AzTrials
AzTrials

Carcinoma, HepatocellularPhase 1/2NCT01258608

Study of Mapatumumab in Combination With Sorafenib in Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A Phase 1/2 study testing Mapatumumab and Sorafenib in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company at 43 sites in 7 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mapatumumab is a fully human, agonist monoclonal antibody that activates the cell death pathway in tumor cells by specifically binding to TRAIL-R1 with high affinity. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, is the standard of care for treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What is being tested?
Mapatumumab and Sorafenib
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
101 participants
Where
43 sitesin 7 countries
Study dates
8 Feb 2011to 29 Nov 2017
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Child-Pugh Class A.
  • Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) advanced stage (C) hepatocellular carcinoma, or BCLC intermediate stage (B) hepatocellular carcinoma if treatment with transarterial chemoembolization is not considered appropriate
  • Measurable disease demonstrating intratumoral arterial enhancement by contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CT), with use of multislice scanners, or contrast enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with at least 1 tumor lesion that meets the following criteria: located in the liver; can be accurately measured in at least 1 dimension; well delineated area of viable, hypervascular (contrast enhancement in the arterial phase) tumor that is >2 centimeter (cm) in the axial plane; suitable for repeat measurement; OR not previously treated with locoregional or systemic treatment unless the lesion shows a well-delineated area of viable (contrast enhancement in the arterial phase) tumor that is >2 cm in the axial plane. (If the lesion is poorly demarcated or exhibits atypical enhancement as a result of the previous intervention, then it cannot be selected as a target lesion)
  • Radiologic eligibility (measurable disease) must be must be confirmed by the BICR prior to randomization.
  • Adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function as defined in the protocol.
  • Performance status of 0, 1 or 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Scale
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent (including consent for the use and disclosure of research-related health information), and comply with the study and follow-up procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Any co-morbid condition that in the judgment of the investigator renders the subject at high risk of treatment complications or reduces the possibility of assessing clinical effect.
  • Received prior investigational or non-investigational cytotoxic chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biological therapy (including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies, small molecules or other immunotherapy) to treat hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • History of organ allograft.
  • Previously received mapatumumab or sorafenib.
  • Underwent resection, radiofrequency ablation, radiation or chemoembolization within 4 weeks before enrollment or not recovered from such treatments.
  • Need for concomitant anticancer therapy (surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, radiofrequency ablation) or other investigational agents during the study treatment period.
Show all 23Show fewer
  • Major surgery (i.e., the opening of a major body cavity, requiring the use of general anesthesia) within 4 weeks before enrollment; minor surgery (except for insertion of vascular access device) within 2 weeks before enrollment; or not yet recovered from the effects of the surgery.
  • Systemic steroids within 1 week before enrollment except steroids used as part of an antiemetic regimen or maintenance-dose steroids for non-cancerous disease.
  • Hepatic encephalopathy, per the investigator's evaluation.
  • History of clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding requiring procedural intervention (e.g., variceal banding, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure, arterial embolization, topical coagulation therapy) within 4 weeks before enrollment.
  • Gastrointestinal disease resulting in an inability to take oral medication or a requirement for intravenous hyperalimentation.
  • History of any infection requiring hospitalization or intravenous antibiotics within 2 weeks before enrollment.
  • Known brain or spinal cord metastases unless adequately treated (surgery or radiotherapy) with no evidence of progression and neurologically stable off anticonvulsants and steroids.
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus infection.
  • Unstable angina, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, >= Class II congestive heart failure according to the New York Heart Association Classification for Congestive Heart Failure within 6 months before enrollment.
  • Cardiac arrhythmias requiring anti-arrhythmic therapy other than beta blockers or digoxin.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >150 millimeters of mercury [mmHg] or diastolic pressure >90 mmHg despite optimal medical management).
  • Using and unable to discontinue use of concomitant strong CYP3A4 inducers (e.g., including but not limited to St. John's Wort, dexamethasone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, rifampin, rifabutin, phenobarbital)
  • Pregnant female or nursing mother. All females with an intact uterus (unless amenorrheic for the 24 months before enrollment) must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening. All non-sterile or non-postmenopausal females must practice a medically accepted method of contraception over the course of the study and for 60 days after the last dose of study agent.
  • Males who do not agree to use effective contraception during the study and for a period of 60 days following the final dose of study agent.
  • Subject is currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days since ending other investigational device or drug study(s) or subject is receiving other investigational agents.
  • Acute or chronic severe renal insufficiency (glomoerular filtration rate <30 milliliters [mL]/minute/1.73 square meters) or acute renal insufficiency of any severity due to the hepato-renal syndrome.
  • Hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) levels >2,000 international units/mL.

Trial locations and contacts

43 sites in 7 countries.

