Arthroplasty Replacement KneePatellaNCT01290627
In Vivo Determination of 3D Patellofemoral Mechanics
An observational study of Arthroplasty Replacement Knee and Knee Prosthesis, run by The University of Tennessee, Knoxville at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will analyze the tibio-femoral and patellofemoral (motion) and mechanics (forces) of participants having a normal knee or a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using one or two different (TKA) devices Low Contract Stress (LCS) Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthroplasty Replacement Knee, Knee Prosthesis
- What is being tested?
- Subjects implanted with DePuy LCS PS RP TKA and Subjects implanted with DePuy Sigma PS RP TKA
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2011to Sep 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Subjects recruited from patients chosen from practice of Dr.'s Dennis and Haas at Colorado Joint Replacement for implanted knee, having either one of the two kinds of implants specified.
Who may be able to join
- Patients must be at least six months post-operative.
- Potential subjects will have a body weight of less than 250 lbs.
- Candidates must have an AKS score >70 post-operatively.
- Patients must have passive flexion of at least 100.
- Implanted group must have either an LCS PS RP TKA, having an anatomical patella, or Sigma PS RP TKA; or normal knee group must have normal knee.
- Must be willing to sign both Informed Consent and HIPAA forms.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant females.
- Subjects not meeting study requirements.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
Colorado Joint Replacement
Denver, Colorado, 80210
Porter Adventist Hospital
Denver, Colorado, 80210
Perkins Hall
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996
Science and Engineering Research Facility
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996
About this study
This study will analyze the tibio-femoral and patellofemoral (motion) and mechanics (forces) of participants having a normal knee or a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using one or two different (TKA) devices Low Contract Stress (LCS) Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). All knees will be analyzed using an image matching technique that will convert a two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopic image into a three-dimensional (3D) image. In conjunction with the fluoroscopic analysis, electromyography (EMG) data, and ground reaction force (GRF) data will all be allow for a complete analysis of the knee joints. These results will help the orthopaedic community better understand knee motion so they can improve testing on existing implants and develop future implants that will further enhance patients' lives.
- Conditions
- Arthroplasty Replacement Knee, Knee Prosthesis
- Being tested
- Subjects implanted with DePuy LCS PS RP TKA, Subjects implanted with DePuy Sigma PS RP TKA
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Subjects implanted with DePuy LCS PS RP TKADevice
Subjects implanted with DePuy Low Contact Stress (LCS) Poster Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
Subjects implanted with DePuy Sigma PS RP TKADevice
Subjects implanted with a DePuy Sigma Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Knee Prosthesis LCS PS RP TKA | Subjects implanted with DePuy Low Contact Stress (LCS) Poster Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Receives: Device: Subjects implanted with DePuy LCS PS RP TKA | |
| Knee Prosthesis Sigma PS RP TKA | Subjects implanted with a DePuy Sigma Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Receives: Device: Subjects implanted with DePuy Sigma PS RP TKA | |
| Control | Subjects with normal knees |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patella Flexion With Respect to Femur
Full extension to maximum flexion. Degrees of flexion analyzed for participants with and without implants.
Measured: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
Patella Rotation With Respect to Femur
Patellar rotation from full extension to maximum flexion for subjects with and without implants. A positive measurement of patellar rotation refers to positive flexion of the patella about the medial-lateral axis, where the patella component rotates so that the top of the patella rotates toward the femur and the bottom rotates away. Conversely, a negative measurement refers to negative flexion of the patella about this axis, where the patellar component rotates so that the top of the patella moves away from the femur and the bottom moves towards.
Measured: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
Patella Tilt With Respect to Femur
full extension to maximum flexion for participants with and without implants.
Measured: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
Normalized Medial Patella Contact Point Translation
full extension to maximum flexion for participants with and without implants. Position of the patellar contact point was determined by locating the closest point to the femur on the patella throughout flexion. There are 2 patello-femoral contact points: a point on the medial aspect of the patella and a point on the lateral aspect of the patella. Throughout flexion, the medial contact point generally moves closer to the top of the patella (hence the positive value for the results). The translation of this contact point is normalized to report a ratio between -1 and 1. In other words, the distance the point has traveled compared to the total height of the patella. For example, if the patella is 8 cm in height and the point travels approximately 2 cm upwards during flexion, the value would be reported as +2/8 = +0.25. Definition of normalized: "multiply (a series, function, or item of data) by a factor that makes the norm or some associated quantity such as an integral equal
Measured: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
Normalized Lateral Patella Contact Point Translation
full extension to maximum flexion for participants with and without implants. Position of patellar contact point was determined by locating closest point to femur on patella throughout flexion. There are 2 patello-femoral contact points: 1 point on the medial aspect of the patella and 1 point on the lateral aspect of the patella. Throughout flexion, lateral contact point generally moves closer to the top of the patella (hence, the positive value for the results). The translation of this contact point is normalized to report a ratio between -1 and 1. The distance the point has traveled compared to the total height of the patella. For example, if the patella is 8 cm in height and the point travels approximately 2 cm upwards during flexion, the value would be reported as +2/8 = +0.25. Definition of normalized: "multiply (a series, function, or item of data) by a factor that makes the norm or some associated quantity such as an integral equal to a desired value (usually 1)."
