Rectal NeoplasmsPhase 1NCT01268943
Study of Postoperative Concurrent Chemo-radiation With Capecitabine in Elderly Rectal Cancer Patients
A Phase 1 study testing Capecitabine in people with Rectal Neoplasms, run by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to seek the proper dose of capecitabine in post-operative concurrent chemotherapy for stage II/III elderly rectal cancer patients receiving radical surgery, and evaluate the toleration of this modality in such patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 71 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Capecitabine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to Jan 2014
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 71 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- rectal adenocarcinoma, pathological stage II/III(T3-4 or N+, UICC 2002), radical surgery received.
- interval between surgery and enrollment no less than two week and no more than 3 months.
- KPS status no less than 70; life expectancy no less than 6 months.
- without life-threatening complications, such as severe hypertension, coronary heart disease, cerebral vascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes, etc.
- without severe drug allergy history.
- hemoglobin >= 100g/L, white blood cell >= 3.5*10E9/L, neutrophil >= 1.5*10E9/L, platelet >= 100*10E9/L.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Creatin <= 1.5* ULN(upper limit of normal), Total bilirubin <= 2.5 ULN, AST and AST <= 2.5* ULN, AKP <= 2.5*ULN
- do not receive chemotherapy before six months from enrollment.
- no previously pelvic irradiation history
- informed consent signed
Who cannot join
- other cancer history, except curable non-melanoma skin cancer or cervix in-situ carcinoma
- allergy history to thymidine phosphorylase
- previous pelvic irradiation history
- receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in six months before enrollment
- active infection existed
- severe complication, such as acute myocardial infarction in 6 months, uncontrolled diabetes ( Plasma glucose concentrations in any time of a day≥11.1mmol/L), severe cardiac arrhythmia, etc.
Show all 11Show fewer
- life expectancy less than 6 months
- estimated cannot finish treatment
- attend other clinical trials in four weeks before enrollment
- receive other anti-cancer treatment currently
- other conditions which regarded illegal by censors with full reasons. for example, some conditions may conflict from the protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
radiation department, Cancer Hospital, CAMS
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021
About this study
Official title: Phase 1 Study of Postoperative Capecitabine With Concurrent Radiation in Elderly With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer
The purpose of this study is to seek the proper dose of capecitabine in post-operative concurrent chemotherapy for stage II/III elderly rectal cancer patients receiving radical surgery, and evaluate the toleration of this modality in such patients.
Read the detailed description
For those "younger" locally advanced (stage II/III) rectal cancer patients (usually means patients less than 70), it is suggested that after radical surgery, patients should receive concurrent chemo-radiation. Capecitabine is a widely used chemotherapy medicine under such condition. Based on experience, the investigators think this modality can also be tolerated by patients over 70, and will increase local control rate as which has been proved in younger ones. As the first step to test this hypothesis, we designed this phase I study to seek the proper dose of capecitabine, a widely used oral chemotherapy medicine, in postoperative concurrent chemo-radiation for stage II/III rectal cancer patients over 70, and to evaluate the safety of this modality in this group of patients.
- Conditions
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Capecitabine
- Keywords
- rectal neoplasms, aged, radiotherapy, drug therapy, dose-escalation, capecitabine
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CapecitabineDrug
Also called stair 1
oral pills, 1000mg/m2/d, split in two times, d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent pelvic radiation.
CapecitabineDrug
Also called stair 2
oral pills, 1200mg/m2/d, split in two times, d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent pelvic radiation.
CapecitabineDrug
Also called stair 3
oral pills, 1400mg/m2/d, split in two times, d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent pelvic radiation.
