For Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 2 study testing CP-690,550 Ointment 1 and CP-690,550 Ointment 2 in people with Psoriasis, run by Pfizer at 12 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study is being conducted to see whether CP-690,550 ointment has potential as a safe and effective treatment for adult patients with mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
Conditions the study is for
Psoriasis
What is being tested?
CP-690,550 Ointment 1 and CP-690,550 Ointment 2
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
71 participants
Where
12 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
16 Feb 2011to 29 Nov 2011
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis (psoriasis vulgaris), with the duration of at least 6 months;
  • A target plaque of at least 9 sq. cm.

Who cannot join

  • Demonstrates "rebound" or "flare" of chronic plaque psoriasis;
  • Non plaque form of psoriasis;
  • Currently have or history of psoriatic arthritis;
  • Current drug induced psoriasis;
  • Currently on systemic therapy or was on systemic therapy for psoriasis within the previous 6 months;
  • Currently on phototherapy for psoriasis or was on phototherapy within the previous 3 months

Trial locations and contacts

12 sites in 2 countries.

12 sites in 2 countries

United States8 sites
  • Academic Dermatology Associates

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106

  • Modern Research Associates, PLLC

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Dermatology Research Associates

    Los Angeles, California, 90045

  • Expresscare Medical

    Los Angeles, California, 90045

  • Horizon Research Group, Inc.

    Mobile, Alabama, 36608

  • Skin Specialists, PC

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68144

  • Park Avenue Dermatology, PA

    Orange Park, Florida, 32073

  • Health Concepts

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702

Other trials in United States

Canada4 sites
  • Innovaderm Research Inc

    Montreal, Quebec, H2K 4L5

  • Siena Medical Research

    Montreal, Quebec, H3Z 2S6

  • Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec metropolitain

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 4X7

  • K.Papp Clinical Research Inc.

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2J 1C4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 2A, MULTI-SITE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL-GROUP STUDY OF THE PILOT EFFICACY, SAFETY, AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF 2 OINTMENT FORMULATIONS OF CP-690,550 IN SUBJECTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE CHRONIC PLAQUE PSORIASIS

The study is being conducted to see whether CP-690,550 ointment has potential as a safe and effective treatment for adult patients with mild to moderate chronic plaque psoriasis.

Conditions
Psoriasis
Being tested
CP-690,550 Ointment 1, Vehicle 1, CP-690,550 Ointment 2, Vehicle 2
Keywords
Multi Site, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Parallel Group, chronic plaque psoriasis, topical treatment, skin diseases, papulosquamous
Medical subject headings
Psoriasis, Skin Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CP-690,550 Ointment 1Drug

    2% CP-690,550 Ointment 1 twice daily for 4 weeks

  • Vehicle 1Drug

    Vehicle 1 twice daily for 4 weeks

  • CP-690,550 Ointment 2Drug

    2% CP-690,550 Ointment 2 twice daily for 4 weeks

  • Vehicle 2Drug

    Vehicle 2 twice daily for 4 weeks

Study groups in NCT01246583
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment Group AExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: CP-690,550 Ointment 1
Treatment Group BPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Vehicle 1
Treatment Group CExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: CP-690,550 Ointment 2
Treatment Group DPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Vehicle 2

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Target Plaque Severity Score (TPSS) at Week 4

    Target plaque was evaluated individually for signs of induration, scaling and erythema. Each of the 3 signs was rated on 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The individual signs severity sub scores were summed to calculate TPSS. The total score varied in increments of 1 and ranged from 1 to 12, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Target Plaque Severity Score (TPSS) at Weeks 1, 2 and 3

    Target plaque was evaluated individually for signs of induration, scaling and erythema. Each of the 3 signs was rated on 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The individual signs severity sub scores were summed to calculate TPSS. The total score varied in increments of 1 and ranged from 1 to 12, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3

  2. Change From Baseline in Target Plaque Severity Score (TPSS) of Erythema, Induration and Scaling at Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4

    Target plaque severity was evaluated individually for signs of induration, scaling and erythema. Each of the 3 signs was rated on 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4

  3. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Area Overall Severity of Psoriasis Response of "Clear" (0) or "Almost Clear" (1)

    Treatment area overall severity of psoriasis is global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling across all psoriatic lesions, rated separately over the treatment area according to a 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the treatment area overall severity of psoriasis score and category. Total possible score range: 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe.

    Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving Decrease From Baseline of Greater Than or Equal to 2 Points in Treatment Area Overall Severity of Psoriasis Score

    Treatment area overall severity of psoriasis is global consideration of the erythema, induration and scaling across all psoriatic lesions, rated separately over the treatment area according to a 5-point severity scale ranged from 0 to 4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. The severity scores are summed and averaged after which the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the treatment area overall severity of psoriasis score and category. Total possible score: 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe.