Measured: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2011
- Primary completionSep 2011
- Study completionSep 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Arthroplasty Replacement KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- DePuy Orthopaedics
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Richard Komistek, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
- Investigators
- Richard D. Komistek, Ph D, Principal investigator, The University of TennesseeDouglas Dennis, MD, Principal investigator, Colorado Joint Replacement, Porter Adventist Hosp
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01290627
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10035/IIS-000126
- Other IDs
- R011373372
- Acronym
- Patella
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 3 Feb 2011
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- In Vivo Determination of 3D Patellofemoral Mechanics
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01290627
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Patella / 10035/IIS-000126
- Conditions
- Arthroplasty Replacement Knee, Knee Prosthesis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- DePuy Orthopaedics
- Study start
- Feb 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jan 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will analyze the tibio-femoral and patellofemoral (motion) and mechanics (forces) of participants having a normal knee or a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using one or two different (TKA) devices Low Contract Stress (LCS) Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). All knees will be analyzed using an image matching technique that will convert a two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopic image into a three-dimensional (3D) image. In conjunction with the fluoroscopic analysis, electromyography (EMG) data, and ground reaction force (GRF) data will all be allow for a complete analysis of the knee joints. These results will help the orthopaedic community better understand knee motion so they can improve testing on existing implants and develop future implants that will further enhance patients' lives.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Knee Prosthesis LCS PS RP TKA | – | Device: Subjects implanted with DePuy LCS PS RP TKASubjects implanted with DePuy Low Contact Stress (LCS) Poster Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) |
| Knee Prosthesis Sigma PS RP TKA | – | Device: Subjects implanted with DePuy Sigma PS RP TKASubjects implanted with a DePuy Sigma Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) |
| Control | – | –Subjects with normal knees |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Subjects recruited from patients chosen from practice of Dr.'s Dennis and Haas at Colorado Joint Replacement for implanted knee, having either one of the two kinds of implants specified.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients must be at least six months post-operative.
- Potential subjects will have a body weight of less than 250 lbs.
- Candidates must have an AKS score >70 post-operatively.
- Patients must have passive flexion of at least 100.
- Implanted group must have either an LCS PS RP TKA, having an anatomical patella, or Sigma PS RP TKA; or normal knee group must have normal knee.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant females.
- Subjects not meeting study requirements.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects implanted with DePuy LCS PS RP TKASubjects implanted with DePuy Low Contact Stress (LCS) Poster Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) | Device | Knee Prosthesis LCS PS RP TKA |
| Subjects implanted with DePuy Sigma PS RP TKASubjects implanted with a DePuy Sigma Posterior Stabilizing (PS) Rotating Platform (RP) Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) | Device | Knee Prosthesis Sigma PS RP TKA |
Primary outcome
Patella Flexion With Respect to Femur
Time frame: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
Full extension to maximum flexion. Degrees of flexion analyzed for participants with and without implants.
Patella Rotation With Respect to Femur
Time frame: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
Patellar rotation from full extension to maximum flexion for subjects with and without implants. A positive measurement of patellar rotation refers to positive flexion of the patella about the medial-lateral axis, where the patella component rotates so that the top of the patella rotates toward the femur and the bottom rotates away. Conversely, a negative measurement refers to negative flexion of the patella about this axis, where the patellar component rotates so that the top of the patella moves away from the femur and the bottom moves towards.
Patella Tilt With Respect to Femur
Time frame: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
full extension to maximum flexion for participants with and without implants.
Normalized Medial Patella Contact Point Translation
Time frame: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
full extension to maximum flexion for participants with and without implants. Position of the patellar contact point was determined by locating the closest point to the femur on the patella throughout flexion. There are 2 patello-femoral contact points: a point on the medial aspect of the patella and a point on the lateral aspect of the patella. Throughout flexion, the medial contact point generally moves closer to the top of the patella (hence the positive value for the results). The translation of this contact point is normalized to report a ratio between -1 and 1. In other words, the distance the point has traveled compared to the total height of the patella. For example, if the patella is 8 cm in height and the point travels approximately 2 cm upwards during flexion, the value would be reported as +2/8 = +0.25. Definition of normalized: "multiply (a series, function, or item of data) by a factor that makes the norm or some associated quantity such as an integral equal
Normalized Lateral Patella Contact Point Translation
Time frame: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.
full extension to maximum flexion for participants with and without implants. Position of patellar contact point was determined by locating closest point to femur on patella throughout flexion. There are 2 patello-femoral contact points: 1 point on the medial aspect of the patella and 1 point on the lateral aspect of the patella. Throughout flexion, lateral contact point generally moves closer to the top of the patella (hence, the positive value for the results). The translation of this contact point is normalized to report a ratio between -1 and 1. The distance the point has traveled compared to the total height of the patella. For example, if the patella is 8 cm in height and the point travels approximately 2 cm upwards during flexion, the value would be reported as +2/8 = +0.25. Definition of normalized: "multiply (a series, function, or item of data) by a factor that makes the norm or some associated quantity such as an integral equal to a desired value (usually 1)."
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Arthroplasty Replacement Knee
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Recruiting
SII Levels Following iPACK Block With Adductor Canal Block in Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Persona SoluTion PPS Femur PMCF
Rhematoid Arthritis, Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Recruiting
ACB and iPACK Blocks With Intravenous Dexamethasone and Perineural Dexmedetomidine in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Richard D. Komistek, Ph D principal investigator
The University of Tennessee
Douglas Dennis, MD principal investigator
Colorado Joint Replacement, Porter Adventist Hosp
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Arthroplasty Replacement Knee and Knee Prosthesis, run by The University of Tennessee, Knoxville at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patella Flexion With Respect to Femur (time frame: Average post-operative time for LCS-PS group was 56 months. Average post-operative time for PS RP group was 55.7 months.). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2019.