Nonmalignant Breast ConditionsPhase 2NCT01286168
Trial of Drain Antisepsis After Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction
A Phase 2 study testing Sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's Solution), Chlorhexidine gluconate disk and Occlusive Adhesive Dressing in people with Nonmalignant Breast Conditions and Breast Cancer, run by Mayo Clinic at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Surgical site infection (SSI) after breast and axillary surgery occurs more often than for other clean surgical procedures. Infection in the setting of a tissue expander can be devastating and can lead to early implant loss and failed reconstruction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nonmalignant Breast Conditions, Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's Solution), Chlorhexidine gluconate disk and Occlusive Adhesive Dressing
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2011to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Females or males age 18-90 able to give informed consent
- Undergoing bilateral mastectomy with immediate expander reconstruction or immediate implant reconstruction
- May have either malignant or benign breast condition
Who cannot join
- Antibiotic use in the fourteen days prior to surgical date
- Undergoing unilateral tissue expander reconstruction
- Documented allergy to chlorhexidine gluconate
- Prior radiation therapy to the breast or chest wall (ie for breast conservation or mantle radiation for Hodgkin's disease)
- Documented allergy to all three of the following antibiotics: cephalosporin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and levofloxacin
- Pregnant women
- Vulnerable subjects - prisoners, institutionalized individuals
- Non-English speaking patients without adequate interpreter assistance
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55904
UCSF
San Francisco, California, 94107
About this study
Surgical site infection (SSI) after breast and axillary surgery occurs more often than for other clean surgical procedures. Infection in the setting of a tissue expander can be devastating and can lead to early implant loss and failed reconstruction. Surgical drains have been noted as a potential source for surgical site infections. Hypothesis: Bacteria present in surgical drains after tissue expander reconstruction may be decreased by simple and inexpensive local antiseptic interventions.
Read the detailed description
Surgical Site infection after breast surgical procedures occurs more frequently than for other clean surgical procedures. Considering the large numbers of patients who undergo breast-related procedures per year and the increasing use of immediate breast reconstruction with placement of tissue expanders or immediate implant reconstruction, a surgical site infection involving the implant can result in its removal and a failed reconstruction.
The primary aim of the study is to determine if chlorhexidine disk application and irrigation of the drainage bulb with dilute Dakin's solution (buffered sodium hypochlorite solution)after tissue expander breast reconstruction or immediate implant reconstruction, effectively decreases rates of bacterial colonization in drain fluid compared to standard care.
Methods:
Patients undergoing bilateral immediate reconstruction with tissue expander placement will have one surgical site treated with standard drain care and the other treated with a drain antisepsis regimen. Drain antisepsis intervention will consist of two measures: 1) placement of a chlorhexidine sponge dressing at the drain exit site, and 2) twice daily irrigation of the drainage bulb with dilute Dakin's solution (buffered hypochlorite).
All patients will undergo semiquantitative cultures of the drain bulb at one week postoperatively. This culture will be repeated at the time of drain removal, with simultaneous cultures of the fluid in the bulb as well as an internal segment of each removed drainage tube. All patients will be evaluated for clinical signs of infection and for any adverse reactions to the drain antisepsis at the follow-up visits.
- Conditions
- Nonmalignant Breast Conditions, Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's Solution), Chlorhexidine gluconate disk, Control, Occlusive Adhesive Dressing
- Keywords
- Bilateral breast mastectomy, Immediate tissue expanders reconstruction
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's Solution)Device
Also called Dakin's solution, Wound cleanser
10 ml of 0.125% sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's solution) irrigation to the drainage bulb two times a day
Chlorhexidine gluconate diskDevice
Also called BioPatch Protective Disk with CHG
Apply one chlorhexidine disk to the intervention drain site(s) and change every three days
ControlProcedure or surgery
Standard drain care will be performed twice a day or three times if bulb is full and needs to be emptied. Standard drain care consists of stripping the tubing, emptying the drainage bulb, recording the volume of fluid, and cleaning the drain site with a cotton swab dipped in rubbing alcohol. The drain exit will be covered with a dry sterile gauze dressing and changed after each episode of drain care.
