AzTrials
AzTrials

Colorectal NeoplasmVALIDNCT01288833

Clinical Study of Real Time Colorectal Polyp Diagnosis During Colonoscopy - the VALID Colonoscopy Study

A study testing Close focus HD NBI Colonoscopy System in people with Colorectal Neoplasm and Colonic Polyps, run by VA Palo Alto Health Care System at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators hypothesize that high definition colonoscopy with close focus narrow band imaging features has a high diagnostic accuracy for colorectal polyp histology, and can replace formal pathologic assessment in cases of high diagnostic confidence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Colorectal Neoplasm, Colonic Polyps
What is being tested?
Close focus HD NBI Colonoscopy System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
558 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2011to Oct 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients referred for routine colonoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Known inflammatory bowel disease
  • Personal or family history of polyposis or non-polyposis syndrome
  • Presentation for emergency endoscopy
  • Inability to remove polyp due to coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Veterans Affairs Kansas City

    Kansas City, Missouri, 64128

  • Veterans Affairs Palo Alto

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Real Time Colorectal Polyp Diagnosis in Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Close Focus High Definition Narrow Band Imaging Colonoscopy Compared to Conventional Histopathology Diagnosis - the VALID (Veterans Affairs Lesion Interpretation and Diagnosis) Colonoscopy Study

The investigators hypothesize that high definition colonoscopy with close focus narrow band imaging features has a high diagnostic accuracy for colorectal polyp histology, and can replace formal pathologic assessment in cases of high diagnostic confidence.

Read the detailed description

A recent single arm prospective cohort study suggested that high definition colonoscopy with narrow band imaging is an acceptable strategy to diagnose polyp histology and determine future surveillance intervals. Endoscopic proficiency in macroscopic features to differentiate polyp histology can be attained in a relatively short time period. A new high definition colonoscope with close focus narrow band imaging features may further improve diagnostic accuracy for polyp differentiation, and can replace formal pathologic assessment in cases of high diagnostic confidence.

Primary Aim: Compare the diagnostic accuracy of high definition narrow band imaging colonoscopy with and without close focus features for the macroscopic differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal lesions using histopathologic diagnosis as the reference standard.

Secondary Aims: Compare diagnostic characteristics of the colonoscopes, measure concordance of high confidence and accuracy, compare accuracy of predicted versus actual surveillance interval recommendations, perform a cost-effective analysis of endoscopic versus pathologic diagnoses, and measure complications.

Being tested
Close focus HD NBI Colonoscopy System
Keywords
Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Imaging, Colorectal Neoplasm, Primary Prevention, Cost and Cost Analysis, Endoscopy
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Close focus HD NBI Colonoscopy SystemDevice

    Technically improved colonoscope with close focus high definition narrow band imaging. Optical specifications include a 2mm near field focal depth.

Study groups in NCT01288833
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Close focus HD NBI Colonoscopy SystemExperimentalUse of close focus to make optical diagnosis
Receives: Device: Close focus HD NBI Colonoscopy System
Current HD NBI Colonoscopy SystemNo interventionUse of standard focus for optical diagnosis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of Accurate High Confidence Polyp Histology Predictions by the Endoscopist in the Two Groups.

    Measure of the percentage of accurate high confidence predictions by the endoscopist in the differentiation of neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions, using the high definition NBI colonoscopy with and without close focus features. High confidence was assigned if the polyp had one or more features of Type 2 (neoplasia) or Type 1 (nonneoplasia) in the NICE classification and no features associated with the other histology Note: one patient may have multiple polyps.

    Measured: At the time of procedure

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Cost

    Measure the cost of colonoscopy with macroscopic histopathologic diagnosis of colorectal lesions compared to colonoscopy with conventional microscopic histopathologic diagnosis, on the lesions that were managed based on an accurate endoscopic diagnosis.

    A reduction in pathology specimens may improve the efficiency of the procedure and has direct pathology cost savings (as well as indirect savings, which were not measured).

    Measured: At the time of procedure

  2. Diagnostic Characteristics

    Compare the diagnostic characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) using the high definition narrow band imaging colonoscopy with and without close focus features.

