AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT01283971

A Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) Versus Adalimumab in Combination With Methotrexate (MTX) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis And an Inadequate Response to Treatment With Only One Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-Inhibitor

A Phase 4 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], adalimumab and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 170 sites in 12 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized, parallel-group study will assess the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) versus adalimumab, both in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], adalimumab and methotrexate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
96 participants
Where
170 sitesin 12 countries
Study dates
May 2011to Aug 2012
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
  • Rheumatoid arthritis of >/= 6 months duration (according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria)(according to ACR criteria)
  • Inadequate response due to inefficacy of treatment (for at least 3 months) with only one approved Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-agent other than adalimumab Depending on the TNF-inhibitor, last dose of TNF-inhibitor should have been 1 to 8 weeks before randomization to the study
  • On methotrexate treatment for >/=12 weeks immediately prior to baseline, with stable dose (10-25 mg/week) for the last 8 weeks
  • Disease Activity Score (DAS28) >3.2 at baseline
  • Oral corticosteroids (</=10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are permitted if the dose has been stable for >/=6 weeks prior to baseline.

Who cannot join

  • Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned surgery within 6 months following randomization
  • Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
  • Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
  • Functional class IV (ACR criteria)
  • History of severe allergic reaction to human, humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
  • Known active current or history of recurrent infection (including tuberculosis)
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active)
  • Body weight >150 kg
  • Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies
  • Previous treatment with tocilizumab
  • Intra-articular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to baseline.

Trial locations and contacts

170 sites in 12 countries.