43 sites in 7 countries

Russia11 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kazan', 420029

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Krasnoyarsk, 660133

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 115478

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 125284

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Moscow, 195067

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pyatigorsk, 357502

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg, 194017

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Saint Petersburg, 198255

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tomsk, 634050

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Yaroslavl, 150054

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Yekaterinburg, 620036

Other trials in Russia

United States9 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-0850

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033-

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Newark, New Jersey, 07103

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801

Other trials in United States

Ukraine8 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dnipropetrovsk, 49044

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Donetsk, 83092

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kharkiv, 61070

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kyiv, 03022

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kyiv, 03039

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lviv, 79031

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Uzhhorod, 88014

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Zaporizhia, 69032

Other trials in Ukraine

Poland6 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gdansk, 80-952

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Olsztyn, 10-228

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Poznan, 61-878

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Szczecin, 71-730

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 02-507

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 04-125

Other trials in Poland

Germany4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hamburg, 20246

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Munich, Bavaria, 81377

Other trials in Germany

Romania4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bucharest, 022328

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cluj-Napoca, 400015

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Craiova, 200385

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Iași, 700483

Other trials in Romania

Puerto Rico1 site
  • GSK Investigational Site

    San Juan, 00927

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Multi-Center, Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study Of Mapatumumab ([HGS1012], A Fully Monoclonal Antibody To TRAIL-R1) In Combination With Sorafenib As A First-Line Therapy In Subjects With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Mapatumumab is a fully human, agonist monoclonal antibody that activates the cell death pathway in tumor cells by specifically binding to TRAIL-R1 with high affinity. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, is the standard of care for treatment of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The mechanisms of sorafenib and mapatumumab action suggest that these agents could interact synergistically. This is a Phase 2, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab in combination with sorafenib in subjects with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Being tested
Mapatumumab, Placebo, Sorafenib
Keywords
advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, Mapatumumab, HGS1012, sorafenib
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MapatumumabDrug

    Mapatumumab will be supplied as a lyophilized formulation in 10 mL vials containing 100 mg mapatumumab for intravenous infusion at the dose of 30 mg/kg.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Normal saline solution for intravenous infusion will be administered as placebo for mapatumumab

  • SorafenibDrug

    Sorafenib will be supplied as tablets, each containing 274 mg sorafenib tosylate, equivalent to 200 mg of sorafenib, to be administered 400 mg (2 x 200 mg tablets) orally twice daily.

Study groups in NCT01258608
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sorafenib plus mapatumumabExperimentalMapatumumab 30 milligrams (mg)/kilogram (kg) intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle (i.e. every 21 days) plus sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each cycle until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Receives: Drug: Mapatumumab; Drug: Sorafenib
Sorafenib plus PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle (i.e. every 21 days) plus sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily continuously in each cycle until radiologic disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Sorafenib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Progression-Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment

    Time to progression is defined as the time from randomization to radiologic disease progression based on blinded independent review (BICR) of imaging scans using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors assessment (mRECIST) for hepatocellular carcinoma. The primary analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods. The median time to progression is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. Analysis was performed on the modified Intent to Treat (mITT) Population which comprised of all randomized participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent (mapatumumab/placebo and/or sorafenib) with participants analyzed according to the groups to which they were randomized. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Time to Progression-Investigator Assessment

    Time to progression is defined as the time from randomization to radiologic disease progression. The primary analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods based on application of mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The median time to progression is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months

  2. Median Overall Survival

    Overall survival is defined as time from randomization to death from any cause. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods. The median overall survival is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months

  3. Progression Free Survival-BICR Assessment

    Progression free survival is defined as time from randomization to radiologic disease progression or death from any cause. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods using BICR assessment of imaging scans. The median progression free survival is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months

  4. Progression Free Survival-Investigator Assessment

    Progression free survival is defined as time from randomization to radiologic disease progression or death from any cause. The analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier methods based on application of mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The median progression free survival is reported with one-sided 90% confidence interval. NA indicates upper limit was not measurable as one-sided confidence interval is presented.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months

  5. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response-BICR Assessment

    Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma using BICR assessment of imaging scans. The percentage of participants with objective response is reported along with 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months

  6. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response-Investigator Assessment

    Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The percentage of participants with objective response is reported along with 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months

  7. Percentage of Participants With Disease Control-BICR Assessment

    Disease control rate is the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response+stable disease according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma. The end point was based on BICR assessment of imaging scans. The percentage of participants with disease control is presented along with 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months

  8. Percentage of Participants With Disease Control-Investigator Assessment

    Disease control rate is the percentage of participants with complete response+partial response+stable disease according to mRECIST criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma to investigator assessments. The percentage of participants with disease control is presented along with 95% confidence interval.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 52.9 months

  9. Time to Response-BICR Assessment

    Time to response is defined as time from randomization to first partial response or complete response in responders only. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. Partial Response (PR): At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months

  10. Duration of Response-BICR Assessment

    Duration of response is defined as time from first PR or CR to radiologic disease progression; in responders only. CR: Disappearance of intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesions, taking as reference the Baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. Progressive disease (PD): An increase of at least 20% in the sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the diameters of viable (enhancing) target lesions recorded since treatment started.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months

  11. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that is temporally associated with the use of a study agent but is not necessarily caused by the study agent. An SAE is an adverse event resulting in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, inpatient hospitalization, prolongation of an existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or other medically important events that may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes mentioned before. A treatment-emergent AE is an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent pre-treatment, or worsened relative to the pre-treatment state. As-Treated Population comprised of participants who received at least part of 1 dose of study agent analyzed according to the treatment that they actually received.

