AzTrials
AzTrials

Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the KneeNCT01269944

Effects of Osteotomies Around the Knee on Cartilage Glycosaminoglycan Content Using dGEMRIC Non-invasive Imaging

An observational study of Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee, run by UMC Utrecht at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee is commonly treated by a surgical intervention called 'high tibial osteotomy' (VTO). Although it has repeatedly been shown that pain improves following this procedure, it is unknown how cartilage quality is affected by the procedure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
Jul 2007to Feb 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients above 18 years with osteoarthritis of the knee and a future planned osteotomy of the tibia or femur are eligible for participation in this study.

Who may be able to join

  • Ten patients will be included satisfying the following inclusion criteria:
  • Both males and females
  • Patients >18 years old
  • Indication as set by treating physician for operative procedure around the knee: HTO (high tibial osteotomy), femoral osteotomy
  • Patient informed consent signed Note: Patients with previous surgery, history of intra-articular medication, meniscectomy or ACL lesions can be included in this study.

Who cannot join

  • The following patients are excluded from participating in this study:
  • Known anaphylactic reactions to Gadolinium or related substances
  • Kidney diseases with a creatinin excretion of < 20 ml/min
  • Risk groups for MRI scanning due to magnetic field or contrast agent (9, 10): Metal in body: Pacemaker / AICD / ICD (coronary defibrillator), Nervus vagus (X) stimulator, Artificial heart valve (depending on type), Metal clips on cerebral arteries or veins, Metal particles in eye, Port-a-cath, Metal stents, Hydrocephalic pump / insuline pump, Metal implants; f/e screws, prostheses, piercings.
  • Claustrofibia
  • First three months of pregnancy (not sufficient information available about effects of contrast agent on foetal development in this stage). Patients will be asked if they may be pregnant (< 3 months of pregnancy): if uncertain, they will be excluded.
  • Contra-indications for MRI scanning, as well as contra-indications to intra-venous administration of contrast agents were discussed with Ms. Shanta Kalaykhan-Sewradj, head of MRI technicians in the UMC Utrecht. For further information, the booklet 'Bijwerkingen van contrastmiddelen: de gadoliniumverbindingen' by Esther Ensing and Janet Hoven was used (Published by Nederlandse Vereniging voor Slachtoffers van Medische Contrastmiddelen, 2004).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • University Medical Center Utrecht

    Utrecht, 3584 CX

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Effects of Osteotomies Around the Knee on Cartilage Glycosaminoglycan Content Using dGEMRIC Non-invasive Imaging, a Pilot Study

Medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee is commonly treated by a surgical intervention called 'high tibial osteotomy' (VTO). Although it has repeatedly been shown that pain improves following this procedure, it is unknown how cartilage quality is affected by the procedure. In this study, a recently developed MRI technique is used to evaluate changes in cartilage quality before and after the surgery. Changes in MRI signals are correlated to subjective improvements (score lists). 10 patients participate in this study. Approval has been granted by the Medical Ethical Committee of the University Medical Center Utrecht. All participants are required to give informed consent before participation.

Read the detailed description

Rationale: Medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is an invalidating disorder and leads to pain, decreased range of motion and inactivity. Two procedures aiming at maintaining original cartilage are the high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and the femur osteotomy. However, effects of this procedure on cartilage quality are not known.

Recently, a new technique has been developed which enables analysing changes in cartilage composition in vivo: the dGEMRIC. The dGEMRIC-technique is based on binding of negatively charged contrast agent Gadolinium (Gd(DPTA)2) to the glycosaminoglycans in the knee cartilage. The T1-signal reflects the gadolinium uptake by the proteoglycans of the knee and thus provides us with an indicative parameter of the cartilage quality. Visualising changes in cartilage composition enables better pre-operative patient selection as well as optimal timing of the operative procedure.

Objective: Primary objective: Evaluate changes in cartilage glycosaminoglycan content using dGEMRIC, in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee undergoing axial correction (HTO, femur osteotomy). Secondary objective: Correlate quantitative MRI data to subjective symptom scores (KOOS, WOMAC, VAS, Knee Society Score)

Study design: This study is a prospective observational study.

Study population: Ten patients will be included satisfying the following inclusion criteria:

  • Both males and females older than 18 years
  • Indication as set by treating physician for operative procedure around the knee: HTO (high tibial osteotomy), femoral osteotomy

Main study parameters/endpoints: In addition to their regular treatment, patients will receive an MRI scan with dGEMRIC settings before and 9 months after the surgical procedure, after removal of orthopaedic hardware. They will further receive questionnaires (VAS, WOMAC, KOOS, Knee Society Scale) before the surgical procedure and at 6,12, and 24 months after the surgical procedure.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In addition to their regular treatment, patients participating in this study will undergo two MRI scans of their knee. Performing of these scans will take about 4 hours. Further, orthopaedic hardware will be removed in daycare before the second MRI (burden: 1 day). Patients are asked to fill out questionnaires before- and after their surgical treatment. Filling out these questionnaires will take around 20 minutes per time moment (4 in total). Risks associated with the MRI scan are the very infrequently occurring allergic reactions to the contrast agent, which is used to depict the cartilage. Risks associated with removal of orthopaedic hardware at 9 months and not different than removal of hardware at a later stage: infection, bleeding, allergic reaction, dental damage or paresthesias.

Keywords
osteoarthritis, knee, high wedge tibial osteotomy, dGEMRIC
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01269944
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Medial compartment knee osteoarthritisPatients with medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee, as proven by x-rays and clinical examination

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MRI T1 signal, change from baseline

    MRI T1 signal is deducted from dGEMRIC measurements

    Measured: Change from baseline 9 months after surgery (HTO)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. KOOS clinical score, change from baseline

    Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (clinical score, completed by all participants)

    Measured: Change from baseline 9 months after surgery (HTO)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jan 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2007
  3. Primary completionFeb 2011
  4. Study completionFeb 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01269944
Sponsor's protocol ID
dGEMRIC HTO
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
29 Dec 2010
Last updated
6 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Burstein D. Tracking longitudinal changes in knee degeneration and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Feb;91 Suppl 1:51-3. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01412.

    PubMed 19182025
  • Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, van Koeveringe AJ, Verhaar JA. Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy. The open versus the closed-wedge technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Sep;87(9):1227-32. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.15972.

    PubMed 16129748
  • Rutgers M, Bartels LW, Tsuchida AI, Castelein RM, Dhert WJ, Vincken KL, van Heerwaarden RJ, Saris DB. dGEMRIC as a tool for measuring changes in cartilage quality following high tibial osteotomy: a feasibility study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012 Oct;20(10):1134-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Jul 10.

    PubMed 22796509

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis of the Knee, run by UMC Utrecht at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MRI T1 signal, change from baseline (time frame: Change from baseline 9 months after surgery (HTO)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01269944, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in