170 sites in 12 countries

United States107 sites
  • Study site

    Annapolis, Maryland, 21401

  • Study site

    Arlington, Virginia, 22205

  • Study site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Study site

    Austin, Texas, 78731

  • Study site

    Aventura, Florida, 33180

  • Study site

    Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808

  • Study site

    Battle Creek, Michigan, 49015

  • Study site

    Biloxi, Mississippi, 39531

  • Study site

    Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606

  • Study site

    Brooklyn, New York, 11201

  • Study site

    Carrollton, Texas, 75007

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29406

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210

  • Study site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Study site

    Clarksburg, West Virginia, 26301

  • Study site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Study site

    Clifton, New Jersey, 07012

  • Study site

    Corpus Christi, Texas, 78404

  • Study site

    Covina, California, 91723

  • Study site

    Cumberland, Maryland, 21502

  • Study site

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • Study site

    Escondido, California, 92025

  • Study site

    Fall River, Massachusetts, 02720

  • Study site

    Flowood, Mississippi, 39232

  • Study site

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334

  • Study site

    Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46804

  • Study site

    Franklin, Wisconsin, 53132

  • Study site

    Frederick, Maryland, 21702

  • Study site

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408

  • Study site

    Greenville, North Carolina, 27834

  • Study site

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740

  • Study site

    Hamden, Connecticut, 06518

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas, 77034

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas, 77070

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas, 77074

  • Study site

    Huntington Beach, California, 92646

  • Study site

    Huntsville, Alabama, 35801

  • Study site

    Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83404

  • Study site

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • Study site

    Jupiter, Florida, 33458

  • Study site

    Kennewick, Washington, 99336

  • Study site

    La Mesa, California, 91942

  • Study site

    Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035

  • Study site

    Lakewood, California, 90712

  • Study site

    Lansing, Michigan, 48910

  • Study site

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40515

  • Study site

    Long Beach, California, 90806

  • Study site

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Study site

    Manalapan, New Jersey, 07726

  • Study site

    Maywood, Illinois, 60153

  • Study site

    Melbourne, Florida, 32901

  • Study site

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38104

  • Study site

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Study site

    Mesquite, Texas, 75150

  • Study site

    Middleburg Heights, Ohio, 44130

  • Study site

    Moline, Illinois, 61265

  • Study site

    Monroe, Louisiana, 71203

  • Study site

    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572

  • Study site

    Naples, Florida, 34102

  • Study site

    New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903

  • Study site

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Study site

    New York, New York, 10029-6574

  • Study site

    Newark, Delaware, 19713

  • Study site

    Norwich, Connecticut, 06360

  • Study site

    Ocala, Florida, 34474

  • Study site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109

  • Study site

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Study site

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • Study site

    Palm Habor, Florida, 34684

  • Study site

    Palm Harbor, Florida, 34684

  • Study site

    Petoskey, Michigan, 49770

  • Study site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19152

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85027

  • Study site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15237

  • Study site

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261

  • Study site

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617

  • Study site

    Reno, Nevada, 89502

  • Study site

    Sacramento, California, 95816-5119

  • Study site

    Saint Claire Shores, Michigan, 48081

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78217

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78258

  • Study site

    San Diego, California, 92108

  • Study site

    Sarasota, Florida, 34239

  • Study site

    South Bend, Indiana, 46601

  • Study site

    Spokane, Washington, 99204

  • Study site

    Springfield, Illinois, 62704

  • Study site

    Springfield, Missouri, 65807

  • Study site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63117

  • Study site

    Sugar Land, Texas, 77479

  • Study site

    Syracuse, New York, 13210

  • Study site

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Study site

    Tamarac, Florida, 33321

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida, 33609

  • Study site

    Toledo, Ohio, 43606

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85712

  • Study site

    Tupelo, Mississippi, 38802

  • Study site

    Valdosta, Georgia, 31602

  • Study site

    Washington, North Carolina, 27889

  • Study site

    Westlake Village, California, 91361

  • Study site

    Whittier, California, 90603

  • Study site

    Whittier, California, 90606

  • Study site

    Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, 19090

  • Study site

    Worcester, Massachusetts, 01610

  • Study site

    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096

  • Study site

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610

Other trials in United States

Germany16 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin, 14059

  • Study site

    Düsseldorf, 40217

  • Study site

    Erfurt, 99096

  • Study site

    Erlangen, 91056

  • Study site

    Frankfurt am Main, 60590

  • Study site

    Gommern, 39245

  • Study site

    Hamburg, 22081

  • Study site

    Hanover, 30625

  • Study site

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Study site

    Herne, 44652

  • Study site

    Hildesheim, 31134

  • Study site

    München, 81541

  • Study site

    Osnabrück, 49074

  • Study site

    Regensburg, 93053

  • Study site

    Rostock, 18059

  • Study site

    Tübingen, 72076

Other trials in Germany

France10 sites
  • Study site

    Grenoble, 38042

  • Study site

    Lille, 59037

  • Study site

    Limoges, 87042

  • Study site

    Metz, 57077

  • Study site

    Montpellier, 34295

  • Study site

    Mulhouse, 68070

  • Study site

    Nantes, 44035

  • Study site

    Orléans, 45000

  • Study site

    Paris, 75651

  • Study site

    Toulouse, 31059

Other trials in France

Spain9 sites
  • Study site

    A Coruña, La Coruña, 15006

  • Study site

    Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28007

  • Study site

    Madrid, Madrid, 28046

  • Study site

    Málaga, Malaga, 29010

  • Study site

    Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33006

  • Study site

    Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208

  • Study site

    Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, 15706

  • Study site

    Valenica, Valencia, 46009

Other trials in Spain

Sweden6 sites
  • Study site

    Gothenburg, 413 45

  • Study site

    Huddinge, SE-141 86

  • Study site

    Lund, 221 85

  • Study site

    Malmö, 205 02

  • Study site

    Umeå, 90185

  • Study site

    Västerås, 72189

Other trials in Sweden

Italy5 sites
  • Study site

    Florence, 50139

  • Study site

    Milan, 20162

  • Study site

    Pavia, 27100

  • Study site

    Pisa, 56100

  • Study site

    Roma, 00161

Other trials in Italy

Russia5 sites
  • Study site

    Kemerovo, 650099

  • Study site

    Moscow, 115522

  • Study site

    Moscow, 119049

  • Study site

    Ufa, 450005

  • Study site

    Ulyanovsk, 432063

Other trials in Russia

Greece4 sites
  • Study site

    Athens, 11527

  • Study site

    Heraklion, 71110

  • Study site

    Thessaloniki, 546 42

  • Study site

    Thessaloniki, 54642

Other trials in Greece

Denmark3 sites
  • Study site

    Aalborg, 9000

  • Study site

    Elsinore, 3000

  • Study site

    Silkeborg, 8600

Other trials in Denmark

Finland3 sites
  • Study site

    Helsinki, 00290

  • Study site

    Hyvinkää, 05800

  • Study site

    Jyväskylä, 40100

Other trials in Finland

Netherlands1 site
  • Study site

    Nijmegen, 6522 JV

Other trials in Netherlands

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Study site

    Caguas, 00725

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group Study of the Reduction of Signs and Symptoms During Treatment With Tocilizumab Versus Adalimumab, Both in Combination With MTX, in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Treatment With Only One TNF Inhibitor

This randomized, parallel-group study will assess the efficacy and safety of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) versus adalimumab, both in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Patients, already treated with MTX at stable doses, will be randomized to receive either RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks or adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks. All patients will receive methotrexate (10-25 mg weekly) and folate (at least 5 mg weekly). The anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks.

