Acute Myocardial InfarctionPhase 4SILOAMNCT01261832
Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Cilostazol in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients
A Phase 4 study testing antiplatelet therapy in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Korea University Guro Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Current antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome have a focus on the dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel. However, the patient's drug resistance of aspirin and clopidogrel is the important cause of poor clinical prognosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- antiplatelet therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 951 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Jul 2011to Mar 2022
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Cilostazol
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or refuses blood transfusions.
- Baseline hemogram with Hb<10g/dL or PLT count<100,000/μL
- Patients already taking warfarin, cilostazol or any other type of anti-platelet agents except aspirin and clopidogrel
- Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months, or major surgery within 2 months.
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Prospective , Open Label, Phase 4 Trial of Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Cilostazol in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-eluting Stent
Current antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome have a focus on the dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel. However, the patient's drug resistance of aspirin and clopidogrel is the important cause of poor clinical prognosis. Therefore, recently, clinical research about the triple antiplatelet therapy including cilostazol is actively conducted. But, clinical research about triple antiplatelet therapy for acute myocardial infarction is inadequate situation, and the ideal duration of triple antiplatelet therapy has been actively discussed. Therefore, we try to evaluate the clinical outcomes of triple antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous intervention with drug eluting stent compared with dual antiplatelet therapy and investigate ideal duration of triple antiplatelet therapy through this research.
Read the detailed description
Drug-eluting stents (DES) have drastically changed the landscape of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with significant reductions in the angiographic restenosis rate and need for repeated revascularization. However, several studies showed that DES is associated with a higher incidence of in-stent thrombosis compared with bare metal stents. Therefore, the latest guideline for antiplatelet therapy after PCI with DES suggests that the dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) be administered for at least 12 months.But is it enough for high-risk patients? Some studies showed that as many as 50% of the patients who received PCI did not react positively to aspirin or clopidogrel.Furthermore, there is increased platelet activity in acute coronary syndrome, especially in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). compared with aspirin or clopidogrel.A recent study suggested that cilostazol could ameliorate platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients who underwent primary PCI. Furthermore, some other studies showed that the administration of cilostazol after PCI could significantly lower the incidence of in-stent restenosis. Therefore, the present study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of additional administration of cilostazol with aspirin and clopidogrel in a real-world cardiology practice among patients presenting with AMI who received primary PCI with DES.
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Being tested
- antiplatelet therapy
- Keywords
- Acute Myocardial Infarction, Percutaneous coronary intervention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
antiplatelet therapyDrug
Also called The brand name of clopidogrel is Plavix., The brand name of cilostazol is Pletaal.
Dual antiplatelet therapy is defined as combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel and triple antiplatelet therapy is defined as combination therapy with aspirin,clopidogrel and cilostazol.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year | Experimental | Dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year : dual antiplatelet combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for 1 year Receives: Drug: antiplatelet therapy |
| Triple antiplatelet therapy for 1 month | Experimental | Triple antiplatelet therapy for 1 month : triple antiplatelet therapy including cilostazol for 1 month and after then, dual antiplatelet therapy for 11 months Receives: Drug: antiplatelet therapy |
| Triple antiplatelet therapy for 6 months | Experimental | Triple antiplatelet therapy for 6 months : triple antiplatelet combination therapy including cilostazol for 6 months and after then, dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 months and cilostazol Receives: Drug: antiplatelet therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebral Events
Composite of total death, Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (Non-QMI , Q-MI), Repeat RevascularizationI (Target Vessel Revascularization +Non Target Vessel Revascularization , Coronary Artery Bypass Graft), Stroke (Ischemic \& Hemorrhagic)
Measured: One Year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Individual outcome of primary end points, Stent thrombosis,Bleeding Complication,PFT (Platelet function test),Genotyping results
- Individual outcome of primary end points
- Stent thrombosis
- Beeding Complication defined by the TIMI criteria \& Minor Bleeding, Vascular Complications
- Angiographic outcomes at 1 year : Binary restenosis, Late loss, FU MLD, mean % restenosis, restenosis type
- IVUS findings at Index and Follow up angiography
- PFT (Platelet function test) : at discharge, intercurrent event , after one year
- Genotyping results : genetic polymorphism
Measured: One year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2011
- Primary completionFeb 2020
- Study completionMar 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 951 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Korea University Guro Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Seung Woon Rha, Korea University Guro Hospital
- Investigators
- Seung Woon Rha, MD. PhD., Principal investigator, Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, 80, Guro-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul, 152-703, Korea
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01261832
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KoreaUGuroH SILOAM
- Acronym
- SILOAM
- Status last verified
- Feb 2020
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2010
- Last updated
- 20 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Chen KY, Rha SW, Li YJ, Poddar KL, Jin Z, Minami Y, Wang L, Kim EJ, Park CG, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Jeong MH, Ahn YK, Hong TJ, Kim YJ, Hur SH, Seong IW, Chae JK, Cho MC, Bae JH, Choi DH, Jang YS, Chae IH, Kim CJ, Yoon JH, Chung WS, Seung KB, Park SJ; Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators. Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2009 Jun 30;119(25):3207-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.822791. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
PubMed 19528339
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Prospective , Open Label, Phase 4 Trial of Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Cilostazol in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-eluting Stent
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01261832
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SILOAM / KoreaUGuroH SILOAM
- Conditions
- Acute Myocardial Infarction
- Keywords
- Acute Myocardial Infarction, Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 951 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Korea University Guro HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Current antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome have a focus on the dual antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and clopidogrel. However, the patient's drug resistance of aspirin and clopidogrel is the important cause of poor clinical prognosis. Therefore, recently, clinical research about the triple antiplatelet therapy including cilostazol is actively conducted. But, clinical research about triple antiplatelet therapy for acute myocardial infarction is inadequate situation, and the ideal duration of triple antiplatelet therapy has been actively discussed. Therefore, we try to evaluate the clinical outcomes of triple antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction patients undergoing percutaneous intervention with drug eluting stent compared with dual antiplatelet therapy and investigate ideal duration of triple antiplatelet therapy through this research.
