Chronic Hepatitis BPhase 4NCT01277601
Efficacy & Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Plus Peginterferon α-2a (Peg-IFN) Versus TDF or Peg-IFN Monotherapy in Chronic Hepatitis B
A Phase 4 study testing TDF and Peg-IFN in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Gilead Sciences at 171 sites in 19 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus peginterferon α-2a (Peg-IFN) combination therapy for 48 weeks versus standard of care TDF monotherapy or Peg-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks in non-cirrhotic adults with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) as… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- What is being tested?
- TDF and Peg-IFN
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 751 participants
- Where
- 171 sitesin 19 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2011to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults (age 18-75) with chronic HBV (positive for serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV DNA for at least 6 months) prior to baseline
- Anti-HBV treatment-naive adults; adults who have taken oral anti-HBV nucleoside therapy with the last dose ≥ 24 weeks prior to screening are also eligible.
- Positive or negative for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)
- HBV DNA ≥ 20,000 IU/ml (HBeAg-positive participants) and ≥ 2,000 IU/ml (HBeAg-negative participants)
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 54 U/L and ≤ 400 U/L for men and > 36 U/L and ≤ 300 U/L for women
- Creatinine clearance ≥ 70 mL/min
Show all 9Show fewer
- Negative serum pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential
- Sexually active females of childbearing potential must agree to use a protocol-recommended method of contraception throughout the study and for 30 days following the last dose of study medication
- Lactating females must agree to discontinue nursing before initiation of study investigational medicinal product
Who cannot join
- Known bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis and/or decompensated liver disease
- Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Significant kidney, heart, lung, neurological, autoimmune disease, or bone disease (eg, osteomalacia,chronic osteomyelitis, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteochondrosis, multiple bone fractures)
- Absolute neutrophil count < 1,500/mm^3, platelet < 100,000/mm^3, hemoglobin < 10 g/dL (female) or < 11 g/dL (male)
- History of severe depression or severe psychiatric disease
- Thyroid dysfunction
- Coinfection with HIV, hepatitis C virus (HCV) or hepatitis D virus (HDV)
- Pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
171 sites in 19 countries.
171 sites in 19 countries
United States26 sites
Digestive Disease Associates
Baltimore, Maryland
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois
Avail Clinical Research, LLC
DeLand, Florida
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan
Medical Procare, PLLC
Flushing, New York
North Shore University Hospital
Great Neck, New York
ID Care, Inc.
Hillsborough, New Jersey
Advanced Liver Therapies at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas
Kelsey Research Foundation
Houston, Texas
Liver Associates of Texas,
Houston, Texas
Asian Pacific Liver Center
Los Angeles, California
Centre for Advanced Gastroenterology
Maitland, Florida
University of Miami / Jackson Memorial Medical Center
Miami, Florida
LSU Gastroenterology/Center for Digestive Diseases
New Orleans, Louisiana
Tulane University Hospital and Clinic
New Orleans, Louisiana
Beth Israel Medical Center
New York, New York
New York Univ. Medical Center
New York, New York
Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University
New York, New York
Stanford University Medical Center
Palo Alto, California
Private Practice
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Liver Institute of Virginia, Bon Secours Health System
Richmond, Virginia
McGuire Research Institute
Richmond, Virginia
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah
Research and Education Inc
San Diego, California
San Jose Gastroenterology
San Jose, California
Australia19 sites
Flinders Medical Center
Adelaide, South Australia
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide SA, South Australia
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Camperdown, New South Wales
Monash Medical Centre
Clayton, Victoria
Concord Repatriation General Hospital
Concord, New South Wales
Saint Vincents Hospital
Fitzroy, Victoria
Western Hospital
Footscray, Victoria
Fremantle Hospital
Fremantle
Austin Health
Heidelberg, Victoria
Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital
Herston, Queensland
Saint George's Hospital
Kogarah, New South Wales
Liverpool Hospital,Gastroenterology Department
Liverpool, New South Wales
Alfred Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria
Box Hill Hospital
Melbourne, Victoria
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
Nedlands
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Parkville, Victoria
