DysphagiaPhase 2NCT01262560
Manuka Honey in Preventing Esophagitis-Related Pain in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy For Lung Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Manuka honey in liquid form, Manuka honey in lozenge form and Standard supportive care in people with Dysphagia and Lung Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 59 sites in United States.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Manuka honey may prevent or reduce esophagitis-related pain caused by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. It is not yet known whether Manuka honey is more effective than standard care in preventing pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dysphagia, Lung Cancer, Pain
- What is being tested?
- Manuka honey in liquid form, Manuka honey in lozenge form and Standard supportive care
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 163 participants
- Where
- 59 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Nov 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Patients being treated with combination chemotherapy (definitive or adjuvant) and radiation therapy once daily for small cell or non-small cell lung cancer (primary population for the trial)
- Patients can receive chemoradiotherapy while on a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) lung trial or while not being on a clinical trial
- No patients receiving chemoradiotherapy while enrolled on a single institution trial or trials coordinated by other cooperative groups
- No patients with metastatic disease
- At least 5 cm of the esophagus must be in the 60 Gy isodose volume in 1.6 to 2.0 Gy fractions
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- Age 18 and up
- Able to swallow thick liquids prior to treatment
- Able to speak English or Spanish in order to complete required forms (verbal completion is adequate)
- No patients with poorly controlled diabetes
- No known hypersensitivity to honey
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No patients who have received prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy
- No patients receiving more than once daily treatments
- Therapeutic use of honey other than the Manuka honey provided for this trial is not allowed while patients are on study
- Patients must also avoid honey-flavored medical products and/or sugary, viscous substances
- Amifostine is not permitted
Trial locations and contacts
59 sites in 1 country.
59 sites in 1 country
United States59 sites
Rosenfeld Cancer Center at Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001
St. Joseph Cancer Center
Bellingham, Washington, 98225
Bryn Mawr Hospital
Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 19010
Mercy Cancer Center at Mercy Medical Center
Canton, Ohio, 44708
Presbyterian Cancer Center at Presbyterian Hospital
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28233-3549
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center at Fairview Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44111
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Payson Center for Cancer Care at Concord Hospital
Concord, New Hampshire, 03301
Geisinger Cancer Institute at Geisinger Health
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822-0001
Seacoast Cancer Center at Wentworth - Douglass Hospital
Dover, New Hampshire, 03820
Northeast Radiation Oncology Center
Dunmore, Pennsylvania, 18512
Duke Cancer Institute
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
CCOP - Hematology-Oncology Associates of Central New York
East Syracuse, New York, 13057
Piedmont Fayette Hospital
Fayetteville, Georgia, 30214
Parkview Regional Cancer Center at Parkview Health
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46805
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0361
Adams Cancer Center
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, 17325
St. Mary's Hospital Medical Center - Green Bay
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54303
St. Vincent Hospital Regional Cancer Center
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54307-3508
Cherry Tree Cancer Center
Hanover, Pennsylvania, 17331
Pardee Memorial Hospital
Hendersonville, North Carolina, 28791
Queen's Cancer Institute at Queen's Medical Center
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
Hawaii Medical Center - East
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817
Cape Cod Hospital
Hyannis, Massachusetts, 02601
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center
Independence, Ohio, 44131
Baptist Cancer Institute - Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756-0002
Lucille P. Markey Cancer Center at University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0093
Monmouth Medical Center
Long Branch, New Jersey, 07740-6395
Elliot Regional Cancer Center at Elliot Hospital
Manchester, New Hampshire, 03103
Fox Chase Virtua Health Cancer Program at Virtua Memorial Hospital Marlton
Marlton, New Jersey, 08053
Hillcrest Cancer Center at Hillcrest Hospital
Mayfield Heights, Ohio, 44124
CCOP - Mount Sinai Medical Center
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Trinity CancerCare Center
Minot, North Dakota, 58701
Providence Cancer Center at Providence Hospital
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
Cancer Center at Ball Memorial Hospital
Muncie, Indiana, 47303-3499
CCOP - Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Florida Cancer Center - Palatka
Palatka, Florida, 32177
Cancer Center of Paoli Memorial Hospital
