AzTrials
AzTrials

Warm WaterNCT01259583

Carbon Dioxide Insufflation (CO2) and Warm Water Infusion (WWI) Versus Standard Air Insufflation (AI) for Unsedated Colonoscopy

A study testing CO2 and Warm water in people with Warm Water and CO2 Colonoscopy, run by Valduce Hospital at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Due to the increasing demand for colonoscopy in clinical practice, great interest has recently renewed for unsedated colonoscopy. Both Carbon dioxide Insufflation (CO2) and Warm Water Infusion (WWI) have been advocated to improve patient tolerance for colonoscopy as compared to standard Air Insufflation (AI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Warm Water, CO2 Colonoscopy, Unsedated Colonoscopy
What is being tested?
CO2 and Warm water
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
341 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
Jul 2010to Dec 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult outpatients willing to undergo colonoscopy without routine initial sedation

Who cannot join

  • refuse to initiate colonoscopy without routine sedation
  • inadequate bowel preparation
  • incapacity to give informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Valduce Hospital - Gastroenterology Department

    Como, 22100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Due to the increasing demand for colonoscopy in clinical practice, great interest has recently renewed for unsedated colonoscopy. Both Carbon dioxide Insufflation (CO2) and Warm Water Infusion (WWI) have been advocated to improve patient tolerance for colonoscopy as compared to standard Air Insufflation (AI). This study is aimed at evaluating the performance of the above techniques versus AI in unsedated patients.

Being tested
CO2, Warm water

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CO2Procedure or surgery

    CO2 insufflation

  • Warm waterProcedure or surgery

    warm water irrigation

Study groups in NCT01259583
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CO2ExperimentalCO2 insufflation instead air insufflation in unsedated colonoscopy
Receives: Procedure: CO2
Warm Water irrigationExperimentalwarm water irrigation during the insertion phase of colonoscopy
Receives: Procedure: Warm water

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. number of patients undergoing complete unsedated colonoscopy

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. evaluation of pain and tolerability scores

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Dec 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionDec 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
341 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01259583
Sponsor's protocol ID
CO2-01
Status last verified
Mar 2013
First submitted
13 Dec 2010
Last updated
13 Mar 2013
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S, Baccarin A, Spinzi G, Terruzzi V. Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion versus standard air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):511-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318279addd.

    PubMed 23478620

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing CO2 and Warm water in people with Warm Water and CO2 Colonoscopy, run by Valduce Hospital at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

number of patients undergoing complete unsedated colonoscopy (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01259583, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in