    Accuracy: number of endoscopic predictions of adenomatous polyps histologically confirmed to be adenomatous/number of predicted hyperplastic polyps confirmed to be hyperplastic out of all polyps Sensitivity: number of endoscopic predictions (optical diagnosis) of adenomatous (neoplastic) polyps out of all histologically confirmed polyps Specificity: number of endoscopic predictions of hyperplastic (non-neoplastic) polyps out of all histologically confirmed polyps PPV: number of histologically confirmed adenomatous polyps out of all endoscopic predictions of adenomatous polyps NPV: number of histologically confirmed hyperplastic polyps out of all endoscopic predictions of hyperplastic (non-neoplastic) polyps Note: a patient may have multiple polyps

    Measured: At time of procedure

  3. Accuracy of Predicted Versus Actual Surveillance Intervals

    Compared the accuracy of predicted versus actual surveillance colonoscopy interval recommendations by determining number of patients with correct surveillance interval recommendation.

    Measured: At the time of procedure

  4. Learning Curve

    Examine the impact of a learning curve (i.e. NPV of high confidence at each of endoscopist's first 50% of exams versus last 50% exams to endoscopically predict polyp histology). NPV is defined as "number of histologically confirmed hyperplastic polyps out of all endoscopic predictions of hyperplastic (non-neoplastic) polyps.

    Measured: At time of procedure.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2015
  4. Study completionOct 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
558 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01288833
Sponsor's protocol ID
VALID PA19624
Acronym
VALID
Status last verified
Apr 2018
First submitted
1 Feb 2011
Last updated
1 Jun 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Friedland S, Soetikno R; American Gastroenterological Association. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technology assessment on image-enhanced endoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2008 Jan;134(1):327-40. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.10.062. Epub 2007 Oct 30.

    PubMed 18061178
  • Muto M, Katada C, Sano Y, Yoshida S. Narrow band imaging: a new diagnostic approach to visualize angiogenesis in superficial neoplasia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jul;3(7 Suppl 1):S16-20. doi: 10.1016/s1542-3565(05)00262-4.

    PubMed 16012987
  • Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1174-81. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.009. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

    PubMed 19187781
  • Raghavendra M, Hewett DG, Rex DK. Differentiating adenomas from hyperplastic colorectal polyps: narrow-band imaging can be learned in 20 minutes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Sep;72(3):572-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.03.1124. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

    PubMed 20561618
  • Rastogi A, Keighley J, Singh V, Callahan P, Bansal A, Wani S, Sharma P. High accuracy of narrow band imaging without magnification for the real-time characterization of polyp histology and its comparison with high-definition white light colonoscopy: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;104(10):2422-30. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.403. Epub 2009 Jul 7.

    PubMed 19584829
  • Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N, Vance M, Guenther T, Saunders BP. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Dec;10(12):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70329-8. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

    PubMed 19910250
  • Rex DK, Fennerty MB, Sharma P, Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R. Bringing new endoscopic imaging technology into everyday practice: what is the role of professional GI societies? Polyp imaging as a template for moving endoscopic innovation forward to answer key clinical questions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jan;71(1):142-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.011. Epub 2009 Nov 17. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19922926
  • von Renteln D, Kaltenbach T, Rastogi A, Anderson JC, Rosch T, Soetikno R, Pohl H. Simplifying Resect and Discard Strategies for Real-Time Assessment of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 May;16(5):706-714. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.036. Epub 2017 Nov 23.

    PubMed 29174789
  • Kaltenbach T, Rastogi A, Rouse RV, McQuaid KR, Sato T, Bansal A, Kosek JC, Soetikno R. Real-time optical diagnosis for diminutive colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging: the VALID randomised clinical trial. Gut. 2015 Oct;64(10):1569-77. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307742. Epub 2014 Nov 11.

    PubMed 25387891
  • McGill SK, Soetikno R, Rastogi A, Rouse RV, Sato T, Bansal A, McQuaid K, Kaltenbach T. Endoscopists can sustain high performance for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps following standardized and continued training. Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):200-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1378096. Epub 2014 Sep 29.

    PubMed 25264764

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Close focus HD NBI Colonoscopy System in people with Colorectal Neoplasm and Colonic Polyps, run by VA Palo Alto Health Care System at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of Accurate High Confidence Polyp Histology Predictions by the Endoscopist in the Two Groups. (time frame: At the time of procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01288833, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in