AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveBPCeauxNCT01296854

The Effect of Spa Treatment on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A study testing Spa therapy in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 6 sites in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to measure and compare the number of exacerbations (moderate or severe) between the two groups of randomized patients with and without thermal treatment). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What is being tested?
Spa therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
39 participants
Where
6 sitesFrance
Study dates
May 2011to Jun 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient must have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Obstructive ventilation problem: Tiffeneau index (expiratory volume in one second / slow vital capacity) < 70%
  • Expiratory volume in one second < 80% of the theoretical value
  • Reversibility < 12% after inhalation of bronchodilators
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Smokers or ex smokers
  • Available for study monitoring
  • Has access to diagnostic, medical and therapeutic care according to the best, current criteria (see the recommendations of the French Language Pseumologist Society)

Who cannot join

  • The patient is participating in another study
  • The patient has participated in another study in the past 12 months
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
  • The patient refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
Show all 19Show fewer
  • The patient is in military service (unavailable for monitoring)
  • Patient is on parole or otherwise has their liberty restricted by administrative or judiciary decision
  • The patient is pregnant, or does not have contraception
  • The patient is breastfeeding
  • Patient has neoplastic disease
  • Patient has asthma
  • Patient has another, evolving pulmonary disease (tuberculosis, pulmonary interstitium disease, active or recent pulmonary infection)
  • Patient has a clinical history indicating asthma or another respiratory disease (in particular bronchiectasis, pneumoconiosis and other occupational diseases, history of pulmonary neoplasia, HIV, immunosuppressive therapy including corticosteroids in the long term
  • Patient has respiratory insufficiency
  • Hypereosinophilic patient (the number of polynuclear eosinophils is > 0.5 giga/l; confirmed on 2 hemograms)
  • Recent psychiatric trouble (less than 1 year)
  • Takes illegal drugs
  • Patient does not have pneumological care according to the standards set by the French Language Pneumologist Society

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

France6 sites
  • Private practice: Karim Berkani

    Aix-les-Bains, 73100

  • Private practice: Jean Hérété

    Amélie Les Bains Palalda, 66110

  • Private practice: Pierre Ethève

    Briey, 54150

  • Private practice: Marc Bellier

    Ceret, 66400

  • Private practice: Pierre Olivier

    Perpignan, 66000

  • Private practice: Muriel Nouvelle

    Saint-Amand-les-Eaux, 59230

Other trials in France

About this study

The primary objective of this study is to measure and compare the number of exacerbations (moderate or severe) between the two groups of randomized patients with and without thermal treatment). An exacerbation is defined by an increase in symptoms which justifies a unscheduled medical action: increased daily treatment and / or use of corticosteroids, and / or antibiotic therapy. Exacerbations are documented via prescriptions, hospitalisation reports or unscheduled visits.

Being tested
Spa therapy
Keywords
spa therapy
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Spa therapyOther

    3 weeks of spa therapy

Study groups in NCT01296854
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
StandardNo interventionThe patients randomized into this arm of the study will not have spa therapy.
Spa TherapyExperimentalThe patients randomized into this arm of the study will have 3 weeks of spa therapy
Receives: Other: Spa therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of exacerbations

    Exacerbation = increase in symptoms (IS) justifying an unprogrammed therapeutic intervention (TI). An IS = increase in >=2 of the following minor symptoms for >= 2 consecutive days (CD): (i) dyspnea, (ii) volume or (iii) purulence of sputum. Or an increase in any 1 of the following major symptoms associated with any of the minor symptoms for at least 2 CD: (a) sore throat, (b) cold, (c) fever, (d) coughing, (e) wheezing. A TI = systemic corticoids and/or antibiotics. An exacerbation is defined as severe if TI is accompanied by a hospital stay > 24h, and as "moderate" otherwise.

