Prostatic HyperplasiaPhase 4CONDUCTNCT01294592
Comparative Efficacy of Dutasteride Plus Tamulosin With Lifestyle Advice Versus Watchful Waiting Plus Lifestyle Advice in the Management of Treatment naïve Men With Moderately Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Enlargement
A Phase 4 study testing Dutasteride plus tamsulosin and tamsulosin in people with Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 80 sites in 8 countries.
Trial summary
Study FDC114615 is a two year, multi-centre, randomised, open-label trial to assess the efficacy of Dutasteride plus tamsulosin when compared to the standard practice of watchful waiting, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin in treatment naive men with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostatic Hyperplasia
- What is being tested?
- Dutasteride plus tamsulosin and tamsulosin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 742 participants
- Where
- 80 sitesin 8 countries
- Study dates
- 22 Dec 2010to 17 Oct 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study:
- Total serum PSA >10.0 ng/mL at Visit 1 (screening).
- History or evidence of prostate cancer (e.g. positive biopsy or ultrasound within the previous 6 months, suspicious DRE and/or rising PSA).
- Excluded medication and therapies Current or any prior use of the following prohibited medications
- a 5α-reductase inhibitor (finasteride or dutasteride),
- anti-cholinergics (e.g. oxybutynin, propantheline)
Show all 33Show fewer
- an alpha-adrenoreceptor blocker (i.e. indoramin, prazosin, terazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin and doxazosin) for BPH or Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)
- any drugs with anti-androgenic properties (e.g. spironolactone, flutamide, bicalutamide, cimetidine, ketoconazole, progestational agents) within the previous 6 months.
- any drugs noted for gynaecomastia effects, or could affect prostate volume, within 6 months of the Visit 1
- any investigational or marketed study drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives, (whichever is longer), preceding the first dose of study treatment.
- Current use of:
- any alpha-adrenoreceptor blocker (i.e. indoramin, prazosin, terazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin and doxazosin)
- anabolic steroids.
- drugs known or thought to have an interaction with tamsulosin, e.g. cimetidine and warfarin.
- Use of phytotherapy for BPH within 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 (screening) and/or predicted to need phytotherapy during the study.
- Have a known (immediate or delayed) hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to the study medication or excipients that, in the opinion of the Investigator or GlaxoSmithKline contraindicates their participation.
- Recent Medical Procedures
- Previous prostatic surgery (including TURP, balloon dilatation, thermotherapy and stent replacement) or other invasive or minimally invasive procedures to treat BPH.
- History of flexible/rigid cystoscopy or other instrumentation of the urethra within 7 days prior to Visit 1 (screening). Catheterisation (<10F) is acceptable with no time restriction.
- Medical history
- History of AUR within 3 months prior to Visit 1 (screening).
- Post-void residual volume >250 mL (suprapubic ultrasound) at Visit 1 (screening)..
- Any causes other than BPH, which may in the judgement of the investigator, result in urinary symptoms or changes in flow rate (e.g. neurogenic bladder, bladder neck contracture, urethral stricture, bladder malignancy, acute or chronic prostatitis, or acute or chronic urinary tract infections).
- History of 'first dose' hypotensive episode on initiation of alpha-1-adrenoreceptor antagonist therapy for hypertension.
- History of postural hypotension, dizziness, vertigo or any other signs and symptoms of orthostasis, which in the opinion of the investigator could be exacerbated by tamsulosin and result in putting the subject at risk of injury.
- History of breast cancer or clinical breast examination finding of unclear origin or suggestive of malignancy.
- History of hepatic impairment or abnormal liver function tests at Visit 1 (screening). (defined as Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alkaline phosphatase >2 times the Upper limit of normal (ULN) , or total bilirubin >1.5 times the ULN, (unless associated with predominantly indirect bilirubin elevation or Gilbert's syndrome).
- History of renal insufficiency, or serum creatinine >1.5 times the upper limit of normal at Visit 1 (screening)..
- Prior history of malignancies (other than basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) within the past 5 years. Subjects who have had no evidence of the malignancy for ≥5 years are eligible.
