AzTrials
AzTrials

Labor Active Dilated CmNCT01290289

Analgesia in Labor, a Prospective Parallel Study to Compare Regional Analgesia and Intravenous (IV) Pethidine Analgesia

A study testing Epidura, CSE & IV in people with Labor Active Dilated Cm, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare combined spinal epidural, epidural and IV pethidine analgesia and their effects on the mother, fetus, newborn and the course of labor. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Labor Active Dilated Cm
What is being tested?
Epidura, CSE & IV
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Jul 2009to Feb 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • full-term, ASA physical status I or II nulliparous women in active labor with cervical dilatation of 5 cm and cephalic presenting fetus

Who cannot join

  • Patients who had diabetes mellitus, neurological disease, pre-eclampsia, or patients who had received parenteral analgesics or patients with contraindication to E or spinal analgesia, or patients with sensitivity to local anesthetics or opioids were excluded from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • El-Galaa Hospital

    Cairo

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Analgesia in Labor, a Prospective Parallel Single Blind Study to Compare Regional Analgesia (Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia (CSE), Epidural Analgesia (E)) and Intravenous (IV) Pethidine Analgesia

To compare combined spinal epidural, epidural and IV pethidine analgesia and their effects on the mother, fetus, newborn and the course of labor.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective parallel single blind study, which was approved by the institutional review board of El-Galaa Teaching Hospital, and the research and ethics committee of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University.

This hospital per si was selected for the study because it is large hospital that could provide the study with a diverse population. It has a population of various socio-economic statuses. This would provide the study with a sample of patients with a wide range of characteristics.

Sixty full-term, ASA physical status I or II nulliparous women in active labor with cervical dilatation of 5 cm and cephalic presenting fetus were randomly assigned to one of five groups after providing informed consent.

  • Group 1: received CSE analgesia, where 25 µg of fentanyl was injected intrathecally and a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8% lidocaine were then injected upon request.
  • Group 2: received CSE analgesia, where 25 µg of fentanyl was injected intrathecally and a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.0625-0.25% bupivacaine were then injected upon request.
  • Group 3: received 50µg of E fentanyl analgesia which was injected intrathecally and a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was administered through the catheter, followed by lidocaine E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8% upon request.
  • Group 4: received analgesia, where 50 µg of E fentanyl were injected intrathecally and a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine was administered through the catheter, followed by E bupivacaine top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.125-0.25% upon request.
  • Group 5: 50 mg of IV pethidine was administered as a loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg/kg, with a total maximum limit of 130 mg.

Study Subjects Excluding Criteria Patients who had diabetes mellitus, neurological disease, pre-eclampsia, or patients who had received parenteral analgesics or patients with contraindication to E or spinal analgesia, or patients with sensitivity to local anesthetics or opioids were excluded from the study.

Study Method All the recruited subjects were screened before the administration of any analgesia. Systolic and diastolic pressures, heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) were monitored. Fetal heart rate (FHR) was monitored using an external cardiotocograph monitor (Partoconter NST Nihon Kohden).

For the E groups, the degree of motor block was assessed according to a modified Bromage scale (Grade I: free movement of legs and feet; Grade II: just able to flex knees with free movement of feet; Grade III: unable to flex knees, but with free movements of feet; Grade IV: unable to move legs or feet) before administration of E analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after the first dose. The start of the analgesia was regarded as time 0. The duration of analgesia was taken as the time from the beginning of analgesic injection (time 0) to the time of request for additional analgesia.

The number of analgesic top-ups was recorded and the intervals between each top-up, in addition to the volume and concentration of the drug injected.

The Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst pain imaginable) was measured before administration of analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after administration of each analgesic dose until the delivery of the baby.

Maternal arterial pressures, heart rate, SpO2, and FHR were noted before the analgesia was given, and afterwards every 30 minutes until delivery.

Maternal temperature was recorded before starting the analgesic regimen and thereafter every hour till the end of labor. Fever was defined as temperature of ≥ 38˚C.

The duration of each stage of labor together with the mode of delivery were recorded.

The total volume of drug injected, total concentration of drug injected, 1-min and 5-min APGAR scores, weight of the neonate were recorded.

Any experienced drug related problem by any of the recruited subjects were recorded.

Being tested
Epidura, CSE & IV
Keywords
Labor, Epidural, Combined spinal epidural, pethidine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epidura, CSE & IVOther

    Gp 1: received CSE analgesia: 25µg of fentanyl \& a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8% lidocaine were then injected.

    Gp 2: received CSE analgesia: 25µg of fentanyl \& a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine was injected epidurally. E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.0625-0.25% bupivacaine were then injected.

    Gp 3: received 50µg of E fentanyl analgesia \& a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine was administered, followed by lidocaine E top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.5-0.8%.

    Gp 4: received analgesia: 50µg of E fentanyl \& a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine was administered, followed by E bupivacaine top-ups of 5-10 ml of 0.125-0.25%.

    Gp 5: 50mg of IV pethidine was administered as loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg/kg.

Study groups in NCT01290289
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Epidura, combined spinal epidura & IVActive comparatorGp 1: received CSE analgesia, 25µg of fentanyl injected intrathecally \& a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine injected epidurally. Gp 2: received CSE analgesia, 25µg of fentanyl injected intrathecally \& a bolus of 10 ml of 0.0625% bupivacaine injected epidurally. Gp 3: received 50µg of E fentanyl analgesia, injected intrathecally \& a bolus of 10 ml of 0.5% lidocaine, followed by lidocaine E top-ups. Gp 4: received 50µg of E fentanyl injected intrathecally and a bolus dose of 10 ml of 0.125% bupivacaine, followed by E bupivacaine top-ups. Gp 5: 50mg of IV pethidine was administered as a loading dose, followed by 0.5 mg/kg.
Receives: Other: Epidura, CSE & IV

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analogue Scale to assess pain control

    The Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS) (0 mm = no pain, 100 mm = worst pain imaginable) was measured before administration of analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after administration of each analgesic dose until the delivery of the baby.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. The degree of motor block

    The degree of motor block was assessed according to a modified Bromage scale (Grade I: free movement of legs and feet; Grade II: just able to flex knees with free movement of feet; Grade III: unable to flex knees, but with free movements of feet; Grade IV: unable to move legs or feet) before administration of E analgesia, 10 and 30 minutes after the first dose. The start of the analgesia was regarded as time 0. The duration of analgesia was taken as the time from the beginning of analgesic injection (time 0) to the time of request for additional analgesia.

    Measured: 24 hours

  2. Number of top-ups

    The number of analgesic top-ups was recorded and the intervals between each top-up, in addition to the volume and concentration of the drug injected.

    Measured: 24 hours

  3. Adverse effects

    Any experienced drug related problem by any of the recruited subjects were recorded.

    Measured: 24 hours

  4. Labour Duration

    The duration of each stage of labor together with the mode of delivery were recorded.

    Measured: 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2009
  3. Primary completionDec 2010
  4. Study completionFeb 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01290289
Sponsor's protocol ID
6111972
Status last verified
Jul 2009
First submitted
4 Feb 2011
Last updated
7 Feb 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Epidura, CSE & IV in people with Labor Active Dilated Cm, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Feb 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analogue Scale to assess pain control (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Feb 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in