AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostatic NeoplasmsPhase 2NCT01288911

A Study of Enzalutamide Versus Bicalutamide in Castrate Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing enzalutamide and bicalutamide in people with Prostatic Neoplasms, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 88 sites in 8 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of oral enzalutamide compared to bicalutamide in castrate men with metastatic prostate cancer who have progressed while on Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Hormone (LHRH) agonist/antagonist or after receiving a bilateral orchiectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostatic Neoplasms
What is being tested?
enzalutamide and bicalutamide
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
375 participants
Where
88 sitesin 8 countries
Study dates
22 Mar 2011to 8 Nov 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate without neuroendocrine differentiation or small cell features
  • Ongoing androgen deprivation therapy with a Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Hormone (LHRH) agonist or antagonist at a stable dose and schedule within 4 weeks of randomization or bilateral orchiectomy (i.e., surgical or medical castration)
  • Metastatic disease documented by one of the following:
  • At least two bone lesions on bone scan, or
  • Soft tissue disease documented by computed tomography (CT)/ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or
  • Unequivocal pelvic adenopathy short axis > 2.0 cm in diameter by CT/MRI
Show all 22Show fewer
  • Progressive disease at study entry defined as one or more of the following three criteria occurring in the setting of castrate levels of testosterone:
  • Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) progression defined by a minimum of three rising PSA levels with an interval of ≥ 1 week between each determination. The PSA value should be ≥ 2 µg/L (2 ng/mL);
  • Soft tissue disease progression defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1;
  • Bone disease progression defined by two or more new lesions on bone scan
  • Asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic from prostate cancer (i.e. the score on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Question #3 must be < 4); no use of opiate analgesics for prostate cancer-related pain currently or anytime within 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, including subjects with decreased performance status not attributed to progressive and symptomatic prostate cancer
  • Estimated life expectancy of ≥ 12 months
  • Able to swallow the study drug and comply with study requirements
  • A male subject and his female spouse/partner who is of childbearing potential must use two acceptable methods of birth control (one of which must include a condom as a barrier method of contraception) starting at Screening and continuing throughout the study period, and for 3 months after final study drug administration. Two acceptable forms of birth control include:
  • Condom (barrier method of contraception), AND
  • In addition to a condom, one of the following acceptable forms of contraception is required:
  • Established use of oral, injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception.
  • Placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS).
  • Barrier methods of contraception: Occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository.
  • Tubal ligation for at least 6 months prior to Screening
  • Vasectomy or other surgical castration at least 6 months prior to Screening

Who cannot join

  • Prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer
  • Severe concurrent disease, infection, or comorbidity that would make the subject inappropriate for enrollment
  • Known or suspected brain and/or skull metastasis or active epidural disease
  • History of another malignancy within the previous 5 years other than curatively treated non-melanomatous skin cancer
  • Current or prior treatment with estrogens and/or drugs with anti-androgenic properties such as spironolactone > 50 mg/day, or progestational agents for the treatment of prostate cancer within 6 months prior to randomization
  • Current or prior use of ketoconazole for the treatment of prostate cancer
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Use of antiandrogens within 6 weeks prior to randomization
  • Documented prior disease progression while receiving antiandrogens. Disease progression defined as PSA progression, radiographic progression and/or clinical deterioration.
  • Current or prior treatment with 5-α reductase inhibitors or anabolic steroids within 6 months prior to randomization
  • Prior use of systemic glucocorticoids (the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone) within 3 months prior to randomization or expectation of their use during the study
  • Radiation therapy to bone lesions or prostatic bed within 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Major surgery within 2 months prior to randomization
  • History of seizure including febrile seizure or any condition that may predispose to seizure (e.g., prior stroke, brain arteriovenous malformation, head trauma with loss of consciousness requiring hospitalization). Also, current or prior treatment with anti-epileptic medications for the treatment of seizures or history of loss of consciousness or transient ischemic attack within 12 months prior to randomization
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease including myocardial infarction within past six months or uncontrolled angina within past three months

Trial locations and contacts

88 sites in 8 countries.