Occlusive Adhesive DressingDevice
Also called Tegaderm CHG Dressing
A chlorhexidine gluconate disk (BioPatch) covered by an occlusive adhesive dressing (Tegaderm) will be applied to the intervention drain sites and changed every three days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Antisepsis Side | Experimental | A chlorhexidine gluconate disk (BioPatch) covered by an occlusive adhesive dressing (Tegaderm) will be applied to the intervention drain sites and changed every three days. The drainage bulb will be irrigated with 10ml of 0.125% sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's solution) twice a day. Receives: Device: Sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's Solution); Device: Chlorhexidine gluconate disk; Device: Occlusive Adhesive Dressing |
| Control Side | Other | Standard drain care will be performed twice a day or three times if bulb is full and needs to be emptied. Standard drain care consists of stripping the tubing, emptying the drainage bulb, recording the volume of fluid, and cleaning the drain site with a cotton swab dipped in rubbing alcohol. The drain exit will be covered with a dry sterile gauze dressing and changed after each episode of drain care. Receives: Procedure: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Subjects With Drain Bulb Fluid Bacterial Colonization at Approximately 1 Week
Bacterial growth was defined as plate growth of 1+ or greater. Drains were removed at variable times across patients, per clinical indication. When clinically indicated, some patients did have their drains removed at the one week visit, in which case they only had one bulb fluid culture.
Measured: Approximately 1 week after surgery
Per Drain Analysis: Drain Bulb Fluid Colonization at Approximately 1 Week
Measured: Approximately 1 week after surgery
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of Subjects With Drain Tubing Colonization at Removal
Drain tubing colonization was defined as greater than 50 colony forming units. Drains were removed at variable timepoints based on the clinical situation.
Measured: Approximately two weeks after surgery
Number of Subjects With Drain Bulb Fluid Bacterial Colonization at Removal
Bacterial growth was defined as plate growth of 1+ or greater. Drains were removed a variable times across patients, per clinical indication. A second bulb culture was obtained later than 1 week ONLY in those drains that were not removed at 1 week.
Measured: Approximately 2 weeks after surgery
Number of Subjects With Surgical Site Infection Within 30 Days
Measured: Approximately 30 days after surgery
Number of Subjects With Surgical Site Infection Within 1 Year
Measured: Approximately one year after surgery
Per Drain Analysis: Drain Tubing Colonization at Removal
Measured: Approximately one month after surgery
Per Drain Analysis: Drain Bulb Fluid Colonization at Removal
Measured: Approximately one month after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionNov 2013
- Study completionNov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nonmalignant Breast ConditionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco, Ethicon, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amy C. Degnim, Mayo Clinic
- Investigators
- Amy C Degnim, M.D., Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01286168
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10-008061
- Other IDs
- UL1TR000135
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 26 Jan 2011
- Last updated
- 19 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Degnim AC, Scow JS, Hoskin TL, Miller JP, Loprinzi M, Boughey JC, Jakub JW, Throckmorton A, Patel R, Baddour LM. Randomized controlled trial to reduce bacterial colonization of surgical drains after breast and axillary operations. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):240-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828c0b85.
PubMed 23518704
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Trial of Drain Antisepsis After Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01286168
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 10-008061
- Conditions
- Nonmalignant Breast Conditions, Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Bilateral breast mastectomy, Immediate tissue expanders reconstruction
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California, San Francisco, Ethicon, Inc.
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Oct 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Surgical site infection (SSI) after breast and axillary surgery occurs more often than for other clean surgical procedures. Infection in the setting of a tissue expander can be devastating and can lead to early implant loss and failed reconstruction. Surgical drains have been noted as a potential source for surgical site infections. Hypothesis: Bacteria present in surgical drains after tissue expander reconstruction may be decreased by simple and inexpensive local antiseptic interventions.
Detailed description
Surgical Site infection after breast surgical procedures occurs more frequently than for other clean surgical procedures. Considering the large numbers of patients who undergo breast-related procedures per year and the increasing use of immediate breast reconstruction with placement of tissue expanders or immediate implant reconstruction, a surgical site infection involving the implant can result in its removal and a failed reconstruction.
The primary aim of the study is to determine if chlorhexidine disk application and irrigation of the drainage bulb with dilute Dakin's solution (buffered sodium hypochlorite solution)after tissue expander breast reconstruction or immediate implant reconstruction, effectively decreases rates of bacterial colonization in drain fluid compared to standard care.
Methods:
Patients undergoing bilateral immediate reconstruction with tissue expander placement will have one surgical site treated with standard drain care and the other treated with a drain antisepsis regimen. Drain antisepsis intervention will consist of two measures: 1) placement of a chlorhexidine sponge dressing at the drain exit site, and 2) twice daily irrigation of the drainage bulb with dilute Dakin's solution (buffered hypochlorite).