Paoli, Pennsylvania, 19301-1792
Parma Community General Hospital
Parma, Ohio, 44129
Regional Cancer Center at Singing River Hospital
Pascagoula, Mississippi, 39581
OSF St. Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, 61615-7827
FirstHealth Moore Regional Community Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center
Pinehurst, North Carolina, 28374
Rex Cancer Center at Rex Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Highland Hospital of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14620
James P. Wilmot Cancer Center at University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
CentraCare Clinic - River Campus
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, 56303
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229-3900
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
Nancy N. and J. C. Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion at St. Joseph's/Candler
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
Gibbs Regional Cancer Center at Spartanburg Regional Medical Center
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29303
Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital - Saint Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
David C. Pratt Cancer Center at St. John's Mercy
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Stanford Cancer Center
Stanford, California, 94305-5824
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1096
Lankenau Cancer Center at Lankenau Hospital
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
York Cancer Center at Apple Hill Medical Center
York, Pennsylvania, 17405
About this study
Official title: Phase II Randomized Trial of Prophylactic Manuka Honey for the Reduction of Chemoradiation Therapy Induced Esophagitis-Related Pain During the Treatment of Lung Cancer
RATIONALE: Manuka honey may prevent or reduce esophagitis-related pain caused by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. It is not yet known whether Manuka honey is more effective than standard care in preventing pain.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II clinical trial is studying Manuka honey to see how well it works in preventing esophagitis-related pain in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy for lung cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Evaluate the relative efficacy of 4 times a day consumption of liquid or lozenge Manuka honey to delay or prevent radiation esophagitis-related pain (during combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for lung cancer) as compared to standard supportive treatment, as measured at week 4 by Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) for pain upon swallowing.
Secondary
- Evaluate the trend of severity of radiation esophagitis-related pain during combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for lung cancer using weekly measurements of the NRPS.
- Evaluate the adverse events associated with Manuka honey, as measured by CTCAE, v. 4.
- Evaluate the severity of radiation esophagitis (grade 3-4, CTCAE, v. 4).
- Assess weight loss (percent weight change from baseline to 4 weeks).
- Assess quality of life (QOL) and pain, as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-30) global QOL score and pain symptom subscale.
- Assess patient-reported dysphagia via a daily patient log.
- Assess nutritional status, as measured by the mean change in serum prealbumin levels from baseline to 4 weeks.
- Assess opioid use by collecting the patient's narcotic use in the previous 24-hour period at each weekly evaluation.
- Evaluate patient-reported adverse events associated with Manuka honey using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to the percentage of esophagus in the radiation field (V60 < 30% vs V60 ≥ 30%). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive standard supportive care for esophagitis-related pain as needed during chemoradiotherapy.
- Arm II: Patients swallow liquid Manuka honey slowly over 3-5 minutes. Patients must refrain from eating and drinking for 1 hour after administration. Treatment continues 4 times per day during chemoradiotherapy.
- Arm III: Patients place Manuka honey lozenges in their mouth one at a time and swallow the honey as it dissolves (no chewing or swallowing it whole). Patients must refrain from eating and drinking for 1 hour after administration. Treatment continues 4 times per day during chemoradiotherapy.
Patients complete quality of life, pain swallowing diary, and pain assessments (Numerical Rating Pain Scale, EORTC QLQ-30 and Pain Subscale, and PRO-CTCAE) periodically during study treatment.
Patients are followed up at 12 weeks from the start of study treatment.
- Conditions
- Dysphagia, Lung Cancer, Pain, Esophagitis
- Being tested
- Manuka honey in liquid form, Manuka honey in lozenge form, Standard supportive care
- Keywords
- pain, dysphagia, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer, extensive stage small cell lung cancer, limited stage small cell lung cancer, recurrent small cell lung cancer, esophagitis
- Medical subject headings
- Deglutition Disorders, Lung Neoplasms, Pain, Esophagitis, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Manuka honey in liquid formDrug
Patients swallow 10 cc (approximately 2 level teaspoons) of liquid Manuka honey 4 times per day while awake over an approximately 12 hour period (e.g. 8 a.m., Noon, 4 p.m., and 8 p.m.) 7 days/week during concurrent chemotherapy and radiation treatment.