88 sites in 8 countries

United States36 sites
  • Site US1527

    Anchorage, Alaska, 99503

  • Site US2975

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Site US1598

    Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, 19004

  • Site US2976

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

  • Site US3182

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20889-5600

  • Site US3078

    Billings, Montana, 59101

  • Site US1580

    Burien, Washington, 98166

  • Site US81

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Site US44

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267

  • Site US2185

    Columbus, Ohio, 43221

  • Site US2935

    Denver, Colorado, 80211

  • Site US892

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49546

  • Site US2104

    Greensboro, North Carolina, 27403

  • Site US2977

    Highland, California, 92346

  • Site US1934

    Homewood, Alabama, 35209

  • Site US464

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Site US2027

    Jeffersonville, Indiana, 47130

  • Site US62

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160-7233

  • Site US1680

    Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17604

  • Site US2968

    Lawrenceville, New Jersey, 08648

  • Site US2014

    Melrose Park, Illinois, 60160

  • Site US2945

    Middlebury, Connecticut, 06762

  • Site US51

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Site US20

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • Site US2926

    Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, 29572

  • Site US1657

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37209

  • Site US3025

    Poughkeepsie, New York, 12601

  • Site US1675

    Rochester, New York, 14642

  • Site US2978

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Site US3630

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Site US2067

    Springfield, Illinois, 62703

  • Site US2934

    Staten Island, New York, 10304

  • Site US3026

    Tucson, Arizona, 85715

  • Site US1653

    Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23462

  • Site US1709

    Wenatchee, Washington, 98801

  • Site US1838

    West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom13 sites
  • Site GB3244