    Measured: 12 months after the beginning of treatment

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. change in the BODE score

    Measured: 3 weeks

  2. change in SF36 questionnaire scores

    the SF36 quality of life questionnaire

    Measured: 3 weeks

  3. Cost (€)

    Costs are evaluated from the point of view of payers associated with the pathology.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  4. C reactive protein (mg/l)

    blood work

    Measured: 3 weeks

  5. Eosiniphil count (thou/ml)

    blood work

    Measured: 3 weeks

  6. Number of exacerbations

    Exacerbation = increase in symptoms (IS) justifying an unprogrammed therapeutic intervention (TI). An IS = increase in >=2 of the following minor symptoms for >= 2 consecutive days (CD): (i) dyspnea, (ii) volume or (iii) purulence of sputum. Or an increase in any 1 of the following major symptoms associated with any of the minor symptoms for at least 2 CD: (a) sore throat, (b) cold, (c) fever, (d) coughing, (e) wheezing. A TI = systemic corticoids and/or antibiotics. An exacerbation is defined as severe if TI is accompanied by a hospital stay > 24h, and as "moderate" otherwise.

    Measured: 3 weeks

  7. change in the BODE score

    Measured: 3 months

  8. change in the BODE score

    Measured: 6 months

  9. change in the BODE score

    Measured: 9 months

  10. change in the BODE score

    Measured: 12 months

  11. change in SF36 questionnaire scores

    the SF36 quality of life questionnaire

    Measured: 3 months

  12. change in SF36 questionnaire scores

    the SF36 quality of life questionnaire

    Measured: 6 months

  13. change in SF36 questionnaire scores

    the SF36 quality of life questionnaire

    Measured: 9 months

  14. change in SF36 questionnaire scores

    the SF36 quality of life questionnaire

    Measured: 12 months

  15. Cost (€)

    Costs are evaluated from the point of view of payers associated with the pathology.

    Measured: 3 months

  16. Cost (€)

    Costs are evaluated from the point of view of payers associated with the pathology.

    Measured: 6 months

  17. Cost (€)

    Costs are evaluated from the point of view of payers associated with the pathology.

    Measured: 9 months

  18. Cost (€)

    Costs are evaluated from the point of view of payers associated with the pathology.

    Measured: 12 months

  19. Number of exacerbations

    Exacerbation = increase in symptoms (IS) justifying an unprogrammed therapeutic intervention (TI). An IS = increase in >=2 of the following minor symptoms for >= 2 consecutive days (CD): (i) dyspnea, (ii) volume or (iii) purulence of sputum. Or an increase in any 1 of the following major symptoms associated with any of the minor symptoms for at least 2 CD: (a) sore throat, (b) cold, (c) fever, (d) coughing, (e) wheezing. A TI = systemic corticoids and/or antibiotics. An exacerbation is defined as severe if TI is accompanied by a hospital stay > 24h, and as "moderate" otherwise.

    Measured: 3 months

  20. Number of exacerbations

    Exacerbation = increase in symptoms (IS) justifying an unprogrammed therapeutic intervention (TI). An IS = increase in >=2 of the following minor symptoms for >= 2 consecutive days (CD): (i) dyspnea, (ii) volume or (iii) purulence of sputum. Or an increase in any 1 of the following major symptoms associated with any of the minor symptoms for at least 2 CD: (a) sore throat, (b) cold, (c) fever, (d) coughing, (e) wheezing. A TI = systemic corticoids and/or antibiotics. An exacerbation is defined as severe if TI is accompanied by a hospital stay > 24h, and as "moderate" otherwise.

    Measured: 6 months

  21. Number of exacerbations

    Exacerbation = increase in symptoms (IS) justifying an unprogrammed therapeutic intervention (TI). An IS = increase in >=2 of the following minor symptoms for >= 2 consecutive days (CD): (i) dyspnea, (ii) volume or (iii) purulence of sputum. Or an increase in any 1 of the following major symptoms associated with any of the minor symptoms for at least 2 CD: (a) sore throat, (b) cold, (c) fever, (d) coughing, (e) wheezing. A TI = systemic corticoids and/or antibiotics. An exacerbation is defined as severe if TI is accompanied by a hospital stay > 24h, and as "moderate" otherwise.

    Measured: 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Why it stopped: The feasability of inclusions has proven very low.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01296854
Sponsor's protocol ID
LOCAL/2010/NM-02
Other IDs
2010-A00693-36
Acronym
BPCeaux
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
15 Feb 2011
Last updated
25 Mar 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Spa therapy in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 6 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: The feasability of inclusions has proven very low.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of exacerbations (time frame: 12 months after the beginning of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in