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland
South Korea18 sites
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-d
Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital
Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-d
Pusan National University Hospital
Busan, Gyeongsang
Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
Busan
SoonChunHyang University Hospital Cheonan
Cheonan, Chungcheon
Kyungpook National University Hospital
Daegu, Gyeongsang
Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital
Goyang, Gyeonggi-Do
Digestive Disease Cntr, Konkuk Univ Hosp
Kwangjin-gu, Seoul
Korea University Guro Hospital
Seoul, Gyeonggi-d
Asan Medical Center
Seoul
Gangnam Severance Hospital
Seoul
Konkuk University Medical Center
Seoul
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul
Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital
Seoul
CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University
Sungnam, Gyeonggi-d
Yonsei Unversity Wonju College of Medicine Wonju Christian Hospital
Wŏnju, Gangwon-do
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan, Gyeongsang
Taiwan14 sites
Changhua Christain Hospital
Changhua
Chiayi Christian Hosp
Chiayi City
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital
Hualien City
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City
Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital
Kaosiung
Chang Gung Medical Foundation-Keelung
Keelung Town/KEELUNG CITY
Far-Eastern Memorial Hosp
New Taipei City, Banciao Dist
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
Taichung
Taichung Veterans Genl Hosp
Taichung
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan
Cathay General Hospital
Taipei
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei
Chang Gung Medical Foundation.LinKou Branch
Taoyuan, Taoyuan
India13 sites
Vedanta Institute of Medical Sciences
Ahmedabad, Gujarat
Manipal Hospitals
Bangalore, Karnataka
VGM Hospital
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar
Delhi, New Delhi
Institute of digestive and liver disease, Dispur Hospital Ganeshguri
Guwahati, Assam
Global Hospital, Lakdi Ka Pul
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh
Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education And Research
Kolkata, West Bengal
Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver Diseases, HPB Surgery and Transplant, Global Hospital
Mumbai, Maharashtra
Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Acharya Donde Marg,Parel
Mumbai, Maharashtra
Midas Institute of Gastroenterology
Nagpur, Maharashtra
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences
New Delhi, New Delhi
Dharamasi Hospital,Chandni Chowk, South Shivajinagar,
Sangli, Maharashtra
Liver Clinic
Surat, Gujarat
Canada8 sites
Heritage Med Research Clinic, Univ of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta
The Ottawa Hospital,Division of Infectious Diseases
Ottawa, Ontario
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario
Toronto Liver Centre
Toronto, Ontario
Gastrointestional Research Institute
Vancouver, British Columbia
Gordon & Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia
Liver and Intestinal Research Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia
University of Alberta, Zeidler Ledcore Centre
Zeidler Ledcore Centre, Alberta
France8 sites
Hôpital Beaujon, Service Hepatologie- Centre Pierre Abrami
Clichy, Cedex
Hôpital de la Croix Rousse
Lyon, Cedex
Hopital Tenon
Paris
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes
Rennes
Hopital Charles Nicolle
Rouen
Centre Hospitalier Regional et Universitaire de Strasbourg, Hopital Civil
Strasbourg
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Purpan
Toulouse
Hopital Paul Brousse
Villejuif
Germany8 sites
Charite Berlin
Berlin
Universitatsklinik Koln
Cologne
Universitätsklinikum Essen - klinikum für Gastroenterolgie und Hepatologie,
Essen
Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe Universitat,
Frankfurt
Asklepios Westklinikum
Hamburg
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover,Hastroenterologie und Hepatologie
Hanover
Universitatsklinikum Leipzig
Leipzig
Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz,
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate
Italy8 sites
Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Cagliari
Monserrato, Cagliari
Seconda Universita degli Studi di Napoli
Naples
Azienda Ospedaliera di Parma,Department of Infectious Diseases and hepatology
Parma
Fondazione PTV - Policlinico Tor Vergata
Roma
Policlinico Umberto I
Rome
University of Milan,Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni, Battista di Torino,Dipartimento di Gastroenterologia
Torino
Poland8 sites
Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny Kazimierza Dluskeigo w Bialymstoku
Bialystok
Wojewódzki Szpital Obserwacyjno Zakazny im. Tadeusza Browicza
Bydgoszcz
Szpital Specjalistyczny w Chorzowie
Chorzów, Silesian Voivodeship
Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie
Krakow
Wojewódzki Specjalistyczny Szpital im. Dr Wladyslawa Bieganskiego w Lodzi
Lodz