- History of any illness (including psychiatric) that in the opinion of the investigator might confound the results of the study or poses additional risk to the subject.
- Any unstable, serious co-existing medical condition(s) including, but not limited to, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, unstable angina, cardiac arrhythmias, clinically evident congestive heart failure, or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to Screening visit; uncontrolled diabetes or peptic ulcer disease which is uncontrolled by medical management.
- History or current evidence of drug or alcohol abuse within the previous 12 months.
- Any serious and/or unstable pre-existing medical, psychiatric disorder or other conditions that could interfere with subject's safety, obtaining informed consent or compliance to the study procedures, in the opinion of the Investigator or GSK Medical Monitor.
Trial locations and contacts
80 sites in 8 countries.
80 sites in 8 countries
France15 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aigrefeuille-sur-Maine, 44140
GSK Investigational Site
Angers, 49000
GSK Investigational Site
Angers, 49933
GSK Investigational Site
Corsept, 44560
GSK Investigational Site
La Montagne, 44620
GSK Investigational Site
La Rochelle, 17000
GSK Investigational Site
Laval, 53000
GSK Investigational Site
Le Temple-de-Bretagne, 44360
GSK Investigational Site
Mûrs-Erigné, 49610
GSK Investigational Site
Nantes, 44300
GSK Investigational Site
Nieul-sur-Mer, 17137
GSK Investigational Site
Sautron, 44880
GSK Investigational Site
Thouars, 79100
GSK Investigational Site
Tiercé, 49125
GSK Investigational Site
Vihiers, 49310
Spain15 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Alava, 01004
GSK Investigational Site
Barcelona, 8907
GSK Investigational Site
Córdoba, 14004
GSK Investigational Site
Coslada, 28822
GSK Investigational Site
Fuenlabrada (Madrid), 28942
GSK Investigational Site
Galdakano, 48960
GSK Investigational Site
Getafe, 28905
GSK Investigational Site
Málaga, 29010
GSK Investigational Site
Marbella, 29600
GSK Investigational Site
Mendaro, Guipuzcoa, 20850
GSK Investigational Site
Murcia, 30008
GSK Investigational Site
Pamplona, 31008
GSK Investigational Site
San Sebastián, 20014
GSK Investigational Site
Valencia, 46010
GSK Investigational Site
Valladolid, 47012
Germany13 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aichach, Bavaria, 86551
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10249
GSK Investigational Site
Buchholz, Lower Saxony, 21244
GSK Investigational Site
Eisleben Lutherstadt, 06295
GSK Investigational Site
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45130
GSK Investigational Site
Hagenow, Brandenburg, 19230
GSK Investigational Site
Hettstedt, Saxony-Anhalt, 06333
GSK Investigational Site
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24143
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04109
GSK Investigational Site
Marburg, Hesse, 35039
GSK Investigational Site
Nuremberg, Bavaria, 90441
GSK Investigational Site
Oranienburg, Brandenburg, 16515
GSK Investigational Site
Strausberg, Brandenburg, 15344
Greece10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Argos, 21200
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 10552
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 115 22
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 11527
GSK Investigational Site
Athens, 151 26
GSK Investigational Site
Larissa, 41110
GSK Investigational Site
Pátrai, 265 04
GSK Investigational Site
Rhodes, 85100
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 546 42
GSK Investigational Site
Thessaloniki, 564 29
Italy10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Avellino, Campania, 83100
GSK Investigational Site
Cagliari, Sardinia, 09134
GSK Investigational Site
Foggia, Apulia, 71100
GSK Investigational Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20132
GSK Investigational Site
Naples, Campania, 80131
GSK Investigational Site
Pisa, Tuscany, 56124
GSK Investigational Site
Rome, Lazio, 00161
GSK Investigational Site
San Fermo Della Battaglia (CO), Lombardy, 22020
GSK Investigational Site
Turin, Piedmont, 10126
GSK Investigational Site
Vasto (CH), Abruzzo, 66054
United Kingdom8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bath, BA1 3NG
GSK Investigational Site
Bristol, BS2 8HW
GSK Investigational Site
Broadway, Fleetwood, FY7 8GU
GSK Investigational Site
Chadderton, Oldham, OL9 0LH
GSK Investigational Site
Chalfont St Giles, Buckinghamshire, HP8 4QG
GSK Investigational Site
