AzTrials
AzTrials

MyopiaNCT01254747

Clinical Evaluation of an Investigational Soft Contact Lens

A study testing Delefilcon A contact lens, Lotrafilcon B contact lens (O2 OPTIX, AIR OPTIX) and Nelfilcon A contact lens (DAILIES AquaComfort Plus) in people with Myopia, run by CIBA VISION at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this 4-week dispensing trial is to evaluate and compare an investigational soft contact lens worn on a daily disposable basis with three other soft contact lenses also worn on a daily disposable basis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Myopia
What is being tested?
Delefilcon A contact lens, Lotrafilcon B contact lens (O2 OPTIX, AIR OPTIX) and Nelfilcon A contact lens (DAILIES AquaComfort Plus)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
130 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Nov 2010to Dec 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Germany: Be of legal age.
  • USA: Be of legal age or, if under legal age, have written consent of parent/guardian to participate and sign informed assent.
  • Sign Informed Consent.
  • Wear soft contact lenses for at least 3 months prior to the study.
  • Wear soft contact lenses on a daily disposable basis, daily wear basis, or occasional extended wear basis.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Who cannot join

  • Eye injury or surgery within twelve weeks prior to enrollment.
  • Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting.
  • Currently enrolled in any clinical trial.
  • Regularly wear contact lenses on an extended/overnight basis.
  • Germany: pregnant or lactating.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

United States1 site
  • CIBA VISION Research Clinic

    Duluth, Georgia, 30097

Other trials in United States

Germany1 site
  • CIBA VISION Research Clinic

    Großwallstadt, 63868

Other trials in Germany

About this study

The purpose of this 4-week dispensing trial is to evaluate and compare an investigational soft contact lens worn on a daily disposable basis with three other soft contact lenses also worn on a daily disposable basis.

Conditions
Myopia
Being tested
Delefilcon A contact lens, Lotrafilcon B contact lens (O2 OPTIX, AIR OPTIX), Nelfilcon A contact lens (DAILIES AquaComfort Plus), Narafilcon A contact lens (1-DAY ACUVUE TRUEYE)
Medical subject headings
Myopia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Delefilcon A contact lensDevice

    Also called DAILIES TOTAL1®

    Investigational silicone hydrogel, single vision contact lens for daily wear, daily disposable use

  • Lotrafilcon B contact lens (O2 OPTIX, AIR OPTIX)Device

    Also called O2 OPTIX®, AIR OPTIX®

    Commercially marketed silicone hydrogel, single vision contact lens for daily wear, daily disposable use

  • Nelfilcon A contact lens (DAILIES AquaComfort Plus)Device

    Also called DAILIES® AquaComfort Plus®

    Commercially marketed hydrogel, single vision contact lens for daily wear, daily disposable use

  • Narafilcon A contact lens (1-DAY ACUVUE TRUEYE)Device

    Also called 1-DAY ACUVUE® TRUEYE™

    Commercially marketed (Europe) silicone hydrogel, single vision contact lens for daily wear, daily disposable use

Study groups in NCT01254747
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Delefilcon AExperimentalDelefilcon A contact lenses worn in both eyes on a daily wear, daily disposable basis for four weeks.
Receives: Device: Delefilcon A contact lens
Lotrafilcon BActive comparatorLotrafilcon B contact lenses worn in both eyes on a daily wear, daily disposable basis for four weeks.
Receives: Device: Lotrafilcon B contact lens (O2 OPTIX, AIR OPTIX)
Nelfilcon AActive comparatorNelfilcon A contact lenses worn in both eyes on a daily wear, daily disposable basis for four weeks.
Receives: Device: Nelfilcon A contact lens (DAILIES AquaComfort Plus)
Narafilcon AActive comparatorNarafilcon A contact lenses worn in both eyes on a daily wear, daily disposable basis for four weeks.
Receives: Device: Narafilcon A contact lens (1-DAY ACUVUE TRUEYE)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Comfort

    Overall comfort was assessed and recorded by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear. Overall comfort was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Vision Quality During the Day

    Vision quality during the day was assessed and recorded by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear. Vision quality during the day was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. Overall Handling

    Overall handling was assessed and recorded by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear. Overall handling was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  4. Dryness Throughout the Day

    Dryness throughout the day was assessed and recorded by the participant on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear. Dryness throughout the day was measured on a 10-point scale, with 1 being very dry and 10 being not dry.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  5. Average Daily Wear Time

    Average daily wear time (hours) was reported by the participant as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear.

    Measured: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Lens Fit

    Lens fit was assessed by the investigator for each eye using a biomicroscope, which magnifies the appearance of the contact lens on the participant's eye. Lens fit was graded on a 5-point scale, with 2=unacceptable loose, 1=acceptable loose, 0=optimal, -1=acceptable tight, and -2=unacceptable tight.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  2. Corrected Visual Acuity

    Corrected visual acuity was tested for each eye while the participant read distant charts in normal lighting. Corrected visual acuity was measured with a Snellen chart, which was converted into logMAR units (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution). A 20/20 Snellen acuity equates to a logMAR acuity of 0.0 and is considered normal distance eyesight. Positive logMAR values indicate poorer vision, and negative values denote better visual acuity.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. Overall Satisfaction

    Overall satisfaction was recorded on a 5-point Likert scale as a single, retrospective evaluation of 4 weeks of wear. The following scale was used: 2=very satisfied, 1=somewhat satisfied, 0=neither, -1=somewhat dissatisfied, and -2=very dissatisfied.

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Dec 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionDec 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
130 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01254747
Sponsor's protocol ID
P-347-C-003v2s2v2
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
3 Dec 2010
Last updated
10 Jul 2012
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Delefilcon A contact lens, Lotrafilcon B contact lens (O2 OPTIX, AIR OPTIX) and Nelfilcon A contact lens (DAILIES AquaComfort Plus) in people with Myopia, run by CIBA VISION at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 May 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Comfort (time frame: 4 weeks). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in