Wojewódzki Specjalistyczny Szpital im. Dr Wladyslawa Bieganskiego w Lodzi
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny 1,Klinika Chorób Zakaznych,ulica Staszica 16
Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship
SP ZOZ Wojewodzki Szpital Zakazny
Warsaw
Romania7 sites
Neomed Research
Brasov
Institutul National de Boli Infectioase "Prof. Dr. Matei Bals"
Bucharest
Institutul National de Boli Infectioase Prof.Dr. Matei Bals
Bucharest
Spitalul Clinic Colentina
Bucharest
Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infectioase si Tropicale "Dr. Victor Babes"
Bucharest
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Sibiu
Sibiu
Cabinet Particular Policlinic Algomed SRL-Gastroenterologie
Timișoara
Spain6 sites
Hospital General Universitari Vall d' Hebron
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Madrid, Madrid
Hospital Carlos III
Madrid
Hospital Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville
Hospital Meixoeiro
Vigo, Pontevedra
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Ankara Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi
Ankara, Ankara
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi
Ankara, Ankara
Gaziantep Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Sahinbey Arastirma ve Uygulama Hastanesi
Gaziantep
Istanbul Universitesi Istanbul Tip Fakultesi
Istanbul
Mersin Üniversitesi Tip Fakültesi, Saglik Arastirma ve Uygulama Hastanesi
Mersin
Greece4 sites
Ippokratio Hospital Athens
Attica
General University Hospital of Patras
Pátrai
Ippokratio Hospital Salonica
Thessaloniki, Attica
Hippokration General Hospital of Thessaloniki
Thessaloniki
Hong Kong4 sites
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong
Princess Margaret Hospital
Kowloon
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin
Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital
Tai Po
Portugal4 sites
Hospital de Egas Moniz
Lisbon
Hospital de Santa Maria
Lisbon
Centro Hospitalar do Porto
Porto
Hospital São João
Porto
Singapore4 sites
Changi General Hospital
Singapore
National University Hospital Singapore
Singapore
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore
United Kingdom4 sites
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham, Wstmid
Royal Free Hospital
Hampstead,London
Barts and The London NHS Trust
London
King's College Hospital
London
Netherlands3 sites
Academisch Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam
Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam
Erasmus Medisch Centrum
Rotterdam
About this study
Official title: A Phase 4, Randomized, Open-label, Active-Controlled, Superiority Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) in Combination With Peginterferon α-2a (Pegasys®) Versus Standard of Care Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Monotherapy or Peginterferon α-2a Monotherapy for 48 Weeks in Non-Cirrhotic Subjects With HBeAg-Positive or HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus peginterferon α-2a (Peg-IFN) combination therapy for 48 weeks versus standard of care TDF monotherapy or Peg-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks in non-cirrhotic adults with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) as determined by loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).
The study will consist of 2 phases for participants in the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups. Following an initial 48 weeks of treatment, participants in these groups will be monitored for 24 weeks for signs of worsening HBV, and those meeting TDF retreatment and flare management criteria will be eligible to receive TDF monotherapy during a retreatment phase, up to Week 120.
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Being tested
- TDF, Peg-IFN
- Keywords
- Chronic Hepatitis B, Hep B, Non cirrhotic, Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), Peginterferon α-2a (Peg-IFN)
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TDFDrug
Also called Viread®
TDF 300 mg tablets administered orally once daily
Peg-IFNDrug
Also called Pegasys®
Peg-IFN 180 µg administered via subcutaneous injection once weekly
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks | Experimental | TDF plus Peg-IFN for 48 weeks Receives: Drug: TDF; Drug: Peg-IFN |
| TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks | Experimental | TDF plus Peg-IFN for 16 weeks, followed by TDF alone for an additional 32 weeks Receives: Drug: TDF; Drug: Peg-IFN |
| TDF 120 Weeks | Active comparator | TDF monotherapy for 120 weeks Receives: Drug: TDF |
| Peg-IFN 48 Weeks | Active comparator | Peg-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks Receives: Drug: Peg-IFN |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss at Week 72 Following Treatment With 48 Weeks of TDF Plus Peg-IFN Combination Versus Peg-IFN Alone for 48 Weeks or TDF Alone
Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. Proportions are based on a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
The analysis visit window for Week 72 comprised Week 70 through Week 78, so results up to Week 78 are included in this analysis.
