AzTrials
AzTrials

NECPhase 2/3pretermNCT01263041

Effect of L-arginine and Glutamine on Preterm

A Phase 2/3 study testing Glutamine and l-arginine in people with NEC and Sepsis, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

effects of enteral l-arginine to decrease feeding intolerance and risk of NEC in neonates via its role as a NO precursor. Also, enteral glutamine which may play a role as an immunomodulator on preterm neonates. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
NEC, Sepsis
What is being tested?
Glutamine and l-arginine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
75 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
May 2011to Mar 2014
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • -Gestational age ≤34 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Severe congenital anomalies.
  • Congenital non-bacterial infection
  • Evidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) grade ≥II on cranial ultrasound scan by day 3 of life
  • Conjugated hyperbilirubinemia
  • Evidence of an inborn error of metabolism
  • Exchange transfusion during the study period

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • NICU of Children hospital and Nicu of obstetric and gynecology hospital, ain shams university

    Cairo, 11566

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Effect of Early Enteral Supplementation of L-arginine and Glutamine on Preterm Neonate

effects of enteral l-arginine to decrease feeding intolerance and risk of NEC in neonates via its role as a NO precursor. Also, enteral glutamine which may play a role as an immunomodulator on preterm neonates. all these had never been studied in developing countries where sepsis and nec act as a major participant in mortality rates.

Read the detailed description

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common acquired gastrointestinal disease that occurs predominantly in premature infants and is considered to be one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in their age group (Schnabl et al., 2008).

Primary prevention of NEC should be the priority, since NEC frequently progresses from nonspecific signs, to extensive necrosis within a matter of hours with medical or surgical treatment, making successful treatment and secondary prevention difficult to achieve (Lin et al., 2013).

One of the assumed novel preventive measures against NEC is L-arginine \& glutamine supplementation to high risk infants (Neu, 2005).

We conducted a prospective, interventional, single blinded clinical study in the period from 1/2011- 3/2014 in both NICUs of Children Hospital \& Maternity Hospital of Ain Shams University. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicinie, Ain Shams University.

Aim of the study was to assess the preventive role of enteral L-arginine \& glutamine against NEC and to assess the role of glutamine in decreasing the impact of sepsis on premature neonates.

Seventy five preterm neonates were enrolled. Inclusion criteria were GA≤ 34 weeks assigned to feed in the first week of life. Exclusion criteria were the presence of any contraindication to feeding (e.g. intestinal surgery), sever or multiple congenital anomalies, intracranial hemorrhage > grade 2 or non- bacterial congenital infection. They were equally divided into 3 groups (L-arginine group, Glutamine group \& Control group), 25 neonates per group were randomly enrolled.

L-arginine group included 25 preterm neonates among which 56% were females. Mean for birth weight was 1.45kg, mean for gestational age was 31.84 weeks, 72% were delivered via CS. Median for APGAR score at 1 \& 5 minutes were 6 \& 8 respectively.

As for the glutamine group, among the 25 neonates included, 52% were females, 92% were born to CS. Mean for birth weight was 1.45kg while mean for GA was 31.84 weeks. Median for APGAR score was 5 in 1st minute (significantly lower than other 2 groups) and 8 at 5 minutes.

In control group that also included 25 neonates, 56% were females and 88% were born to CS. Mean for birth weight was significantly lower if compared to other groups (1.31 kg) while GA was comparable to them (30.64). Median for APGAR score in 1 \& 5 minutes was 7 \& 8 respectively.

All study subjects received their usual care and medications according to the treating physicians' protocols of management. Additionally, L-arginine group received enteral l-arginine supplementation (starting 0.75mmol/kg/day and reaching 1.5 mmol/kg/day when enteral feeding reaches 40% of full intake), while glutamine group additionally received enteral glutamine supplementations (starting 156mg/kg/day and reaching 312 mg/kg/day when enteral feeding reaches 40% of full intake). The additional enteral supplementations where added with the start of feeding.

Study subjects were followed up daily since the time of enrollment till they were discharged, died or completed 30 days of life. Daily measurement of weight, blood pressure and blood sugar level were done. Feeding protocol of all patients was recorded regarding age on which feeding was initiated, daily increment of feeding, frequency of feeding intolerance, and stoppage of feeding for any stage of NEC. Frequency of septic episodes and hospital stay were also recorded. Plasma l-arginine \& glutamine levels were measured at time of enrollment (sample 1), after 15 days of enrollment (sample 2) and at time of diagnosis of any stage of NEC (sample 3). Staging and diagnosis were done according to Bell's criteria. Transcranial ultrasound was done to all study subjects at time of enrollment, before discharge and whenever needed.