    Measured: Week 1, 2, 3, 4

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Target Plaque Area at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4

    A tracing of the target plaque on transparent film was used to quantify the target plaque area. The target plaque area was calculated by image analysis (planimetry). At baseline, target plaque area was determined prior to randomization to confirm the target plaque size of at least 9 cm^2.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4

  6. Itch Severity Item (ISI)

    The severity of itch was assessed using a single-item Patient Reported Outcome (PRO). Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to psoriasis at the treatment area over the past 24 hours on a numeric rating scale ranging from of 0-10 where, 0=no itching and 10=worst possible itching.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4

  7. Change From Baseline in the Treatment Area Itch Severity Item (ISI) at Week 1, 2, 3 and 4

    The severity of itch was assessed using a single-item PRO. Participants were asked to assess their worst itching due to psoriasis at the treatment area over the past 24 hours on a numeric rating scale ranging from of 0-10 where, 0=no itching and 10=worst possible itching.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4

  8. Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Satisfaction With Study Medication (PSSM) Response Category

    The PSSM evaluates overall participants satisfaction with the study treatment. Participants response evaluation was based on single 7-point item: 1=very satisfied, 2=somewhat satisfied, 3=slightly satisfied, 4=neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 5=slightly dissatisfied, 6=somewhat dissatisfied, and 7=very dissatisfied.

    Measured: Week 4

  9. Number of Participants With Administration Site Adverse Events

    An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. Application site adverse event included documentation of any clinically significant local reaction, e.g erosion, vesicles or scabbing.

    Measured: Baseline up to follow up visit (Day 36-39 after last dose of study treatment) (up to maximum of 9.5 weeks)

  10. Number of Participants With Burning/Stinging of Psoriatic or Perilesional Skin in The Treatment Area

    Burning/stinging symptoms at the treatment area including target plaque, additional plaque/s within the treatment area (if any) and treated perilesional skin (if any) were queried from the participants and scored by the investigator using a 4-point scale: 0=none; 1=Mild; 2=Moderate; 3=Severe. Except at baseline pre-dosing, burning/stinging was assessed for 2 time periods based on the maximum burning or stinging that the participant has experienced: Immediate (within 5 minutes after application); Persistent (beyond 5 minutes after application).

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4

  11. Number of Participants With Draize Score of Perilesional Skin in The Treatment Area

    Draize scoring evaluated perilesional skin within treatment area for erythema and presence/absence of other signs and symptoms. Erythema score ranged from 0 to 4 as: 0(no reaction visible), 1(trace reactions- barely perceptible pinkness), 2(mild reaction- readily visible pinkness), 3(moderate reaction- definite redness), 4 (Strong to severe reaction- very intense redness). Letter grade defined as: J(Burning, stinging, itching), E(Edema), P(Papules), V(Vesicles), B(Bulla reaction), S(Spreading), W(Weeping), I(Induration), XC(Additional comments). Superficial observations defined as: G(Glazing), Y(Peeling), C(Scab), D(Hyperpigmentation), H(Hypopigmentation), F(Fissuring), R(Erosion), U(Ulceration), K(Scaling). Erythema and other signs/symptoms with at least 1 participant with Draize Score of Perilesional Skin in the treatment area were reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4

  12. Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 1, 2, 3, 4

    Blood pressure (BP) was measured in duplicate (approximately 5 minutes apart) using a standard calibrated BP measuring device. BP defined as pressure exerted by circulating blood upon walls of blood vessels. Diastolic BP is minimum pressure in arteries, near beginning of cardiac cycle when ventricles are filled with blood. Systolic BP is peak pressure in arteries, near end of the cardiac cycle when ventricles are contracting. Normal blood pressure is less than 120 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) systolic and less than 80 mmHg diastolic. Change=value at week 1, 2, 3, 4 minus value at baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4

  13. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 1, 2, 3, 4

    Heart (pulse) rate was measured in duplicate (approximately 5 minutes apart) for a minimum of 30 seconds. Heart rate is the number of heartbeats per unit of time, usually per minute. The heart rate is based on the number of contractions of the ventricles (the lower chambers of the heart). Change=value at week 1, 2, 3, 4 minus value at baseline.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4

  14. Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings at Week 4

    A single standard supine 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) was performed after the participant had rested quietly for at least 10 minutes. ECG parameters included RR interval, PR interval, QRS complex, QT interval, QTcB (corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula) interval, and QTcF (corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula) interval.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  15. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Level at Week 2, 4

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4

  16. Change From Baseline in Platelet and Neutrophil Count at Week 2, 4

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4

  17. Change From Baseline in Creatinine Level at Week 2, 4

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4

  18. Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Creatine Kinase (CK) Level at Week 2, 4

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4

  19. Plasma Concentration of CP-690,550

    Summary statistics were calculated by setting concentration values below the lower limit of quantification (lower limit of quantification=0.1 nanogram per milliliter [ng/mL]) to zero. Summary statistics were not presented if number of observations above lower limit of quantification (NALQ) = 0.

    Measured: 0 (predose), 1, 2 and 4-9 hours postdose on Day 29 or early termination

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Nov 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start16 Feb 2011
  3. Primary completion29 Nov 2011
  4. Study completion29 Nov 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
71 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01246583
Sponsor's protocol ID
A3921116
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
22 Nov 2010
Last updated
11 Jan 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Ports WC, Khan S, Lan S, Lamba M, Bolduc C, Bissonnette R, Papp K. A randomized phase 2a efficacy and safety trial of the topical Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib in the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jul;169(1):137-45. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12266.

    PubMed 23387374

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing CP-690,550 Ointment 1 and CP-690,550 Ointment 2 in people with Psoriasis, run by Pfizer at 12 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 12 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jan 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change From Baseline in Target Plaque Severity Score (TPSS) at Week 4 (time frame: Baseline, Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01246583, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in