Measured: Baseline; Week 72
Secondary outcomes (13)
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss at Week 72 Following Treatment With TDF (48 Weeks) Plus Peg-IFN (16 Weeks) Combination Versus Peg-IFN Alone for 48 Weeks or TDF Alone
Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. Proportions are based on a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
The analysis visit window for Week 72 comprised Week 70 through Week 78, so results up to Week 78 are included in this analysis.
Measured: Baseline; Week 72
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss at Weeks 96 and 120
Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. Proportions are based on a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
The analysis visit window for Week 96 comprised study Week 90 through Week 102, so results up to Week 102 are included in this analysis. The analysis visit window for Week 120 comprised study Week 114 through Week 126, so results up to Week 126 are included in this analysis.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 96 and 120
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 72, 96, and 120
HBsAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBsAg from negative to positive. Proportions are based on a Kaplan-Meier estimate.
The analysis visit window for Week 72 comprised Week 70 through Week 78, so results up to Week 78 are included in this analysis. The analysis visit window for Week 96 comprised Week 90 through Week 102, so results up to Week 102 are included in this analysis. The analysis visit window for Week 120 comprised Week 114 through Week 120.
Measured: Baseline; Weeks 72, 96, and 120
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss and Seroconversion at Week 72
Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive. Percentages were based on the number of subjects with non-missing HBeAg results or missing HBeAg results imputed as failures at each visit.
For the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups, data are presented in the "Not Retreated" column for participants who had not entered the retreatment phase by Week 72, and in the "Retreated" column for participants who did enter the retreatment phase by Week 72.
Measured: Baseline; Week 72
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss and Seroconversion at Week 96
Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive. Percentages were based on the number of subjects with non-missing HBeAg results or missing HBeAg results imputed as failures at each visit.
For the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups, data are presented in the "Not Retreated" column for participants who had not entered the retreatment phase by Week 96, and in the "Retreated" column for participants who did enter the retreatment phase by Week 96.
Measured: Baseline; Week 96
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss and Seroconversion at Week 120
Loss of HBeAg was defined as change of detectable HBeAg from positive to negative. HBeAg seroconversion was defined as change of detectable antibody to HBeAg from negative to positive. Percentages were based on the number of subjects with non-missing HBeAg results or missing HBeAg results imputed as failures at each visit.
For the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups, data are presented in the "Not Retreated" column for participants who had not entered the retreatment phase by Week 120, and in the "Retreated" column for participants who did enter the retreatment phase by Week 120.
Measured: Baseline; Week 120
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response (HBV DNA < 117 IU/mL) at Week 72
For the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups, data are presented in the "Not Retreated" column for participants who had not entered the retreatment phase by Week 72, and in the "Retreated" column for participants who did enter the retreatment phase by Week 72.
Measured: Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response (HBV DNA < 117 IU/mL) at Week 96
For the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups, data are presented in the "Not Retreated" column for participants who had not entered the retreatment phase by Week 96, and in the "Retreated" column for participants who did enter the retreatment phase by Week 96.
Measured: Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response (HBV DNA < 117 IU/mL) at Week 120
For the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups, data are presented in the "Not Retreated" column for participants who had not entered the retreatment phase by Week 120, and in the "Retreated" column for participants who did enter the retreatment phase by Week 120.
Measured: Week 120
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Week 72
Normal ALT was ≤ 30 U/L for males and ≤ 19 U/L for females (based on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) 2008 guidelines), and ≤ 41 U/L for males and ≤ 31 U/L for females (based on central laboratory upper limit of the normal range (ULN) for ALT).
For the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups, data are presented in the "Not Retreated" column for participants who had not entered the retreatment phase by Week 72, and in the "Retreated" column for participants who did enter the retreatment phase by Week 72.
Measured: Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Week 96
Normal ALT was ≤ 30 U/L for males and ≤ 19 U/L for females (based on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) 2008 guidelines), and ≤ 41 U/L for males and ≤ 31 U/L for females (based on central laboratory upper limit of the normal range (ULN) for ALT).
For the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups, data are presented in the "Not Retreated" column for participants who had not entered the retreatment phase by Week 96, and in the "Retreated" column for participants who did enter the retreatment phase by Week 96.