Glasgow, G51 4TF
GSK Investigational Site
High Heaton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
GSK Investigational Site
Sandbach, Cheshire, CW11 1EQ
Netherlands7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Doetinchem, 7009 BL
GSK Investigational Site
Maarssen, 3607 KN
GSK Investigational Site
Sneek, 8601 ZK
GSK Investigational Site
The Hague, 2582 LJ
GSK Investigational Site
Voerendaal, 6367 ED
GSK Investigational Site
Wildervank, 9648 BE
GSK Investigational Site
Winterswijk, 7101 BN
Romania2 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Arad, 310175
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest
About this study
Official title: Comparative Efficacy of DuodartTM Versus Watchful Waiting With Step-up Therapy to Tamsulosin in the Management of Treatment naïve Men With Symptomatic BPH
Study FDC114615 is a two year, multi-centre, randomised, open-label trial to assess the efficacy of Dutasteride plus tamsulosin when compared to the standard practice of watchful waiting, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin in treatment naive men with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
Once consented, each subject will undergo screening procedures to ensure the prostate volume and post void residual are within eligible range. If all entry criteria are met, subjects will be randomised (1:1) to receive Dutasteride plus tamsulosin with lifestyle advice or watchful waiting, with lifestyle advice, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin. Escalation will be initiated when no improvement from baseline is scored using the International Prostate Symptom Score (version 2) (IPSS) questionnaire.
After randomisation, the subjects return to site at one month, then every 13 weeks until two years of treatment is complete or they are withdrawn. Key assessments, such as Adverse Events (AE's) and concomitant medication monitoring and completion of the quality of life questionnaires are performed at each visit and the data recorded.
Read the detailed description
This will be a European, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group study. The aim of the study is to investigate whether Dutasteride plus Tamulson treatment with lifestyle advice is more effective than watchful waiting treatment plus lifestyle advice plus step-up therapy with tamsulosin for improvement of symptoms and Acte Urinary Retention (AUR) and BPH-related prostatic surgery, in older men (≥50 yrs), with moderate symptoms of BPH (IPSS 8-19), enlarged prostates (≥30cc) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≥1.5ng/mL.
Data from all participating centres will be pooled prior to analysis. Investigative centres will be pooled a priori into clusters based on geographic location; these clusters may be used in analyses to adjust for site effects. Clusters will be defined once all investigative centres have been identified and randomisation has been completed.
Subjects will be screened for inclusion into the study and eligible subjects will be randomised by investigative centre. Subjects will be allocated to one of two treatment groups, according to a pre-determined randomisation schedule (in a 1:1 ratio):
- Dutasteride plus tamsulosin once daily plus lifestyle advice.
- Watchful waiting plus lifestyle advice. Escalation to tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily at any visit from Week 4 if any IPSS measurement shows no improvement or worsening from baseline. At any study visit, if the IPSS is the same or greater than the baseline value for that subject, tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily will be initiated. If tamsulosin is initiated, it will be continued for the remainder of the study unless the subject elects to withdraw from the study. Initiation of tamsulosin will be recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF.) Subjects will self-administer study medication once daily for up to 104 weeks, (up to 100 weeks for those on tamsulosin). Subjects will return to the clinic at 4 weeks post-randomisation and then at 13-week intervals post-randomisation during the 2-year treatment period (i.e. at 4, 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91 and 104 weeks) for the assessments listed as in Appendix 1 Time and Events Schedule.
Approximately 760, treatment naive men with symptomatic BPH will be randomised into the study in order to achieve at least 592 evaluable subjects. 380 into the Dutasteride plus tamsulosin with lifestyle advice arm and 380 into the watchful waiting plus lifestyle advice arm.