Manuka honey in lozenge formDrug
Patients place 2 lozenges (the equivalent of 10 cc of liquid Manuka honey), one at a time, in the mouth, allowing each lozenge to dissolve on the tongue/in the mouth, swallowing the honey as it dissolves. Patients do this 4 times per day while awake over an approximately 12 hour period (e.g. 8 a.m., Noon, 4 p.m., and 8 p.m.) 7 days/week during concurrent chemotherapy and radiation treatment.
Standard supportive careDrug
Patients receive standard supporting care for esophagitis-related pain as needed during concurrent chemotherapy and radiation treatment. The following regimen is recommended, but the local standard of care is permitted.
- A compound containing viscous lidocaine and magnesium aluminum oxide (Maalox®);
- Liquid or solid oxycodone, 5-10 mg, every 3 hours as needed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Supportive Care | Active comparator | Standard supportive care Receives: Drug: Standard supportive care |
| Liquid Manuka Honey | Experimental | Manuka honey in liquid form Receives: Drug: Manuka honey in liquid form |
| Lozenge Manuka Honey | Experimental | Manuka honey in lozenge form Receives: Drug: Manuka honey in lozenge form |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Radiation Esophagitis-related Pain at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale for Pain on Swallowing (NRPS)
Esophagitis-related pain was measured using patient-reported pain on swallowing as assessed by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), an 11-point scale (0-10) in which 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Generally, scores of 1-4 indicate mild pain, scores of 5-6 indicate moderate pain, and scores of 7-10 indicate severe pain. Change was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 4-week value. The experimental arms (honey) were compared to the standard arm (supportive care).
Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks from the start of treatment
Secondary outcomes (9)
Radiation Esophagitis-related Pain During Treatment as Measured During Treatment and 12 Weeks by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS)
Esophagitis-related pain was measured using patient-reported pain on swallowing as assessed by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), an 11-point scale (0-10) in which 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Generally, scores of 1-4 indicate mild pain, scores of 5-6 indicate moderate pain, and scores of 7-10 indicate severe pain. Change was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from values at the later time points. The experimental arms (honey) were compared to the standard arm (supportive care).
Measured: Baseline, weekly during treatment, and 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Dysphagia Via Daily Patient Log
Dysphagia, as reported by the patient, was measured by the patient swallowing diary. Swallowing score has increasing severity 1-5, where 1 = "none" and 5 = "cannot swallow liquids".
Measured: Weekly during treatment and 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Quality of Life and Pain, as Measured by the EORTC QLQ-30 Global QOL Score and Pain Symptom Subscale at 4 and 12 Weeks
The pain symptom subscale (2 items) evaluated pain and the global score (30 items) evaluated quality of life. Each ranges from 0-100 with lower scores indicating lesser burden and improved symptoms or quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, 4 and 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Percentage of Participants With Radiation Esophagitis Grade 3-4 (CTCAE v. 4)
Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v3.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE. For esophagitis specifically, Grade 3 criteria includes severely altered eating/swallowing, tube feeding, total parenteral nutrition (TPN) or hospitalization indicated. Grade 4 criteria include life-threatening consequences, urgent operative intervention indicated.
Measured: Up to 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Percent Change in Weight From Baseline to 4 Weeks
Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks from the start of treatment
Nutritional Status (Change in Serum Prealbumin Levels From Baseline to 4 Weeks)
Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks from the start of treatment
Percentage of Patients Using Opioids
The percentage of patients using opioid analgesics is reported. Use of opioid analgesics was assessed for a 24-hour period before completing the assessment. Patients with at least one reported administration of opioid analgesic were considered to have received opioid analgesics.