Measured: Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Week 120
Normal ALT was ≤ 30 U/L for males and ≤ 19 U/L for females (based on the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) 2008 guidelines), and ≤ 41 U/L for males and ≤ 31 U/L for females (based on central laboratory upper limit of the normal range (ULN) for ALT).
For the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups, data are presented in the "Not Retreated" column for participants who had not entered the retreatment phase by Week 120, and in the "Retreated" column for participants who did enter the retreatment phase by Week 120.
Measured: Week 120
Percentage of Participants Who Required Retreatment
Participants in the TDF 120 week group were not eligible to enter the retreatment phase and are not presented.
Measured: Up to 120 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2011
- Primary completionAug 2014
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Hepatitis BStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Gilead SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 751 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Gilead Sciences
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Belinda Jump, Study director, Gilead Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01277601
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GS-US-174-0149
- Other IDs
- 2010-024586-45
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2011
- Last updated
- 26 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Marcellin P, Ahn SH, Ma X, Caruntu FA, Tak WY, Elkashab M, Chuang WL, Lim SG, Tabak F, Mehta R, Petersen J, Foster GR, Lou L, Martins EB, Dinh P, Lin L, Corsa A, Charuworn P, Subramanian GM, Reiser H, Reesink HW, Fung S, Strasser SI, Trinh H, Buti M, Gaeta GB, Hui AJ, Papatheodoridis G, Flisiak R, Chan HL; Study 149 Investigators. Combination of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Peginterferon alpha-2a Increases Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):134-144.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.043. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
PubMed 26453773Chan HL, Elkhashab M, Trinh H, Tak WY, Ma X, Chuang WL, Kim YJ, Martins EB, Lin L, Dinh P, Charuworn P, Foster GR, Marcellin P. Association of baseline vitamin D levels with clinical parameters and treatment outcomes in chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2015 Nov;63(5):1086-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.06.025. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
PubMed 26143444
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 4, Randomized, Open-label, Active-Controlled, Superiority Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) in Combination With Peginterferon α-2a (Pegasys®) Versus Standard of Care Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Monotherapy or Peginterferon α-2a Monotherapy for 48 Weeks in Non-Cirrhotic Subjects With HBeAg-Positive or HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01277601
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GS-US-174-0149
- Conditions
- Chronic Hepatitis B
- Keywords
- Chronic Hepatitis B, Hep B, Non cirrhotic, Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), Peginterferon α-2a (Peg-IFN)
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 751 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Gilead SciencesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2011
- Primary completion
- Aug 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Sep 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus peginterferon α-2a (Peg-IFN) combination therapy for 48 weeks versus standard of care TDF monotherapy or Peg-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks in non-cirrhotic adults with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) as determined by loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).
The study will consist of 2 phases for participants in the TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, and Peg-IFN 48 Weeks groups. Following an initial 48 weeks of treatment, participants in these groups will be monitored for 24 weeks for signs of worsening HBV, and those meeting TDF retreatment and flare management criteria will be eligible to receive TDF monotherapy during a retreatment phase, up to Week 120.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks | Experimental | Drug: TDF, Drug: Peg-IFNTDF plus Peg-IFN for 48 weeks |
| TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks | Experimental | Drug: TDF, Drug: Peg-IFNTDF plus Peg-IFN for 16 weeks, followed by TDF alone for an additional 32 weeks |
| TDF 120 Weeks | Active comparator | Drug: TDFTDF monotherapy for 120 weeks |
| Peg-IFN 48 Weeks | Active comparator | Drug: Peg-IFNPeg-IFN monotherapy for 48 weeks |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Adults (age 18-75) with chronic HBV (positive for serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV DNA for at least 6 months) prior to baseline
- Anti-HBV treatment-naive adults; adults who have taken oral anti-HBV nucleoside therapy with the last dose ≥ 24 weeks prior to screening are also eligible.