Detailed description
Drug-eluting stents (DES) have drastically changed the landscape of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with significant reductions in the angiographic restenosis rate and need for repeated revascularization. However, several studies showed that DES is associated with a higher incidence of in-stent thrombosis compared with bare metal stents. Therefore, the latest guideline for antiplatelet therapy after PCI with DES suggests that the dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) be administered for at least 12 months.But is it enough for high-risk patients? Some studies showed that as many as 50% of the patients who received PCI did not react positively to aspirin or clopidogrel.Furthermore, there is increased platelet activity in acute coronary syndrome, especially in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). compared with aspirin or clopidogrel.A recent study suggested that cilostazol could ameliorate platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel in patients who underwent primary PCI. Furthermore, some other studies showed that the administration of cilostazol after PCI could significantly lower the incidence of in-stent restenosis. Therefore, the present study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of additional administration of cilostazol with aspirin and clopidogrel in a real-world cardiology practice among patients presenting with AMI who received primary PCI with DES.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year | Experimental | Drug: antiplatelet therapyDual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year : dual antiplatelet combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel for 1 year |
| Triple antiplatelet therapy for 1 month | Experimental | Drug: antiplatelet therapyTriple antiplatelet therapy for 1 month : triple antiplatelet therapy including cilostazol for 1 month and after then, dual antiplatelet therapy for 11 months |
| Triple antiplatelet therapy for 6 months | Experimental | Drug: antiplatelet therapyTriple antiplatelet therapy for 6 months : triple antiplatelet combination therapy including cilostazol for 6 months and after then, dual antiplatelet therapy for 6 months and cilostazol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- The patient has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications: Heparin, Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Cilostazol
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or refuses blood transfusions.
- Baseline hemogram with Hb<10g/dL or PLT count<100,000/μL
- Patients already taking warfarin, cilostazol or any other type of anti-platelet agents except aspirin and clopidogrel
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| antiplatelet therapyAlso: The brand name of clopidogrel is Plavix., The brand name of cilostazol is Pletaal.Dual antiplatelet therapy is defined as combination therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel and triple antiplatelet therapy is defined as combination therapy with aspirin,clopidogrel and cilostazol. | Drug | Dual antiplatelet therapy for 1 year, Triple antiplatelet therapy for 1 month, Triple antiplatelet therapy for 6 months |
Primary outcome
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebral Events
Time frame: One Year
Composite of total death, Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction (Non-QMI , Q-MI), Repeat RevascularizationI (Target Vessel Revascularization +Non Target Vessel Revascularization , Coronary Artery Bypass Graft), Stroke (Ischemic \& Hemorrhagic)
1 secondary outcome
Individual outcome of primary end points, Stent thrombosis,Bleeding Complication,PFT (Platelet function test),Genotyping results
Time frame: One year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Feb 2020.
- Background: PubMed 19528339Chen KY, Rha SW, Li YJ, Poddar KL, Jin Z, Minami Y, Wang L, Kim EJ, Park CG, Seo HS, Oh DJ, Jeong MH, Ahn YK, Hong TJ, Kim YJ, Hur SH, Seong IW, Chae JK, Cho MC, Bae JH, Choi DH, Jang YS, Chae IH, Kim CJ, Yoon JH, Chung WS, Seung KB, Park SJ; Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry Investigators. Triple versus dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2009 Jun 30;119(25):3207-14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.822791. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
Related trials for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elicit Drugs in Myocardial Infarction
Young Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Recruiting
CT Stress Myocardial Perfusion, Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography in Patients With Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
Recruiting
Heart@Home Safety and Efficacy of Hospital-at-Home Care Versus Standard Hospitalization in Cardiac Patients
Myocardial Infarction, Myocarditis Acute
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Selatogrel Outcome Study in Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Seung Woon Rha, MD. PhD. principal investigator
Cardiovascular Center, Korea University Guro Hospital, 80, Guro-dong, Guro-gu, Seoul, 152-703, Korea
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing antiplatelet therapy in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Korea University Guro Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebral Events (time frame: One Year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01261832, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Feb 2020.