CapecitabineDrug
Also called stair 4
oral pills, 1500mg/m2/d, split in two times, d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent pelvic radiation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1000mg | Experimental | capecitabine 1000mg/m2/d d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent radiotherapy will be given to enrolled patients. Receives: Drug: Capecitabine |
| 1200mg | Experimental | capecitabine 1200mg/m2/d d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent radiotherapy will be given to enrolled patients. Receives: Drug: Capecitabine |
| 1400mg | Experimental | capecitabine 1400mg/m2/d d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent radiotherapy will be given to enrolled patients. Receives: Drug: Capecitabine |
| 1500mg | Experimental | capecitabine 1500mg/m2/d d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent radiotherapy will be given to enrolled patients. Receives: Drug: Capecitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Dose Related Toxicity
dose related toxicity is defined as follows:1. WBC damage >= grade 3; granular cell decrease >= grade 3; hemoglobin >= grade 2; platelet >= grade 2;SGPT/SGOT elevation >= grade 2; ALP >= grade 2; GGT >= grade 2; Tbil >= grade 2;renal function damage: BUN/Cr elevation >= grade 2;Non-gradular cell decreased fever >= grade 2;nausea/vomiting >= grade 2; fatigue >= grade 3; weight loss >= grade 3;gastritis >= grade 3; dairrea >= grade 3; abdominal pain >= grade 3; pancreatitis >= grade 2; upper gastrointestinal bleeding >= grade 2;other toxic reaction >= grade 3;KPS < 50 during the treatment
Measured: up to 9 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionJan 2014
- Study completionJan 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jing Jin, M.D., Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
- Investigators
- Jing Jin, Ph.D., Principal investigator, radiation department, cancer hospital, CAMSYexiong Li, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Radiation Department, Cancer Hospital, CAMS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01268943
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CH-GI-013
- Status last verified
- Mar 2015
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2010
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 8,507 patients from 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2001 Oct 20;358(9290):1291-304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06409-1.
PubMed 11684209Tveit KM, Guldvog I, Hagen S, Trondsen E, Harbitz T, Nygaard K, Nilsen JB, Wist E, Hannisdal E. Randomized controlled trial of postoperative radiotherapy and short-term time-scheduled 5-fluorouracil against surgery alone in the treatment of Dukes B and C rectal cancer. Norwegian Adjuvant Rectal Cancer Project Group. Br J Surg. 1997 Aug;84(8):1130-5.
PubMed 9278661Fisher B, Wolmark N, Rockette H, Redmond C, Deutsch M, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Caplan R, Jones J, Lerner H, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy for rectal cancer: results from NSABP protocol R-01. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Mar 2;80(1):21-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.1.21.
PubMed 3276900Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, Wieand HS, Collins RT, Beart RW, Kubista TP, Poon MA, Meyers WC, Mailliard JA, et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 14;324(11):709-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103143241101.
PubMed 1997835Wolmark N, Wieand HS, Hyams DM, Colangelo L, Dimitrov NV, Romond EH, Wexler M, Prager D, Cruz AB Jr, Gordon PH, Petrelli NJ, Deutsch M, Mamounas E, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Rockette H, Fisher B. Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Mar 1;92(5):388-96. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.5.388.
PubMed 10699069Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jun 6;312(23):1465-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198506063122301.
PubMed 2859523Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, Cox J, Kocha W, Kuperminc M, Maroun J, Walde D, Weaver C, Harrison E, Burger HU, Osterwalder B, Wong AO, Wong R. Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Apr 15;19(8):2282-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.8.2282.
PubMed 11304782Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J, Allman D, Bajetta E, Boyer M, Bugat R, Findlay M, Frings S, Jahn M, McKendrick J, Osterwalder B, Perez-Manga G, Rosso R, Rougier P, Schmiegel WH, Seitz JF, Thompson P, Vieitez JM, Weitzel C, Harper P; Xeloda Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Nov 1;19(21):4097-106. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.21.4097.
PubMed 11689577Van Cutsem E, Hoff PM, Harper P, Bukowski RM, Cunningham D, Dufour P, Graeven U, Lokich J, Madajewicz S, Maroun JA, Marshall JL, Mitchell EP, Perez-Manga G, Rougier P, Schmiegel W, Schoelmerich J, Sobrero A, Schilsky RL. Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials. Br J Cancer. 2004 Mar 22;90(6):1190-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601676.
PubMed 15026800Zhu AX, Willett CG. Chemotherapeutic and biologic agents as radiosensitizers in rectal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003 Oct;13(4):454-68. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4296(03)00048-1.
PubMed 14586834Souglakos J, Androulakis N, Mavroudis D, Kourousis C, Kakolyris S, Vardakis N, Kalbakis K, Pallis A, Ardavanis A, Varveris C, Georgoulias V. Multicenter dose-finding study of concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for operable rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Aug 1;56(5):1284-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00275-x.
