AzTrials
AzTrials

Myofascial Pain SyndromePhase 4NCT01250184

Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome With Lidocaine Injection and Physical Therapy.

A Phase 4 study testing Physical therapy, Lidocaine injection and Lidocaine injection + physical therapy in people with Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Pain, run by Grupo Rehabilitacion en Salud at 2 sites in Colombia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the shoulder girdle and cervical region is a common musculoskeletal problem that is often chronic or recurrent. It has demonstrated the effectiveness of different treatments such as exercise, injection but not comparing them with each other. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Physical therapy, Lidocaine injection and Lidocaine injection + physical therapy
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
127 participants
Where
2 sitesColombia
Study dates
May 2009to Sep 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Cervical Pain at least six weeks
  • At least 40 mm in the VAS
  • They cannot been received treatment like physical therapy or analgesics
  • Maximum score of PHQ 16 points

Who cannot join

  • Depression
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Cervical Radiculopathy

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Colombia2 sites
  • Clinica de Las Américas

    Medellín, Antioquia

  • Ips Universitaria

    Medellín, Antioquia

Other trials in Colombia

About this study

Official title: Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome With Lidocaine Injection and Physical Therapy, Alone or in Combination: a Single-blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the shoulder girdle and cervical region is a common musculoskeletal problem that is often chronic or recurrent. It has demonstrated the effectiveness of different treatments such as exercise, injection but not comparing them with each other. The objective of this research was to demonstrate whether lidocaine injection into trigger points combined with a physical therapy program was more effective than each separatetreatment in improving pain, function and quality of life in a group of patients with myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the shoulder girdle and cervical region.

Design: Single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial with three parallel groups in the departments of physical medicine and rehabilitation of two urban hospitals. There were 127 patients with myofascial pain in the shoulder girdle for more than six weeks in length and pain greater than 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS). There were three intervention groups: physical therapy (PT), lidocaine injection (LI), or the combination of both (PT + LI). The primary outcome at one month was the VAS, and the secondary outcomes were measured using the SF36 pain scaleat one and three months.

Keywords: Myofascial pain, trigger points, lidocaine injection, physical therapy.

Read the detailed description

We propose a double blind randomized controlled clinical trial, in different health centers in Medellin. The subjects are patients with myofascial trigger points (MTP) in muscles of the shoulder girdle (levator scapulae, trapezius, infraspinatus) diagnosed by neck ans shoulder pain lasting langer than 6 weeks, and that have not received rehabilitation treatment and are not currently taking analgesic medications. We have calculated a sample of 45 patients in each group.

The physical and rehabilitation doctors who evaluated the patients and the nurse who assessed the patients were blinded to treatment allocation. Physicians who performed the MTP injection did not participate in the evaluation of primary and secondary outcomes. Physical therapists who conducted the therapeutic exercise program did not participate in the evaluation of primary and secondary outcomes.

Being tested
Physical therapy, Lidocaine injection, Lidocaine injection + physical therapy
Keywords
Myofascial pain, Trigger points., Lidocaine injection., Physical therapy
Medical subject headings
Myofascial Pain Syndromes, Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Physical therapyOther

    Also called standardized therapeutic exercise program

    Twelve sessions (3 per week)

  • Lidocaine injectionDrug

    Also called blocking the Myofascial trigger point

    blocking the Myofascial trigger point (MTP) with lidocaine injection, unique dose.

  • Lidocaine injection + physical therapyOther

    Also called blocking plus a standarized therapeutic exercise program

    blocking the Myofascial trigger point (MTP) with lidocaine injection plus a standarized therapeutic exercise program (twelve sessions, 3 per week)

Study groups in NCT01250184
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Physical TherapyActive comparatorTwelve sessions, 3 per week.
Receives: Other: Physical therapy
Lidocaine injectionActive comparatorBlocking the myofascial trigger point (MTP) with lidocaine injection, unique dose.
Receives: Drug: Lidocaine injection
Lidocaine injection + physical therapyExperimentalBlocking the Myofascial trigger point (MTP) with lidocaine injection plus a standarized therapeutic exercise program, twelve sessions, 3 per week.
Receives: Other: Lidocaine injection + physical therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analogue Scale

    VAS with a score of 0-100, where 100 is the value representing the highest degree of pain and 0 the lowest. Successful treatment was defined as a reduction in pain of at least 20% of the previous score on the VAS after 4 weeks of the initial evaluation, or 14 mm on the VAS; this scale is a reliable pain assessment measure that has been validated previously

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Visual Analogue Scale

    VAS with a score of 0-100, where 100 is the value representing the highest degree of pain and 0 the lowest. Successful treatment was defined as a reduction in pain of at least 20% of the previous score on the VAS after 4 weeks of the initial evaluation, or 14 mm on the VAS; this scale is a reliable pain assessment measure that has been validated previously

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. PHQ 9 Function Measured With the Hand Back and Hand Mouth Maneuvers. Complications and Adverse Reactions Need for Rescue Medication

    The PHQ-9 was developed from the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. The self-report instrument asks individuals how much they had been bothered by any of the nine problems over the prior two weeks. Items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Items are summed and the total score (from 0 to 27) represents the severity of depressive symptoms. 0 - 4 None-minimal None, 5 - 9 Mild, 10 - 14 Moderate, 15 - 19 Moderately Severe, 20 - 27 Severe

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Quality of Life SF-36

    The SF-36 consists of 36 items addressing the patient's perception of their quality of life (QoL) in the following eight domains: physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), and mental health (MH), and one item change in health. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 as the best, most positive QoL in that area and 0 is the worst. There is a total scale score, all subscales range from 0 to 100. This scale was validated in Colombia.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. PHQ 9 Function Measured With the Hand Back and Hand Mouth Maneuvers. Complications and Adverse Reactions Need for Rescue Medication

    The PHQ-9 was developed from the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. The self-report instrument asks individuals how much they had been bothered by any of the nine problems over the prior two weeks. Items are scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Items are summed and the total score (from 0 to 27) represents the severity of depressive symptoms. 0 - 4 None-minimal None, 5 - 9 Mild, 10 - 14 Moderate, 15 - 19 Moderately Severe, 20 - 27 Severe

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Quality of Life SF-36

    The SF-36 consists of 36 items addressing the patient's perception of their quality of life (QoL) in the following eight domains: physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical problems (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), and mental health (MH), and one item change in health. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 as the best, most positive QoL in that area and 0 is the worst. There is a total scale score, all subscales range from 0 to 100. This scale was validated in Colombia.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Nov 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2009
  3. Primary completionJun 2011
  4. Study completionSep 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
127 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01250184
Sponsor's protocol ID
GrupoRS0001
Status last verified
Oct 2014
First submitted
27 Nov 2010
Last updated
10 Oct 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Physical therapy, Lidocaine injection and Lidocaine injection + physical therapy in people with Myofascial Pain Syndrome and Pain, run by Grupo Rehabilitacion en Salud at 2 sites in Colombia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Colombia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analogue Scale (time frame: 4 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in