AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic SinusitisPhase 3ADVANCE IINCT01253577

A Clinical Evaluation of a Steroid-Coated Sinus Stent When Used Following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With Chronic Sinusitis

A Phase 3 study testing Sinus Stent with drug coating and Non Coated Sinus Stent in people with Chronic Sinusitis, run by Intersect ENT at 11 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Propel mometasone furoate implant when used following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) in patients with Chronic Sinusitis (CS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Sinusitis
What is being tested?
Sinus Stent with drug coating and Non Coated Sinus Stent
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
105 participants
Where
11 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2009to Oct 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient has bilateral chronic sinusitis confirmed by CT scan and defined as inflammation of the mucosa of the nose and paranasal sinuses of at least 8 consecutive weeks' duration.
  • Patient is indicated for and has consented to FESS.
  • FESS successfully completed without significant complication that in the opinion of the physician would confound study results and the patient's anatomy remains amenable to Sinus Stent placement.
  • CT Imaging Inclusion Criteria:
  • CS diagnosis confirmed and documented by CT Scan within 6 months of the procedure.
  • Patient has minimum total CT score (Lund-Mackay method) of 6. • Patient has bilateral ethmoid sinus disease confirmed by CT.

Who cannot join

  • insulin dependent diabetics
  • oral steroid dependent condition
  • glaucoma, ocular hypertension, posterior subcapsular cataracts
  • middle turbinate resection

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 1 country.

11 sites in 1 country

United States11 sites
  • Austin ENT Clinics

    Austin, Texas

  • Charlotte Eye, ENT Associates

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Colorado ENT & Allergy

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909

  • University of Texas SW Medical School

    Dallas, Texas

  • Northshore University Health System

    Evanston, Illinois, 60201

  • Central California ENT

    Fresno, California, 93720

  • University of Texas Medical School

    Houston, Texas, 77098

  • Advanced ENT & Allergy

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40207

  • Eastern Virgina Medical School

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507

  • Intermountain ENT

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Propel mometasone furoate implant when used following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) in patients with Chronic Sinusitis (CS).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Propel mometasone furoate implant when used following Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) in patients with Chronic Sinusitis (CS). The Propel implant is designed to provide a mechanical spacing function within the sinus anatomy to separate mucosal tissues, provide stabilization of the middle turbinate, and thereby prevent tissue adhesions from forming. The implant is coated with a small amount of mometasone furoate (a corticosteroid) in order to help minimize post surgical inflammation within the supported tissues.

The study utilizes an intra-patient control design to assess the safety and efficacy of the drug-coated implant compared to the non-drug coated implant that is identical in appearance.

Being tested
Sinus Stent with drug coating, Non Coated Sinus Stent

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sinus Stent with drug coatingDevice

    Sinus stent coated with 370 ug of the corticosteroid mometasone furoate

  • Non Coated Sinus StentDevice

    Sinus stent (visually identical) without drug coating

Study groups in NCT01253577
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Drug CoatedActive comparatorSinus stent coated with steroid
Receives: Device: Sinus Stent with drug coating
Non coatedPlacebo comparatorSinus stent without drug coating
Receives: Device: Non Coated Sinus Stent

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Sinuses Requiring Post-operative Intervention

    Post-operative interventions include either need for surgical adhesion lysis or the need for oral steroids prescription, as determined from video-endoscopies reviewed by a panel of independent blinded sinus surgeons.

    Measured: 30-days

  2. Percentage of Patients With Clinically Significant Increase in Intra-ocular Pressure

    clinically significant IOP elevation is a change from baseline of >10 mm Hg on sinus side with drug-coated implant but not on side with control implant

    Measured: 90 days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Percentage of Sinuses That Developed Frank Polyposis

    Frank polyposis means polyps grade 2 or 3, which was determined from video-endoscopies reviewed by a panel of independent blinded sinus surgeons.

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Dec 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2009
  3. Primary completionOct 2010
  4. Study completionOct 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
105 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01253577
Sponsor's protocol ID
P500-1009
Acronym
ADVANCE II
Status last verified
May 2015
First submitted
2 Dec 2010
Last updated
22 Jun 2015

Publications

  • Han JK, Marple BF, Smith TL, Murr AH, Lanier BJ, Stambaugh JW, Mugglin AS. Effect of steroid-releasing sinus implants on postoperative medical and surgical interventions: an efficacy meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012 Jul-Aug;2(4):271-9. doi: 10.1002/alr.21044. Epub 2012 May 1.

    PubMed 22550039

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Sinus Stent with drug coating and Non Coated Sinus Stent in people with Chronic Sinusitis, run by Intersect ENT at 11 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Apr 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Sinuses Requiring Post-operative Intervention (time frame: 30-days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01253577, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in