    Belfast, BT9 7AB

  • Site GB3029

    Bristol, UK, BS2 8HW

  • Site GB2702

    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ

  • Site GB3028

    Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4XW

  • Site GB3166

    Glasgow, G12 0YN

  • Site GB1862

    Leicher, LE5 4PW

  • Site GB3027

    London, UK, SE19RT

  • Site GB3030

    London, UK, SW17 0QT

  • Site GB3163

    London, NW1 2PG

  • Site GB2624

    Manchester, M20 4BX

  • Site GB3355

    Merseyside, CH63 4JY

  • Site GB3245

    Northwood, Middlesex, HA6 2RN

  • Site GB3290

    Preston, PR2 9HT

Other trials in United Kingdom

Germany11 sites
  • Site DE2989

    Aachen, 51074

  • Site DE3287

    Bergisch Gladbach, D-51465

  • Site DE2993

    Bonn, 53105

  • Site DE2995

    Bonn, 53111

  • Site DE2994

    Bonn, 53117

  • Site DE2990

    Hamburg, 22081

  • Site DE3270

    Hanover, 30625

  • Site DE4000

    Nürtingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72622

  • Site DE2992

    Reutlingen, 72764

  • Site DE3286

    Waldshut-Tiengen, 29761

  • Site DE2988

    Wuppertal, 42103

Other trials in Germany

France8 sites
  • Site FR1091

    Créteil, 94010

  • Site FR3009

    Lille, 59037

  • Site FR442

    Lyon, 69437

  • Site FR3002

    Paris, 75020

  • Site FR3003

    Poitiers, 86000

  • Site FR3000

    Rennes, 35033

  • Site FR3007

    Rouen, 76031

  • Site FR3005

    Suresnes, 92151

Other trials in France

Canada7 sites
  • Site CA3242

    Abbotsford British Columbia, British Columbia, V2S 3N5

  • Site CA3104

    Calgary, Alberta, T2V 1P9

  • Site CA2984

    Granby, Quebec, J2G 8Z9

  • Site CA2646

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7

  • Site CA170

    Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4

  • Site CA166

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Site CA3084

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

Other trials in Canada

Belgium6 sites
  • Site BE3015

    Brussels, 1090

  • Site BE1322

    Ghent, 9000

  • Site BE3018

    Kortrijk, 8500

  • Site BE3288

    Leuven, 3000

  • Site BE3289

    Liège

  • Site BE3013

    Turnhout, 2300

Other trials in Belgium

Denmark4 sites
  • Site DK3354

    Aalborg, 9000

  • Site DK3356

    Aarhus, 8200

  • Site DK1857

    Copenhagen, 2200

  • Site DK1263

    Herlev, 2730

Other trials in Denmark

Romania3 sites
  • Site RO3042

    Bucharest, RO, 022328

  • Site RO3039

    Bucharest, RO, 050659

  • Site RO3035

    Bucharest, 041345

Other trials in Romania

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase II, Efficacy and Safety Study of MDV3100 Versus Bicalutamide in Castrate Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of oral enzalutamide compared to bicalutamide in castrate men with metastatic prostate cancer who have progressed while on Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Hormone (LHRH) agonist/antagonist or after receiving a bilateral orchiectomy.

Read the detailed description

An open-label period was added to the main protocol. Following unblinding at the end of the double-blind period and demonstration of a statistically significant advantage of enzalutamide over bicalutamide as assessed by the primary endpoint, all ongoing enzalutamide treated participants and ongoing or previous bicalutamide treated participants that met entry criteria were offered open-label enzalutamide at the discretion of the participant and study investigators.

Being tested
enzalutamide, bicalutamide
Keywords
Metastatic, MDV3100, Prostate, progressive, Cancer, enzalutamide
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • enzalutamideDrug

    Also called MDV3100

    capsules

  • bicalutamideDrug

    Also called Casodex

    tablets

Study groups in NCT01288911
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EnzalutamideExperimentalParticipants received enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
Receives: Drug: enzalutamide
BicalutamideActive comparatorParticipants received bicalutamide 50 mg orally once daily until confirmed radiographic disease progression, skeletal-related event or the initiation of a new antineoplastic therapy.
Receives: Drug: bicalutamide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Central Review (ICR) Assessment

    PFS is the time from randomization to the date of the first progression event detected. A progression event was defined as objective evidence of radiographic disease progression based on the assessments by the ICR, skeletal-related event, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy or death by any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions on bone scan (≥ 2 new bone lesions) confirmed by the next bone scan. A skeletal-related event was any radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression or change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. The initiation of new antineoplastic therapy included any new therapy for the treatment of disease progression after the study drug administration started.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. PFS Based on Investigator Assessment

    PFS was calculated as the time from randomization to the date of the first progression event detected. A progression event was defined as objective evidence of radiographic disease progression based on the assessments by investigators, skeletal-related event, initiation of new antineoplastic therapy or death by any cause, whichever occurred first. Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions on bone scan (≥ 2 new bone lesions) confirmed by the next bone scan. A skeletal-related event was defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression or change in antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. The initiation of new antineoplastic therapy included any new therapy for the treatment of disease progression after the study drug administration started.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

  2. Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Response by Week 13

    The PSA response by Week 13 was defined as the percentage change from Baseline to the smallest PSA value after Baseline (i.e., a decrease of 100% represents the largest possible decrease to a value below the lower limit of quantification) and on or before day 99 (i.e., upper boundary of the Week 13 visit window). For participants with no decrease in PSA post-baseline by Week 13, the PSA response by Week 13 was the smallest increase in PSA up to day 99. For participants with no post-baseline PSA values up to day 99, the PSA response by Week 13 was set to missing. PSA was analyzed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 13

  3. Best PSA Response

    The best PSA response was defined as the percentage change from Baseline to the smallest PSA value after Baseline including PSA results from samples taken after the study drug was stopped. For participants with no decrease in PSA post-baseline, the best PSA response was the smallest increase in PSA. For participants with no post-baseline PSA values, the PSA response was set to missing. PSA was analyzed at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

  4. Time to PSA Progression

    Time to PSA progression was calculated as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of first observation of PSA progression. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL above the nadir (or above the baseline value for participants who did not have a decline in PSA post-baseline values), and confirmed by a second consecutive PSA assessment at least 3 weeks later. For participants with no documented PSA progression, the time to PSA progression was censored on the date the last PSA sample was taken.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

