Indolent B-cell NHLPhase 3ROBINNCT01289223
A Trial to Investigate the Efficacy of Bendamustine in Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Refractory to Rituximab.
A Phase 3 study testing Bendamustine IV and Treatment of Physicians Choice in people with Indolent B-cell NHL, run by Mundipharma Research Limited at 3 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
To compare the efficacy of bendamustine against treatment of physician's choice on progression-free survival in subjects with indolent B-cell NHL. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Indolent B-cell NHL
- What is being tested?
- Bendamustine IV and Treatment of Physicians Choice
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 88 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to 31 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Indolent B-cell lymphoma: grades 1-3a follicular, small lymphocytic, lymphoplasmacytic, and marginal zone lymphoma; stages III-IV, or bulky disease stage II (i.e. as any single mass > 5 cm in any direction) defined according to WHO Classification, 2008
- CT imaging in screening phase (based on local evaluation) showing 2 or more clearly demarcated lesions with a largest diameter ≥ 1.5 cm, or 1 clearly demarcated lesion with a largest diameter ≥ 2.0 cm. CT imaging performed at screening will be considered the baseline image
- Indolent B-cell NHL that remains stable or unresponsive during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen:
- Maintaining stable disease or failure to achieve PR to rituximab-based therapy. (CT imaging will support this finding, and will be performed at least 30 days after the last dose of rituximab-based therapy) or,
- Disease progression while on rituximab-based therapy (e.g., includes 4 weekly courses of rituximab given at 6 week intervals) or,
- Disease progression in subjects with stable disease or better response to rituximab-based therapy < 6 months of the last dose of rituximab Note: Subjects must have received at least 4 infusions of rituximab (either as monotherapy or in combination with any chemotherapy).
Show all 34Show fewer
- Screening laboratory values:
- Platelets ≥ 75,000/µL (7 x 109 cells/L)
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,000/µL (1.0 x 109 cells/L)
- ALT, AST and alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 ULN and total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 xULN (isolated predominantly indirect hyperbilirubinaemia due to Gilbert's syndrome is acceptable for inclusion)
- ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Life expectancy of at least 3 months
- Signed written informed consent prior to performing any study-specific procedures
- Main exclusion criteria:
- Grade 3b follicular lymphoma or evidence that the indolent lymphoma has transformed to aggressive lymphoma as verified by biopsy confirmation [e.g. constitutional symptoms, poor performance status, fast growing tumour or increasing lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level]
- Previous allogeneic stem cell transplant
- Previous external beam radiation therapy to the pelvis. Previous external beam radiation therapy for bony disease to the cranium, mediastinum, and axilla or to more than 3 vertebral bodies
- More than 10 mg prednisolone daily at the time of randomisation
- Prior bendamustine treatment within 1 year of randomisation not resulting in a CR or PR for at least 6 months
- Known CNS involvement of indolent lymphoma
- Other past or current malignancy. Subjects who have been free of malignancy for at least 5 years, or have a history of definitively treated non-melanoma skin cancer, or successfully treated in situ carcinoma, are eligible
- Chronic or current active infectious disease requiring systemic antibiotics, antifungal, or antiviral treatment such as, but not limited to, chronic renal infection, chronic chest infection with bronchiectasis, tuberculosis and active Hepatitis C
- Clinically significant cardiac disease including unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction within 6 months of screening, congestive heart failure, and arrhythmia requiring therapy, with the exception of extrasystoles or minor conduction abnormalities. Subjects with well controlled congestive heart failure and atrial arrhythmias need not be excluded but should be discussed with the study Medical Monitor
- Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition including, but not limited to, renal, hepatic, haematological, gastrointestinal, endocrine, pulmonary, neurological, cerebral or psychiatric disease
- History of significant cerebrovascular disease or event with significant symptoms or sequelae
- Current active liver or biliary disease (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones, liver metastases or otherwise stable chronic liver disease per investigator assessment)
- Jaundice
- Known HIV, Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C positive
- Creatinine clearance ≤ 10 mL/min (measured or estimated using Cockcroft and Gault equation)
- Treatment with any known non-marketed drug substance or experimental therapy within 5-terminal half-lives or 4 weeks prior to screening, whichever is longer or currently participating in any other interventional clinical study unless the sole purpose of the study is for collection of survival data
- Known or suspected inability to comply with study protocol
- Lactating women, women with a positive pregnancy test at screening or women (of childbearing potential) as well as men with partners of childbearing potential, who are not willing to use adequate contraception from study start through last treatment dose and for 6 months following cessation of treatment. Female contraception must be individually recommended by an expert. Adequate contraception is defined as abstinence, oral contraceptive, either combined or progestogen alone, injectable progestogen, implants of levonorgestrel, estrogenic vaginal ring, percutaneous contraceptive patches, intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS), male partner sterilization (vasectomy with documentation of azoospermia) prior to the female subject's entry into the study, and this male is the sole partner for that subject, or double barrier method: condom and an occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with a vaginal spermicidal agent (foam/gel/film/cream/suppository).
- 20.Major surgery less than 30 days prior to start of treatment. 21.Known hypersensitivity to the active substance or any excipients that cannot be controlled by appropriate pre-medication
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 2 countries.
3 sites in 2 countries
Australia2 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, 5000
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, QLD 4102
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Open Label, Multi-centre, Phase III Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Bendamustine Compared to Treatment of Physician's Choice in the Treatment of Subjects With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Refractory to Rituximab
To compare the efficacy of bendamustine against treatment of physician's choice on progression-free survival in subjects with indolent B-cell NHL.
