AzTrials
AzTrials

Compensatory HyperhidrosisNCT01295853

T3 Versus T4 Sympathicotomy for Treatment of Primary Palmar Hyperhidrosis

A study testing t3 sympathicotomy and t4 symapthicotomy in people with Compensatory Hyperhidrosis and Recurrence, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

T3 versus T4 as a primary treatment for palmer hyperhydrosis and effect on postoperative compensatory hyperhydrosis Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 38 years
Conditions the study is for
Compensatory Hyperhidrosis, Recurrence
What is being tested?
t3 sympathicotomy and t4 symapthicotomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
136 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Feb 2008to Sep 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 38 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with primary palmar hyperhidrosis

Who cannot join

  • Patients with pleural adhesion
  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Local infection
  • Patients with certain anatomic anomalies

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Mansoura University Hospital

    Al Mansurah, Mansoura, 35111

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: T3 Versus T4 Sympathicotomy for Treatment of Primary Palmar Hyperhidrosis: a Prospective Randomized Study

T3 versus T4 as a primary treatment for palmer hyperhydrosis and effect on postoperative compensatory hyperhydrosis

Read the detailed description

Palmar hyperhidrosis (PH) is a benign sympathetic disorder that does not threaten health but affects daily activities, and may causes social withdrawal and even depression.1 An incidence of up to 1% has been reported by various series in the literature. The incidence in men and women is the same; however women are more likely to seek medical attention, which may explain the higher incidence of female patients in most surgical series [2,3]. Although various treatment options are available, including topical and systemic therapies, iontophoresis, regional nerve block, and botulinum toxin injection, each has its limitations 4. Video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathetic surgery is currently a worldwide accepted treatment of primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PH) 5. However, compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) is the most common and serious side effect that occurs in 30-70% of patients after T2 or T2-3 sympathectomy 6. For that now T2 sympathetic surgeries are seldom used in PH. Procedures that involve T3 or/and T4 sympathetic ganglions are widely accepted in many centers with favourable results.5 But some patients still present with certain degrees of CH or over dry hands after operation 7, 8.

The aim of this study is to compare the two methods for the treatment of PH, in which the sympathetic chain was transected in merely one segment, on the level of either the third or the fourth ribbed, defined as T3 sympathicotomy or T4 sympathicotomy, respectively. Emphasis was placed on the evaluation of the efficacy, side effects, and patients' satisfaction rate to these two types of surgical therapy.

Being tested
t3 sympathicotomy, t4 symapthicotomy
Medical subject headings
Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • t3 sympathicotomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called sympathectomy

    The sympathetic chain was identified at the level of the crossing of the third or fourth costal heads after dissection of the parietal pleura and completely divided about 1 cm wide at the upper margin of the rib. With assistance of anaesthesia team we reinflate the lung totally in sequence with removal of the trocars. The same procedure was performed on the opposite side and ablation of the sympathetic chain overlying the rib was performed bilaterally. At the end of surgery, a postoperative chest x-ray was routinely taken to rule out pneumothorax or hemothorax.

  • t4 symapthicotomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called sympathectomy

    The sympathetic chain was identified at the level of the crossing of the third or fourth costal heads after dissection of the parietal pleura and completely divided about 1 cm wide at the upper margin of the rib. With assistance of anaesthesia team we reinflate the lung totally in sequence with removal of the trocars. The same procedure was performed on the opposite side and ablation of the sympathetic chain overlying the rib was performed bilaterally. At the end of surgery, a postoperative chest x-ray was routinely taken to rule out pneumothorax or hemothorax.

Study groups in NCT01295853
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
t3 sympathicotomyActive comparatorThe sympathetic chain was identified at the level of the crossing of the third or fourth costal heads after dissection of the parietal pleura and completely divided about 1 cm wide at the upper margin of the rib. With assistance of anaesthesia team we reinflate the lung totally in sequence with removal of the trocars. The same procedure was performed on the opposite side and ablation of the sympathetic chain overlying the rib was performed bilaterally. At the end of surgery, a postoperative chest x-ray was routinely taken to rule out pneumothorax or hemothorax.
Receives: Procedure: t3 sympathicotomy; Procedure: t4 symapthicotomy
t4 sypathicotomyActive comparatorThe sympathetic chain was identified at the level of the crossing of the third or fourth costal heads after dissection of the parietal pleura and completely divided about 1 cm wide at the upper margin of the rib. With assistance of anaesthesia team we reinflate the lung totally in sequence with removal of the trocars. The same procedure was performed on the opposite side and ablation of the sympathetic chain overlying the rib was performed bilaterally. At the end of surgery, a postoperative chest x-ray was routinely taken to rule out pneumothorax or hemothorax.
Receives: Procedure: t4 symapthicotomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. postoperative compensatory hyperhidrosis

    CH remains the most common and distressing complication postsympathicotomy and many efforts have been made to ovoid its happening .Chou et al, 2 suggested that the underlying mechanism of CH may be due to a reflex response in sweating centre in hypothalamus but the exact mechanism beyond this phenomenon remain unclear.

    Measured: 2008-2010

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. improvement of planter sweating assessment of overdry hands early postoperative complication ( pneumothorax,,,,,) recurrance

    The recurrence rate in T4 group was occurring in 2 patients (2.8%), whereas one recurrence found in T3 group (1.5%).

    Kim et al 4, reported a 4.2 % of patients undergo T3 sympathicotomy complaining of gustatory sweating in a study carried out on 56 patients. However In our study there was no occurrence of postsympathicotomy gustatory hyperhidrosis and this may be due to the small numbers in our series.

    Measured: 2008-2010

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2008
  3. Primary completionSep 2010
  4. Study completionSep 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01295853
Sponsor's protocol ID
AMRO2345
Status last verified
Feb 2008
First submitted
14 Feb 2011
Last updated
15 Feb 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Chou SH, Kao EL, Lin CC, Chang YT, Huang MF. The importance of classification in sympathetic surgery and a proposed mechanism for compensatory hyperhidrosis: experience with 464 cases. Surg Endosc. 2006 Nov;20(11):1749-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0829-7. Epub 2006 Oct 5.

    PubMed 17024534

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing t3 sympathicotomy and t4 symapthicotomy in people with Compensatory Hyperhidrosis and Recurrence, run by Mansoura University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Feb 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

postoperative compensatory hyperhidrosis (time frame: 2008-2010). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01295853, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Feb 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in