  5. Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL

    Time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a decline in PSA to a result of 4 ng/mL or below was recorded. In participants without PSA results ≤ 4 ng/mL, the time to PSA ≤ 4 ng/mL was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants with a PSA result ≤ 4 ng/mL at Baseline, participants with no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization

    Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

  6. Time to ≥ 30% PSA Decline From Baseline

    The time to ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 30% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 30% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

  7. Time to ≥ 50% PSA Decline From Baseline

    The time to ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 50% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 50% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

  8. Time to ≥ 90% PSA Decline From Baseline

    The time to ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date a PSA decline from Baseline of at least 90% was recorded. In participants without ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline, the time to ≥ 90% PSA decline from Baseline was censored on the date of the last PSA sample taken. Participants who had no Baseline PSA and participants with no post-baseline PSA results were censored on the date of randomization.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

  9. Radiographic PFS Based on ICR Assessment

    Radiographic PFS was calculated as the time interval from the date of randomization to the first date of radiographic disease progression. Radiographic disease progression was defined as either a progression in soft tissue on CT/MRI scan according to RECIST 1.1, and/or a progression in bone lesions (a minimum of 2 new bone lesions as compared to previous scan) on bone scan and confirmed by the next bone scan.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

  10. Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response

    Response assessments were reported by ICR for target lesions in soft tissues and non-target lesions in soft tissues based on CT and/or MRI according to RECIST version 1.1. Objective response was defined as the number of participants achieving either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR) based on participant's best overall response assessed at the end of the treatment.

    Measured: From randomization until the data cutoff date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.

  11. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

    A serious adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: ● Resulted in death ● Was life threatening ● Resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity ● Resulted in congenital anomaly or birth defect ● Required inpatient hospitalization or led to prolongation of hospitalization ● Other medically important events. Treatment-related indicates adverse events assessed by the Investigator as probably or possibly related to study treatment. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened after starting administration of study drug through end of the study (i.e., the treatment-emergent period).

    Measured: From initiation of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or the 30-day safety follow-up visit, whichever was last (Median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in enzalutamide arm and 5.8 in bicalutamide arm, 12.6 in the total arm).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 Mar 2011
  3. Primary completion19 Oct 2014
  4. Study completion8 Nov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
375 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01288911
Sponsor's protocol ID
9785-CL-0222
Other IDs
2010-021868-15
Status last verified
Nov 2024
First submitted
1 Feb 2011
Last updated
6 Dec 2024
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Access to anonymized individual participant level data will not be provided for this trial. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

Publications

  • Schultz NM, Shore ND, Chowdhury S, Klotz LH, Concepcion RS, Penson DF, Karsh LI, Yang H, Brown BA, Barlev A, Flanders SC. Number-needed-to-treat analysis of clinical progression in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the STRIVE and TERRAIN trials. BMC Urol. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0387-7.

    PubMed 30189902
  • Heidenreich A, Chowdhury S, Klotz L, Siemens DR, Villers A, Ivanescu C, Holmstrom S, Baron B, Wang F, Lin P, Shore ND. Impact of Enzalutamide Compared with Bicalutamide on Quality of Life in Men with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Additional Analyses from the TERRAIN Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):534-542. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.027. Epub 2016 Aug 3.

    PubMed 27497762
  • Shore ND, Chowdhury S, Villers A, Klotz L, Siemens DR, Phung D, van Os S, Hasabou N, Wang F, Bhattacharya S, Heidenreich A. Efficacy and safety of enzalutamide versus bicalutamide for patients with metastatic prostate cancer (TERRAIN): a randomised, double-blind, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):153-163. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00518-5. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

    PubMed 26774508

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing enzalutamide and bicalutamide in people with Prostatic Neoplasms, run by Astellas Pharma Inc at 88 sites in 8 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 22 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 88 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Canada and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Dec 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression Free Survival (PFS) Based on Independent Central Review (ICR) Assessment (time frame: From randomization until the data cut-off date of 19 October 2014, median duration of treatment was 11.6 months in the enzalutamide arm and 5.8 months in the bicalutamide arm.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01288911, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in