Measured: Baseline, 4 weeks, end of radiation treatment, and 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Adverse Events Associated With Manuka Honey Using CTCAE v4.0
Adverse events are graded using CTCAE v4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v4.0 assigns Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild AE, Grade 2 Moderate AE, Grade 3 Severe AE, Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling AE, Grade 5 Death related to AE.
Measured: Until 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Patient Reported Difficulty in Swallowing Associated With Manuka Honey Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Change from baseline to four weeks in patient-reported difficulty in swallowing via the PRO-CTCAE. PRO-CTCAE is an item bank consisting of individual items to assess adverse symptom events from the patient perspective. There are 78 symptoms included in the survey but the primary item of interest assesses difficulty swallowing. For each AE in the PRO-CTCAE, between 1 and 3 items are included to assess the frequency, severity, and/or interference with activities related to that AE. Frequency questions have responses ranging from never, which is scored as a 0, to almost constantly, which is scored as a 4. Severity questions have responses ranging from none, which is scored as a 0, to very severe, which is scored as a 4. Interference questions have responses ranging from not at all, which is scored as a 0, to very much, which is scored as a 4. Difficulty in swallowing only has a severity question.
Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks from the start of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Dec 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionFeb 2014
- Study completionNov 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for DysphagiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 163 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), NRG Oncology
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lawrence B. Berk, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Tampa General Hospital, University of South Florida
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01262560
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RTOG 1012
- Other IDs
- RTOG-1012, CDR0000690182, NCI-2011-02620
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2010
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Randomized Trial of Prophylactic Manuka Honey for the Reduction of Chemoradiation Therapy Induced Esophagitis-Related Pain During the Treatment of Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01262560
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RTOG 1012
- Conditions
- Dysphagia, Lung Cancer, Pain, Esophagitis
- Keywords
- pain, dysphagia, recurrent non-small cell lung cancer, stage IA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIA non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIB non-small cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 163 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), NRG Oncology
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Dec 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 Aug 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Manuka honey may prevent or reduce esophagitis-related pain caused by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. It is not yet known whether Manuka honey is more effective than standard care in preventing pain.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase II clinical trial is studying Manuka honey to see how well it works in preventing esophagitis-related pain in patients receiving chemotherapy and radiation therapy for lung cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Evaluate the relative efficacy of 4 times a day consumption of liquid or lozenge Manuka honey to delay or prevent radiation esophagitis-related pain (during combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for lung cancer) as compared to standard supportive treatment, as measured at week 4 by Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) for pain upon swallowing.
Secondary
- Evaluate the trend of severity of radiation esophagitis-related pain during combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy for lung cancer using weekly measurements of the NRPS.
- Evaluate the adverse events associated with Manuka honey, as measured by CTCAE, v. 4.
- Evaluate the severity of radiation esophagitis (grade 3-4, CTCAE, v. 4).
- Assess weight loss (percent weight change from baseline to 4 weeks).
- Assess quality of life (QOL) and pain, as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-30) global QOL score and pain symptom subscale.
- Assess patient-reported dysphagia via a daily patient log.
- Assess nutritional status, as measured by the mean change in serum prealbumin levels from baseline to 4 weeks.
- Assess opioid use by collecting the patient's narcotic use in the previous 24-hour period at each weekly evaluation.
- Evaluate patient-reported adverse events associated with Manuka honey using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE).
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to the percentage of esophagus in the radiation field (V60 < 30% vs V60 ≥ 30%). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive standard supportive care for esophagitis-related pain as needed during chemoradiotherapy.
- Arm II: Patients swallow liquid Manuka honey slowly over 3-5 minutes. Patients must refrain from eating and drinking for 1 hour after administration. Treatment continues 4 times per day during chemoradiotherapy.
- Arm III: Patients place Manuka honey lozenges in their mouth one at a time and swallow the honey as it dissolves (no chewing or swallowing it whole). Patients must refrain from eating and drinking for 1 hour after administration. Treatment continues 4 times per day during chemoradiotherapy.
Patients complete quality of life, pain swallowing diary, and pain assessments (Numerical Rating Pain Scale, EORTC QLQ-30 and Pain Subscale, and PRO-CTCAE) periodically during study treatment.
