HeartburnPhase 4NCT01249651
To Assess the Efficacy of Esomeprazole 40 mg Once Daily in Subjects Who Still Had Heartburn After Receiving Rabeprazole
A Phase 4 study testing esomeprazole 40 mg in people with Heartburn, run by AstraZeneca at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Administration of esomeprazole 40 mg to subjects who still had heartburn after receiving rabeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 to 8 weeks will result in statistically significant improvement of heartburn after 8-week treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heartburn
- What is being tested?
- esomeprazole 40 mg
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Jun 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female aged 20 years or more
- Documented history of reflux esophagitis verified by endoscopy in the past, including the grade of Los Angeles (LA) classification (Lundell LR et al 1999) before treatment
- Ongoing (until date of Visit 1) treatment with rabeprazole 20 mg, given once daily, for a period of 4 to 8 weeks. The subject must take Rabeprazole at least 4 days a week in the past 7 days prior to Visit 1.
- Persisting symptoms of heartburn during the past 7 days prior to Visit 1, judged by the investigator(s) as follows: At least 2 days with moderate (i.e. discomfort sufficient to cause interference with normal activities) to severe symptoms (i.e. incapacitating, with inability to perform normal activities) OR At least 4 days with symptoms including mild ones (i.e. awareness of sign or symptom, but easily tolerated).
- The subject needs to be able to understand and read the official languages of the country.
Who cannot join
- Use of other PPIs and/or H2RA during rabeprazole treatment
- Previous use of esomeprazole 40 mg during the 12 weeks before enrolment
- Current or historical evidence of gastrointestinal pathology
- History, signs or symptoms of clinically significant or uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, endocrine, hematologic, neurologic, psychiatric pancreatic or hepatic disease as judged by the investigator to interfere with the conduct of the study, the interpretation of study results, subject compliance, or the health of the subject during the study.
- Documented upper gastrointestinal surgery such as gastric resection, vagotomy and/or pyloroplasty, hiatus hernia surgery or fundoplication. Note: endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection or simple suturing of an ulcer are not exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: An 8-week, Open Label, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy of Esomeprazole 40 mg Once Daily in Subjects With Continuing Symptoms of Heartburn Following Treatment With a Previous Rabeprazole.
Administration of esomeprazole 40 mg to subjects who still had heartburn after receiving rabeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 to 8 weeks will result in statistically significant improvement of heartburn after 8-week treatment.
- Conditions
- Heartburn
- Being tested
- esomeprazole 40 mg
- Keywords
- Patients, Single
- Medical subject headings
- Heartburn
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
esomeprazole 40 mgDrug
Also called No comparator
esomeprazole 40 mg once daily, 8 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | One arm: esomeprazole 40 mg Receives: Drug: esomeprazole 40 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to the 8 Week Visit (Visit 3) Compared to the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to Baseline (Visit 1)
The number of days with heartburn during the 7-day period prior to the 8 week visit (Visit 3) was compared to the number of days with heartburn during the 7-day period prior to baseline (Visit 1). The difference in the number of days with heartburn from baseline to 8 weeks was analysed.
Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to the 4 Week Visit (Visit 2) Compared to the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to Baseline (Visit 1)
The number of days with heartburn during the 7-day period prior to the 4 week visit (Visit 3) was compared to the number of days with heartburn during the 7-day period prior to baseline (Visit 1). The difference in the number of days with heartburn from baseline to 4 weeks was analysed.
Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change in the Maximum Severity of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to the 4 Week Visit (Visit 2) Compared to the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to Baseline (Visit 1)
Maximum severity of heartburn during 7 days at baseline and at 4 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at 4 weeks was better than at baseline in a participant, the participant was s categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, then categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorised into "Worsened".
Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change in the Maximum Severity of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to the 8 Week Visit (Visit 3) Compared to the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to Baseline (Visit 1)
Maximum severity of heartburn during 7 days at baseline and at 8 weeks was obtained (None, Mild, Moderate, Severe). If the value at 8 weeks was better than at baseline in a participant, the participant was s categorized into "Improved". If the value was same, then categorised into "Unchanged". If the value was worsened, categorised into "Worsened".