Treatment naïve is defined as a man that has recently been diagnoses with BPH whom has received no prescribed therapeutic treatment. For example, medicines such as 5 α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) or invasive procedures such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) prescribed to directly treat the BPH symptoms are considered therapeutic treatments. As per the entry criteria, phytotherapy is allowed unless it was performed less than two weeks prior to the screening visit.
The anticipated recruitment period will be approximately 6 months. The study will be conducted in approximately 8 countries within Europe.
- Conditions
- Prostatic Hyperplasia
- Being tested
- Dutasteride plus tamsulosin, tamsulosin
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Hyperplasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dutasteride plus tamsulosinDrug
Take 1 capsule daily
tamsulosinDrug
Take 1 capsule daily when escalation criteria met
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dutasteride plus tamsulosin | Active comparator | Dutasteride plus tamsulosin arm + lifestyle advice Receives: Drug: Dutasteride plus tamsulosin |
| Watchful waiting with escalation to tamsulosin | Experimental | Watchful waiting with escalation to tamsulosin Receives: Drug: tamsulosin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach
The IPSS questionnaire is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire designed to quantify the following urinary symptoms: Question 1 (Q1), incomplete emptying; Q2, frequency; Q3, intermittency; Q4, urgency; Q5, weak stream; Q6, straining; Q7, nocturia. It has an additional, independent eighth question to assess change in BPH-related health status (BHS) and quality of life. BHS scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "delighted" and 6 indicates "terrible." The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). Change from Baseline in IPSS total score was calculated as the Month 24 value minus the Baseline value. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.
Measured: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Secondary outcomes (10)
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Symptom improvement was assessed using IPSS categorical changes from Baseline. Change from Baseline categories were summarized by treatment group using five improvement levels: >=1 point through >=5 points. IPSS percent change from Baseline was summarized using seven improvement levels: >0 percent, >=10 percent, >=20 percent, >=25 percent, >=30 percent, >=40 percent, and >=50 percent. Change in IPSS from Baseline was analysed using the LOCF method and is summarized for the following categories: >=2 points, >=3 points, and percent change >=25. The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35).
Measured: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Change From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
The BII is a 4-item questionnaire covering physical discomfort, worry, bother, and impact on usual activities, with a minimum score of 0 (best) and a maximum score (worst) of 13 points. Individual missing questionnaire responses were imputed, as applicable. Change from Baseline in the BII score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Change From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Each participant was asked the following question "If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?". This response was rated from 0 ("delighted") to 6 ("terrible"). Change from Baseline in the BHS score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted means from the general linear model: Change from Baseline =Treatment + Cluster + Baseline Value. Baseline is defined as the Visit 2 value if it exists; otherwise, it is the latest of all Screening values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.
Measured: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Number of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH
The number of participants with the first occurrence of clinical progression (CP) of BPH occurring on or after the randomization date are summarized by treatment and year. Time is based on the date of the first-occurring CP event, and is relative to the randomization date. CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom deterioration by IPSS >=3 points from Baseline (Visit 2); acute urinary retention related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single >=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value >=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). For components that required multiple episodes, the first of the multiple episodes was utilized in terms of timing.
Measured: Up to 2 years
Number of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH
CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom progression (symptom deterioration by IPSS >=3 points from Baseline [Visit 2]); acute urinary retention (AUR) related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single >=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value >=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). The number of participants with CP of BPH, the number of participants with the indicated first-occurring component of CP of BPH, the number of participants with two simultaneously first-occurring components ("Tied for first component"), and the number of participants with multiple first-occurring components were summarized by treatment group.
Measured: Up to Month 24
Number of Participants Who Had Any BPH-related Surgery, Who Had the Indicated Type of Surgery, Who Had 2 BPH-related Surgeries, and Who Had >=3 BPH-related Surgeries
BPH-related surgery was summarized for events occurring on or after the date of randomization. The number of participants who had any BPH-related surgery, the indicated type of surgery, and multiple surgeries was summarized by treatment. Type of surgery data (cystoscopy, transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP], and prostatectomy) are presented in terms of the first-occurring BPH-related surgery after randomization. It was possible for a single participant to have multiple surgeries.