Patients are followed up at 12 weeks from the start of study treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Supportive Care | Active comparator | Drug: Standard supportive careStandard supportive care |
| Liquid Manuka Honey | Experimental | Drug: Manuka honey in liquid formManuka honey in liquid form |
| Lozenge Manuka Honey | Experimental | Drug: Manuka honey in lozenge formManuka honey in lozenge form |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Manuka honey in liquid formPatients swallow 10 cc (approximately 2 level teaspoons) of liquid Manuka honey 4 times per day while awake over an approximately 12 hour period (e.g. 8 a.m., Noon, 4 p.m., and 8 p.m.) 7 days/week during concurrent chemotherapy and radiation treatment. | Drug | Liquid Manuka Honey |
| Manuka honey in lozenge formPatients place 2 lozenges (the equivalent of 10 cc of liquid Manuka honey), one at a time, in the mouth, allowing each lozenge to dissolve on the tongue/in the mouth, swallowing the honey as it dissolves. Patients do this 4 times per day while awake over an approximately 12 hour period (e.g. 8 a.m., Noon, 4 p.m., and 8 p.m.) 7 days/week during concurrent chemotherapy and radiation treatment. | Drug | Lozenge Manuka Honey |
| Standard supportive carePatients receive standard supporting care for esophagitis-related pain as needed during concurrent chemotherapy and radiation treatment. The following regimen is recommended, but the local standard of care is permitted. 1. A compound containing viscous lidocaine and magnesium aluminum oxide (Maalox®); 2. Liquid or solid oxycodone, 5-10 mg, every 3 hours as needed. | Drug | Supportive Care |
Primary outcome
Change in Radiation Esophagitis-related Pain at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale for Pain on Swallowing (NRPS)
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks from the start of treatment
Esophagitis-related pain was measured using patient-reported pain on swallowing as assessed by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), an 11-point scale (0-10) in which 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Generally, scores of 1-4 indicate mild pain, scores of 5-6 indicate moderate pain, and scores of 7-10 indicate severe pain. Change was calculated by subtracting the baseline value from the 4-week value. The experimental arms (honey) were compared to the standard arm (supportive care).
9 secondary outcomes
Radiation Esophagitis-related Pain During Treatment as Measured During Treatment and 12 Weeks by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS)
Time frame: Baseline, weekly during treatment, and 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Dysphagia Via Daily Patient Log
Time frame: Weekly during treatment and 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Quality of Life and Pain, as Measured by the EORTC QLQ-30 Global QOL Score and Pain Symptom Subscale at 4 and 12 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline, 4 and 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Percentage of Participants With Radiation Esophagitis Grade 3-4 (CTCAE v. 4)
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Percent Change in Weight From Baseline to 4 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks from the start of treatment
Nutritional Status (Change in Serum Prealbumin Levels From Baseline to 4 Weeks)
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks from the start of treatment
Percentage of Patients Using Opioids
Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, end of radiation treatment, and 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Adverse Events Associated With Manuka Honey Using CTCAE v4.0
Time frame: Until 12 weeks from the start of treatment
Patient Reported Difficulty in Swallowing Associated With Manuka Honey Using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks from the start of treatment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Dysphagia
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of K-CAB Tab./K-CAB ODT(Tegoprazan) 25 mg as Maintenance Therapy Following the Treatment of GERD
Maintenance Therapy Following Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)
Recruiting
The Esophageal String Test as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Africans With Dysphagia in Mali and the United States
Dysphagia, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Recruiting
taVNS in Infants Severe Dysphagia
Dysphagia, Swallowing Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Early Feeding TL Trial
Total Laryngectomy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lawrence B. Berk, MD, PhD principal investigator
Tampa General Hospital, University of South Florida
59 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Manuka honey in liquid form, Manuka honey in lozenge form and Standard supportive care in people with Dysphagia and Lung Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 59 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 59 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Radiation Esophagitis-related Pain at 4 Weeks as Measured by the Numerical Rating Pain Scale for Pain on Swallowing (NRPS) (time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks from the start of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2017.