Overall incidence of NEC was 12%. Comparing the groups, glutamine group had significant lower incidence of NEC while no difference in NEC incidence was found between L-arginine \& control group. Lower gestational age and birth weight were significant risk factors, however; both didn't affect the age of NEC diagnosis. MOD, gender, age on starting feeding and daily increment (wither > 20cc or ≤ 20 cc/kg/day) also didn't affect the incidence of NEC.

Regarding the NEC outcome,3 patients were diagnosed as having NEC in arginine group among which one suffered stage 1 (improved), one suffered stage 2 NEC (improved), and one suffered stage 2 (died), while in control group, among the 6 diagnosed neonates, one suffered stage 1 (died), 5 suffered stage 2 (0ne improved \& 4 died). Occurrence of NEC significantly increased risk of mortality \& delayed reaching full oral intake.

Overall mortality in the whole study was 13.3%. No significant difference between the 3 groups.

While age on starting feeding was significantly higher in glutamine group (p<0.05), it had no effect on the length of stay or the clinical outcome on the 3 groups. Regarding the frequency of septic episodes, length of stay and attacks of feeding intolerance, no significant difference was reported between the 3 groups.

As for plasma levels of l-arginine \& glutamine, no significant difference was estimated among control and glutamine groups regarding initial glutamine levels while edscap group had significantly higher initial l-arginine level compared to l- arginine group. Both l-arginine and glutamine levels were significantly higher in sample 2 in all groups when compared to sample 1 of same patient. However, their levels in sample 2 were significantly correlated to the initial levels rather than their diverse enteral supplementation. No correlation was found between l-arginine and glutamine plasma levels at point of diagnosis of NEC to initial level, gestational age or birth weight. Reaching the full oral intake was significantly delayed in NEC patients, while it wasn't affected by age of initiation of feeding.

Assessing the side effects that may be contributed to L-arginine, incidence of hypotension requiring inotropic management or hyperglycemia requiring insulin therapy showed no statistical significance between the 3 groups denoting possible safety.

Finally, the study supports the finding that enteral glutamine supplementation may be helpful in decreasing the incidence of NEC in preterm neonates. However, this beneficial role was not proven for arginine against NEC, or for glutamine itself against sepsis. Larger studies are needed to confirm the results.

Conditions
NEC, Sepsis
Being tested
Glutamine, l-arginine
Keywords
Glutamine, NEC, L-arginine,Preterm,Sepsis
Medical subject headings
Sepsis, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GlutamineDrug

    Also called Pure a.a. chemical

    enteral or via NG tube dose of 312mg/kg/day divided every 12 hours from starting feeding + usual care and medications up to 30 says post natal age

  • l-arginineDrug

    Also called pure a.a. chemical

    enteral or via NG tube dose of 260mg/kg/day divided every 12 hours from starting feeding + usual care and medications up to 30 says post natal age

Study groups in NCT01263041
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
glutamine, PT, sepsisExperimentalenteral or via NG tube dose of 312mg/kg/day divided every 12 hours from starting feeding up to 30 says post natal age + usual care and medications
Receives: Drug: Glutamine
ControlNo interventionafter been allocated, will receive nothing and observed for the same outcomes
L-arginine,NEC, PTExperimentalenteral or via NG tube dose of 260 mg/kg/day divided every 12 hours from starting feeding up to 30 says post natal age + usual care and medications
Receives: Drug: l-arginine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. NEC incidence, stage and outcome

    determining the incidence, stage and outcome of NEC in both l-arginine receiving and control groups

    Measured: age of 28 days of life

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Sepsis

    incidence, severity and outcome of sepsis age at reaching full enteral intake

    Measured: age of 28 days of life

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2011
  3. Primary completionFeb 2014
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
75 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01263041
Sponsor's protocol ID
ghada a. saleh MD protocol
Acronym
preterm
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
17 Dec 2010
Last updated
15 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Shah P, Shah V. Arginine supplementation for prevention of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004339. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004339.pub3.

    PubMed 17636753
  • El-Shimi MS, Awad HA, Abdelwahed MA, Mohamed MH, Khafagy SM, Saleh G. Enteral L-Arginine and Glutamine Supplementation for Prevention of NEC in Preterm Neonates. Int J Pediatr. 2015;2015:856091. doi: 10.1155/2015/856091. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

    PubMed 25861285

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Glutamine and l-arginine in people with NEC and Sepsis, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

NEC incidence, stage and outcome (time frame: age of 28 days of life). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01263041, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in