Measured: Baseline to 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionJun 2011
- Study completionJun 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HeartburnStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Quintiles, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Masataka Date, MD, PhD, Study director, AstraZeneca KK Corporate Communications
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01249651
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D961HL00001
- Status last verified
- Jun 2012
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 31 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An 8-week, Open Label, Multicentre Study to Assess the Efficacy of Esomeprazole 40 mg Once Daily in Subjects With Continuing Symptoms of Heartburn Following Treatment With a Previous Rabeprazole.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01249651
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D961HL00001
- Conditions
- Heartburn
- Keywords
- Patients, Single
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Quintiles, Inc.
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Oct 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Administration of esomeprazole 40 mg to subjects who still had heartburn after receiving rabeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 to 8 weeks will result in statistically significant improvement of heartburn after 8-week treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Other | Drug: esomeprazole 40 mgOne arm: esomeprazole 40 mg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or female aged 20 years or more
- Documented history of reflux esophagitis verified by endoscopy in the past, including the grade of Los Angeles (LA) classification (Lundell LR et al 1999) before treatment
- Ongoing (until date of Visit 1) treatment with rabeprazole 20 mg, given once daily, for a period of 4 to 8 weeks. The subject must take Rabeprazole at least 4 days a week in the past 7 days prior to Visit 1.
- Persisting symptoms of heartburn during the past 7 days prior to Visit 1, judged by the investigator(s) as follows: At least 2 days with moderate (i.e. discomfort sufficient to cause interference with normal activities) to severe symptoms (i.e. incapacitating, with inability to perform normal activities) OR At least 4 days with symptoms including mild ones (i.e. awareness of sign or symptom, but easily tolerated).
- The subject needs to be able to understand and read the official languages of the country.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Use of other PPIs and/or H2RA during rabeprazole treatment
- Previous use of esomeprazole 40 mg during the 12 weeks before enrolment
- Current or historical evidence of gastrointestinal pathology
- History, signs or symptoms of clinically significant or uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, endocrine, hematologic, neurologic, psychiatric pancreatic or hepatic disease as judged by the investigator to interfere with the conduct of the study, the interpretation of study results, subject compliance, or the health of the subject during the study.
- Documented upper gastrointestinal surgery such as gastric resection, vagotomy and/or pyloroplasty, hiatus hernia surgery or fundoplication. Note: endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection or simple suturing of an ulcer are not exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| esomeprazole 40 mgAlso: No comparatoresomeprazole 40 mg once daily, 8 weeks | Drug | 1 |
Primary outcome
Change in the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to the 8 Week Visit (Visit 3) Compared to the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to Baseline (Visit 1)
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
The number of days with heartburn during the 7-day period prior to the 8 week visit (Visit 3) was compared to the number of days with heartburn during the 7-day period prior to baseline (Visit 1). The difference in the number of days with heartburn from baseline to 8 weeks was analysed.
3 secondary outcomes
Change in the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to the 4 Week Visit (Visit 2) Compared to the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to Baseline (Visit 1)
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change in the Maximum Severity of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to the 4 Week Visit (Visit 2) Compared to the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to Baseline (Visit 1)
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks
Change in the Maximum Severity of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to the 8 Week Visit (Visit 3) Compared to the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to Baseline (Visit 1)
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Oct 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Heartburn
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan 10 mg Compared to Placebo for Relief of Episodic Heartburn in Participants With Symptomatic Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Through 24 Weeks
Symptomatic Non-erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Domperidone in Treating Patients With Gastrointestinal Disorders
Digestive System Disorder, Dyspepsia
RecruitingObservational study
A Study of the Safety of Vonoprazan Exposure in Pregnant Women and Their Offspring
Erosive Esophagitis, Heartburn
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
The Johns Hopkins Heartburn Center Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Barrett Esophagus
Not yet recruiting
Antireflux Surgery Without Preoperative Esophageal Manometry
GERD, Hiatal Hernia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Masataka Date, MD, PhD study director
AstraZeneca KK Corporate Communications
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing esomeprazole 40 mg in people with Heartburn, run by AstraZeneca at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Oct 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to the 8 Week Visit (Visit 3) Compared to the Frequency of Heartburn During the 7-day Period Prior to Baseline (Visit 1) (time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2012.