- Positive or negative for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)
- HBV DNA ≥ 20,000 IU/ml (HBeAg-positive participants) and ≥ 2,000 IU/ml (HBeAg-negative participants)
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 54 U/L and ≤ 400 U/L for men and > 36 U/L and ≤ 300 U/L for women
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Known bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis and/or decompensated liver disease
- Evidence of hepatocellular carcinoma
- Significant kidney, heart, lung, neurological, autoimmune disease, or bone disease (eg, osteomalacia,chronic osteomyelitis, osteogenesis imperfecta, osteochondrosis, multiple bone fractures)
- Absolute neutrophil count < 1,500/mm^3, platelet < 100,000/mm^3, hemoglobin < 10 g/dL (female) or < 11 g/dL (male)
- History of severe depression or severe psychiatric disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TDFAlso: Viread®TDF 300 mg tablets administered orally once daily | Drug | TDF 120 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks |
| Peg-IFNAlso: Pegasys®Peg-IFN 180 µg administered via subcutaneous injection once weekly | Drug | Peg-IFN 48 Weeks, TDF 48 Weeks + Peg-IFN 16 Weeks, TDF+Peg-IFN 48 Weeks |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss at Week 72 Following Treatment With 48 Weeks of TDF Plus Peg-IFN Combination Versus Peg-IFN Alone for 48 Weeks or TDF Alone
Time frame: Baseline; Week 72
Loss of HBsAg was defined as change of detectable HBsAg from positive to negative. Proportions are based on a Kaplan-Meier estimate. The analysis visit window for Week 72 comprised Week 70 through Week 78, so results up to Week 78 are included in this analysis.
13 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss at Week 72 Following Treatment With TDF (48 Weeks) Plus Peg-IFN (16 Weeks) Combination Versus Peg-IFN Alone for 48 Weeks or TDF Alone
Time frame: Baseline; Week 72
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss at Weeks 96 and 120
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 96 and 120
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Seroconversion at Weeks 72, 96, and 120
Time frame: Baseline; Weeks 72, 96, and 120
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss and Seroconversion at Week 72
Time frame: Baseline; Week 72
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss and Seroconversion at Week 96
Time frame: Baseline; Week 96
Percentage of Participants With HBeAg Loss and Seroconversion at Week 120
Time frame: Baseline; Week 120
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response (HBV DNA < 117 IU/mL) at Week 72
Time frame: Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response (HBV DNA < 117 IU/mL) at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response (HBV DNA < 117 IU/mL) at Week 120
Time frame: Week 120
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Week 72
Time frame: Week 72
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Week 96
Time frame: Week 96
Percentage of Participants With Normal ALT at Week 120
Time frame: Week 120
Percentage of Participants Who Required Retreatment
Time frame: Up to 120 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 26453773Marcellin P, Ahn SH, Ma X, Caruntu FA, Tak WY, Elkashab M, Chuang WL, Lim SG, Tabak F, Mehta R, Petersen J, Foster GR, Lou L, Martins EB, Dinh P, Lin L, Corsa A, Charuworn P, Subramanian GM, Reiser H, Reesink HW, Fung S, Strasser SI, Trinh H, Buti M, Gaeta GB, Hui AJ, Papatheodoridis G, Flisiak R, Chan HL; Study 149 Investigators. Combination of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate and Peginterferon alpha-2a Increases Loss of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):134-144.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.043. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 26143444Chan HL, Elkhashab M, Trinh H, Tak WY, Ma X, Chuang WL, Kim YJ, Martins EB, Lin L, Dinh P, Charuworn P, Foster GR, Marcellin P. Association of baseline vitamin D levels with clinical parameters and treatment outcomes in chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2015 Nov;63(5):1086-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.06.025. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
Related trials for Chronic Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Sequential Therapy With Daplusiran/Tomligisiran (DAP/TOM) Followed by Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB)
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection, Hepatitis B
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Study of Bepirovirsen in Participants Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection (B-Focus)
Hepatitis B
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Long-term Follow-up Study to Evaluate Durability of Treatment Response in Previous Bepirovirsen Study Participants (B-Sure)
Hepatitis B
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
A Phase I Clinical Trial of CPU-YL01 Injection in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Belinda Jump study director
Gilead Sciences
171 sites in 19 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing TDF and Peg-IFN in people with Chronic Hepatitis B, run by Gilead Sciences at 171 sites in 19 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 171 sites in United States, Australia, South Korea, Taiwan, India and 14 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Sep 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With HBsAg Loss at Week 72 Following Treatment With 48 Weeks of TDF Plus Peg-IFN Combination Versus Peg-IFN Alone for 48 Weeks or TDF Alone (time frame: Baseline; Week 72). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01277601, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Aug 2016.