AzTrials
AzTrials

AphasiaPhase 2VNeSTNCT01300624

Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on Lexical Retrieval in Aphasia

A Phase 2 study testing Verb Network Strengthening Treatment in people with Aphasia, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on the ability to produce sentences and connected speech in persons with aphasia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 89 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Aphasia
What is being tested?
Verb Network Strengthening Treatment
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
11 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2011to Jul 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 89 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Veterans with a diagnosis of aphasia
  • primary language is English
  • aphasia due to stroke

Who cannot join

  • Functionally bilingual

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System

    Gainesville, Florida, 32608

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Effect Of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment on Lexical Retrieval in Aphasia

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on the ability to produce sentences and connected speech in persons with aphasia.

Read the detailed description

Stroke is the leading cause of disability in the United States today, and aphasia, a language disorder that affects production and comprehension of language, remains one of the most devastating aspects of stroke recovery. The most prominent symptom of aphasia is difficulty retrieving words, especially in sentence production and connected speech (e.g., telling a story, having a conversation). The current project examines the effect Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST), a language therapy, on the ability of persons with moderate aphasia to retrieve words in sentences and connected speech. The primary goals of VNeST are to 1) increase the specificity of nouns and verbs in sentences, 2) maximize improvement to untrained words across a variety of language tasks, and 3) engage and challenge participants with salient and relevant treatment materials and activities. Persons with aphasia who are enrolled in the study will receive VNeST for 10 weeks for 4 hours per week. Treatment tasks involve the retrieval of nouns related to a target verb. For example, for the verb measure, participants would come up with people who measure and what they measure (e.g., carpenter/lumber, chef/sugar). They would then answer questions related to why, where, and when these things might occur (e.g., for carpenter/measure, they might say "to get the right length of board," (why) "at a construction site," (where) and "when building a house" (where)). Cues and assistance are provided to the participants when they are unable to complete any given task. As the participants improve, cues are reduced.

Prior to treatment, testing will be conducted on participants to establish their abilities to retrieve words in the following contexts: 1) naming pictures of objects and actions, 2) sentences, and 3) connected speech.

Participants and a family member or friend (i.e., proxy) will also complete a questionnaire about how the participant is able to communicate in everyday tasks (e.g., indicating yes or no, providing medical information).

During the treatment phase, sentence production abilities on items related to treatment will be examined in order to determine how word retrieval abilities are changing with treatment. After the completion of treatment, all measures examined prior to treatment (including the questionnaire) will be re-examined in order to determine whether improvement was observed. Additionally, participants will complete testing one more time 3 months after the completion of treatment to determine if post-treatment improvements were maintained.

Finally, an analysis of improvement over time across the treatment phase will be examined in order to determine the rate of improvement (or lack of it) over time. All statistical analyses will use group data (i.e., group design), but additional examination of improvements for each participant (i.e., single subject design) will also be conducted. Thus, the overall experimental design is a mix of group and single subject analyses. The findings from this study will help to inform aphasia treatment practices and potentially allow for a larger study with more participants in a clinical trial.

Conditions
Aphasia
Being tested
Verb Network Strengthening Treatment
Keywords
Aphasia, therapy, treatment, verbs, sentences
Medical subject headings
Aphasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Verb Network Strengthening TreatmentBehavioural

    Also called aphasia treatment, anomia, sentence production, discourse

    Treatment to improve word retrieval in sentences and discourse for persons with aphasia due to stroke.

Study groups in NCT01300624
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Verb Network Strengthening TreatmentExperimentalVerb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) tasks involve the retrieval of nouns related to a target verb. For example, for the verb measure, participants would come up with people who measure and what they measure (e.g., carpenter/lumber, chef/sugar). They would then answer questions related to why, where, and when these things might occur (e.g., for carpenter/measure, they might say to get the right length of board, (why) at a construction site, (where) and when building a house (where). Cues and assistance are provided to the participants when they are unable to complete any given task. As the participants improve, cues are reduced.
Receives: Behavioral: Verb Network Strengthening Treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Trained Sentence Probe

    Picture description task that include trained words.

    Measured: pre-treatment, post-treatment and 3-months post-treatment (maintenance)

  2. Untrained Sentence Probes

    Picture description with sentences containing untrained words.

    Measured: pre-treatment, post-treatment and 3-months post-treatment (maintenance)

  3. Complete Utterances in Discourse

    Sentence in discourse that were relevant to topic and syntactically correct

    Measured: pre-treatment, post-treatment and 3-months post-treatment (maintenance)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Noun Naming

    Confrontation naming of 162 objects

    Measured: pre-treatment and post-treatment

  2. Verb Naming

    Confrontation of 100 action pictures

    Measured: pre-treatment and post-treatment

  3. Western Aphasia Battery

    Standardized measure of aphasia severity

    Measured: pre-treatment and post-treatment

  4. Communicative Effectiveness Ratings

    This questionnaire (Lomas et al, 1989) was provided to persons who communicated with the treatment participant regularly (e.g., a spouse). They rated how well the participant was able to perform on 16 common communication tasks (e.g., participating in a conversation over coffee). They rated each scenario along a line that spanned between the two extremes of ability, from "not at all able" to "as able as before the stroke." The line was 100 mm. To score responses, the place where they bisected the line was measured. An average of their responses across the 16 questions was calculated.

    Measured: pre-treatment, post-treatment and 3-months post-treatment (maintenance)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionJul 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
11 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01300624
Sponsor's protocol ID
C7695-R
Acronym
VNeST
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
21 Jan 2011
Last updated
9 Jun 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Verb Network Strengthening Treatment in people with Aphasia, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Jun 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Trained Sentence Probe (time frame: pre-treatment, post-treatment and 3-months post-treatment (maintenance)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in