All patients will undergo semiquantitative cultures of the drain bulb at one week postoperatively. This culture will be repeated at the time of drain removal, with simultaneous cultures of the fluid in the bulb as well as an internal segment of each removed drainage tube. All patients will be evaluated for clinical signs of infection and for any adverse reactions to the drain antisepsis at the follow-up visits.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Antisepsis Side | Experimental | Device: Sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's Solution), Device: Chlorhexidine gluconate disk, Device: Occlusive Adhesive DressingA chlorhexidine gluconate disk (BioPatch) covered by an occlusive adhesive dressing (Tegaderm) will be applied to the intervention drain sites and changed every three days. The drainage bulb will be irrigated with 10ml of 0.125% sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's solution) twice a day. |
| Control Side | Other | Procedure: ControlStandard drain care will be performed twice a day or three times if bulb is full and needs to be emptied. Standard drain care consists of stripping the tubing, emptying the drainage bulb, recording the volume of fluid, and cleaning the drain site with a cotton swab dipped in rubbing alcohol. The drain exit will be covered with a dry sterile gauze dressing and changed after each episode of drain care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Females or males age 18-90 able to give informed consent
- Undergoing bilateral mastectomy with immediate expander reconstruction or immediate implant reconstruction
- May have either malignant or benign breast condition
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Antibiotic use in the fourteen days prior to surgical date
- Undergoing unilateral tissue expander reconstruction
- Documented allergy to chlorhexidine gluconate
- Prior radiation therapy to the breast or chest wall (ie for breast conservation or mantle radiation for Hodgkin's disease)
- Documented allergy to all three of the following antibiotics: cephalosporin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and levofloxacin
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's Solution)Also: Dakin's solution, Wound cleanser10 ml of 0.125% sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's solution) irrigation to the drainage bulb two times a day | Device | Antisepsis Side |
| Chlorhexidine gluconate diskAlso: BioPatch Protective Disk with CHGApply one chlorhexidine disk to the intervention drain site(s) and change every three days | Device | Antisepsis Side |
| ControlStandard drain care will be performed twice a day or three times if bulb is full and needs to be emptied. Standard drain care consists of stripping the tubing, emptying the drainage bulb, recording the volume of fluid, and cleaning the drain site with a cotton swab dipped in rubbing alcohol. The drain exit will be covered with a dry sterile gauze dressing and changed after each episode of drain care. | Procedure or surgery | Control Side |
| Occlusive Adhesive DressingAlso: Tegaderm CHG DressingA chlorhexidine gluconate disk (BioPatch) covered by an occlusive adhesive dressing (Tegaderm) will be applied to the intervention drain sites and changed every three days. | Device | Antisepsis Side |
Primary outcome
Number of Subjects With Drain Bulb Fluid Bacterial Colonization at Approximately 1 Week
Time frame: Approximately 1 week after surgery
Bacterial growth was defined as plate growth of 1+ or greater. Drains were removed at variable times across patients, per clinical indication. When clinically indicated, some patients did have their drains removed at the one week visit, in which case they only had one bulb fluid culture.
Per Drain Analysis: Drain Bulb Fluid Colonization at Approximately 1 Week
Time frame: Approximately 1 week after surgery
6 secondary outcomes
Number of Subjects With Drain Tubing Colonization at Removal
Time frame: Approximately two weeks after surgery
Number of Subjects With Drain Bulb Fluid Bacterial Colonization at Removal
Time frame: Approximately 2 weeks after surgery
Number of Subjects With Surgical Site Infection Within 30 Days
Time frame: Approximately 30 days after surgery
Number of Subjects With Surgical Site Infection Within 1 Year
Time frame: Approximately one year after surgery
Per Drain Analysis: Drain Tubing Colonization at Removal
Time frame: Approximately one month after surgery
Per Drain Analysis: Drain Bulb Fluid Colonization at Removal
Time frame: Approximately one month after surgery
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Dec 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23518704Degnim AC, Scow JS, Hoskin TL, Miller JP, Loprinzi M, Boughey JC, Jakub JW, Throckmorton A, Patel R, Baddour LM. Randomized controlled trial to reduce bacterial colonization of surgical drains after breast and axillary operations. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):240-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31828c0b85.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amy C Degnim, M.D. principal investigator
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Sodium hypochlorite (Dakin's Solution), Chlorhexidine gluconate disk and Occlusive Adhesive Dressing in people with Nonmalignant Breast Conditions and Breast Cancer, run by Mayo Clinic at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Subjects With Drain Bulb Fluid Bacterial Colonization at Approximately 1 Week (time frame: Approximately 1 week after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01286168, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2014.