    Measured: Start of study treatment to maximum of 52.9 months

  12. Number of Participants With Severe AEs

    An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or disease that is temporally associated with the use of a study agent but is not necessarily caused by the study agent. Severity of AEs were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.0. Grade 1 represents mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 represents moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 represents severe or medically significant but not immediately life -threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 represents life -threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 represents death related to AE. Severe AE is defined as AEs classified by investigator as severe (causing inability to carry out usual activities), life threatening or fatal using NCI-CTCAE Version 4.0 grading.

    Measured: Start of study treatment to maximum of 52.9 months

  13. Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-chemistry Parameters

    Blood samples were collected for the evaluation of following chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), amylase, bilirubin, gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), calcium, potassium, magnesium, albumin, sodium and creatinine. Laboratory toxicities were graded based on the NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Grade 1 represents mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 represents moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 represents severe or medically significant but not immediately life -threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 represents life -threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Number of participants with worst toxicity grades for any abnormalities observed in any chemistry parameters during the study is presented.

    Measured: Enrolment to maximum of 52.9 months

  14. Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade-hematology Parameters

    Blood samples were collected for assessment of the following hematology parameters: activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), hemoglobin, international normalized ratio (INR), lymphocytes, neutrophils, platelets and white blood cells (WBC). Laboratory toxicities were graded based on the NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Grade 1 represents mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 represents moderate; minimal, local or non-invasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 represents severe or medically significant but not immediately life -threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 represents life -threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Number of participants with worst toxicity grades for any abnormalities observed in any hematology parameters during the study is presented.

    Measured: Enrolment to maximum of 52.9 months

  15. Number of Participants With Anti-mapatumumab Antibodies

    Blood samples were collected for the assessment of serum antibodies. The presence of anti-mapatumumab antibodies was assessed using a validated electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. The assay incorporated a tiered testing approach which used screening and confirmation steps. The anti-drug antibody (ADA) confirmed positive participants were separated into transient or persistent antibody positives. Persistent positive refers to positive immunogenic response at 2 or more assessments or at the final assessment. Transient positive refers to positive immunogenic response at only 1 assessment and negative at the final assessment.

    Measured: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months

  16. Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

    SBP and DBP were obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)

  17. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

    Heart rate was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)

  18. Change From Baseline in Temperature

    Temperature was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)

  19. Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate

    Respiratory rate was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose.Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)

  20. Change From Baseline in Weight

    Weight was obtained on Day 1 of each cycle. Baseline is the last assessment prior to first dose. Change from Baseline is the value at indicated time point minus the value at Baseline. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time point.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 75 (each cycle of 21 days)

  21. Serum Concentration of Mapatumumab

    Blood samples were collected for determination of serum mapatumumab concentration at the indicated time points. NA indicates standard deviation could not be calculated as only one participant was analyzed at the specified time points.

    Measured: Day1 pre-dose(Cycle 1,2,4,5,6,8,9,10,12,14,16,17,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34);end of infusion (Cycle 1);Day8 pre-dose(Cycle 1);Day15 pre-dose (Cycle 1,2);Day21(Cycle 2,4,6,8,9,12,14,16,18,20,22,24,26,28,30,32,34);Cycle 99(end of treatment) (21-day cycles)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Feb 2011
  3. Primary completion31 May 2013
  4. Study completion29 Nov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
101 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01258608
Sponsor's protocol ID
200149
Other IDs
HGS1012-C1103
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
7 Dec 2010
Last updated
19 Dec 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.

Publications

  • Ciuleanu T, Bazin I, Lungulescu D, Miron L, Bondarenko I, Deptala A, Rodriguez-Torres M, Giantonio B, Fox NL, Wissel P, Egger J, Ding M, Kalyani RN, Humphreys R, Gribbin M, Sun W. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of mapatumumab with sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):680-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw004. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

    PubMed 26802147

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Mapatumumab and Sorafenib in people with Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, run by Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company at 43 sites in 7 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 43 sites in Russia, United States, Ukraine, Poland, Germany and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Dec 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Progression-Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) Assessment (time frame: Randomization to maximum of 24.1 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01258608, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in