Being tested
tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], adalimumab, placebo to tocilizumab, placebo to adalimumab, methotrexate
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]Drug

    Also called RoActemra/Actemra

    Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg IV every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.

  • adalimumabDrug

    Adalimumab 40 mg SC every 2 weeks.

  • placebo to tocilizumabDrug

    Placebo to tocilizumab IV every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.

  • placebo to adalimumabDrug

    Placebo to adalimumab SC every 2 weeks for 24 weeks.

  • methotrexateDrug

    Methotrexate 10-25 mg weekly.

  • folateDrug

    Folate at least 5 mg weekly.

Study groups in NCT01283971
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateExperimentalTocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenous (IV) every 4 weeks + Placebo to adalimumab subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. All participants received methotrexate 10-25 mg and folate at least 5 mg/kg weekly.
Receives: Drug: tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]; Drug: placebo to adalimumab; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: folate
Adalimumab + MethotrexateActive comparatorAdalimumab 40 mg SC every 2 weeks + Placebo to tocilizumab IV every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. All participants received methotrexate 10-25 mg and folate at least 5 mg/kg weekly.
Receives: Drug: adalimumab; Drug: placebo to tocilizumab; Drug: methotrexate; Drug: folate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Remission at Week 24

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.

    Measured: Week 24

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) Response at Week 24

    ACR20 response is defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Percentage of Participants With ACR50 Response at Week 24

    ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  3. Percentage of Participants With ACR70 Response at Week 24

    ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  4. Percentage of Participants With Good or Moderate European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) DAS28 Responses at Week 24

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR. DAS28 total score ranges from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 or a change from Baseline < -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  5. Percentage of Participants With DAS28 Low Disease Activity (LDAS) at Week 24

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. LDAS is defined as DAS28 ≤3.2.

    Measured: Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in DAS28 Score at Week 24

    The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. A higher value indicated higher disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  7. Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Week 24

    66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  8. Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Week 24

    68 joints are assessed for tenderness and joints are classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 24

    The patient assessed their pain using a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS at Week 24

    The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  11. Change From Baseline in the Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity VAS at Week 24

    The physician global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a 0 to 100 mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 24

    Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (a test for analysis of inflammatory and infectious disorders) and was analyzed at a central laboratory. The concentration of CRP was measured in milligram/liter (mg/L). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  13. Change From Baseline in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 24

    Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) (a test that assesses tissue inflammation) and was analyzed at a local laboratory. ESR was measured in millimeter/hour (mm/hr). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  14. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 24

    The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis, consisting of 20 questions in 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. There are 4 possible responses for each question: 0=without any difficulty, 1=with some difficulty, 2=with much difficulty and 3=unable to do. The score for each of the domains is the highest (worst) score in each domain. A patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains to calculate a valid HAQ-DI score which is the sum of domain scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  15. Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue) Score at Week 24

    FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  16. Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Short Form (SF-36) Score at Week 24

    The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  17. Change From Baseline in Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) Score at Week 24

    RAPID3 is a patient self reported assessment that combines the HAQ-DI [20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions answered on a 4-point scale where 0=without any difficulty to 3=unable to do} converted to a score of 0-10, the Patients Assessment of Pain [Over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain] converted to a score of 0-10 and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity [over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity] converted to a score of 0-10. The 3 individual scales are summed for a raw score of 0-30 which is divided by 3 to achieve a total possible adjusted score of 0-10. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  18. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at Week 24

    Blood was collected at Baseline and Week 24. The samples were sent to a central laboratory for Hemoglobin analysis reported in gram/deciliter (g/dL). A positive number change from Baseline (a higher hemoglobin level compared to Baseline) indicated improvement

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  19. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Adverse Events (AEs), Discontinuation Due to AEs and Deaths

    An adverse event was considered any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease associated with the use of the study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Preexisting conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events.

    A serious adverse event is any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant.

    Measured: 32 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jan 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2011
  3. Primary completionAug 2012
  4. Study completionAug 2012

Why it stopped: The study was closed due to the slow enrollment rate.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
96 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01283971
Sponsor's protocol ID
MA25522
Other IDs
2010-023587-40
Status last verified
Jan 2014
First submitted
25 Jan 2011
Last updated
10 Feb 2014

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing tocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra], adalimumab and methotrexate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 170 sites in 12 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 170 sites in United States, Germany, France, Spain, Sweden and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Feb 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Remission at Week 24 (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in