AzTrials
AzTrials

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasePhase 2NCT01296841

Telemedicine To Provide Inflammatory Bowel Disease Outpatient Care

A Phase 2 study testing Collaborative Imaging in people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Ulcerative Colitis, run by VA Palo Alto Health Care System at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators hypothesize that outpatient clinical care of Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients may be provided using a new computerized system over standard network - called Collaborative Imaging - with similar patient experience compared to a conventional clinic visit. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Collaborative Imaging
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2009to Jun 2010
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult (> 18 years old) outpatient IBD patients in the Veterans Affairs medical system

Who cannot join

  • VA patients without IBD
  • Hospitalized IBD patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Veterans Affairs Palo Alto

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Pilot: Use of Telemedicine To Provide Inflammatory Bowel Disease Outpatient Care

The investigators hypothesize that outpatient clinical care of Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients may be provided using a new computerized system over standard network - called Collaborative Imaging - with similar patient experience compared to a conventional clinic visit.

Read the detailed description

Significant advances in gastroenterology have led the field to grow into a number of advanced subspecialties: inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), motility, therapeutic endoscopy, and transplant hepatology. Telemedicine, the application of information technology in support of health care delivery from a distance, has been employed with good success in various chronic conditions with excellent patient satisfaction.

Primary Aim: Our primary study endpoint was measuring patient clinical experience between two groups: A telemedicine remote clinic visit and a standard "in-house" visit.

Secondary Aim: To compare standard clinic metrics including clinic wait time, patient throughput, and appointment time between the two groups.

Being tested
Collaborative Imaging
Keywords
telemedicine, remote consultation, telehealth, ehealth, image archiving, inflammatory bowel disease
Medical subject headings
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Colitis, Ulcerative, Crohn Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Collaborative ImagingDevice

    Also called Telemedicine

    Hardware and software communication tools to provide clinical care from a distance.

Study groups in NCT01296841
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard encounterNo interventionStandard "in-house" clinical visit between patient and physician.
Telemedicine EncounterExperimentalRemote clinical appointment between patient and physician.
Receives: Device: Collaborative Imaging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Clinical Experience

    We used a validated Ware Specific Visit Questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with their clinic-visit encounter. This is a 14-item questionnaire on doctor-patient interaction including factors such as attention to complaints, technical skills, and personal manner (courtesy,and ease of appointment scheduling and is based on a five-point Likert scale (1 excellent to 5 poor). Patients completed the questionnaire at the time of the visit. The 14 item scores were individually scored and then averaged to provide the final overall value.

    Measured: Clinic Visit

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Clinic Appointment Duration

    The investigators recorded appointment duration in minutes.

    Measured: Clinic Visit

  2. Clinic Appointment Wait Time

    The investigators recorded clinic appointment wait time duration in minutes

    Measured: Clinic Visit

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2009
  3. Primary completionJun 2010
  4. Study completionJun 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01296841
Sponsor's protocol ID
TELEMED PA
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
15 Feb 2011
Last updated
3 Mar 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Telleman H, Burger TF, Mulder CJ. Evolution of gastroenterology training. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr 21;15(15):1793-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1793.

    PubMed 19370773
  • Fisher ES, Welch HG. The future of the Department of Veterans Affairs health care system. JAMA. 1995 Feb 22;273(8):651-5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 7844876
  • Dorsey ER, Deuel LM, Voss TS, Finnigan K, George BP, Eason S, Miller D, Reminick JI, Appler A, Polanowicz J, Viti L, Smith S, Joseph A, Biglan KM. Increasing access to specialty care: a pilot, randomized controlled trial of telemedicine for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2010 Aug 15;25(11):1652-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23145.

    PubMed 20533449
  • Verhoeven F, Tanja-Dijkstra K, Nijland N, Eysenbach G, van Gemert-Pijnen L. Asynchronous and synchronous teleconsultation for diabetes care: a systematic literature review. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 May 1;4(3):666-84. doi: 10.1177/193229681000400323.

    PubMed 20513335
  • Grogan-Johnson S, Alvares R, Rowan L, Creaghead N. A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech language therapy provided by telemedicine with conventional on-site therapy. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(3):134-9. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2009.090608. Epub 2010 Mar 2.

    PubMed 20197354
  • van der Heijden JP, Spuls PI, Voorbraak FP, de Keizer NF, Witkamp L, Bos JD. Tertiary teledermatology: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):56-62. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0020.

    PubMed 20064068
  • Wallace P, Haines A, Harrison R, Barber JA, Thompson S, Roberts J, Jacklin PB, Lewis L, Wainwright P; Virtual Outreach Project Group. Design and performance of a multi-centre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint tele-consultations [ISRCTN54264250]. BMC Fam Pract. 2002 Jan 11;3:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-3-1. Epub 2002 Jan 11.

    PubMed 11835692

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Collaborative Imaging in people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Ulcerative Colitis, run by VA Palo Alto Health Care System at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Feb 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Clinical Experience (time frame: Clinic Visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01296841, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in