Measured: Up to Month 24
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 1 was: "Overall, how satisfied are you with the treatment and its effect on your urinary problems?" There were seven possible responses, including: "very satisfied," "satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied." Response categories were created by grouping together "very satisfied," "satisfied," and "somewhat satisfied" responses into the category of "Any Satisfaction (AS)," and separately grouping "neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied" responses into the category of "Neutral or Any Dissatisfaction (N/AD)." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.
Measured: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 2 was: "Would you ask your doctor for the treatment you received in this study?" There were three possible responses, including: "Yes," "No," and "Not sure." Response categories included "Yes" and "No or Not Sure," created by grouping together "No" and "Not sure." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.
Measured: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Exposure to Study Drug
Study drug exposure (days) = treatment stop date - treatment start date + 1. Participants in the Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes subgroup could have been escalated to study drug at any time during the study. Therefore, it is possible that participants were exposed to tamsulosin for a shorter length of time than participants in the dutasteride plus tamsulosin group.
Measured: Up to 2 years
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization
A post-randomization adverse event is defined as an event with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scientific judgment was exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate in other situations. Refer to the general non-serious AE/SAE module for a list of non-serious AEs (occurring at a frequency threshold of >=5%) and SAEs.
Measured: Up to 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Study start22 Dec 2010
- Primary completion17 Oct 2013
- Study completion17 Oct 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Prostatic HyperplasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 742 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01294592
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 114615
- Acronym
- CONDUCT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2011
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Efficacy of DuodartTM Versus Watchful Waiting With Step-up Therapy to Tamsulosin in the Management of Treatment naïve Men With Symptomatic BPH
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01294592
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CONDUCT / 114615
- Conditions
- Prostatic Hyperplasia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 742 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 22 Dec 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Oct 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 16 Jun 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Study FDC114615 is a two year, multi-centre, randomised, open-label trial to assess the efficacy of Dutasteride plus tamsulosin when compared to the standard practice of watchful waiting, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin in treatment naive men with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH).
Once consented, each subject will undergo screening procedures to ensure the prostate volume and post void residual are within eligible range. If all entry criteria are met, subjects will be randomised (1:1) to receive Dutasteride plus tamsulosin with lifestyle advice or watchful waiting, with lifestyle advice, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin. Escalation will be initiated when no improvement from baseline is scored using the International Prostate Symptom Score (version 2) (IPSS) questionnaire.
After randomisation, the subjects return to site at one month, then every 13 weeks until two years of treatment is complete or they are withdrawn. Key assessments, such as Adverse Events (AE's) and concomitant medication monitoring and completion of the quality of life questionnaires are performed at each visit and the data recorded.
Detailed description
This will be a European, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel group study. The aim of the study is to investigate whether Dutasteride plus Tamulson treatment with lifestyle advice is more effective than watchful waiting treatment plus lifestyle advice plus step-up therapy with tamsulosin for improvement of symptoms and Acte Urinary Retention (AUR) and BPH-related prostatic surgery, in older men (≥50 yrs), with moderate symptoms of BPH (IPSS 8-19), enlarged prostates (≥30cc) and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ≥1.5ng/mL.
Data from all participating centres will be pooled prior to analysis. Investigative centres will be pooled a priori into clusters based on geographic location; these clusters may be used in analyses to adjust for site effects. Clusters will be defined once all investigative centres have been identified and randomisation has been completed.
Subjects will be screened for inclusion into the study and eligible subjects will be randomised by investigative centre. Subjects will be allocated to one of two treatment groups, according to a pre-determined randomisation schedule (in a 1:1 ratio):
- Dutasteride plus tamsulosin once daily plus lifestyle advice.