PubMed 12873672Dunst J, Reese T, Sutter T, Zuhlke H, Hinke A, Kolling-Schlebusch K, Frings S. Phase I trial evaluating the concurrent combination of radiotherapy and capecitabine in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Oct 1;20(19):3983-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.02.049.
PubMed 12351595Ngan SY, Michael M, Mackay J, McKendrick J, Leong T, Lim Joon D, Zalcberg JR. A phase I trial of preoperative radiotherapy and capecitabine for locally advanced, potentially resectable rectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004 Sep 13;91(6):1019-24. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602106.
PubMed 15305186Aapro MS, Kohne CH, Cohen HJ, Extermann M. Never too old? Age should not be a barrier to enrollment in cancer clinical trials. Oncologist. 2005 Mar;10(3):198-204. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-3-198.
PubMed 15793223Folprecht G, Cunningham D, Ross P, Glimelius B, Di Costanzo F, Wils J, Scheithauer W, Rougier P, Aranda E, Hecker H, Kohne CH. Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Ann Oncol. 2004 Sep;15(9):1330-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh344.
PubMed 15319237
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 1 Study of Postoperative Capecitabine With Concurrent Radiation in Elderly With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01268943
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CH-GI-013
- Conditions
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- rectal neoplasms, aged, radiotherapy, drug therapy, dose-escalation, capecitabine
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Mar 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to seek the proper dose of capecitabine in post-operative concurrent chemotherapy for stage II/III elderly rectal cancer patients receiving radical surgery, and evaluate the toleration of this modality in such patients.
Detailed description
For those "younger" locally advanced (stage II/III) rectal cancer patients (usually means patients less than 70), it is suggested that after radical surgery, patients should receive concurrent chemo-radiation. Capecitabine is a widely used chemotherapy medicine under such condition. Based on experience, the investigators think this modality can also be tolerated by patients over 70, and will increase local control rate as which has been proved in younger ones. As the first step to test this hypothesis, we designed this phase I study to seek the proper dose of capecitabine, a widely used oral chemotherapy medicine, in postoperative concurrent chemo-radiation for stage II/III rectal cancer patients over 70, and to evaluate the safety of this modality in this group of patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1000mg | Experimental | Drug: Capecitabinecapecitabine 1000mg/m2/d d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent radiotherapy will be given to enrolled patients. |
| 1200mg | Experimental | Drug: Capecitabinecapecitabine 1200mg/m2/d d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent radiotherapy will be given to enrolled patients. |
| 1400mg | Experimental | Drug: Capecitabinecapecitabine 1400mg/m2/d d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent radiotherapy will be given to enrolled patients. |
| 1500mg | Experimental | Drug: Capecitabinecapecitabine 1500mg/m2/d d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent radiotherapy will be given to enrolled patients. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 71 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- rectal adenocarcinoma, pathological stage II/III(T3-4 or N+, UICC 2002), radical surgery received.
- interval between surgery and enrollment no less than two week and no more than 3 months.
- KPS status no less than 70; life expectancy no less than 6 months.
- without life-threatening complications, such as severe hypertension, coronary heart disease, cerebral vascular disease, uncontrolled diabetes, etc.
- without severe drug allergy history.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- other cancer history, except curable non-melanoma skin cancer or cervix in-situ carcinoma
- allergy history to thymidine phosphorylase
- previous pelvic irradiation history
- receiving adjuvant chemotherapy in six months before enrollment
- active infection existed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CapecitabineAlso: stair 1oral pills, 1000mg/m2/d, split in two times, d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent pelvic radiation. | Drug | 1000mg |
| CapecitabineAlso: stair 2oral pills, 1200mg/m2/d, split in two times, d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent pelvic radiation. | Drug | 1200mg |
| CapecitabineAlso: stair 3oral pills, 1400mg/m2/d, split in two times, d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent pelvic radiation. | Drug | 1400mg |
| CapecitabineAlso: stair 4oral pills, 1500mg/m2/d, split in two times, d1-14, d22-35 combined with concurrent pelvic radiation. | Drug | 1500mg |
Primary outcome
Dose Related Toxicity
Time frame: up to 9 weeks
dose related toxicity is defined as follows:1. WBC damage >= grade 3; granular cell decrease >= grade 3; hemoglobin >= grade 2; platelet >= grade 2;SGPT/SGOT elevation >= grade 2; ALP >= grade 2; GGT >= grade 2; Tbil >= grade 2;renal function damage: BUN/Cr elevation >= grade 2;Non-gradular cell decreased fever >= grade 2;nausea/vomiting >= grade 2; fatigue >= grade 3; weight loss >= grade 3;gastritis >= grade 3; dairrea >= grade 3; abdominal pain >= grade 3; pancreatitis >= grade 2; upper gastrointestinal bleeding >= grade 2;other toxic reaction >= grade 3;KPS < 50 during the treatment
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 11684209Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 8,507 patients from 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2001 Oct 20;358(9290):1291-304. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06409-1.
