CataractPhase 4NCT01261975
Co-Axial Micro-Incision Versus Co-Axial Small Incision Cataract Surgery Using the Stellaris Enhancement System
A Phase 4 study testing Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery and Coaxial Small Incision Cataract Surgery in people with Cataract and Aphakia, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.
Trial summary
The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the time to reach a stable refraction is significantly shorter in eyes operated with the 1.8 mm coaxial microincision compared to eyes operated with the 2.75 mm standard incision using the Stellaris Vision Enhancement System. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- What is being tested?
- Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery and Coaxial Small Incision Cataract Surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 2009to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects must be undergoing bilateral primary in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for the correction of aphakia.
- Subject's ocular media must be clear except for the presence of the cataract in both eyes.
Who cannot join
- Subject with any disease, which, in the Investigator's opinion, might interfere with the conduct of the study.
About this study
Official title: Co-Axial Micro-incision Cataract Surgery(C-MICS) Versus Standard Co-Axial Small Incision Cataract Surgery Using the Stellaris Enhancement System
The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the time to reach a stable refraction is significantly shorter in eyes operated with the 1.8 mm coaxial microincision compared to eyes operated with the 2.75 mm standard incision using the Stellaris Vision Enhancement System.
- Being tested
- Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery, Coaxial Small Incision Cataract Surgery
- Keywords
- Ocular Surgery, Intraocular Lens
- Medical subject headings
- Cataract, Aphakia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called Stellaris Vision Enhancement System
1.8 mm coaxial micro incision
Coaxial Small Incision Cataract SurgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called Stellaris Vision Enhancement System
2.75 mm coaxial incision
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery | Experimental | 1.8 mm coaxial microincision Receives: Procedure: Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery |
| Coaxial Small Incision Cataract Surgery | Active comparator | 2.75 mm standard incision Receives: Procedure: Coaxial Small Incision Cataract Surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Refractive Stability
Cumulative portion of eyes achieving refractive stability within 0.5 D of the final value for the remainder of the trial by surgical procedure and visit.
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Best corrected distance visual acuity(BCVA) was assessed using logMAR charts. Change from preoperative visit summarized by visit. A minus change represents an improvement of the visual acuity
Measured: Visit 1, visit 2, visit 3, visit 4
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Best corrected distance visual acuity(BCVA) was assessed using logMAR charts. Change from baseline summarized by visit. A minus change represents an improvement of the visual acuity.
Measured: visit 5, visit 6, visit 7, visit 8
Uncorrected Visual Acuity
Uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA) was assessed using logMAR charts. Change from baseline summarized by visit.
Measured: Visit 1, visit 2, visit 3, visit 4
Uncorrected Visual Acuity
Uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA) was assessed using logMAR charts. Change from baseline summarized by visit.
Measured: visit 5, visit 6, visit 7, visit 8
Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA)
Surgically induced astigmatism was presented in dioptres at each visit.
Measured: Visits 1-3
Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA)
Surgically induced astigmatism presented in dioptres at each visit.
Measured: Visits 4-8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2009
- Primary completionApr 2010
- Study completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for CataractStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anne Williart, MD, Study director, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01261975
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 607
- Status last verified
- Jan 2012
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2010
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2012
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Co-Axial Micro-incision Cataract Surgery(C-MICS) Versus Standard Co-Axial Small Incision Cataract Surgery Using the Stellaris Enhancement System
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01261975
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 607
- Keywords
- Ocular Surgery, Intraocular Lens
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2009
- Primary completion
- Apr 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Feb 2012
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the time to reach a stable refraction is significantly shorter in eyes operated with the 1.8 mm coaxial microincision compared to eyes operated with the 2.75 mm standard incision using the Stellaris Vision Enhancement System.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery | Experimental | Procedure: Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery1.8 mm coaxial microincision |
| Coaxial Small Incision Cataract Surgery | Active comparator | Procedure: Coaxial Small Incision Cataract Surgery2.75 mm standard incision |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Subjects must be undergoing bilateral primary in-the-bag intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for the correction of aphakia.
- Subject's ocular media must be clear except for the presence of the cataract in both eyes.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subject with any disease, which, in the Investigator's opinion, might interfere with the conduct of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract SurgeryAlso: Stellaris Vision Enhancement System1.8 mm coaxial micro incision | Procedure or surgery | Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery |
| Coaxial Small Incision Cataract SurgeryAlso: Stellaris Vision Enhancement System2.75 mm coaxial incision | Procedure or surgery | Coaxial Small Incision Cataract Surgery |
Primary outcome
Refractive Stability
Time frame: 12 weeks
Cumulative portion of eyes achieving refractive stability within 0.5 D of the final value for the remainder of the trial by surgical procedure and visit.
6 secondary outcomes
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Time frame: Visit 1, visit 2, visit 3, visit 4
Best Corrected Visual Acuity
Time frame: visit 5, visit 6, visit 7, visit 8
Uncorrected Visual Acuity
Time frame: Visit 1, visit 2, visit 3, visit 4
Uncorrected Visual Acuity
Time frame: visit 5, visit 6, visit 7, visit 8
Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA)
Time frame: Visits 1-3
Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA)
Time frame: Visits 4-8
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2012.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Cataract
Recruiting
Implementing AI-based Glaucoma Screening Within Federally Qualified Health Centers
Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Not yet recruiting
Trial to Investigate the Safety and Effectiveness of the KI-362-US1 (YP2.2VM) Intraocular Lens (IOL) in Adult Participants for Correction of Aphakia Following Cataract Extraction
Aphakia, Postcataract
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Oxygen Cage Support During Cataract Surgery
Cataract
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) Follow-Up
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Cataract
RecruitingObservational study
Objective Depth-of-Focus Changes During Light Adjustable Lens UV Adjustments
Light Adjustable Lens, Objective Depth of Focus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anne Williart, MD study director
Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Coaxial Micro-Incision Cataract Surgery and Coaxial Small Incision Cataract Surgery in people with Cataract and Aphakia, run by Bausch & Lomb Incorporated.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Feb 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Refractive Stability (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2012.