Read the detailed description
To test whether bendamustine will improve progression-free survival in subjects with indolent B-cell NHL that did not respond (stable disease or progressive disease) to rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen during or within 6 months of the last rituximab treatment compared to treatment of physican's choice.
- Conditions
- Indolent B-cell NHL
- Being tested
- Bendamustine IV, Treatment of Physicians Choice
- Keywords
- Indolent B-cell NHL, bendamustine, rituximab, progression-free survival
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bendamustine IVDrug
Treatment of Physicians ChoiceOther
Also called Defined as any cancer specific therapy or best supportive care.
Defined as any cancer specific therapy or best supportive care. Treatment should be given according to the label and based upon local institutional medical practice and clinical judgement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment of Physicians Choice | Active comparator | Defined as any cancer specific therapy or best supportive care. Treatment should be given according to the label and based upon local institutional medical practice and clinical judgement. Receives: Other: Treatment of Physicians Choice |
| Bendamustine IV | Experimental | Up to 8 cycles of Bendamustine (120mg/m2 Days 1 and 2, every 21 days (+ 3 days). Receives: Drug: Bendamustine IV |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free survival
Screening of 14 days, prior to ramdomisation. 8 cycles of 21 days, then follow up every 3 months after end of last cycle until disease progression, then every 6 months.
Measured: 8 cycles of 21 days, then follow up every 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Overall Response Rate
Complete remission (CR)/partial remission (PR), Duration of response (DR), Overall survival (OS), Safety and tolerability, Change in health related quality of life (HRQL) measures
Measured: 8 cycles of 21 days, then follow up every 3 months until progressive disease, then every 6 months for overall survival
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completion31 Jul 2018
- Study completion31 Jul 2018
Why it stopped: Ongoing challenges to successfully recruit the required number of subjects
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Indolent B-cell NHLStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mundipharma Research Limited
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01289223
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BDM3502
- Other IDs
- 2010-022102-41
- Acronym
- ROBIN
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 2 Feb 2011
- Last updated
- 4 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Open Label, Multi-centre, Phase III Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Bendamustine Compared to Treatment of Physician's Choice in the Treatment of Subjects With Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Refractory to Rituximab
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01289223
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROBIN / BDM3502
- Conditions
- Indolent B-cell NHL
- Keywords
- Indolent B-cell NHL, bendamustine, rituximab, progression-free survival
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Ongoing challenges to successfully recruit the required number of subjects
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mundipharma Research LimitedIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the efficacy of bendamustine against treatment of physician's choice on progression-free survival in subjects with indolent B-cell NHL.
Detailed description
To test whether bendamustine will improve progression-free survival in subjects with indolent B-cell NHL that did not respond (stable disease or progressive disease) to rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen during or within 6 months of the last rituximab treatment compared to treatment of physican's choice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment of Physicians Choice | Active comparator | Other: Treatment of Physicians ChoiceDefined as any cancer specific therapy or best supportive care. Treatment should be given according to the label and based upon local institutional medical practice and clinical judgement. |
| Bendamustine IV | Experimental | Drug: Bendamustine IVUp to 8 cycles of Bendamustine (120mg/m2 Days 1 and 2, every 21 days (+ 3 days). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (34 listed)
- Indolent B-cell lymphoma: grades 1-3a follicular, small lymphocytic, lymphoplasmacytic, and marginal zone lymphoma; stages III-IV, or bulky disease stage II (i.e. as any single mass > 5 cm in any direction) defined according to WHO Classification, 2008
- CT imaging in screening phase (based on local evaluation) showing 2 or more clearly demarcated lesions with a largest diameter ≥ 1.5 cm, or 1 clearly demarcated lesion with a largest diameter ≥ 2.0 cm. CT imaging performed at screening will be considered the baseline image
- Indolent B-cell NHL that remains stable or unresponsive during or within 6 months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen:
- Screening laboratory values:
- ECOG Performance Status of 0, 1, or 2
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bendamustine IV | Drug | Bendamustine IV |
| Treatment of Physicians ChoiceAlso: Defined as any cancer specific therapy or best supportive care.Defined as any cancer specific therapy or best supportive care. Treatment should be given according to the label and based upon local institutional medical practice and clinical judgement. | Other | Treatment of Physicians Choice |
Primary outcome
Progression-free survival
Time frame: 8 cycles of 21 days, then follow up every 3 months
Screening of 14 days, prior to ramdomisation. 8 cycles of 21 days, then follow up every 3 months after end of last cycle until disease progression, then every 6 months.
1 secondary outcome
Overall Response Rate
Time frame: 8 cycles of 21 days, then follow up every 3 months until progressive disease, then every 6 months for overall survival
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Ongoing challenges to successfully recruit the required number of subjects). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Sep 2018.
Related trials for Indolent B-cell NHL
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
First-in-Human (FIH) Trial in Patients With Relapsed, Progressive or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma
DLBCL, High-grade B-cell Lymphoma (HGBCL)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Novel Vaccine (EO2463) as Monotherapy and in Combination, for Treatment of Patients With Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Follicular Lymphoma, Marginal Zone Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Copanlisib and Nivolumab in Treating Patients With Richter's Transformation or Transformed Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Addition of a New Anti-cancer Drug, Venetoclax, to Usual Chemotherapy for High Grade B-cell Lymphomas
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Combination of Anti-cancer Drugs Mosunetuzumab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bendamustine IV and Treatment of Physicians Choice in people with Indolent B-cell NHL, run by Mundipharma Research Limited at 3 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 34 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Australia, Slovakia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Ongoing challenges to successfully recruit the required number of subjects). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free survival (time frame: 8 cycles of 21 days, then follow up every 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Sep 2018.