- Background: PubMed 9278661Tveit KM, Guldvog I, Hagen S, Trondsen E, Harbitz T, Nygaard K, Nilsen JB, Wist E, Hannisdal E. Randomized controlled trial of postoperative radiotherapy and short-term time-scheduled 5-fluorouracil against surgery alone in the treatment of Dukes B and C rectal cancer. Norwegian Adjuvant Rectal Cancer Project Group. Br J Surg. 1997 Aug;84(8):1130-5.
- Background: PubMed 3276900Fisher B, Wolmark N, Rockette H, Redmond C, Deutsch M, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Caplan R, Jones J, Lerner H, et al. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy for rectal cancer: results from NSABP protocol R-01. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Mar 2;80(1):21-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/80.1.21.
- Background: PubMed 1997835Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, Wieand HS, Collins RT, Beart RW, Kubista TP, Poon MA, Meyers WC, Mailliard JA, et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 14;324(11):709-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199103143241101.
- Background: PubMed 10699069Wolmark N, Wieand HS, Hyams DM, Colangelo L, Dimitrov NV, Romond EH, Wexler M, Prager D, Cruz AB Jr, Gordon PH, Petrelli NJ, Deutsch M, Mamounas E, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Rockette H, Fisher B. Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Mar 1;92(5):388-96. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.5.388.
- Background: PubMed 2859523Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jun 6;312(23):1465-72. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198506063122301.
- Background: PubMed 11304782Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, Cox J, Kocha W, Kuperminc M, Maroun J, Walde D, Weaver C, Harrison E, Burger HU, Osterwalder B, Wong AO, Wong R. Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Apr 15;19(8):2282-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.8.2282.
- Background: PubMed 11689577Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J, Allman D, Bajetta E, Boyer M, Bugat R, Findlay M, Frings S, Jahn M, McKendrick J, Osterwalder B, Perez-Manga G, Rosso R, Rougier P, Schmiegel WH, Seitz JF, Thompson P, Vieitez JM, Weitzel C, Harper P; Xeloda Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Nov 1;19(21):4097-106. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.21.4097.
- Background: PubMed 15026800Van Cutsem E, Hoff PM, Harper P, Bukowski RM, Cunningham D, Dufour P, Graeven U, Lokich J, Madajewicz S, Maroun JA, Marshall JL, Mitchell EP, Perez-Manga G, Rougier P, Schmiegel W, Schoelmerich J, Sobrero A, Schilsky RL. Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials. Br J Cancer. 2004 Mar 22;90(6):1190-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601676.
- Background: PubMed 14586834Zhu AX, Willett CG. Chemotherapeutic and biologic agents as radiosensitizers in rectal cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003 Oct;13(4):454-68. doi: 10.1016/S1053-4296(03)00048-1.
- Background: PubMed 12873672Souglakos J, Androulakis N, Mavroudis D, Kourousis C, Kakolyris S, Vardakis N, Kalbakis K, Pallis A, Ardavanis A, Varveris C, Georgoulias V. Multicenter dose-finding study of concurrent capecitabine and radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for operable rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Aug 1;56(5):1284-7. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00275-x.
- Background: PubMed 12351595Dunst J, Reese T, Sutter T, Zuhlke H, Hinke A, Kolling-Schlebusch K, Frings S. Phase I trial evaluating the concurrent combination of radiotherapy and capecitabine in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Oct 1;20(19):3983-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.02.049.
Related trials for Rectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jing Jin, Ph.D. principal investigator
radiation department, cancer hospital, CAMS
Yexiong Li, Ph.D. principal investigator
Radiation Department, Cancer Hospital, CAMS
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Capecitabine in people with Rectal Neoplasms, run by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Mar 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Dose Related Toxicity (time frame: up to 9 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01268943, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2015.