- Watchful waiting plus lifestyle advice. Escalation to tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily at any visit from Week 4 if any IPSS measurement shows no improvement or worsening from baseline. At any study visit, if the IPSS is the same or greater than the baseline value for that subject, tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily will be initiated. If tamsulosin is initiated, it will be continued for the remainder of the study unless the subject elects to withdraw from the study. Initiation of tamsulosin will be recorded in the electronic case report form (eCRF.) Subjects will self-administer study medication once daily for up to 104 weeks, (up to 100 weeks for those on tamsulosin). Subjects will return to the clinic at 4 weeks post-randomisation and then at 13-week intervals post-randomisation during the 2-year treatment period (i.e. at 4, 13, 26, 39, 52, 65, 78, 91 and 104 weeks) for the assessments listed as in Appendix 1 Time and Events Schedule.
Approximately 760, treatment naive men with symptomatic BPH will be randomised into the study in order to achieve at least 592 evaluable subjects. 380 into the Dutasteride plus tamsulosin with lifestyle advice arm and 380 into the watchful waiting plus lifestyle advice arm.
Treatment naïve is defined as a man that has recently been diagnoses with BPH whom has received no prescribed therapeutic treatment. For example, medicines such as 5 α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) or invasive procedures such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) prescribed to directly treat the BPH symptoms are considered therapeutic treatments. As per the entry criteria, phytotherapy is allowed unless it was performed less than two weeks prior to the screening visit.
The anticipated recruitment period will be approximately 6 months. The study will be conducted in approximately 8 countries within Europe.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dutasteride plus tamsulosin | Active comparator | Drug: Dutasteride plus tamsulosinDutasteride plus tamsulosin arm + lifestyle advice |
| Watchful waiting with escalation to tamsulosin | Experimental | Drug: tamsulosinWatchful waiting with escalation to tamsulosin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (33 listed)
- Subjects meeting any of the following criteria must not be enrolled in the study:
- Total serum PSA >10.0 ng/mL at Visit 1 (screening).
- History or evidence of prostate cancer (e.g. positive biopsy or ultrasound within the previous 6 months, suspicious DRE and/or rising PSA).
- Excluded medication and therapies Current or any prior use of the following prohibited medications
- a 5α-reductase inhibitor (finasteride or dutasteride),
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dutasteride plus tamsulosinTake 1 capsule daily | Drug | Dutasteride plus tamsulosin |
| tamsulosinTake 1 capsule daily when escalation criteria met | Drug | Watchful waiting with escalation to tamsulosin |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach
Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
The IPSS questionnaire is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire designed to quantify the following urinary symptoms: Question 1 (Q1), incomplete emptying; Q2, frequency; Q3, intermittency; Q4, urgency; Q5, weak stream; Q6, straining; Q7, nocturia. It has an additional, independent eighth question to assess change in BPH-related health status (BHS) and quality of life. BHS scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "delighted" and 6 indicates "terrible." The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum of the first 7 items) can range from 0 to 35: mild (0 to 7), moderate (8 to 19), or severe (20 to 35). Change from Baseline in IPSS total score was calculated as the Month 24 value minus the Baseline value. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study.
10 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Change From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Change From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Number of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Number of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH
Time frame: Up to Month 24
Number of Participants Who Had Any BPH-related Surgery, Who Had the Indicated Type of Surgery, Who Had 2 BPH-related Surgeries, and Who Had >=3 BPH-related Surgeries
Time frame: Up to Month 24
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach
Time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24
Exposure to Study Drug
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization
Time frame: Up to 2 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Related trials for Prostatic Hyperplasia
Recruiting
Clinical Study on Prostate Thermal Vapor Ablation Guided by MRI/TRUS Fusion Imaging
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Standard Versus Double Alpha Blockers Treatment for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Obstruction
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia)
RecruitingObservational study
ProVIDE Studies Post Exit Analysis
BPH With Symptomatic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Recruiting
Learning Curve of Tri-lobar HoLEP Versus En-bloc HoLEP
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With Outflow Obstruction
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Long-term Dutasteride Use on Perioperative Outcomes of HoLEP
Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
80 sites in 8 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Dutasteride plus tamsulosin and tamsulosin in people with Prostatic Hyperplasia, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 80 sites in 8 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 80 sites in France, Spain, Germany, Greece, Italy and 3 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Jun 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach (time frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2018.